Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel

Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel below.
Solutions of Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 1

What is the primary purpose of the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution as clarified by the Supreme Court in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 1
The primary purpose of the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution, as highlighted by the Supreme Court in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, is to address grave derelictions of duty or violations of fundamental legal principles. This jurisdiction is not intended to correct every error but to ensure that serious legal infractions are rectified, emphasizing the role of high courts in upholding legal integrity and principles.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 2

In the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, where was the appellant in judicial custody and unable to appear before the Delhi High Court for a civil suit?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 2
In the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, the appellant was in judicial custody in Jaipur and faced challenges in appearing before the Delhi High Court for a civil suit. This situation added complexity to the legal proceedings and raised questions about jurisdiction and access to justice for the appellant.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 3

What did the Supreme Court underscore regarding the exercise of powers under Article 227 in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 3
In the context of the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, the Supreme Court highlighted that the powers under Article 227 should be sparingly used to ensure justice without transforming them into a routine avenue for appeals. This emphasis on judicious and selective utilization of Article 227 powers reflects the court's commitment to maintaining the integrity and purpose of legal remedies available under the Indian Constitution.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 4
According to the Supreme Court's ruling in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, why did the Court find the High Court's interference under Article 227 unwarranted?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 4
The Supreme Court deemed the High Court's interference under Article 227 unwarranted in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case because the lower court's decision did not exhibit errors that justified such intervention. This ruling underscored the importance of respecting the decision-making authority of lower courts unless substantial legal errors or violations are evident.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 5
What key principle did the Supreme Court stress regarding the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 5
The Supreme Court, in the Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel case, emphasized that the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 is not aimed at correcting every error but rather at addressing grave derelictions of duty or violations of fundamental legal principles. This principle underscores the significance of upholding legal standards and principles while maintaining the integrity of legal processes in the Indian judicial system.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 6
What is the primary emphasis of Article 227 according to the Supreme Court's interpretation?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 6
The Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that Article 227 grants high courts powers of superintendence over lower courts and tribunals, not as a means to act as appellate courts. This distinction is crucial to prevent endless litigation and maintain judicial efficiency.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 7
What concept has the judiciary highlighted regarding arbitral tribunals in the context of judicial interference?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 7
Additionally, the judiciary has underscored the importance of respecting arbitral tribunals and promoting a pro-arbitration stance to minimize judicial interference in arbitration proceedings. This approach aims to uphold the autonomy and efficiency of arbitration proceedings.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 8
How does promoting a pro-arbitration stance help in minimizing judicial interference, as per the judicial perspective?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 8
Promoting a pro-arbitration stance involves respecting arbitral tribunals and their decisions, thereby minimizing judicial interference in arbitration proceedings. This approach aims to uphold the integrity of arbitration processes and encourage alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 9
Why is it essential to differentiate between the roles of high courts and appellate courts as per Article 227?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 9
The distinction between the powers of high courts as granted by Article 227 and appellate courts is crucial to prevent endless litigation and maintain judicial efficiency. This differentiation helps in streamlining the judicial process and ensuring effective supervision over lower courts and tribunals.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 10
According to the Supreme Court's stance, what is the key objective behind granting high courts powers of superintendence over lower courts and tribunals?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 10
The primary objective behind granting high courts powers of superintendence over lower courts and tribunals, as emphasized by the Supreme Court, is to prevent endless litigation and maintain judicial efficiency. This distinction is crucial for effective supervision and management of legal proceedings within the judicial system.
Information about Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams