All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test - Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 below.
Solutions of Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 | 200 questions in 120 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 1
Save

An agreement in connection with horse racing under Section 30 is

Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 1
Section 30 of the Indian Contract Act states that agreements by way of wager are void, but exception to the rule states that this section shall not be deemed to render unlawful a subscription or contribution or agreement to subscribe or contribute, made or entered into for or toward any plate, prize or sum of money, of value or amount of five hundred rupees or upwards, to be awarded to the winner or winners of any horse race.
So, an agreement in connection with horse racing under Section 30 is valid.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 2
Save

What is the difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code?

Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 2

Section 34 states as following: 'When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.'
Section 149 states as following: 'If an offence is committed by any member of an unlawful assembly in prosecution of the common object of that assembly, or such as the members of that assembly knew to be likely to be committed in prosecution of that object, every person who, at the time of the committing of that offence, is a member of the same assembly, is guilty of that offence.'
Therefore, it can be seen that Section 34 requires active participation in action whereas Section 149 requires mere passive membership of the unlawful assembly.

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 3
Save

Judgement on admission can be given under

Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 3
Order XII Rule 6 of Civil Procedure Code says that where admissions of fact have been made either in the pleading or otherwise, whether orally or in writing, the court may at any stage of the suit, either on the application of an party or of its own motion and without waiting for the determination of any other question between the parties, make such order or give such judgement as it may think fit, having regard to such admissions.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 4
Save
The word 'takes' in Section 361 of the IPC signifies
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 4
The word 'takes' in Section 361 of the IPC signifies physical taking.
Kidnapping from lawful guardianship: Whoever takes or entices any minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age if a female, or any person of unsound mind, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor or person of unsound mind, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 5
Save

Fill in the blank with the correct option.
Ours is the ___ house on the street.
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 5

Last' here tells the position of the house on the street.

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 6
Save
Mark the incorrect statement:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 6
Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure elaborates on the rejection of plaints in certain circumstances. It has mentioned certain grounds on the basis of which plaints are rejected by the courts. One of them is not mentioning the cause of action that the plaintiff seeks against the respondent. As per Order VII Rule 11(b), if the amount of compensation that is being demanded by the plaintiff is less than the requisite, the plaint can be rejected; it is the duty of the Court to return it to be filed in the proper court.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 7
Save
The period of limitation for a review of the judgement is:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 7
As per Article 124 of the Schedule in the Act, the review application shall be filed within 30 days from the day the judgement or order was passed. And for appeal against any sentence or judgement in High court, it shall be filed within 60 days from the day of judgement. For the appeal against the death sentence or capital punishment, the limitation period is 30 days from the passing of order.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 8
Save
Which among the following roped in Bollywood actors Vijay Raaz and Varun Sharma as brand ambassadors in 2021?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 8
Bollywood actors Vijay Raaz and Varun Sharma were named as brand ambassadors for EaseMyTrip.com (Easy Trip Planners Limited), an online travel company based in India. EaseMyTrip, founded by Nishant Pitti and Rikant Pitti in 2008, was started as the Business-to-Business (B2B) portal and entered into the Business-to-Consumer (B2C) segment in 2011.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 9
Save
The defendant wants to file an application under Section 152 CPC to contract an accidental slip in a judgement. It should be filed
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 9
Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgements, decrees or orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission may at any time be corrected by the Court either of its own motion or on the application of any of the parties.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 10
Save
The maxim 'ignorantia juris non excusat' means ignorance of
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 10
Ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat is a legal principle holding that a person, who is unaware of a law, may not escape liability for violating that law merely because one was unaware of its content. Therefore, ignorance of law is no excuse is the right answer.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 11
Save
Culpable homicide is causing death
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 11
Section 299 defines culpable homicide as whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide.
Thus, all of the above is suitable.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 12
Save
Which of the following is/are grounds for condonation of delay?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 12
Under Law of Limitation, condonation of delay is the extension of the prescribed period in certain cases. Courts require to be convinced with a sufficient cause in order to get the condonation of delay. Some reasons for considering (or not considering) for the condonation include the following.
1. Illness: It includes nature and magnitude of illness and facts surrounding the inability to act.
2. Imprisonment: Mere imprisonment is not a sufficient cause. Other reasons should satisfy a court.
3. Other insufficient grounds: Poverty, parda nashin lady, minors, ignorance of law, negligence (vigilantibus non dormantibus jura subvenient), mistake of court, mislead by rulings, mistake of counsel, mistake of law, delay in obtaining copies etc.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 13
Save
Which of the following Constitutional Articles mentions about transfer of certain cases to the Supreme Court?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 13
Article 139A of the Constitution of India states provision for transfer of certain cases to the Supreme Court. Where cases involving the same or substantially the same questions of law are pending before the Supreme Court and one or more High Courts or before two or more High Courts and the Supreme Court is satisfied on its own motion or an application made by the Attorney General of India or by a party to any such case that such questions are substantial questions of general importance, the Supreme Court may withdraw the case or cases pending before the High Court or the High Courts and dispose of all the cases itself: Provided that the Supreme Court may after determining the said questions of law return any case so withdrawn together with a copy of its judgment on such questions to the High Court from which the case has been withdrawn, and the High Court shall on receipt thereof, proceed to dispose of the case in conformity with such judgment.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 14
Save
A sues B for Rs. 1,000, which, A alleges, is borrowed by B. A shows entry in his books of a/c showing B to be indebted to prove the debt. This entry is
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 14
Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that: Entries in books of accounts including those maintained in an electronic form, regularly kept in the course of business, are relevant whenever they refer to a matter into which the Court has to inquire, but such statements shall not alone be sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability.
Therefore, in this case, the entries are relevant but not sufficient, without other evidence, to prove the debt.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 15
Save
Which Pakistani batsman became the quickest player to reach 1000 runs in ODI?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 15
Pakistan's Fakhar Zaman becomes fastest player to reach 1000 runs in ODIs. Zaman made his ODI debut just over a year ago in the ICC Champions Trophy 2017.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 16
Save

The blanks in the following sentences can be most appropriately filled with
i. A dispute arose ________ the shopkeeper and the customer.
ii. The four sisters quarreled ______ themselves.
iii. The book was kept on the table _______ the bed.
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 16

For two objects, we use 'between' and for more than two objects, we use 'among'.
So, 'between' fills the first blank correctly and 'among' fills the second blank correctly.
Only one option has both of these correct.
So, the correct answer is 'between; among; beside'.

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 17
Save
Justice Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan was sworn in as the first Chief Justice of which court?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 17
Justice Thottathil Bhaskaran Nair Radhakrishnan was sworn in as the first Chief Justice of the Telangana High Court on January 1, 2019. Prior to this, Justice Radhakrishnan had been serving as the Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for both Telangana and Andhra Pradesh.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 18
Save
The Supreme Court, in Sher Singh @ Partapa v. State of Haryana, held that the prosecution can discharge the initial burden to prove the ingredients of which of the following sections of the IPC even by preponderance of probabilities?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 18
The Supreme Court, in Sher Singh @ Partapa v. State of Haryana, held that the prosecution can discharge the initial burden to prove the ingredients of Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, even by preponderance of probabilities. Section 304B of the IPC deals with the presumption of dowry death. It states:
'Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or har­assment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called dowry death, and such husband or relative shall be deemed to have caused her death. The burden of proof that the death was not caused in connection with dowry demand shall be on the husband or relative of the husband.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 19
Save
The offence of voyeurism is punishable under:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 19
As per Section 354C of Indian Penal Code, "Any man who watches, or captures the image of a woman engaging in a private act in circumstances where she would usually have the expectation of not being observed either by the perpetrator or by any other person at the behest of the perpetrator or disseminates such image, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year, but which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine, and be punished on a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than three years, but which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine."
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 20
Save
If after service of summons, the defendant appears but does not file the written statement within the prescribed time and right to file written statement is closed,
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 20
Order VIII Rule 10 says, "Where any party from whom a written statement is required under Rule 1 or Rule 9 fails to present the same within the time permitted or fixed by the court, as the case may be, the court shall pronounce judgement against him, or make such order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit and on the pronouncement of such judgement, a decree shall be drawn up."
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 21
Save
Where a suit is withdrawn by the plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC,
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 21
Order XXIII Rule 1A of the CPC says, "Where a suit is withdrawn or abandoned by a plaintiff under Rule 1, any of the defendants thereto can apply to be transposed as plaintiff only if satisfies the court, that the conditions under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and further that the said defendant has a substantial question to be decided against any of the other defendants."
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 22
Save
Right to lodge a 'caveat' has been provided under which Section of the Code of Civil Procedure?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 22
A caveat is a right given to a person in civil proceedings to avoid ex-parte orders or judgments. A notice is given asking the Court not to act in any manner without informing the person who gave such a notice. Under the Civil Procedure Court, the provision of caveat is dealt within Section 148A. According to Section 148A, a caveat can also be filed by a third party as well, if they in, any manner, are connected to the suit in question.
As provided by the sub-section (5), the caveat stays in force for a period of 90 days.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 23
Save
Under the Indian Penal Code, if the offence is punishable with fine only and the accused has been awarded with fifty rupees fine, the period of imprisonment in default shall be:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 23
According to Section 67 of the Indian Penal Code, if the offence be punishable with fine only, the imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of the fine shall be simple, and the term for which the Court directs the offender to be imprisoned, in default of payment of fine, shall not exceed the following scale, that is to say, for any term not exceeding two months when the amount of the fine shall not exceed fifty rupees, and for any term not exceeding four months when the amount shall not exceed one hundred rupees, and for any term not exceeding six months in any other case.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 24
Save
`A` faced trial for cheating `Z` by dishonestly inducing him to lend money by knowingly pledging fake diamonds. `Z` died during trial and was survived by a son `X`. `X` moved an application in the Trial Court to compound the offence. Which of the following is the correct legal preposition?
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 24
See Section 320 of Cr.P.C.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 25
Save
In case of breach of any of the terms on which temporary injunction was granted, the court may order
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 25
Order 39 Rule 2A CPC clearly provides that in such situation detention in civil prision cannot exceed three months and so cannot be for 'indefinite period' and futher, that the amount payable as compensation has to be determined and balance paid back to the party in default. Hence, it is not rule that entire sale proceeds must necessarily be paid as compensation.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 26
Save
The term consensus ad idem means
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 26
ad idem means to agree on the same thing with same sense.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 27
Save
Inadequacy of consideration is relevant in determining the question of
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 27
Explanation 2 of Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 28
Save

A suit to set aside a transfer of property made by the guardian of a ward, by the ward who has attained majority, can be filed within three years (Art. 60 (1) of Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963) from when the
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 28

Article 60(1) of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 29
Save
Which of the following writs can be sought to be issued to quash unconstitutional appointment to a public office:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 29
See any treaties on writs e.g., M.P. Jain Indian Constitutional Law, 6th edn., pp.462-4.
Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 30
Save
X' installed a live-naked wire in a drain between his field and that of the neighbour with an intention of preventing animals from entering his field. The neighbour was electrocuted and he died. 'X' has committed an offence under Section:
Detailed Solution for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 - Question 30
The relevant section is Section 304 Part II of the IPC, which deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder but done with the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. In this case, 'X' did not intend to cause the death of the neighbour, but his actions were likely to cause death, and he had knowledge of this risk.
Section 304 Part II IPC is applicable when a person commits an act with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death but without the intention to cause death or grievous hurt. The punishment for an offence under this section is imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, or with fine, or with both.
View more questions
Information about Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4

Find all the important questions for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 resources.

Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Delhi Judicial Services Prelims Mock Test - 4 with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup