Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy

Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy below.
Solutions of Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 1

What is the significance of the Doctrine of Repugnancy in the Indian legal framework?

Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 1
The Doctrine of Repugnancy plays a crucial role in the Indian legal system by preventing conflicts between Central and State laws. This doctrine helps maintain uniformity and coherence in the legal framework by resolving conflicts that may arise between laws enacted by the Centre and the States.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 2

How does the Doctrine of Repugnancy contribute to the distribution of legislative powers in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 2
The Doctrine of Repugnancy contributes to the distribution of legislative powers in India by delineating the jurisdiction between the Centre and the States. This delineation helps clarify the areas where each entity has the authority to legislate, thereby preventing conflicts and ensuring a smooth functioning legal system.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 3

How does the Doctrine of Repugnancy draw inspiration from the American federal system?

Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 3
The Doctrine of Repugnancy in the Indian Constitution draws inspiration from the American federal system by clarifying the distribution of legislative powers between the Centre and the States. This doctrine helps establish the supremacy of Parliament in making laws for the entire country, similar to the role of the federal government in the United States.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 4
What does the judgment in M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India emphasize regarding conflicting laws on the Concurrent List?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 4
The judgment in M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India highlights that in situations of conflict between laws on the Concurrent List, the Central law takes precedence. This ruling underscores the significance of Central legislation in such scenarios, ensuring uniformity and consistency in governance across the nation.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 5
According to the case of Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Ltd. v. State of Assam, what approach do courts emphasize when dealing with conflicting Centre-State legislations not pertaining to the same list?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 5
In the case of Bharat Hydro Power Corporation Ltd. v. State of Assam, courts stress the importance of harmonizing conflicting Centre-State legislations that do not relate to the same list. This approach aims to reconcile differences between laws enacted by the Centre and the State, promoting cooperation and avoiding unnecessary conflicts in governance.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 6
Grand Kakatiya Sheraton Hotel and Towers Employees & Workers Union v. Srinivasa Resorts Ltd highlights that State legislation can override Centre's laws under what condition?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 6
The case of Grand Kakatiya Sheraton Hotel and Towers Employees & Workers Union v. Srinivasa Resorts Ltd clarifies that State legislation can supersede Centre's laws but only with the specific approval of the President. This provision ensures that State laws can prevail over conflicting Central laws under certain circumstances with proper authorization.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 7
In the context of Article 254(1), what scenario could lead to conflicts between laws enacted by the Center and the States?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 7
Conflicts between laws enacted by the Center and the States can arise when both entities have the authority to legislate on the same subject matter, even if the laws fall under different legislative lists. This scenario can lead to challenges in harmonizing legislation and determining the precedence of laws in case of conflicts.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 8
Which list in the Indian Constitution's Seventh Schedule is primarily emphasized when discussing conflicts related to the Doctrine of Repugnancy?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 8
When discussing conflicts related to the Doctrine of Repugnancy in the Indian Constitution, most judgments focus on conflicts within List III (Concurrent List). This list contains subjects on which both the Center and States have the authority to legislate, leading to potential conflicts that need resolution.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 9
What aspect does the doctrine underscore regarding the authority of Parliament and the States in legislating under the Concurrent List?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 9
The doctrine emphasizes Parliament's authority over the States in legislating under List III (Concurrent List) in the Indian Constitution. This underscores the importance of understanding the balance of power between the Center and States to prevent conflicting legislation and ensure effective governance and legal harmony.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 10
What does the Doctrine of Repugnancy primarily aim to address in the Indian constitutional framework?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 10
The Doctrine of Repugnancy in the Indian context primarily deals with the allocation of legislative powers between the central and state governments. It ensures that in cases of conflict between laws made by the Parliament and laws made by the State Legislatures on matters in the Concurrent List, the law made by the Parliament prevails. This doctrine helps maintain a balance of power between the Center and State to avoid conflicting legislation, as outlined in the Constitution.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 11
In the context of the Doctrine of Repugnancy, what is the significance of Article 254 of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 11
Article 254 of the Indian Constitution holds significant importance in governing the relationship between the central and state governments concerning legislative conflicts. It clarifies the hierarchy of laws, stating that in cases where there is a conflict between a central law and a state law on a Concurrent List subject, the central law will prevail over the state law. This article plays a crucial role in maintaining the federal structure of India's Constitution.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 12
How does the Supreme Court interpret the Doctrine of Repugnancy in the case of Tika Ram vs State of Uttar Pradesh?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 12
In the case of Tika Ram vs State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court clarified the Doctrine of Repugnancy by stating that it applies when state laws are not in conflict with existing central laws. This interpretation establishes the criteria for determining whether a state law is repugnant to a central law. It underscores the importance of ensuring that there is an existing central law in place for Parliament to enact a law repealing a state law.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 13
How does the Doctrine of Repugnancy contribute to maintaining the federal nature of the Indian Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 13
The Doctrine of Repugnancy plays a crucial role in maintaining the federal nature of the Indian Constitution by establishing a clear hierarchy of laws between the central and state governments. It ensures that in cases of conflict between laws made by the Parliament and laws made by the State Legislatures on matters in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. This mechanism helps uphold the balance of power between the Center and the States, reinforcing the federal structure of the Indian Constitution.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 14
What term is used to describe the Constitution due to its allocation of powers to both central and state governments, allowing for one legislature to prevail over another in cases of conflict?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 14
The Constitution is often characterized as a Quasi-Federal Constitution because it allocates powers to both the central and state governments, while also permitting one legislature to prevail over another in cases of conflict. This term signifies a unique blend of federal and unitary features within the Indian constitutional structure, reflecting a complex system of governance.
Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 15
In which case did the Supreme Court clarify the Doctrine of Repugnancy, emphasizing the significance of Article 254 in governing the relationship between the central and state governments?
Detailed Solution for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy - Question 15
The Supreme Court clarified the Doctrine of Repugnancy in the case of Tika Ram vs State of Uttar Pradesh. This judgment underscored the importance of Article 254 in managing conflicts between central and state laws. Article 254 plays a crucial role in maintaining a balance of power between the Centre and the States by providing guidelines on the validity of conflicting laws enacted by different levels of government.
Information about Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: A brief on Doctrine of Repugnancy, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams