All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors

Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 1
Save

In what year did the Supreme Court recognize the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 1
The Supreme Court of India recognized the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution in the year 2017. This landmark decision emphasized the importance of individual privacy as a core aspect of personal liberty and autonomy in a democratic society.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 2
Save

What event in 2017 led to the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 2
In 2017, former Union Minister Jairam Ramesh contested Aadhaar's classification as a money bill, which ultimately led to the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 by the Supreme Court. This case raised significant legal questions surrounding Aadhaar and its implications on privacy rights in India.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 3
Save

When did the Supreme Court of India uphold the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act while striking down certain provisions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 3
On September 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act while simultaneously striking down certain provisions. This decision marked a significant point in the legal landscape surrounding Aadhaar, affirming its overall validity while addressing specific concerns related to privacy and individual rights.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 4
Save
What fundamental concern is raised regarding the Aadhaar Project in relation to the potential establishment of a surveillance state?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 4
The Aadhaar Project's potential to lead to a surveillance state raises significant constitutional concerns. The fear is that the extensive collection of biometric and personal data through Aadhaar could pave the way for a surveillance state, where individual privacy and freedoms may be compromised. This issue underscores the delicate balance between enhancing services and safeguarding civil liberties in a democratic society.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 5
Save
In what aspect does the Aadhaar Act potentially conflict with the principles of Limited Government, Good Governance, and Constitutional Trust?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 5
The Aadhaar Act's clash with notions of Limited Government, Good Governance, and Constitutional Trust highlights concerns about governmental overreach and the potential infringement on individual rights. This conflict underscores the importance of upholding constitutional principles and ensuring that governance practices align with the core tenets of a democratic society, emphasizing the need for accountability, transparency, and respect for civil liberties.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 6
Save
Which viewpoint highlighted the benefits of Aadhaar in preventing duplication and fraud in accessing government services?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 6
The viewpoint presented by the Respondents emphasized the advantages of Aadhaar in preventing duplication and fraud when accessing government services. By implementing Aadhaar, they aimed to ensure that government benefits reach all eligible individuals without compromising privacy rights. This focus on enhancing the efficiency and integrity of service delivery through Aadhaar underscores the Respondents' perspective on the benefits of the program in addressing issues related to duplication and fraudulent activities in accessing government services.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 7
Save
What principle does Justice Chelameswar emphasize in his delineation of privacy facets, focusing on repose, sanctuary, and intimate decision?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 7
Justice Chelameswar emphasizes the need for state interests in privacy infringements by delineating privacy into facets like repose, sanctuary, and intimate decision. This underscores the balance required between individual privacy rights and state interests in regulating certain aspects for the greater good of society.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 8
Save
Which section of the Aadhaar Act has been criticized for granting broad discretion to UIDAI regarding biometric information?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 8
Section 29(4) of the Aadhaar Act has been criticized for granting broad discretion to UIDAI regarding biometric information. This provision has raised concerns about the extent of control and authority conferred upon UIDAI, potentially impacting the privacy and security of individuals' biometric data.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 9
Save
What aspect of privacy rights does Justice Nariman categorize into three groups?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 9
Justice Nariman categorizes privacy rights into three groups, emphasizing protection from state intrusion and control over personal choices. This classification underscores the significance of safeguarding individuals' privacy from government interference and ensuring autonomy in personal decision-making.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 10
Save
Why is protecting personal information such as financial data or health records crucial in the digital age?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 10
Protecting personal information such as financial data or health records is crucial in the digital age to safeguard individuals' security and privacy. With the rise of cyber threats and data breaches, ensuring the confidentiality of personal data has become increasingly important to prevent identity theft, financial fraud, and other forms of privacy violations. It is essential for individuals to be cautious about sharing sensitive information online and to utilize secure practices to protect their personal data.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 11
Save
How does the Aadhar Card help marginalized individuals facing challenges accessing essential services?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 11
The Aadhar Card helps marginalized individuals facing challenges accessing essential services by serving as a means to bridge the identification gap and provide necessary support. For individuals without proper identification, the Aadhar Card acts as a unique identification number that enables them to access various government services, welfare programs, and financial assistance. It plays a crucial role in ensuring that marginalized populations can avail themselves of essential services and support that they might otherwise struggle to access.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 12
Save
In the case of Navtej Singh Johar and Ors Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 2018 (Supreme Court), which aspect did the Supreme Court focus on when declaring Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 unconstitutional?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 12
The Supreme Court, in the case of Navtej Singh Johar and Ors Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 2018, focused on the right to privacy for the LGBT community when declaring Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 unconstitutional. By referencing the Puttaswamy v. Union of India judgment, the court argued that denying privacy rights to the LGBT community based on minority status violated fundamental rights. This landmark decision marked a significant step towards upholding the rights and dignity of the LGBTQ+ community in India.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 13
Save
In the context of telephone tapping under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, what criteria did the Bombay High Court apply to interception orders?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 13
The Bombay High Court applied the legitimacy and proportionality tests to interception orders, emphasizing that such orders must adhere to these criteria to be justified. Legitimacy ensures that the interception is lawful and authorized, while proportionality assesses whether the intrusion is proportionate to the intended goal. These tests aim to balance public safety concerns with the right to privacy.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 14
Save
In the case of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, 2019, what did the Supreme Court determine regarding the Chief Justice's office under the Right to Information Act, 2005?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 14
The Supreme Court ruled that the Chief Justice's office is a 'public authority' under the Right to Information Act, 2005, thereby requiring the disclosure of information such as judges' personal assets. This decision underscores the importance of transparency and accountability within the judiciary, balancing the right to access information with the privacy concerns of individuals in public office.
Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 15
Save
What significant legal concept gained prominence following a particular judgment related to the Aadhaar project?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors - Question 15
Following a specific judgment related to the Aadhaar project, the right to privacy gained prominence as a vital safeguard for individual rights. This legal development underscored the importance of protecting individuals' personal information and autonomy in the digital age, setting a crucial precedent for future discussions on privacy rights in India and beyond.
Information about Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors resources.

Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anothers. vs Union of India and Ors with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup