Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat

Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat below.
Solutions of Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 1

What is the primary emphasis of the Latin legal maxim "ut res magis valeat quam pereat"?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 1
The Latin legal maxim "ut res magis valeat quam pereat" stresses the importance of interpreting laws in a manner that ensures their effectiveness rather than rendering them void. This principle guides courts to provide interpretations that keep laws practical and operational, serving their intended purposes. By doing so, the legal system maintains functionality and upholds justice, aligning with legislative intent and preventing laws from becoming ineffective.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 2

How should courts apply the principle of "ut res magis valeat quam pereat" when interpreting legal provisions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 2
Courts should apply the principle of "ut res magis valeat quam pereat" by interpreting legal provisions in a manner that maintains their practicality and functionality. This approach ensures that laws achieve their intended goals and serve the interests of justice effectively. By upholding this principle, courts contribute to the preservation of the legal system's efficacy and prevent laws from losing their intended purpose.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 3

Why is it essential for courts to interpret laws in a manner that preserves their functionality and ensures they achieve their intended goals?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 3
Courts interpret laws to preserve their functionality and achieve their intended goals to safeguard the rights and obligations of individuals. This ensures that the legal system upholds justice and fairness, maintaining order and stability in society.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 4
How does clear interpretation of legal provisions contribute to judicial decision-making?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 4
Clear interpretation of legal provisions contributes to judicial decision-making by fostering consistency in legal decisions. This clarity helps judges avoid confusion, apply the law accurately, and make decisions that uphold the spirit of the law and promote justice.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 5
What role does legal certainty play in ensuring stable legal outcomes and promoting societal stability?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 5
Legal certainty ensures stable legal outcomes and promotes societal stability by providing predictability and consistency in legal decisions. It helps individuals understand their rights and obligations, contributing to a fair and just legal system.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 6
Why is the maxim ut res magis valeat quam pereat considered crucial for the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 6
The maxim ut res magis valeat quam pereat is considered crucial for the legal system because it prevents legal documents from becoming mere formalities. By stressing the importance of interpreting statutes and legal provisions in a way that upholds their functionality and intent, this maxim ensures that the rule of law, fairness, and justice are maintained. It encourages a practical and adaptable approach to legal interpretation, thereby safeguarding against laws losing their significance or leading to unintended outcomes.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 7
What is the primary aim of the legal principle ut res magis valeat quam pereat?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 7
The primary aim of the legal principle ut res magis valeat quam pereat is to interpret laws in a manner that preserves their effectiveness and functionality. This principle emphasizes the importance of upholding the intent and purpose of laws, ensuring that they are applied meaningfully to serve justice and the rule of law. By adopting a flexible and pragmatic approach to legal interpretation, this principle aims to prevent laws from becoming obsolete or leading to unintended consequences.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 8
How does the legal principle ut res magis valeat quam pereat contribute to the overall goal of serving justice and the rule of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 8
The legal principle ut res magis valeat quam pereat contributes to the overall goal of serving justice and the rule of law by ensuring that laws are not rendered meaningless or misapplied. This principle emphasizes the importance of interpreting laws in a manner that preserves their effectiveness and intent, thereby preventing unintended consequences and preserving the functionality of legal instruments. By upholding this principle, the legal system can maintain its integrity and ensure that justice is served equitably.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 9
According to the doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat, what should be the initial presumption when assessing the constitutionality of a law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 9
According to the doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat, the initial presumption when assessing the constitutionality of a law should be in favor of its constitutionality. This principle underscores the importance of upholding the validity of laws unless there are clear reasons to deem them unconstitutional, emphasizing stability and respect for legislative intent.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 10
How does the doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat suggest laws should be interpreted to align with legislative intent?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 10
The doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat advocates for interpreting laws in a manner that avoids unworkable interpretations. This approach ensures that the intended purpose and effectiveness of laws are preserved, aligning with the notion that laws should be fully utilized for their intended objectives. By sidestepping interpretations that render parts of laws useless, the doctrine aims to maintain the integrity and functionality of legal frameworks.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 11
What principle does the doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat emphasize to guide courts in their decision-making regarding laws?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 11
The doctrine of Ut Res Magis Valeat Quam Pereat underscores the importance of judicial restraint in guiding courts when evaluating laws. While courts possess the authority to declare laws unconstitutional, exercising judicial restraint involves refraining from introducing vagueness or unconstitutionality through unconventional interpretations. This principle promotes a balanced approach by encouraging courts to exercise their power judiciously and within the boundaries of legal interpretation, respecting legislative intent and the rule of law.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 12
What was the key emphasis of the Supreme Court ruling in the case of Avtar Singh v. the State of Punjab (1965)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 12
The Supreme Court ruling in the case of Avtar Singh v. the State of Punjab (1965) emphasized the importance of following the procedures outlined in Section 50 of the Indian Electricity Act for prosecution. This ruling underscored the significance of adhering to the prescribed legal procedures to ensure fair and just outcomes in cases related to the theft of electricity.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 13
In the case of KB Nagpur, MD (Ayurvedic) v. the Union of India (2012), what aspect did the Supreme Court uphold regarding the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 13
In the case of KB Nagpur, MD (Ayurvedic) v. the Union of India (2012), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 7(1) of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. This decision highlights the court's affirmation of the legality and validity of the specific provision within the act, emphasizing its compliance with the constitutional framework.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 14
What was the focus of the Supreme Court's interpretation in the case of D. Salbaba v. the Bar Council of India (2003)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 14
The Supreme Court's interpretation in the case of D. Salbaba v. the Bar Council of India (2003) emphasized the importance of understanding time limits in legal proceedings to ensure fairness and effectiveness. This underscores the significance of adhering to designated time constraints within the legal system to uphold the principles of justice and procedural integrity.
Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 15
How does the Supreme Court's principle of "Presumption Against Reducing a Statute to Futility" impact statutory interpretation?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat - Question 15
The Supreme Court's principle of "Presumption Against Reducing a Statute to Futility" ensures that statutes remain operational and meaningful. This principle guides the Court to interpret statutes in a way that avoids rendering them ineffective and serves to uphold the legislative intent behind the laws, ensuring their practical application and relevance.
Information about Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Ut res magis valeat quam pereat, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams