Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan

Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan below.
Solutions of Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 1

What was the primary area of law under consideration in The State of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan case?

Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 1
The fundamental area of law that was central to The State of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan case was Constitutional Law. This case played a crucial role in shaping legal interpretations and discussions around constitutional provisions related to equality and discrimination. Constitutional Law deals with the fundamental principles and rules that govern the operation of a country's constitution, outlining the powers and functions of various entities within the legal system.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 2

In the case of The State of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan, how many judges comprised the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India?

Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 2
The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India that presided over The State of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan case was composed of 7 judges. Constitution Benches are usually constituted to decide significant questions of law and the interpretation of the Constitution of India. This particular case was pivotal in addressing issues related to constitutional rights and equality under the law.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 3

What was the primary issue at the center of the case State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan?

Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 3
The case State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan primarily revolved around a challenge to a governmental rule regarding reservation in educational institutions. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan, a Brahmin woman, was denied admission to a medical school despite her academic merit due to a governmental order. This legal challenge focused on the validity of the reservation policy in place at the time.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 4
What prompted Champakam Dorairajan to appeal to the Supreme Court for a final decision in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 4
Champakam Dorairajan appealed to the Supreme Court for a final decision in the case due to the inadequate provision of seats for Brahmins as per the Government Order (G.O.). Her exclusion from admission to the medical school was a direct result of the insufficient allocation of seats for Brahmins, which prompted her legal challenge and subsequent appeal to the highest court in the land.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 5
Which article in the Indian Constitution deals with laws that conflict with fundamental rights and renders them invalid to the extent of the inconsistency?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 5
Article 13 of the Indian Constitution specifically addresses laws that are in conflict with fundamental rights, declaring them void to the extent of the inconsistency. This article serves as a crucial safeguard to ensure the protection of fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution against any conflicting legislation.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 6
Under which provision of the Indian Constitution are States permitted to reserve appointments or posts for any backward class not adequately represented in State services?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 6
Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution empowers States to reserve appointments or posts for any backward class that is not adequately represented in State services. This provision aims to address historical disparities and promote inclusivity by providing opportunities to underrepresented groups in the public sector.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 7
What is one of the significant questions that arises in the State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan case regarding Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 7
One of the key questions that arises in the State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan case is about the hierarchy between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy when they come into conflict. This dilemma raises important considerations about the precedence of these principles and their implications on governance and rights protection in the Indian context. Understanding this hierarchy is crucial for maintaining a balance between individual rights and societal welfare.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 8
According to the appellant in the case of State of Madras v Champakam Dorairajan, what does Article 46 of the Indian Constitution primarily mandate the State to do?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 8
Article 46 of the Indian Constitution mandates the State to advance the educational and economic well-being of marginalized groups like Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes to prevent social injustices. This provision underscores the State's responsibility to uplift and support these disadvantaged communities, aiming to create a more equitable and inclusive society.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 9
What was the defendant's stance regarding the Communal Government Order in the case of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 9
The defendant in the case argued that the Communal Government Order, established under Article 46 of the Indian Constitution, violates Fundamental Rights. This stance reflects a legal and constitutional challenge to the order, suggesting a conflict between the implementation of the order and the protection of individuals' fundamental rights as enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 10
What was the primary argument made by the respondent in the case of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 10
The respondent in the case argued that the reservation system implemented by the Communal Government Order promotes caste discrimination, thereby contravening Article 16(1) of the Indian Constitution. This contention underscores the deep-rooted issue of caste-based discrimination in educational institutions, highlighting the ongoing battle for equality and fairness in access to education.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 11
What was the key reason for the High Court of Madras striking down the Communal Government Order in the case of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 11
The High Court of Madras invalidated the Communal Government Order primarily because it contravened the Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized the paramount importance of Fundamental Rights, which are the cornerstone of the Constitution and must not be overridden by any government order. This decision underscored the critical nature of upholding Fundamental Rights in the legal framework of India.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 12
In the context of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan, what did the Supreme Court clarify regarding the status of the Directive Principles of State Policy outlined in Part 4 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 12
The Supreme Court clarified that the Directive Principles of State Policy, as detailed in Part 4 of the Indian Constitution, are crucial for societal welfare but are not legally enforceable. While Fundamental Rights hold precedence over Directive Principles when conflicts arise, the Directive Principles serve as guiding principles for the State in formulating policies for the betterment of society. This distinction underscores the complementary relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles in the constitutional framework of India.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 13
What was the key legal basis for nullifying the Communal Government Order in the case of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 13
The Communal Government Order was nullified in the case of State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan primarily due to its inconsistency with Article 29(2) of the Indian Constitution, which mandates non-discrimination in educational institutions. This article emphasizes the importance of equal treatment and opportunities in educational settings, ensuring that individuals are not discriminated against on the basis of religion, race, caste, or language. By contravening Article 29(2), the Communal Government Order was deemed unconstitutional and thus invalidated by the court's decision.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 14
What was the central issue in the legal dispute between the State of Madras and Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 14
The legal dispute between the State of Madras and Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan primarily revolved around the implementation of a quota system for educational admissions based on caste considerations. This dispute highlighted the issue of discrimination and the importance of upholding equality in educational institutions, leading to a significant legal precedent in Indian history.
Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 15
What was the key legal principle emphasized by the High Court of Madras in the case of State of Madras v Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan?
Detailed Solution for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan - Question 15
The High Court of Madras emphasized the significance of aligning laws and policies with the Fundamental Rights provisions of the Indian Constitution in the case of State of Madras v Srimathi Champakam Dorairajan. This legal principle underscores the importance of upholding constitutional rights and ensuring that laws do not infringe upon fundamental principles of equality and non-discrimination.
Information about Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams