Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel

Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel below.
Solutions of Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 1

What does the recent Supreme Court case of Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel primarily emphasize about the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 1
The recent Supreme Court case of Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel underscores that the revisional jurisdiction of high courts under Article 227 is not intended to correct every error but to address grave derelictions of duty or violations of fundamental legal principles. This emphasizes the importance of this jurisdiction in upholding legal standards and principles rather than correcting minor mistakes.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 2

In the case discussed, why did the Supreme Court rule that the High Court's interference under Article 227 was unwarranted?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 2
The Supreme Court ruled that the High Court's interference under Article 227 was unwarranted in this case because the lower court's decision did not exhibit errors that justified such intervention. This decision underscores the importance of the limited nature of the powers under Article 227 and the need for their judicious application.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 3

What key comparison does the Supreme Court make regarding the powers under Article 227 and Article 226 in the context of the recent case discussed?

Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 3
The Supreme Court highlighted in the recent case that the powers under Article 227 are limited compared to Article 226. This distinction is crucial as it underscores the need to exercise caution and restraint when invoking Article 227 to ensure that justice is served without it becoming an avenue for routine appeals.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 4
What guiding principle did the Supreme Court emphasize in terms of using the powers under Article 227 in the recent case of Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 4
The Supreme Court emphasized in the recent case that the powers under Article 227 should be sparingly used to ensure justice without becoming an avenue for routine appeals. This directive highlights the court's intention to maintain the integrity of the legal system while upholding fundamental legal principles.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 5
In the context of the recent Supreme Court case, what did the court determine regarding the appellant who was in judicial custody in Jaipur?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 5
In the recent Supreme Court case, the appellant in judicial custody in Jaipur faced several legal twists and challenges, including the inability to appear before the Delhi High Court for a civil suit. Despite these complications, the apex court's ruling shed light on the complexities involved and the need for a careful consideration of legal procedures.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 6
In the context of judicial powers, what distinction has the Supreme Court consistently emphasized regarding Article 227?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 6
The Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that Article 227 grants high courts powers of superintendence over lower courts and tribunals, not as a means to act as appellate courts. This distinction is crucial to prevent endless litigation and maintain judicial efficiency.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 7
Why is it essential to respect arbitral tribunals according to the judiciary's perspective?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 7
The judiciary underscores the importance of respecting arbitral tribunals and promoting a pro-arbitration stance to minimize judicial interference in arbitration proceedings. This stance aims to uphold the efficiency and autonomy of the arbitration process.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 8
What is the primary objective of maintaining a pro-arbitration stance in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 8
Maintaining a pro-arbitration stance aims to minimize judicial interference in arbitration cases, allowing for a more efficient and independent resolution of disputes outside of traditional court proceedings.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 9
How does the emphasis on superintendence powers contribute to preventing a specific issue in the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 9
The emphasis on superintendence powers over lower courts and tribunals helps prevent excessive litigation and maintain efficiency in the judicial system. By focusing on oversight rather than acting as appellate courts, high courts can streamline processes and avoid prolonged legal battles.
Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 10
What is the significance of high courts' superintendence powers according to the Supreme Court's perspective?
Detailed Solution for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel - Question 10
High courts' superintendence powers are crucial for overseeing and guiding lower courts and tribunals, ensuring proper administration of justice and adherence to legal principles. This oversight role helps maintain judicial efficiency and consistency in legal proceedings.
Information about Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Limits on Jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 227 | Garment Craft v. Prakash Chand Goel, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams