Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab

Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 1

What was Bachan Singh tried, convicted, and sentenced to death for?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 1
Bachan Singh was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death under Section 302 of IPC 1860 for the murder of Desa Singh, Durga Bai, and Veeran Bai. The severity of the crime led to the imposition of the death penalty, highlighting the gravity of his actions.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 2

Why did Bachan Singh appeal to the Supreme Court?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 2
Bachan Singh appealed to the Supreme Court after the High Court confirmed his death sentence. His appeal aimed to challenge the constitutionality of the death penalty for murder, raising fundamental questions about the application of capital punishment in such cases.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 3

What was the outcome of Bachan Singh's appeal to the Supreme Court?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 3
The Supreme Court upheld Bachan Singh's death sentence upon appeal. This decision reaffirmed the severity of the crime and the application of the death penalty in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Penal Code.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 4
What action did a bench of the Supreme Court take in Bachan Singh's case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 4
A bench of the Supreme Court directed the case records to be submitted to the Chief Justice to resolve the question of the constitutional validity of the death penalty for murder. This step was crucial in addressing the broader legal implications of Bachan Singh's case and the application of capital punishment in India.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 5
Which court confirmed Bachan Singh's death sentence before his appeal to the Supreme Court?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 5
Before appealing to the Supreme Court, Bachan Singh's death sentence was confirmed by the High Court. This judicial affirmation underscored the seriousness of the charges against him and the need for a higher legal review to address complex legal issues, including the constitutionality of the death penalty.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 6
What is the primary issue addressed in the case of Bachan Singh v State of Punjab?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 6
The case of Bachan Singh v State of Punjab primarily revolves around the constitutionality of the death penalty for murder as per Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the sentencing procedure outlined in Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973. In this case, the Court deliberated on various circumstances that could warrant a milder sentence due to mitigating factors alongside aggravating circumstances, highlighting the complexities of society and the importance of respecting human life in the context of capital punishment.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 7
Why does the judicial system find it challenging to quantify certain factors relevant to sentencing in criminal cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 7
The judicial system encounters difficulties in quantifying certain factors relevant to sentencing in criminal cases primarily due to the subjective nature of mitigating and aggravating circumstances. These factors, which play a crucial role in determining the severity of a sentence, are often complex and can vary significantly based on individual case details and societal contexts.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 8
In the context of capital punishment, what does Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 mandate?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 8
Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 mandates that the death penalty should not be imposed unless there are "special reasons" recorded for such a sentence. This provision underscores the necessity for exceptionally grave circumstances specific to the crime in question to justify the imposition of the death penalty, emphasizing the gravity and deliberation involved in such sentencing decisions.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 9
Why does the principle of respect for human life lead to a reluctance to resort to capital punishment in the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 9
The principle of respect for human life leads to a reluctance to resort to capital punishment in the legal system as it underscores the importance of maintaining the sanctity of life and upholding humanitarian values. By recognizing the inherent worth and dignity of every individual, this principle emphasizes a cautious approach towards imposing the ultimate penalty of death, reflecting a commitment to preserving life and promoting justice through humane and ethical practices.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 10
What do the "special reasons" referred to in Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 signify in the context of capital punishment?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 10
The term "special reasons" mentioned in Section 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 signifies extraordinary justifications for imposing the death penalty. These reasons denote exceptionally grave circumstances that are specific to the crime in question and necessitate a high threshold of justification for sentencing a convicted individual to death. This provision highlights the gravity and seriousness associated with capital punishment, emphasizing the need for meticulous consideration and justification in such sentencing decisions.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 11
According to the Supreme Court's ruling in 1980, in what circumstances should the exercise of discretion under section 354(3) of the CRPC be reserved for?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 11
As per the Supreme Court's ruling in 1980, the exercise of discretion under section 354(3) of the CRPC should be reserved for exceptional and grave circumstances. This means that the decision-making process regarding the imposition of the death penalty should be limited to situations that are truly exceptional and serious in nature, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and evaluation before such a severe punishment is imposed.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 12
What principle did the Supreme Court clarify regarding the death penalty in relation to Article 19 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 12
The Supreme Court clarified that the death penalty does not violate the principles of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution. Article 19 guarantees certain fundamental rights to the citizens of India, and the Court's clarification indicates that the imposition of the death penalty for murder is not in conflict with these constitutional principles.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 13
In what type of cases did the Supreme Court emphasize that the death penalty should be limited to according to the 1980 ruling?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 13
According to the Supreme Court's ruling in 1980, the imposition of the death sentence should be limited to the "rarest of rare" cases. This criterion signifies that the death penalty should only be applied in extremely exceptional and compelling circumstances where the crime committed is considered to be among the most heinous and grave offenses.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 14
What aspect of the death penalty did the Supreme Court uphold in 1980 in relation to murder under section 302?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 14
In 1980, the Supreme Court upheld the provision of the death penalty as a punishment for murder under section 302, emphasizing the constitutionality of this form of punishment. This ruling reaffirmed the legality of imposing the death penalty for the crime of murder within the Indian legal framework.
Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 15
According to the Supreme Court's 1980 ruling, what factor determines the consideration of the death penalty in cases of murder?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab - Question 15
As per the Supreme Court's ruling in 1980, the consideration of the death penalty in cases of murder is determined by the heinousness of the crime committed. This implies that the severity and brutality of the offense play a crucial role in deciding whether the death penalty is an appropriate and justifiable punishment in specific murder cases.
Information about Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Bachan Singh v State of Punjab, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams