Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation

Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation below.
Solutions of Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 1

Why is free speech considered a fundamental human right according to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights?

Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 1
Free speech is regarded as a fundamental human right because it enables the expression of diverse opinions, which is crucial for fostering a society where various perspectives can be shared and debated openly. This freedom allows individuals to voice their thoughts, beliefs, and criticisms, contributing to a rich tapestry of ideas and facilitating societal progress.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 2

How does protecting freedom of speech contribute to personal satisfaction and dignity?

Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 2
Safeguarding freedom of speech enhances personal satisfaction and dignity by empowering individuals to express themselves freely without fear of repression or censorship. This liberty to articulate one's thoughts and beliefs plays a vital role in upholding personal autonomy, self-expression, and dignity, allowing individuals to participate actively in public discourse and shape societal conversations.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 3

What concept is emphasized by the idea of the "marketplace of ideas" in a democratic society?

Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 3
The notion of the "marketplace of ideas" underscores the importance of facilitating diverse viewpoints and opinions within a democratic society. Similar to how a marketplace allows for the exchange of goods and services, the marketplace of ideas promotes the free exchange of a wide range of perspectives, beliefs, and ideologies. This concept recognizes the value of open dialogue and debate in enriching public discourse and driving intellectual growth.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 4
What pivotal legal test is frequently utilized in evaluating speech advocating unlawful actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 4
The Brandenburg standard test is commonly applied in assessing speech that advocates unlawful actions. This test, originating from the case of Brandenburg v. Ohio, sets a high bar for restricting speech, stating that speech can only be prohibited if it is directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. This standard provides robust protection for freedom of speech and limits the government's ability to criminalize inflammatory speech unless it poses a direct and immediate threat of illegal action.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 5
Why do civil societies impose certain restrictions on the right to freedom of speech?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 5
Civil societies impose restrictions on the right to freedom of speech to strike a balance between individual rational desires and the collective interests of society as a whole. These restrictions are often necessary to prevent harm, such as hate speech or incitement to violence, while upholding core societal values like equality, tolerance, and respect for others. In essence, limitations on free speech aim to maintain social harmony and protect the rights and well-being of all members of the community.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 6
Which legal case expanded the definition of free speech to encompass symbolic speech?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 6
The case of United States v. Eichman played a pivotal role in expanding the definition of free speech to include symbolic speech. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag as a form of protest was a protected expression under the First Amendment. This decision underscored the importance of symbolic speech as a form of political expression and reinforced the broad scope of protections afforded by the First Amendment.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 7
What does Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India guarantee?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 7
Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, a fundamental right that allows individuals to express their thoughts and opinions freely. This right is essential for a democratic society as it enables citizens to participate in public discourse, criticize the government, and contribute to the exchange of ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 8
Which key court case clarified that the concept of "security of the state" is not restricted by Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 8
In the case of Romesh Thappar v The State of Madras, the court differentiated between public order and the security of the state, clarifying that the concept of "security of the state" is not restricted by Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution. This distinction is crucial in understanding the scope of restrictions on freedom of speech and expression in India.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 9
What was emphasized by the Supreme Court in the case of Brij Bhushan v State of Delhi regarding laws limiting freedom?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 9
In the case of Brij Bhushan v State of Delhi, the Supreme Court emphasized that laws limiting freedom must serve the interest of public order. This ruling underscores the importance of balancing individual freedoms with the maintenance of public order to ensure the stability and well-being of society.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 10
What distinguishes the guarantee of the right to freedom of speech and expression in India from that in the United States?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 10
The distinction between the guarantee of the right to freedom of speech and expression in India and the United States lies in the extent of permissible expression. While the U.S. protects even potentially hurtful or demeaning speech under freedom of speech without limitations, India's interpretation and application of Article 19(1) and (2) of the Constitution are influenced by moral standards and cultural ethics, leading to a nuanced approach in balancing free speech with societal norms and values.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 11
Which case demonstrated the delineation of boundaries of free speech in the United States?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 11
The case of Roth v United States illustrated the delineation of boundaries of free speech in the United States. This landmark case addressed issues related to obscenity and established guidelines for what constitutes unprotected speech under the First Amendment.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 12
How does the Indian judiciary's approach to free speech differ from that of the United States regarding potentially hurtful speech?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 12
The United States allows potentially hurtful speech without limitations under the freedom of speech, while the Indian judiciary, influenced by moral standards and cultural ethics, takes a more cautious approach in interpreting and applying the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 13
How do the frameworks in India and the United States differ regarding the guarantee of the right to freedom of speech and expression?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 13
The frameworks in India and the United States diverge in their treatment of freedom of speech. While the U.S. protects potentially hurtful speech without limitations, India considers moral standards and cultural ethics when interpreting and applying Article 19(1) and (2) of the Constitution. This distinction highlights the nuanced approach each country takes in balancing free speech with societal norms and values.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 14
In the case of Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd. v Union of India, what did Justice Bhagwati observe about the extent of permissible expression in India and the United States?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 14
Justice Bhagwati observed that in the United States, even potentially hurtful or demeaning speech is protected under freedom of speech without limitations, whereas in India, moral standards and cultural ethics influence the extent of permissible expression. This difference underscores how each country balances free speech with societal norms.
Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 15
How does the Indian judiciary approach the interpretation and application of Article 19(1) and (2) of the Constitution in relation to freedom of speech?
Detailed Solution for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation - Question 15
The Indian judiciary considers moral standards and cultural ethics when interpreting and applying Article 19(1) and (2) of the Constitution in matters related to freedom of speech. This approach reflects a nuanced understanding of how societal norms and values influence the exercise of free speech rights in India.
Information about Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Constitutional Framework of Freedom of Speech & Expression in India and USA:A Comparative Evaluation, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams