CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Test  >  Daily Passage Practice  >  Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - CLAT MCQ

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 MCQs & solutions Free


MCQ Practice Test & Solutions: Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 (10 Questions)

You can prepare effectively for CLAT Daily Passage Practice for CLAT with this dedicated MCQ Practice Test (available with solutions) on the important topic of "Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31". These 10 questions have been designed by the experts with the latest curriculum of CLAT 2026, to help you master the concept.

Test Highlights:

  • - Format: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
  • - Duration: 10 minutes
  • - Number of Questions: 10

Sign up on EduRev for free to attempt this test and track your preparation progress.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 1

What is the primary requirement to establish a claim of negligence in tort law?

Detailed Solution: Question 1

Negligence requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused legally compensable harm. The passage clearly outlines these essential elements. Intentional harm relates to intentional torts, a contract is not necessary, and financial loss alone is insufficient unless linked to a breached duty.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 2

In the scenario, what defense might Arjun use to reduce his liability?

Detailed Solution: Question 2

Arjun argues that Neha’s failure to wear a helmet and her inattention contributed to her injuries. This is the defense of contributory negligence, where the plaintiff’s own negligence reduces or limits recovery. The other options relate to different legal doctrines not applicable here.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 3

Which case mentioned in the passage established the neighbor principle?

Detailed Solution: Question 3

The passage explicitly states that Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) introduced the neighbor principle, which forms the foundation of the duty of care in negligence law.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 4

If Neha’s injuries were partly due to her failure to wear a helmet, how might the court apportion liability under Indian law?

Detailed Solution: Question 4

Indian courts apportion liability based on the degree of fault. If Neha’s negligence contributed to her injuries, Arjun’s liability may be reduced proportionately under the principle of contributory negligence.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 5

What role does the principle of res ipsa loquitur play in Arjun’s case?

Detailed Solution: Question 5

Res ipsa loquitur applies when the nature of the act itself implies negligence. If Arjun’s excessive speeding is inherently negligent, the burden shifts to him to prove he was not at fault.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 6

What tort is Kavita likely to claim against GreenFields for her crop failure?

Detailed Solution: Question 6

Kavita’s claim arises from contamination of her farmland, which interferes specifically with her use and enjoyment of her own property. This fits the definition of private nuisance, which affects an individual’s property rights rather than the community at large.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 7

What principle from M.C. Mehta v. Union of India applies to GreenFields’ liability?

Detailed Solution: Question 7

The passage explains that in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987), the Supreme Court imposed strict liability on industries engaged in hazardous activities. Therefore, GreenFields would be liable for harm caused by its effluents regardless of intention or negligence.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 8

What remedy did the Supreme Court order in Ratlam Municipality v. Vardichand?

Detailed Solution: Question 8

The passage clearly states that in Ratlam Municipality v. Vardichand (1980), the Supreme Court mandated the municipality to remedy the public nuisance caused by open drains in order to protect public health.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 9

If GreenFields proves compliance with regulatory permits, how might this affect its liability?

Detailed Solution: Question 9

Under strict liability, hazardous industries are responsible for harm regardless of intent or negligence. However, the passage mentions that defenses like statutory authority may mitigate damages, meaning liability may be reduced but not completely removed.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 - Question 10

What broader issue does the scenario highlight in Indian tort law?

Detailed Solution: Question 10

The passage concludes by emphasizing the tension between rapid industrial growth and sustainable development goals. This reflects the broader issue in Indian tort law of balancing economic progress with environmental protection and ecological justice.

365 tests
Information about Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Jan 31, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF