FAQs on Roster System in the Supreme Court for Allotment of Cases

Question 1

1. What exactly is the roster system in the Supreme Court and how does it work for case allocation?

Accepted Answer

Ans. The roster system is the Supreme Court's mechanism for distributing cases among judges based on their expertise, workload, and availability. The Chief Justice or a designated administrative judge assigns cases to appropriate benches-single-judge, two-judge, or larger benches-depending on case complexity and constitutional significance. This systematic allocation ensures balanced caseload distribution and optimal utilisation of judicial resources.

Question 2

2. How are cases assigned to specific judges under the Supreme Court roster system?

Accepted Answer

Ans. Cases are assigned through a computerised roster that considers the subject matter jurisdiction, judge specialisation, and current pending cases. When a case is filed, the roster system automatically directs it to an available judge or bench with relevant expertise. This method prevents forum shopping and ensures impartial allocation while maintaining transparency in case distribution across all Supreme Court benches.

Question 3

3. Why does the Supreme Court use a roster system instead of allowing parties to choose their judges?

Accepted Answer

Ans. The roster system eliminates bias and prevents forum shopping-where parties manipulate case assignment to favour particular judges. By using objective, systematic allocation, the system ensures judicial impartiality, maintains public confidence in the court, and distributes workload equitably. This strengthens the integrity of Supreme Court proceedings and guarantees fair case management for all litigants.

Question 4

4. What's the difference between the original roster system and changes made to improve case allocation?

Accepted Answer

Ans. The original roster system relied on manual assignment, which was time-consuming and occasionally inconsistent. Modern improvements introduced computerised tracking and stricter allocation protocols to reduce delays and eliminate discretionary bias. These reforms enhanced transparency in case distribution, reduced pendency rates, and ensured judges receive cases aligned with their areas of specialisation and current workload.

Question 5

5. Can the roster system be challenged or modified for specific cases in the Supreme Court?

Accepted Answer

Ans. Parties cannot challenge routine roster assignments as the system operates under established judicial protocols and Chief Justice directives. However, the Chief Justice possesses discretionary powers to reassign cases in exceptional circumstances-such as judge recusal, conflict of interest, or cases requiring specialised benches. These limited exceptions maintain roster integrity while addressing extraordinary situations requiring judicial intervention.

Roster System in the Supreme Court for Allotment of Cases Video Lecture

Crash Course for CLAT

Revision

Mock Test & Practice

Main Subjects

Schools

Competitive Exams

Study Roster System in the Supreme Court for Allotment of Cases on the App