Explore Exams
Login Signup
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Test  >  Daily Passage Practice  >  Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - CLAT MCQ

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 MCQs & solutions Free


MCQ Practice Test & Solutions: Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 (5 Questions)

You can prepare effectively for CLAT Daily Passage Practice for CLAT with this dedicated MCQ Practice Test (available with solutions) on the important topic of "Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23". These 5 questions have been designed by the experts with the latest curriculum of CLAT 2026, to help you master the concept.

Test Highlights:

  • - Format: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
  • - Duration: 10 minutes
  • - Number of Questions: 5

Sign up on EduRev for free to attempt this test and track your preparation progress.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - Question 1
Save

In the context of a politician named Mohan, who made a speech during an election rally containing derogatory remarks about a specific religious community's practices, potentially inciting hatred and enmity, the police filed an FIR against him under Section 153A of the IPC. Mohan argued in his defense that his speech was based on historical facts and that he was exercising his right to free speech under the Indian Constitution. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the legal situation?

Detailed Solution: Question 1

According to the passage, Section 153A of the IPC criminalizes the promotion of enmity between groups of people based on factors like religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and actions that disrupt communal harmony. Intent plays a vital role in this offense. While truth can be used as a defense to some extent, it may not provide absolute protection under Section 153A. Additionally, the right to free speech under the Indian Constitution is not absolute and can be restricted in the interest of public order, decency, or morality. Therefore, the correct answer is C.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - Question 2
Save

In a scenario involving Rakesh, a member of a political party, who delivered a speech at a public gathering containing imputations and assertions about a specific community that could potentially generate prejudice and hostility towards that community, an FIR was filed against Rakesh under Section 153B of the IPC. However, Rakesh's speech did not specifically target any individual within the community; rather, it pertained to the community as a whole. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the legal situation?

Detailed Solution: Question 2

According to the passage, Section 153B of the IPC criminalizes imputations and assertions made through speech that are directed towards certain members of a group due to their membership in a particular community, and these assertions are prejudicial to national integration. The speech doesn't have to target a specific individual but can be directed at a group of people belonging to a specific community. While truth may be a defense in some cases, it might not provide absolute protection under Section 153B. Moreover, the intention to foster prejudice and hostility towards a community is a crucial element in this offense, and mens rea (guilty mind) needs to be proven for the offense to be established.
Hence, the correct answer is C.

Clear all your doubts with EduRev
Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - Question 3
Save

In a speech delivered at a political rally, Rajesh, a well-known politician, makes derogatory remarks about a specific religious community, potentially inciting violence against them. Even though no formal complaint is filed, the police take suo motu action against Rajesh under Section 153A of the IPC. In his defense, Rajesh argues that he was merely presenting factual information and did not intend to fuel enmity between different groups. Which of the following statements is accurate?

Detailed Solution: Question 3

Section 153A of the IPC criminalizes the promotion of hostility between groups based on factors like religion and race. The passage highlights that intention is a significant element in this offense, and mens rea (guilty mind) must be proven to establish the offense. In this case, Rajesh's derogatory remarks, even if rooted in what he claims are factual information, have the potential to incite violence against a religious community. Consequently, he can be held accountable for hate speech under Section 153A of the IPC, irrespective of whether he had the intention to promote enmity among groups.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - Question 4
Save

During a religious procession, a group of individuals from a particular community vandalizes a temple, causing significant damage to its structure. The police initiate suo motu action against these individuals under Section 295 of the IPC. The individuals argue that their actions were justified because the temple was constructed on land belonging to their community and was wrongfully acquired by the temple's trustees. Which of the following statements is accurate?

Detailed Solution: Question 4

Section 295 of the IPC deals with offenses related to injuring or defiling a place of worship with the intent to insult the religion of any class. While intention is an important factor, the passage doesn't provide explicit information about the individuals' intentions. However, if the individuals genuinely believed their actions were justified due to land ownership disputes, it may influence the legal assessment of their intent.

Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 - Question 5
Save

Based on the passage given, which of the following statements correctly explains the legal position regarding the liability of a public figure under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code for making a speech that accuses a particular community of fostering terrorism and leads to communal unrest?

Detailed Solution: Question 5

The public figure can be held liable under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code if their speech incites violence, regardless of their intent. This means that even if the public figure claims their speech was merely an opinion on national security, if it leads to communal unrest, they can still face legal consequences. The law focuses on the potential impact of the speech rather than the speaker's intentions.

365 tests
Join Course
Information about Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF

About this CLAT Practice Test

This test contains 5 MCQs on Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 with detailed solutions for each question. It is part of the Daily Passage Practice for CLAT course on EduRev, designed to align with the current CLAT syllabus. Each solution explains not just the correct answer but also gives you an understanding of the topic — not just to attempt the question but also help you prepare for the exam with practice.

Explore more CLAT Study Resources

If you found this Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Sep 23 MCQ Test helpful, you can further enhance your CLAT preparation with in-depth courses on EduRev, for all the subjects and topics available in Daily Passage Practice for CLAT course. The course offers:
  • Video Lectures: covering all the topics of Daily Passage Practice for CLAT
  • Notes for Revision: offering revision notes, important questions, summaries, flashcards, cheatsheets & more for CLAT preparation
  • MCQ Test: variety of questions as per the pattern of CLAT exam
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup