Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 1

What fundamental rights were cited as being violated in the case of Ahar v. State of Maharashtra?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 1
The fundamental rights of the petitioners under Articles 14 (Right to Equality), 15, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution of India were challenged in the case of Ahar v. State of Maharashtra. Article 14 ensures equality before the law or equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. In this context, the petitioners argued that certain provisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act and its Rules infringed upon their right to equality guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 2

What is a key requirement mandated by Condition 11 for the location of dance bars in the given regulations?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 2
Condition 11 in the regulations mandates that dance bars must be located at least 1 km away from educational and religious institutions. This requirement aims to ensure a certain distance between these establishments to potentially mitigate any negative influences or disturbances that could arise from their proximity.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 3

Which rule mandated the installation of CCTV cameras in public areas with recordings retained for 30 days in the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act and its Rules?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 3
Condition 20 of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance Act and its Rules mandated the installation of CCTV cameras in public areas with recordings retained for 30 days. This rule was put in place to ensure surveillance and monitoring of activities within the premises of the dance bars as a measure for security and compliance with regulations.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 4
Which condition from Part B of the regulations focuses on ensuring the background check of employees in dance bars?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 4
Condition 16 in Part B of the regulations requires licensees to ensure that employees have no criminal record. This condition emphasizes the importance of conducting background checks on employees to maintain a safe and secure environment within the dance bars, protecting both the patrons and the establishment itself.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 5
According to the specified conditions, what is mandated regarding the installation of CCTV cameras in dance bars?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 5
As per the conditions outlined, dance bars are mandated to install CCTV cameras in public areas, with recordings required to be retained for 30 days. This measure is crucial for ensuring the safety and security of both employees and patrons within the establishment. By maintaining recordings for a specified period, authorities can review footage if necessary for investigations or security purposes.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 6
Which condition specifies the prohibition of customers throwing money or items onto the stage during performances in dance bars?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 6
Condition 6 expressly prohibits customers from throwing money or items onto the stage during performances at dance bars. This regulation aims to maintain decorum, safety, and respect within the establishment, ensuring that such actions do not disrupt the performances or pose any risk to the performers or other patrons.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 7
What issue did the petitioner raise regarding Section 6(4) of the Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 7
The petitioner argued that Section 6(4) of the Act infringed upon Article 14 and 19(1) of the Indian Constitution. This section aimed to prevent the issuance of licenses for both dance bars and discotheques or orchestras at the same venue without providing a rational explanation based on reasonable differences. The petitioner contended that this violated key constitutional articles aimed at ensuring equality and freedom.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 8
According to the petitioner, what was the main contention regarding the prohibition specified under section 8(4)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 8
The petitioner argued that the prohibition under section 8(4) targeted only dancers and not singers or waitresses. They contended that offering tips to dancers as a form of appreciation should not be considered an offense under the law, drawing parallels to appreciating singers or waitresses for their performance or service. This argument highlighted a specific aspect of the law's application and its perceived inconsistencies in targeting only a particular group of individuals.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 9
What was one of the main reasons for challenging Condition 11 of Part A in the legal framework governing dance bars in Mumbai?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 9
Condition 11 of Part A was deemed impractical due to the proximity of educational and religious institutions to most buildings in a congested city like Mumbai. This raised concerns about the potential impact on these nearby institutions, leading to the challenge of this specific condition.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 10
Why was the imposition of a mandatory tip amount in the bill, as per Condition No. 6, considered unjust by the petitioner in the legal context of dance bars?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 10
The petitioner argued that the imposition of a mandatory tip amount in the bill (Condition No. 6) was unjust because it was seen as an additional and potentially burdensome expense for customers. This requirement could be viewed as unfair and unnecessary, impacting the overall customer experience in dance bars.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 11
According to the defense's argument, which condition under Part B of the Act was explained as a response to economic realities, aiming to combat the exploitation of working-class women?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 11
Condition No. 2 of Part B was explained as a response to economic realities, aiming to combat the exploitation of working-class women by mandating written contracts and salary deposits for their protection. This condition seeks to establish safeguards to protect vulnerable workers in certain industries, ensuring that they are not taken advantage of due to their economic circumstances.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 12
Which section of the Act was defended by explaining that the term 'prurient interest' carries a specific meaning as per the dictionary and is also present in Section 292 of the IPC, which criminalizes obscenity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 12
Section 2(8) of the Act defining 'obscene dance' was defended by explaining that the term 'prurient interest' carries a specific meaning as per the dictionary and is also present in Section 292 of the IPC, which criminalizes obscenity. This defense aimed to clarify the specific terminology used in the Act and link it to existing legal frameworks, emphasizing the rationale behind the definition of 'obscene dance' within the legislation.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 13
What was the court's stance on the provision mandating the installation of CCTV cameras in Part B?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 13
The court nullified the provision mandating the installation of CCTV cameras in Part B due to its invasion of privacy, which was deemed to violate constitutional rights. This decision highlights the court's emphasis on protecting individual privacy rights as established in relevant legal precedents.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 14
Which provision in Part B was upheld as reasonable with regard to the timing of dance performances?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 14
Condition No. 9 of Part B, which stipulated the timing of dance performances until 11:30 pm, was upheld as reasonable by the court. This decision indicates the court's assessment of providing a sufficient time frame for such activities without imposing disproportionate restrictions on the operation of businesses in the specified industry.
Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 15

Which provision of Part A was annulled for being deemed irrational and unjustifiable?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra - Question 15

Condition No. 11 of Part A was annulled by the court for being deemed irrational and unjustifiable. This decision highlights the court's role in scrutinizing legal provisions to ensure they align with principles of reasonableness and fairness.

Information about Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams