Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India

Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India below.
Solutions of Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 1

What does Article 21 of the Constitution of India primarily guarantee to individuals?

Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 1
Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the Right to Life and Personal Liberty to individuals. This fundamental right ensures protection against infringement by the state and limits the state's power over an individual's life and liberty. It is a crucial aspect of the Indian Constitution that safeguards the basic freedoms and rights of its citizens.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 2

Which legal precedent emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and reasonableness in state actions affecting personal liberties?

Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 2
The legal precedent of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) emphasized the significance of procedural fairness in depriving someone of their rights and highlighted the need for reasonableness in state actions affecting personal liberties. This landmark case played a pivotal role in influencing the interpretation of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and underscored the importance of upholding individual rights within the legal framework.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 3

What concept was emphasized by the Maneka Gandhi case regarding state actions affecting personal liberties?

Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 3
The Maneka Gandhi case highlighted the need for reasonableness in state actions affecting personal liberties. This landmark case influenced the interpretation of Article 21, emphasizing procedural fairness when depriving someone of their rights. It broadened the scope of personal liberty in India and stressed the significance of reasonable state actions impacting individual freedoms.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 4
What aspect did the judgment in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Association of India (1978) primarily emphasize regarding personal liberty under Article 21?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 4
The judgment in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Association of India (1978) emphasized the right to travel abroad as part of personal liberty under Article 21. This decision expanded the scope of personal liberty to encompass various rights and stressed the importance of fair and just procedures in upholding individual freedoms.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 5
In the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Association of India (2018), what significant concept related to human dignity was expanded by the court's ruling?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 5
In the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Association of India (2018), the court's ruling expanded the concept of human dignity to include the right to personal autonomy and self-expression. This case specifically addressed the issue of consensual sexual acts between LGBT individuals, ruling that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code violated fundamental rights by criminalizing such acts. The judgment made consensual sexual acts between LGBT adults lawful, emphasizing the importance of respecting individual choices and personal autonomy.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 6
How did the court rule in the Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation case regarding the eviction of residents from ghettos and slums in Bombay?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 6
In the Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the court ruled in favor of the government's action to evict the residents for using public property for private purposes. However, it acknowledged the residents' vulnerability and ordered that evictions should take place after the approaching monsoon season. This decision highlighted the court's recognition of the government's authority while also considering the residents' circumstances.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 7
What was one significant outcome of the Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation case in relation to the residents of the ghettos and slums in Bombay?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 7
Following the Olga Tellis and Ors. v. Bombay Municipal Corporation case, residents who were enumerated before 1976 were deemed eligible for resettlement. This provision aimed to address the situation of those residents who had been living in the ghettos and slums for an extended period. The eligibility criteria based on enumeration before 1976 ensured that a specific group of residents could benefit from the resettlement process.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 8
How did the case of R. Rajagopal v. Province of Tamil Nadu contribute to the evolution of the Right to Privacy in India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 8
The case of R. Rajagopal v. Province of Tamil Nadu played a pivotal role in recognizing the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right in India. This landmark judgment affirmed an individual's right to control their private information, setting a precedent for future decisions upholding the importance of personal autonomy and data protection.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 9
What was the significance of the autobiography written by the murder convict in the case of R. Rajagopal v. Province of Tamil Nadu?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 9
The autobiography written by the murder convict in the case of R. Rajagopal v. Province of Tamil Nadu revealed sensitive information about his relationship with prison authorities. This disclosure led to a legal battle where the court ultimately recognized the convict's right to control the publication of his private information, emphasizing the importance of privacy rights and personal autonomy.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 10
According to the provided case study, in the legal case of Mr. X v. Clinic Z (1998), why did the court rule that the individual's Right to Privacy was overridden?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 10
The court ruled that the individual's Right to Privacy was overridden to protect the public interest. This decision was based on the significant impact of the undisclosed HIV diagnosis on Ms. Y's life, emphasizing the court's prioritization of public interest over individual privacy rights in certain circumstances.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 11
In the context of the Right to Privacy, why is it considered a crucial right for individuals in a modern democratic society?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 11
The Right to Privacy is considered a crucial right for individuals in a modern democratic society because it allows individuals to control their personal information. This control empowers individuals to manage their personal data, make autonomous decisions about its use, and maintain a sense of autonomy and self-determination in various aspects of their lives.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 12
In the context of the legal case discussed, what was the primary factor that the court considered when ruling in favor of Ms. Y's right to know over the individual's right to privacy?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 12
The court prioritized Ms. Y's right to know a crucial fact about the person she intended to marry because it significantly impacted her life. This ruling highlights the delicate balance between an individual's right to privacy and broader societal interests, emphasizing that personal privacy can be superseded by considerations that affect the rights and well-being of others.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 13
In the context of phone tapping and the right to privacy, which case highlighted the issue of interception of messages by governmental bodies?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 13
The People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997) case brought to light the issue of interception of messages by governmental bodies. This case specifically challenged the constitutional validity of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, which allowed for the interception and recording of messages in certain circumstances. The court's ruling in this case emphasized the importance of strict authorization procedures for interceptions to protect privacy rights and outlined guidelines for the proper handling of intercepted communications.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 14
What was one of the key mandates established by the court in the People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997) case regarding interception of messages?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 14
In the People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (1997) case, the court ruled that interceptions could only be authorized by specific high-level government officials when absolutely necessary and for a limited period, not exceeding six months. This mandate was put in place to ensure that interceptions were conducted only in cases of public emergency or in the interest of public safety, with strict oversight to prevent misuse and protect individual privacy rights.
Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 15
Why are oversight mechanisms like the Review Committee deemed essential in surveillance operations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India - Question 15
Oversight mechanisms such as the Review Committee are crucial in surveillance operations to prevent the abuse of surveillance powers. By ensuring that interceptions are in compliance with the law and immediately destroying any unauthorized interceptions, these mechanisms help uphold the integrity of surveillance activities and protect individuals' rights to privacy.
Information about Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Article 21 of the Constitution of India, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams