Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case)

Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 1

What was the main reason for the appeal made by the Appellant in the Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 1
The main reason for the appeal made by the Appellant in the case was to challenge the Kerala High Court's decision that declared his marriage with Hadiya (alias Akhila) null and void. This legal challenge aimed to contest the annulment of their marriage and seek a reversal of the court's ruling.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 2

What action did the High Court take regarding the marriage between Hadiya and the Appellant in the case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 2
The High Court annulled the marriage between Hadiya and the Appellant, declaring it null and void. Additionally, the court issued an order for Hadiya to stay with her parents, overturning the marital arrangement that had taken place during that period.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 3

Why was Hadiya initially ordered by the court to stay with her parents before the events leading to the appeal?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 3
Hadiya was initially ordered by the court to stay with her parents because of a writ petition of habeas corpus that was filed before the court. This legal action led to the court's decision for Hadiya to remain with her parents during that period, prior to the subsequent events that unfolded in the case.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 4
What course of study was Hadiya pursuing while the events leading to the appeal were unfolding?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 4
Hadiya was pursuing a course in BHMS (Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery) at a private college located in Salem. This detail is significant in understanding her educational background and activities during the time frame when the legal proceedings and decisions were being made in the case.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 5
What fundamental right of individuals does the appellant argue was violated by the High Court's decision in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 5
The appellant argues that the High Court's decision violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to marriage for adults and the freedom to follow any religion. This fundamental right ensures that individuals have the liberty to marry and practice their chosen religion without undue interference.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 6
What jurisdiction did the court invoke in the case according to the arguments presented by the appellant's legal representative?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 6
The appellant's legal representative asserts that the court wrongly invoked its "Parens Patriae jurisdiction" in this case, which allows the state to intervene in situations to protect individuals who are legally unable to act on their own behalf. In this context, it was argued that such intervention was not warranted, leading to a debate on the appropriateness of the court's actions.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 7
What claim do the respondents make regarding the appellant's influence on Hadiya in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 7
The respondents claim that the appellant influenced Hadiya and coerced her into marriage without her parents' consent, alleging that she was vulnerable and easily manipulated. This argument suggests a power dynamic and coercion in the decision-making process surrounding the marriage.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 8
What principle is raised by the appellant to challenge the court's decision regarding Hadiya's custody in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 8
The principle of habeas corpus, which protects against unlawful detention, is raised by the appellant to challenge the court's decision regarding Hadiya's custody. This principle ensures that individuals have the right to challenge the legality of their detention or confinement, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty and freedom from arbitrary restraint.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 9
What is the appellant's primary argument regarding the High Court's decision in the case discussed?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 9
The appellant argues that the High Court's decision violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the right to marriage for adults and the freedom to follow any religion. They believe that the annulment of the marriage between two consenting adults is unjust. This argument revolves around fundamental rights enshrined in the constitution.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 10
What do the respondents claim regarding the appellant's influence on Hadiya in the context of the marriage?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 10
The respondents claim that the appellant influenced Hadiya and coerced her into marriage without her parents' consent, alleging that she was vulnerable and easily manipulated. This accusation suggests a power dynamic that the respondents believe led to an unjust marriage.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 11
What is the respondents' primary argument for advocating Hadiya's stay with her parents and the annulment of the marriage?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 11
The respondents argue that Hadiya's well-being is best served by staying with her parents, who have her best interests at heart, and that the marriage should be annulled due to undue influence. This argument centers on the belief that familial care and protection are essential for Hadiya's welfare.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 12
What was the outcome of the appeal in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors.?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 12
The appeal in the case of Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. was successful, confirming the validity of the marriage between Shafin Jahan and Hadiya. This decision upheld the marriage in question, marking it as legally valid.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 13
Why was the habeas corpus writ deemed unnecessary in the context of Hadiya's situation?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 13
The habeas corpus writ, which allows the court to ensure a person is not unlawfully detained, was considered unnecessary in Hadiya's case because she willingly appeared in court when summoned. This voluntary action by Hadiya made the writ redundant in this situation.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 14
In the context of the current case discussed, what is the central legal dilemma regarding inter-caste and inter-religious marriages in Indian society?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 14
The central legal dilemma highlighted in the discussion pertains to the necessity of prioritizing individual rights over deeply ingrained social traditions. This conflict underscores the importance of balancing personal freedoms with societal expectations and traditional values to ensure effective adjudication of such cases.
Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 15
What key principle should the legal framework prioritize to effectively address conflicts arising from inter-caste and inter-religious marriages?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) - Question 15
The legal framework should prioritize the protection of individual rights to effectively address conflicts stemming from inter-caste and inter-religious marriages. By emphasizing equality and the safeguarding of personal freedoms, the legal system can navigate the complexities of societal expectations and cultural traditions in a balanced manner.
Information about Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Shafin Jahan vs Ashokan K.M. & Ors. (Hadiya Marriage Case), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams