All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr

Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 1
Save

What was the key issue that led to legal challenges in the case of E.P Royappa?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 1
The legal challenges in the case of E.P Royappa primarily stemmed from the Central Government's decision to equate the post of First Member of the Board of Revenue with that of Chief Secretary, thereby elevating its status. This move raised questions about the validity and implications of this decision, leading to legal disputes.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 2
Save

Which position did the Government of India elevate the Chief Secretary's position to in the case of E.P Royappa?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 2
In the case of E.P Royappa, the Government of India elevated the Chief Secretary's position to that of the Secretary to the Government of India. This promotion signified a significant advancement in Royappa's career within the administrative hierarchy.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 3
Save

What was one of the temporary roles created for E.P Royappa that contributed to the issues surrounding his transfers and appointments?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 3
One of the temporary positions created for E.P Royappa was Deputy Chairman in the State Planning Commission. This additional role, among others, played a part in the complexities surrounding his transfers and appointments, adding layers of administrative intricacies to his career trajectory.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 4
Save
What legal action was taken by Royappa to challenge his transfers and appointments in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 4
Royappa filed a legal petition under Article 32 of the Constitution to challenge his transfers and appointments in the case. This legal recourse allowed Royappa to bring his grievances regarding the legality of his appointments and transfers before the appropriate judicial authority, seeking redress and clarity on the matter.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 5
Save
What was the primary concern raised by Royappa regarding his temporary appointments in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 5
In the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr, Royappa raised concerns about the duration and validity of his temporary appointments. This issue was a key point of contention as per the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954. Royappa's questioning of the continuous creation and transfer of positions at the Chief Secretary level was rooted in the duration and legitimacy of his temporary roles.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 6
Save
What aspect of administrative service appointments and promotions was under scrutiny in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 6
The case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr involved scrutiny of rules governing administrative service appointments and promotions. This scrutiny highlighted the importance of adhering to established regulations and guidelines in the process of appointing and promoting officials within the administrative service, ensuring transparency and fairness in such procedures.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 7
Save
In the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr, what specific rules were alleged to have been violated by the petitioner's transfers between job posts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 7
The petitioner's transfers between job posts were alleged to have violated specific rules under the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954 and the Indian Administrative (Pay) Rules, 1954. These rules govern the procedures and regulations related to appointments and pay within the administrative service. It is crucial for such rules to be followed to ensure fairness and transparency in administrative decisions and actions.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 8
Save
What constitutional articles were cited as potentially breached by the petitioner's transfer in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 8
The petitioner's transfer was alleged to be a breach of Article 14 and Article 16 of the Constitution of India. Article 14 guarantees the right to equality before the law, while Article 16 ensures equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. These constitutional provisions aim to uphold fairness, non-discrimination, and equal opportunities for all individuals under the law.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 9
Save
What critical aspect was questioned regarding the respondents in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 9
The respondents' intent in transferring the petitioner from his position was questioned in the case. This raises concerns about whether there was any malicious intent behind the transfers and whether they were conducted in good faith and in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations. The examination of intent is crucial in legal cases to determine the motives behind specific actions and decisions.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 10
Save
According to the respondents in the case, on what basis was the petitioner appointed to the position of Chief Secretary?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 10
The respondents in the case argued that the petitioner was appointed to the position of Chief Secretary on an officiating basis, citing Fundamental Rule 9(19). This rule allows a government servant to temporarily perform duties in a post when another person holds the official position or when a post is vacant. It implies that the appointment was made temporarily and in accordance with the rules governing such appointments.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 11
Save
What constitutional articles were cited as being violated by the appointment, according to the petitioner in E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 11
The petitioner claimed that the appointment was a violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. These articles pertain to equality before the law and equal opportunity in matters of public employment, suggesting that the petitioner believed the appointment did not adhere to these constitutional provisions.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 12
Save
What does Rule 9 of the Indian Administrative Service (Pay) Rules specifically ensure regarding cadre members?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 12
Rule 9 of the Indian Administrative Service (Pay) Rules ensures that cadre members are not assigned to lower-ranking non-cadre positions. This rule is crucial to maintain the integrity and hierarchy within the administrative service, preventing cadre members from being inappropriately placed in positions below their rank.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 13
Save
Which legal concept is highlighted by Justice Bhagwati's assertion on equality in public employment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 13
Justice Bhagwati's assertion on equality in public employment highlights the legal concept of the right to equality. This principle, derived from Article 16 and as an extension of Article 14, aims to combat arbitrariness and discrimination in public employment, ensuring fair treatment and opportunities for all individuals.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 14
Save
In the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr, what was the primary reason for the petitioner's inability to claim the position of Chief Secretary permanently?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 14
The petitioner's inability to claim the position of Chief Secretary permanently was primarily due to the temporary nature of his promotion as clarified by the official document. This temporary status prevented him from securing the role definitively. It is essential in legal matters to pay close attention to the specific terms and conditions of appointments, as they can significantly impact one's ability to claim a position permanently.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 15
Save
What aspect of the State of Tamil Nadu's actions was considered unauthorized in the judgment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 15
The judgment deemed the State of Tamil Nadu unauthorized in introducing new positions such as Deputy Chairman, State Planning Commission, and Officer on Special Duty within the existing administrative structure. This unauthorized action was considered to disrupt the established hierarchy without the necessary authority. Such unauthorized changes can lead to confusion and undermine the stability of the administrative system.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 16
Save
What was the key factor that led to the dismissal of the petition in the case of E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 16
The dismissal of the petition in the case was primarily due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the petitioner's claims against the Chief Minister. When making serious accusations, especially against high-ranking officials, it is crucial to provide substantial evidence to substantiate the allegations. Without sufficient proof, it becomes challenging for the court to rule in favor of the petitioner. This highlights the importance of presenting strong and verifiable evidence in legal proceedings to support one's case effectively.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 17
Save
What was the primary reason behind the dismissal of the petitioner's challenge regarding promotions and transfers vis-a-vis junior colleagues?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 17
The primary reason behind the dismissal of the petitioner's challenge was the lack of substantial proof of malicious intent against the Chief Minister. This highlighted the importance of presenting concrete evidence when leveling accusations, especially against high-ranking officials. In legal proceedings, proving malicious intent requires strong and undeniable evidence to support the claims.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 18
Save
Why was the petitioner's promotion to Chief Secretary considered interim rather than permanent?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 18
The petitioner's promotion to Chief Secretary was deemed temporary because the previous Chief Secretary retained rights to the position until actual retirement. This situation prevented the petitioner from claiming the role definitively. This case underscores the significance of understanding administrative protocols and legal entitlements in hierarchical structures within governmental organizations.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 19
Save
What critical aspect led to the rejection of the challenge against the introduction of new positions within the State of Tamil Nadu's administrative structure?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 19
The challenge against the introduction of new positions within the State of Tamil Nadu's administrative structure was rejected due to the unauthorized alteration of the established hierarchy. Introducing positions such as Deputy Chairman and Officer on Special Duty without proper authority was considered to disrupt the existing administrative order. This emphasizes the importance of adhering to established protocols when making structural changes within governmental bodies.
Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 20
Save
What aspect of the verdict delivered by the honorable justices in the particular case holds significant legal weight and remains relevant in current legal practice?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr - Question 20
The interpretation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India by the honorable justices holds significant legal weight and remains relevant in current legal practice. Articles 14 and 16 of the Indian Constitution are fundamental rights that guarantee equality before the law and provide for equal opportunity in matters of public employment. The opinions expressed by the justices regarding these articles are crucial in shaping how these rights are understood and applied in the context of Indian legal history.
Information about Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr

Find all the important questions for Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr resources.

Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Case Brief: E.P Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup