Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test - Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law)

Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) below.
Solutions of Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) | 150 questions in 120 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 1

Which of the following pairs is not jural-correlative?

Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 1

Jural correlatives are

Thus, option (4) is correct in relation to above question.

Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 2

Who among the following, along with sitting Chief Justice, has been convicted by the court in Maldives for obstruction of justice?

Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 2
A court in the Maldives convicted former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and the sitting Chief Justice for obstruction of justice and sentenced them to 19 months in prison. Gayoom, who is the country's longest serving leader, Chief Justice Abdulla Saeed and Supreme Court Justice Ali Hameed were found guilty on Wednesday after they were charged for refusing to hand over their mobile phones for a police investigation.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 3

Fair trial in a criminal case is guaranteed in the Constitution of India by Article

Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 3
In Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court declared that fair and speedy trial is an essential ingredient of 'reasonable just and fair' procedure guaranteed by Article 21 and it is the constitutional obligation of state to set up such a procedure as would ensure speedy trial to the accused. State cannot avoid its constitutional obligation by pleading financial or administrative inadequacy.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 4
Without paying proper remuneration, labour taken from the prisoners is 'forced labour' and violation of
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 4
Considering the problem of prisoners as workmen, the Supreme Court held that labour taken from prisoners without paying proper remuneration was 'forced labour' and violative of Article 23 of the Constitution. The prisoners are entitled to payment of reasonable wages for the work taken through them and the Court is under duty to enforce their claim. Article 23 of the Constitution of India prohibits forced labour.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 5

Wherein a judicial proceeding, the handwriting of a teacher is in question, the opinion of his student may be relevant under which of the following sections of Indian Evidence Act?

Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 5

Section 47 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, deals with the opinion as to hand-writing, when relevant. It says that when the Court has to form an opinion as to the person by whom any document was written or signed, the opinion of any person acquainted with the handwriting of the person by whom it is supposed to be written or signed that it was or was not written or signed by that person, is a relevant fact.
Explanation: A person is said to be acquainted with the handwriting of another person when he has seen that person write or when he has received documents purporting to be written by that person in answer to documents written by himself or under his authority and addressed to that person or when, in the ordinary course of business, documents purporting to be written by that person have been habitually submitted to him.
In the instant case, a student is said to be acquainted with the handwriting of their teacher. Hence, their opinion is relevant.

Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 6
Which of the following sections makes provision of solitary confinement under IPC?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 6
Section 73 in the Indian Penal Code deals with the solitary confinement. It says that whenever any person is convicted of an offence for which under this Code, the Court has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment, the Court may, by its sentence, order that the offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to which he is sen­tenced, not exceeding three months in the whole, according to the following scale, that is to say, a time not exceeding one month, if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months, a time not exceeding two months, if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and [shall not exceed one] year and a time not exceeding three months, if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 7
Which of the following is the basis of specific relief?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 7
In cases of specific performance of a contract, the rights of the parties are governed by the principles of equity and law. Orders of specific performance are granted when damages are not an adequate remedy, and in some specific cases such as land sale. Such orders are discretionary, as with all equitable remedies, so the availability of this remedy will depend on whether it is appropriate in the circumstances of the case. Thus, the basis of specific relief is law of equity.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 8
Which among the following can request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 8
General Assembly can request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 9
Which country launched a spacecraft carrying FEDOR, a humanoid robot in 2019?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 9
The robot named FEDOR, its full name of "Final Experimental Demonstration Object Research," was sent up on August, 23 2019 in a Soyuz MS-14 spacecraft from Russia's Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 10
I have fought against white domination.....it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.' who said this?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 10
Correct Answer: Nelson Mandela
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 11
The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 came into force on
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 11
The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 came into force on the first day of July, 1882.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 12
Which of the following conditions is invalid according to Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 12
Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act states that where property is transferred subject to a condition or limitation absolutely restraining the transferee or any person claiming under him from parting with or disposing of his interest in the property, the condition or limitation is void.
A condition not to sell during the lifetime of the transfer is a condition absolutely restraining the transferee from parting with or disposing of his interest in the property.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 13
Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not apply to
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 13
Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 does not apply to pre-existing rights. It purports to creating entirely new rights pendente lite.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 14
As per preamble of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the purpose of this Act is
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 14
As per preamble of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the purpose of this Act is to consolidate, define and amend the law of evidence.
Thus, option 4 is correct.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 15
The appropriate Government may commute the sentence of death of an accused person to any other sentence
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 15
Section 54 of the Indian Penal Code states that in every case in which sentence of death shall have been passed, the appropriate Government may, without the consent of the offender, commute the punishment for any other punishment provided by this Code.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 16
Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 2002 was enforced from
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 16
The Parliament has amended the Code vide Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002. The amendment in Code was done in 1999 also, but the said amendments were not made effective. Both the Amendment Acts, which became effective from 1st July 2002, taken together intend to bring in virtually certain radical changes.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 17
A buys from B an original painting of Picasso. B refuses to honour his promise. On what ground can A specifically enforce the contract?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 17
Compensation is not an adequate remedy because such paintings are rare and if A has paid the price, then he must be delivered the painting. Mere compensation is not enough. Specific performance of contract is required.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 18
The meaning of 'written statement' is:
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 18
The term 'written statement' has not been defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is a term which means 'a reply to the plaint which is filed by the plaintiff'. It is a pleading of the defendant wherein he deals with every material fact alleged by the plaintiff along with any new facts in his favour. This written statement is filed within 30 days of services of summons to him, which is extendable up to 90 days, if court is satisfied with the reasons given for the delay.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 19
A proclaimed offender whose property has been attached can claim back the property or sale proceeds, on appearance before the court
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 19
According to Section 85(3) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if, within two years from the date of the attachment, any person whose property is or has been at the disposal of the State Government, appears voluntarily or is apprehended and brought before the Court by whose order the property was attached and proves to the satisfaction of such Court that he did not abscond or conceal himself for the purpose of avoiding execution of the warrant, and that he had not such notice of the proclamation as to enable him to attend within the time specified therein, such property, or, if the same has been sold, the net proceeds of the sale, or, if part only thereof has been sold, the net proceeds of the sale and the residue of the property, shall, after satisfying therefrom all costs incurred in consequence of the attachment, be delivered to him.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 20
In which of the following cases did the Court say that the distinction between de facto and de jure recognition is political, rather than legal?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 20
In the Arantzazu Mendi Case, the Court said that the distinction between de facto and de jure recognition is political, rather than legal.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 21
A preliminary version of a legal document is termed as
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 21
Correct Answer: draft
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 22

A is accused of murder of B by pistol alleged to be purchased on 15th September at Dehradun. A makes a statement that on 15th September, he was at Lucknow and not at Dehradun. A's statement is a relevant fact under:

Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 22

Section 11 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with the case when facts not otherwise relevant become relevant. It says that facts not otherwise relevant are relevant
(1) if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
(2) if by themselves or in connection with other facts they make the existence or non-existence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Illustrations:-
(a) The question is, whether A committed a crime at Calcutta on a certain day. The fact that, on that day, A was at Lahore is relevant. The fact that, near the time when the crime was committed, A was at a distance from the place where it was committed, which would render it highly improbable, though not impossible, that he committed it, is relevant.
(b) The question is, whether A committed a crime. The circumstances are such that the crime must have been committed either by A, B, C or D. Every fact which shows that the crime could have been committed by no one else, and that it was not committed by either B, C or D, is relevant.

Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 23
The fact of which the court will take judicial notice under Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 23
Section 56 of the Indian Evidence Act lays that no fact of which the court will take judicial notice needs to be proved.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 24
The offence of destruction of electronic record to prevent its production as an evidence is punishable under Indian Penal Code, 1860 under:
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 24
The offence of destruction of electronic record to prevent its production as an evidence is punishable under Indian Penal Code, 1860 under Section 204.
The offence of giving false information in respect of an offence committed is punishable under Indian Penal Code, 1860 under Section 203.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 25
Which of the following factors separate robbery from dacoity?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 25
Where five or more persons had committed or attempted to commit a robbery, it is called dacoity.
A robbery is committed by one to four persons and having the ingredients of Section 389 is a robbery.
Th number of people separates the offence of robbery from dacoity.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 26
What was the motto for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and Paralympics?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 26
United by Emotion' was revealed as the motto for the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and Paralympics. The motto was be displayed on the iconic Tokyo Skytree, the Japanese capital's tallest landmark.
Some 10,000 athletes from over 200 countries gathered in Tokyo for the Olympics, which which ran from 23 July 2021 to 8 August 2021.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 27
Which article of the Constitution deals with definitions of various terms used in the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 27
Article 366 of the Indian Constitution defines all the major terms or phrases mentioned in the Constitution in order to avoid any sort of ambiguity in relation to understanding of the Indian Constitution.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 28
What is the maximum punishment of imprisonment which could be awarded by a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate under the provisions of the CrPC?
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 28
Section 29 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Chief Judicial Magistrate to impose an imprisonment up to 7 years, whereas the Judicial Magistrate of First Class can impose an imprisonment up to 3 years or fine up to 10,000/- or both.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 29
Cognizable offence has been defined
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 29
According to Section 2(c) of Cr.P.C., a cognizable offence means an offence for which, and cognizable case means a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the first Schedule or under any other law for the time being in force arrest without warrant.
Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 30
Naz Foundation' case is related to Constitutionality of:
Detailed Solution for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) - Question 30
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, introduced during British rule of India, criminalises 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature'. Naz Foundation appealed to the Supreme Court of India against the decision of the High Court to dismiss the petition on technical grounds. The question here was on the Constitutionality of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.
View more questions
Information about Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Uttar Pradesh Judicial Services Prelims Paper 2 Mock Test - 4 (Law), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams