All questions of The Interview for NEET Exam

The American publisher thought that the novel The Name of the Rose won't sell in America because it was a country where nobody had seen a cathedral or studied Latin. The novel, however, sold two or three million copies in the U.S. Umberto Eco rightly pointed out that the success is a mystery.

Umberto Eco has manDenis Brain has appropriately said that almost everything reaches us through one man asking questions of another. Hence the interviewer holds a position of unprecedented power and influence. Every famous person has a right to his or her privacy. Interviewers sometimes embarrass celebrities with very personal questions.y philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

There is no one reason for the huge success of the novel “The Name of the Rose’. Umberto Eco himself calls its success a mystery. It is possible that this detective story that delved into metaphysics, theology and medieval history, interested the readers because the time in which it was written was most appropriate, neither a decade earlier nor a decade later.

Eco’s writing style was a personalised and interesting one, contrary to regular academic writings. In his writings, he told the story of his research, instead of simply presenting his research, which gave his academic writing a narrative quality.

Umberto Eco firstly considered himself as an academic scholar because he was a professor and wrote many academic texts while he wrote his first novel at the age of 50 accidently.

Some primitive cultures believed that photographing a person is no less than stealing his/her soul out of the body and rendering him incomplete and slighted.

Eco replies that just like the universe has empty spaces, our lives too, have a lot of empty spaces or 'interstices', as he calls them. Whenever he has a few moments to spare in between two different tasks, instead of wasting them, he uses the time to write.

Umberto Eco prefers himself to be called an academician rather than a novelist. He wrote more than 40 philosophical writings against just five novels. He started writing novels just by accident and that too at a late age of 50. Modesty and honesty are the signs of a great writer like Eco. Mukund Padmanabhan asks the reason behind the huge success of ‘The Name of the Rose’. Umberto honestly replies that the success of this novel is a mystery even to him. Perhaps, he wrote it at an appropriate time. Had it been written 10 years before or after, perhaps it wouldn’t have been such a huge success.

Umberto Eco feels elevated on calling him a professor. People think that he is doing many things but he concludes of doing himself the same thing. It is because that Umberto Eco had some philosophical interest which he followed in his novels and other academic work. His children books are based on peace and non-violence. There is a touch of philosophical and ethical interest as well.

He write the novels on sunday because he was free on that day. He think very much free on that day.

Umberto Eco’s famous novel ‘The Name of the Rose’ is a very ‘serious novel’ But it enjoyed a mass audience. The interviewer wants to know the reason of its huge success. Even journalists and publishers are puzzled. People like what is served to them. If they are given to read even serious novels, they will read them. They accepted and digested a serious novel like ‘The Name of the Rose’. Its ‘timing’ was perfect. About 10 to 15 million copies of the novel were sold.

Umberto Eco was essentially an academician who pursued his scholarly pursuits through academic writings. He wrote about forty non¬fictions and as he himself says, ‘he became a novelist by accident’. That was the reason he started writing novels at the age of almost fifty. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He is not even very sure about any one single reason for the huge success of his novel ‘The Name of the Rose’. He feels perhaps the timing of the novel’s publication was the most important factor of its success. The fact that at one level it appears to be a detective yarn but also delves into metaphysics, theology and medieval history also adds to its appeal. Though the novel is quite a heavy reading experience, it attracted a mass audience and made Eco popular more as a novelist rather than an academic scholar.

Umberto shares a secret with the interviewer. He thinks that if we eliminate the empty spaces from the universe, the world will shrink. It will become as big as a fist. Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces or ‘interstices’ in our lives. He works in these spaces and uses them to his advantage.

Umberto Eco has many philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

The Interview is an excerpt from Christopher's introduction to The Penguin Book of Interviews, which is a book of interviews compiled by Christopher Silvester.

Naipaul's feelings about interviews can be described as wounded. V.S. Naipaul, the Trinidadian-born British writer, was known for his reluctance to give interviews and his often contentious interactions with journalists. Throughout his career, Naipaul expressed a deep skepticism or even disdain for the interview process, which can be seen in his public statements and actions.

One of the reasons for Naipaul's wounded feelings towards interviews can be attributed to his belief that interviews were a superficial and insufficient medium for truly understanding his work and ideas. In his view, the complexity and nuance of his writing could not be adequately captured or conveyed in a brief interview. He felt that interviews tended to reduce his ideas to soundbites and oversimplified interpretations, which frustrated him.

Moreover, Naipaul often clashed with journalists during interviews due to his combative and confrontational style. He was known for his sharp and sometimes controversial opinions, which he did not hesitate to express. This led to numerous instances where Naipaul found himself engaged in heated exchanges with interviewers, further reinforcing his negative perception of the interview process.

Another factor that contributed to Naipaul's wounded feelings about interviews was the scrutiny and criticism he faced as a public figure. Naipaul was a highly acclaimed and influential writer, but his views on topics such as colonialism, race, and religion were often polarizing. As a result, interviews often became platforms for journalists to challenge or critique his ideas, which could be emotionally draining and hurtful for Naipaul.

Overall, Naipaul's wounded feelings about interviews can be attributed to his belief that they were inadequate for capturing the depth of his work, his confrontational interactions with journalists, and the scrutiny and criticism he faced as a public figure. These factors combined to create a negative perception of the interview process, leading to his reluctance and disdain for participating in them.

Umberto Eco points out towards empty space in this universe. According to him if the empty space is eliminated from the universe, and as well as from the atoms, this universe will turn as big as our fist. In the same way, our lives are full of empty spaces. Umberto Eco calls them interstices. Eco says: “ Suppose you are coming over to my place on the third floor. You are in an elevator from the first to third floor and I am waiting for you. This is an interstice.”

There are several celebrities mentioned in this chapter like Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, H.G. Wells, Saul Bellow and etc. who dislike interviews very strongly. They never became ready to be interviewed. Most of them considered interviews as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives. They did not want to reveal the secrets of their personal lives.

Author of the Lesson ‘The Interview’
The author of the lesson ‘The Interview’ is Christopher Silvester (1959).

Explanation:
The lesson 'The Interview' is a part of the English textbook for Class 12. The author of this lesson is Christopher Silvester (1959). Let's delve into more details about the author and his works.

About Christopher Silvester:
- Christopher Silvester is a British author and journalist born in 1959.
- He has written several books and articles on various subjects, including literature, politics, and travel.
- Silvester's works have been published in reputable newspapers and magazines such as The Guardian, The Independent, and The Spectator.
- He has also authored books like 'The Penguin Book of Interviews' and 'Christopher Silvester's Guide to the London Literary World'.
- Silvester is known for his expertise in conducting interviews and his ability to capture the essence of the interviewees' personalities and experiences.

Importance of ‘The Interview’ Lesson:
- 'The Interview' is a lesson that focuses on the art of interviewing and its significance in the field of journalism.
- It provides insights into the techniques, challenges, and ethical considerations involved in conducting interviews.
- The lesson presents various interview scenarios and analyzes the different approaches taken by journalists.
- It also explores the impact of interviews on interviewees and the responsibility of the interviewer to portray their subjects accurately and fairly.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, Christopher Silvester (1959) is the author of the lesson 'The Interview'. His expertise in conducting interviews and his extensive writing experience contribute to the lesson's significance in understanding the art of interviewing in journalism.

In his interview with Mukand Padmanabhan, Umberto Eco points out that he is a university professor who writes novels on Sundays. Though he readily participates in academic conferences but he has no interest to attend to the meetings of Pen Clubs and the writers. He is very much clear about himself and identifies himself with the academic community. One can estimate that Eco is a modest cooperative and firm in his convictions. He does not call himself a successful novelist. Through his interview with Mukund we get aspects of his writings, style and ideas. Even then most of the people take him to be a novelist because of the huge success of his novel “The Name of the Rose” yet he remains committed to his regular professional academic work. In his novels for children one can find non-violence and peace.

Interview is considered as a reliable source of truth. Contemporaries and their success can be read through the interviews. A very important part of journalism is interview now a days.

The interview held between Eco and Padamnabhan reveals several facts about Padamnabhan's career and interests. Let's go through each option and see which facts are being showcased in the interview.

a) He takes pride in being an academician, a university Professor first:
In the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he has been a professor for many years and still teaches at the university. He emphasizes the importance of being an academician and mentions that he takes pride in his profession. This indicates that being an academician and a university professor is his primary focus and priority.

b) Being a novelist is a secondary thing for him:
Padamnabhan mentions that writing novels is something he does in his free time. It is not his main profession or source of income. This suggests that being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him, and his primary focus is on his academic career.

c) He uses his free time for writing novels:
During the interview, Padamnabhan mentions that he writes novels in his spare time. He explains that he enjoys writing and finds it to be a creative outlet. This indicates that he utilizes his free time for writing novels, further highlighting that it is not his primary occupation.

d) All these:
Based on the information provided in the interview, all of the above facts are being showcased. Padamnabhan takes pride in being an academician and a university professor first, and being a novelist is a secondary pursuit for him. He uses his free time for writing novels as a creative outlet. Therefore, option D is the correct answer as it encompasses all the facts mentioned in the interview.

Introduction:
Most celebrity writers despise being interviewed because of the unwarranted intrusion in their life. This intrusion often leads to their privacy being hurt. This answer will explain in detail why being interviewed is despised by celebrity writers.

Unwanted Intrusion:
When celebrities become writers, they are often interviewed by journalists who want to know more about their personal lives and experiences. These interviews can delve into personal and sensitive topics that the celebrities may not be comfortable discussing publicly. The intrusion into their personal space can be overwhelming and invasive, making them despise the entire interview process.

Limited Control over Narrative:
During interviews, celebrities may find themselves at the mercy of the journalist's agenda. They often have limited control over the narrative that is being presented to the public. Journalists have the power to shape the story and emphasize certain aspects while downplaying or omitting others. This lack of control can be frustrating for celebrity writers who may feel misrepresented or misunderstood.

Pervasive Public Scrutiny:
Celebrity writers already face a significant amount of public scrutiny due to their fame. Being interviewed further exposes them to judgment and criticism from the public. The fear of being misquoted or having their words taken out of context adds to their apprehension towards interviews. The constant scrutiny can be mentally and emotionally exhausting, leading to a disdain for being interviewed.

Privacy Concerns:
Privacy is a major concern for celebrity writers. Being in the public eye already means that aspects of their personal lives are often exposed. Interviews can further infringe upon their privacy as journalists dig for sensational or intimate details. Celebrity writers value their privacy and may despise interviews because they feel it violates their right to keep certain aspects of their lives private.

Maintaining Authenticity:
Celebrity writers may also despise interviews because they feel it hinders their ability to maintain authenticity. The pressure to be interesting or captivating during interviews can lead to a sense of performance rather than genuine expression. This can be frustrating for writers who value sincerity in their work and prefer to let their writing speak for itself.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, most celebrity writers despise being interviewed due to the unwanted intrusion in their life and the subsequent hurt to their privacy. The lack of control over the narrative, pervasive public scrutiny, and concerns about maintaining authenticity further contribute to their disdain for interviews.

The expression 'thumbprints on his windpipe' means an aggressive invasion into the private views and utterances of the interviewee, ft is also suggestive of answers being forced out of the person who is being interviewed.

Interview is a medium of interaction and introspection. It is a structured conversation between two or more people with the purpose of gathering information, sharing ideas, and evaluating the qualifications of the interviewee.

Importance of Interviews:
- Interaction: Interviews allow for direct interaction between the interviewer and interviewee, enabling a deeper understanding of the individual's thoughts, experiences, and qualifications.
- Information Gathering: Interviews are a valuable tool for gathering information, insights, and perspectives on a particular topic or individual.
- Assessment: Interviews help assess the skills, knowledge, and suitability of a candidate for a job, program, or any other opportunity.
- Introspection: Interviews also provide an opportunity for self-reflection and introspection, as individuals may be asked to reflect on their experiences, strengths, weaknesses, and goals.

Types of Interviews:
- Job Interviews: Conducted by employers to evaluate a candidate's qualifications for a specific job role.
- Journalistic Interviews: Conducted by journalists to gather information for news articles, reports, or broadcasts.
- Research Interviews: Conducted by researchers to gather data for studies, surveys, or academic research.
- Panel Interviews: Involving multiple interviewers to assess a candidate from different perspectives.
- Virtual Interviews: Conducted remotely using video conferencing tools, especially in situations where in-person meetings are not feasible.
In conclusion, interviews serve as a crucial medium for communication, information exchange, evaluation, and self-reflection. It is a valuable tool in various fields such as recruitment, journalism, research, and personal development.