CLAT PG Exam  >  CLAT PG Test  >  Jurisprudence  >  Test: Definition and Nature of Law - CLAT PG MCQ

Definition and Nature of Law - Free MCQ Practice Test with solutions, CLAT


MCQ Practice Test & Solutions: Test: Definition and Nature of Law (15 Questions)

You can prepare effectively for CLAT PG Jurisprudence with this dedicated MCQ Practice Test (available with solutions) on the important topic of "Test: Definition and Nature of Law". These 15 questions have been designed by the experts with the latest curriculum of CLAT PG 2026, to help you master the concept.

Test Highlights:

  • - Format: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
  • - Duration: 25 minutes
  • - Number of Questions: 15

Sign up on EduRev for free to attempt this test and track your preparation progress.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 1

According to John Austin, law properly so-called is:

Detailed Solution: Question 1

Austin defines “law proper” as a sovereign’s command enforced by sanctions, distinguishing it from customs or moral rules.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 2

Austin excluded which of the following from the category of “law proper”?

Detailed Solution: Question 2

International law lacks a sovereign with coercive authority and is treated by Austin as “positive morality,” not law proper.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 3

The four essential elements of law in Austin’s theory are command, sovereign, duty, and:

Detailed Solution: Question 3

Sanction—an evil consequence for disobedience—is essential for a rule to qualify as “law proper” under Austin.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 4

Austin’s theory is criticised mainly because:

Detailed Solution: Question 4

Critics argue Austin overlooks judicial creativity, customary law, and modern complexities in sovereign authority.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 5

The greatest contribution of Austin’s command theory is that it:

Detailed Solution: Question 5

Austin’s framework laid foundational ideas for legal positivism and analytical jurisprudence, influencing Bentham and Hart.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 6

H.L.A. Hart criticised Austin’s theory primarily for:

Detailed Solution: Question 6

Hart argued that Austin’s model treats law like a gunman’s order—commands plus threats—failing to explain modern legal systems with rules, institutions, and continuity.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 7

The “rule of recognition” in Hart’s theory is:

Detailed Solution: Question 7

The rule of recognition provides the ultimate criteria for legal validity, accepted by officials within the system.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 8

According to Hart, the key difference between being “obliged” and having an “obligation” is:

Detailed Solution: Question 8

Being “obliged” arises from coercion, whereas “obligation” arises when rules are internally accepted as binding by officials.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 9

Hart’s theory explains the existence of which of the following that Austin’s theory could not?

Detailed Solution: Question 9

Secondary rules—especially the rule of recognition—explain how constitutional rules constrain legislators, something Austin’s sovereign theory cannot account for.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 10

Hart’s concept of law is best described as:

Detailed Solution: Question 10

Hart’s central thesis is that legal systems are a union of primary and secondary rules, making them more complex than mere commands backed by threats.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 11

According to Salmond, law is:

Detailed Solution: Question 11

Salmond defines law as principles enforced by the State through courts, placing emphasis on administration of justice as the core of law.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 12

Savigny’s concept of “Volksgeist” refers to:

Detailed Solution: Question 12

“Volksgeist” represents the collective national spirit from which law organically grows according to Savigny.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 13

The Historical School of Savigny is primarily opposed to:

Detailed Solution: Question 13

Savigny rejected premature codification, arguing that law must evolve naturally with societal development.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 14

Which statement correctly distinguishes Salmond and Savigny?

Detailed Solution: Question 14

Salmond belongs to the analytical school (law as state-enforced rules), while Savigny views law as an organic, historical product of national consciousness.

Test: Definition and Nature of Law - Question 15

The greatest contribution of Savigny’s Historical School is:

Detailed Solution: Question 15

Savigny’s core insight is that law grows naturally from the traditions, customs, and spirit of the people, not through imposed legislation.

46 docs|16 tests
Information about Test: Definition and Nature of Law Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Definition and Nature of Law solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Definition and Nature of Law, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
46 docs|16 tests
Download as PDF