Who were the key members of the Supreme Court of India involved in the decision-making process for the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras?

Hiralal Kania, Saiyid Fazl Ali, M. Patanjali Sastri

Meher Chand Mahajan, B. K. Mukherjea, S.R. Das

H. J. Kania, M. C. Mahajan, B. R. Mukherjea

S. F. Ali, M. P. Sastri, S. R. Das

What was the central theme explored in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras regarding constitutional law?

Establishment of federalism principles

Interpretation of directive principles of state policy

Abrogation of fundamental rights under specific constitutional articles

Determination of powers between the executive and judiciary

What was the primary reason for A.K. Gopalan challenging the constitutionality of the Preventive Detention Act in A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras?

Violation of his rights under ordinary criminal law

Alleged violations of his rights under articles 19, 21, and 22 of the constitution

Unlawful detention under the state of Madras

Political disagreement with the communist party

What was the rationale behind the majority opinion in A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras regarding preventive and punitive detention in relation to Article 19?

Article 19 protects the rights of detained citizens

Preventive detention aligns with the enforcement of Article 19(1)

Preventive and punitive detention are irrelevant to Article 19

The Detention Act of 1950 violates Article 19 rights

Why did the court in A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras conclude that the Preventive Detention Act of 1950 did not infringe upon rights guaranteed under Article 21?

The Act was deemed unconstitutional

The Act followed proper state law procedures

The Act violated Article 21 rights

The Act granted excessive powers to the executive

What was the key determination regarding the Preventive Detention Act IV of 1950 in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras?

The entire act was deemed unconstitutional.

Section 14 of the act was upheld as constitutional.

Section 14 of the act was found to be Ultra Vires.

Section 12 of the act was declared unconstitutional.

According to Fazl Ali's dissenting opinion in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, how did he propose fundamental rights violations should be interpreted?

By analyzing each Article under Part III in isolation.

By considering the interconnectedness of various Articles under Part III.

By prioritizing personal liberty over other fundamental rights.

By emphasizing the authority of the judiciary in such matters.

What was Justice Mahajan's perspective on the legality of Section 12 of the Preventive Detention Act IV of 1950 in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras?

Section 12 was considered beyond the scope of authority.

Section 12 was upheld as constitutionally valid.

Section 12 was found to be in compliance with Article 22.

Section 12 was interpreted as essential for national security.

How did the majority opinion in the case of A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras define Article 21?

Article 21 pertains to natural justice exclusively.

Article 21 pertains to the law established by the state, not natural justice.

Article 21 encompasses both natural justice and state-established law.

Article 21 is not defined within the case.

According to Professor Hart's perspective discussed in the case, what relationship did he suggest between law and morals?

Law and morals are completely interdependent.

Law and morals have no connection whatsoever.

Law and morals are linked but not interdependent.

Law and morals are subjective concepts.

What was the primary disagreement with the positivist interpretation discussed in the case?

Positivism includes natural justice and morals in its understanding of law.

Positivism excludes natural justice and morals from the understanding of law.

Positivism emphasizes the importance of ethics in legal systems.

Positivism argues for the integration of natural justice into legal frameworks.

Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

Important Questions for Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras resources.

Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution