Daily Passage Test for CLAT - Oct 18 MCQs & solutions Free

Option (a) is correct because the passage states that “vehicle producers have to meet annual mandatory EPR targets for scrapping ELVs, covering all transport and nontransport vehicles,” with the only exceptions being specific agricultural vehicles, and that the scrapping obligations apply based solely on age criteria (transport vehicles older than 15 years and non-transport vehicles older than 20 years). This means Vidit Automotives is obligated to include all eligible vehicles in its scrapping target without subjective exclusions. Option (b) is incorrect because the rules do not permit any exclusion based on assessments of environmental harm beyond the stated statutory exceptions. Option (c) is incorrect as the obligation clearly applies to both transport and non-transport vehicles, not just one category. Option (d) is incorrect because the rules mandate scrapping under the EPR scheme and do not provide an alternative compliance mechanism based on environmental measures.

Option (b) is correct because the passage explicitly requires that RVSFs must ensure that all recovered and segregated materials are sent only to registered recyclers, refurbishers, or co-processors, and that any non-recyclable or hazardous waste is disposed of at designated TSDFs. Further the passage provides that State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) oversee RVSFs and bulk consumers and SPCBs may inspect, audit, suspend, or cancel registrations for non-compliance. Therefore there can be sanction upon RVSF for non-complaince. Vidya Scrap Facility’s failure to fully depollute ELVs, its diversion of materials to an unregistered recycler, and the improper disposal of hazardous waste clearly breach these requirements. Option (a) is incorrect as voluntary remedial plans do not retroactively validate non-compliant practices. Option (c) is incorrect because the rules do not provide for a leniency threshold based on repeated violations; any significant breach can trigger sanctions. Option (d) is incorrect because subsequent registration of the recycler or temporary waste disposal does not excuse the initial non-compliance mandated by the rules.

Option (a) is correct because the passage states that “Producers must establish Designated Collection Centres for ELV handling and ensure their transfer to RVSFs. The registered owner or bulk consumer mandatorily have to deposit the ELV at a designated sales outlet or Collection Centre. The Producers and registered owner or bulk consumer should ensure that ELVs reach the RVSF within 180 days of classification as an ELV. Both the entity should act within reasonable time so that both can perform their duly properly and timely. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitors compliance for producers, while State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) oversee RVSFs and registered owner or bulk consumers. CPCB and SPCBs may inspect, audit, suspend, award penalties or cancel registrations for negligent non-compliance. Since there was no negligence on the part of producer as the ELV was deposited to its centre after the prescribed time frame. Hence the producer cannot be made subject to penalties. Option (b) is incorrect because there is no facts which suggests wrong on the part of producer. Option (c) is incorrect as it provides an irrelevant fact. Option (d) is incorrect as though there is delay in deposit of ELV to RVSF, there is no negligence on the part of producer.

Option (b) is correct because the passage clearly mandates that “Producers must establish Designated Collection Centres for ELV handling and ensure their transfer to RVSFs. The registered owner or bulk consumer mandatorily have to deposit the ELV at a designated sales outlet or Collection Centre. The Producers and registered owner or bulk consumer should ensure that ELVs reach the RVSF within 180 days of classification as an ELV. Both the entity should act within reasonable time so that both can perform their duly properly and timely. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) monitors compliance for producers, while State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs) oversee RVSFs and registered owner or bulk consumers. CPCB and SPCBs may inspect, audit, suspend, award penalties or cancel registrations for negligent non-compliance; therefore, Vidya Motor Ltd’s failure to meet this deadline triggers regulatory sanctions. Option (a) is incorrect because the audit reveals that Vidya Motor Ltd’s designated collection centre in Pune experienced prolonged staffing shortages and there were no efforts on part of Vidya Motor Ltd to appoint the staff. Hence it cannot be said that it is unforeseen. Option (c) is incorrect since deferral of penalties is not contemplated by the rules. Option (d) is incorrect because the statutory obligation applies to every instance of delayed deposit, not only to systemic or repeated breaches.

Option (d) is correct because the Assertion is false: the Rules do not mandate EPR targets for every vehicle indiscriminately. Instead, the Rules impose scrapping obligations based on specific age criteria—transport vehicles must be older than 15 years and non-transport vehicles older than 20 years—and expressly exclude certain vehicles like agricultural tractors, trailers, combine harvesters, and power tillers. The Reason accurately reflects this selective application, making it true even though the Assertion is false.