All Exams > UPSC > Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos > All Questions
All questions of Political Dynamics for UPSC CSE Exam
Communalism in Indian context means: - a)Serving the community in a befitting manner
- b)Using communal identity for political gains
- c)A group of people bound by ethnic feelings
- d)Creating friendly relations with the other communities
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Communalism in Indian context means:
a)
Serving the community in a befitting manner
b)
Using communal identity for political gains
c)
A group of people bound by ethnic feelings
d)
Creating friendly relations with the other communities
 | Minakshi Shivsharan answered |
Option no.b
Disqualification on the ground of defection for a Member of Parliament will not apply: - a)In case of a split in the original political party to which he is elected
- b)If he has voluntarily given up his membership of the political party.
- c)If he abstains from voting in the house contrary to the direction of the political party.
- d)If a nominated member of a House joins a political party after six months.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Disqualification on the ground of defection for a Member of Parliament will not apply:
a)
In case of a split in the original political party to which he is elected
b)
If he has voluntarily given up his membership of the political party.
c)
If he abstains from voting in the house contrary to the direction of the political party.
d)
If a nominated member of a House joins a political party after six months.
 | Priya Sengupta answered |
Disqualification on the ground of defection for a Member of Parliament will not apply if he goes out of his party as a result of a merger of the party with another party. This exemption is provided under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, which deals with anti-defection laws.
Explanation:
- The Tenth Schedule was added to the Constitution in 1985 to address the issue of political defections, which were seen as a threat to the stability of government.
- The Schedule lays down the procedure for disqualification of Members of Parliament and State Legislatures on the grounds of defection.
- Defection is defined as voluntarily giving up the membership of a political party or disobeying the directives of the party leadership on a vote in the house.
- However, there are certain exceptions to the rule of disqualification on the grounds of defection. One such exception is provided under clause (4) of the Schedule, which states that a member shall not be disqualified if he goes out of his party as a result of a merger of the party with another party.
- This means that if a political party merges with another party and a member of that party decides to join the new merged party, he will not be disqualified for defection under the Schedule.
- This exception is based on the rationale that if two parties merge, the resulting new party is essentially a continuation of the old parties and the members of the old parties should not be penalized for joining the new party.
- However, this exemption is subject to certain conditions, such as the merger must be approved by at least two-thirds of the members of the original party and the member must not hold any office in the new party other than that of a mere member.
- Therefore, if a member of parliament goes out of his party as a result of a merger with another party, he will not be disqualified for defection under the Tenth Schedule.
Explanation:
- The Tenth Schedule was added to the Constitution in 1985 to address the issue of political defections, which were seen as a threat to the stability of government.
- The Schedule lays down the procedure for disqualification of Members of Parliament and State Legislatures on the grounds of defection.
- Defection is defined as voluntarily giving up the membership of a political party or disobeying the directives of the party leadership on a vote in the house.
- However, there are certain exceptions to the rule of disqualification on the grounds of defection. One such exception is provided under clause (4) of the Schedule, which states that a member shall not be disqualified if he goes out of his party as a result of a merger of the party with another party.
- This means that if a political party merges with another party and a member of that party decides to join the new merged party, he will not be disqualified for defection under the Schedule.
- This exception is based on the rationale that if two parties merge, the resulting new party is essentially a continuation of the old parties and the members of the old parties should not be penalized for joining the new party.
- However, this exemption is subject to certain conditions, such as the merger must be approved by at least two-thirds of the members of the original party and the member must not hold any office in the new party other than that of a mere member.
- Therefore, if a member of parliament goes out of his party as a result of a merger with another party, he will not be disqualified for defection under the Tenth Schedule.
Which of the following are the true functions of the electoral process in a democracy like India? - To keep the government responsive to the popular will
- To bring together citizens to choose public decision makers
- To change the government periodically if necessary
- To support a competitive party system
Select the correct answer from the codes given below:- a)1 and 2
- b)1, 2 and 3
- c)1, 3 and 4
- d)2, 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are the true functions of the electoral process in a democracy like India?
- To keep the government responsive to the popular will
- To bring together citizens to choose public decision makers
- To change the government periodically if necessary
- To support a competitive party system
Select the correct answer from the codes given below:
a)
1 and 2
b)
1, 2 and 3
c)
1, 3 and 4
d)
2, 3 and 4
 | Ravi Sharma answered |
The nature of democracy is that elected officials are accountable to the people, and they must return to the voters at prescribed intervals to seek their mandate to continue in office. For that reason most democratic constitutions provide that elections are held at fixed regular intervals.
Which one of the following statements is not an explanation of the general characteristics of a pressure group? - a)A major objective of a pressure group is to acquire, consolidate and extend political power.
- b)A pressure group aims at projecting and fulfilling specific interests.
- c)A pressure group seeks to influence decision-makers in a manner favourable to its specific interests.
- d)A pressure group is generally too limited in its organisation and goals to be mistaken for a bonafide political party.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following statements is not an explanation of the general characteristics of a pressure group?
a)
A major objective of a pressure group is to acquire, consolidate and extend political power.
b)
A pressure group aims at projecting and fulfilling specific interests.
c)
A pressure group seeks to influence decision-makers in a manner favourable to its specific interests.
d)
A pressure group is generally too limited in its organisation and goals to be mistaken for a bonafide political party.
 | Simran Mehta answered |
Explanation of the correct answer:
Pressure groups are not primarily focused on acquiring, consolidating, and extending political power. Their main goal is to influence decision-makers in favor of their specific interests rather than seeking political power for themselves. Here's a breakdown of the characteristics of a pressure group:
A major objective of a pressure group is to acquire, consolidate and extend political power:
- Pressure groups do not aim to acquire political power themselves but rather seek to influence those in power to align with their interests.
- They often use various tactics such as lobbying, public campaigns, and advocacy to achieve their goals.
A pressure group aims at projecting and fulfilling specific interests:
- Pressure groups represent specific interests such as environmental protection, labor rights, or business interests.
- They work to advance these interests through influencing policy decisions and shaping public opinion.
A pressure group seeks to influence decision-makers in a manner favorable to its specific interests:
- The main purpose of a pressure group is to influence policymakers, lawmakers, and other decision-makers to support their causes.
- They use various strategies to make their voices heard and push for policies that benefit their members or constituents.
A pressure group is generally too limited in its organization and goals to be mistaken for a bonafide political party:
- Pressure groups are usually focused on specific issues or interests and do not have the broad platform or goals of a political party.
- They do not seek to govern or hold political office but rather work to influence the political process from the outside.
Pressure groups are not primarily focused on acquiring, consolidating, and extending political power. Their main goal is to influence decision-makers in favor of their specific interests rather than seeking political power for themselves. Here's a breakdown of the characteristics of a pressure group:
A major objective of a pressure group is to acquire, consolidate and extend political power:
- Pressure groups do not aim to acquire political power themselves but rather seek to influence those in power to align with their interests.
- They often use various tactics such as lobbying, public campaigns, and advocacy to achieve their goals.
A pressure group aims at projecting and fulfilling specific interests:
- Pressure groups represent specific interests such as environmental protection, labor rights, or business interests.
- They work to advance these interests through influencing policy decisions and shaping public opinion.
A pressure group seeks to influence decision-makers in a manner favorable to its specific interests:
- The main purpose of a pressure group is to influence policymakers, lawmakers, and other decision-makers to support their causes.
- They use various strategies to make their voices heard and push for policies that benefit their members or constituents.
A pressure group is generally too limited in its organization and goals to be mistaken for a bonafide political party:
- Pressure groups are usually focused on specific issues or interests and do not have the broad platform or goals of a political party.
- They do not seek to govern or hold political office but rather work to influence the political process from the outside.
In which of the following years, was the National Integration Council constituted first? - a)1950
- b)1956
- c)1961
- d)1963
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
In which of the following years, was the National Integration Council constituted first?
a)
1950
b)
1956
c)
1961
d)
1963
 | Utkarsh Joshi answered |
The National Integration Council (NIC) was constituted in 1961, following a decision taken at a national conference on ‘unity in diversity’, convened by the Central government, at New Delhi.
Which of the following problems is not considered or confronted by the National Integration Council?- a)Linguism
- b)Casteism
- c)Cyber-security threat
- d)Threat of regional violence
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following problems is not considered or confronted by the National Integration Council?
a)
Linguism
b)
Casteism
c)
Cyber-security threat
d)
Threat of regional violence
| | Devanshi Choudhury answered |
The correct answer is option 'C', which states that cyber-security threat is not considered or confronted by the National Integration Council. The National Integration Council (NIC) is a government body in India that aims to address and resolve issues related to the integration of diverse communities and regions of the country. It was established in 1961 and consists of representatives from political parties, religious groups, academia, and civil society.
Linguism:
Linguism refers to discrimination or prejudice based on language. In a country as linguistically diverse as India, where multiple languages are spoken, language-based discrimination can be a significant challenge to national integration. The National Integration Council recognizes the importance of addressing linguism and works towards promoting harmony and equality among different linguistic communities.
Casteism:
Casteism is a social issue deeply rooted in the Indian society, where individuals are discriminated against based on their caste. The caste system has been a long-standing challenge to national integration, as it creates social divisions and hinders the progress and unity of the country. The National Integration Council recognizes the importance of eradicating casteism and works towards creating a more inclusive and equal society.
Threat of Regional Violence:
The threat of regional violence refers to conflicts and tensions between different regions or states within the country. Regionalism can sometimes lead to violence and disruption of peace, which poses a challenge to national integration. The National Integration Council aims to address and resolve such regional tensions through dialogue, negotiation, and policy interventions.
Cyber-security Threat:
Cyber-security threats, on the other hand, are not directly related to national integration. While cyber-security is an important issue for the overall security and well-being of the nation, it is not specifically within the purview of the National Integration Council. Cyber-security threats are typically addressed by specialized agencies and departments, such as the Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, and various law enforcement agencies.
In conclusion, the National Integration Council primarily focuses on addressing issues related to linguism, casteism, and the threat of regional violence. While cyber-security is an important concern, it falls under the domain of specialized agencies and departments rather than the National Integration Council.
Linguism:
Linguism refers to discrimination or prejudice based on language. In a country as linguistically diverse as India, where multiple languages are spoken, language-based discrimination can be a significant challenge to national integration. The National Integration Council recognizes the importance of addressing linguism and works towards promoting harmony and equality among different linguistic communities.
Casteism:
Casteism is a social issue deeply rooted in the Indian society, where individuals are discriminated against based on their caste. The caste system has been a long-standing challenge to national integration, as it creates social divisions and hinders the progress and unity of the country. The National Integration Council recognizes the importance of eradicating casteism and works towards creating a more inclusive and equal society.
Threat of Regional Violence:
The threat of regional violence refers to conflicts and tensions between different regions or states within the country. Regionalism can sometimes lead to violence and disruption of peace, which poses a challenge to national integration. The National Integration Council aims to address and resolve such regional tensions through dialogue, negotiation, and policy interventions.
Cyber-security Threat:
Cyber-security threats, on the other hand, are not directly related to national integration. While cyber-security is an important issue for the overall security and well-being of the nation, it is not specifically within the purview of the National Integration Council. Cyber-security threats are typically addressed by specialized agencies and departments, such as the Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, and various law enforcement agencies.
In conclusion, the National Integration Council primarily focuses on addressing issues related to linguism, casteism, and the threat of regional violence. While cyber-security is an important concern, it falls under the domain of specialized agencies and departments rather than the National Integration Council.
Who was the Chairman of the National Integration Council that was reconstituted in 2010?- a)Manmohan Singh
- b)Sonia Gandhi
- c)Rajnath Singh
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the Chairman of the National Integration Council that was reconstituted in 2010?
a)
Manmohan Singh
b)
Sonia Gandhi
c)
Rajnath Singh
d)
None of the above
| | Ritika Choudhury answered |
In April 2010 the council was reconstituted with 147 members, again chaired by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.The fifteenth meeting was scheduled in Delhi for 10 September 2011. The agenda included discussion of measures to eliminate discrimination, promote communal harmony and curb communalism and communal violence.
Which one of the following is the primary purpose of a pressure group? - a)To criticise the government
- b)To contest the elections
- c)To formulate policy
- d)To bring pressure on government to influence policy decision
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following is the primary purpose of a pressure group?
a)
To criticise the government
b)
To contest the elections
c)
To formulate policy
d)
To bring pressure on government to influence policy decision
 | Ojasvi Mehta answered |
The pressure groups influence the policymaking and policy implementation in the government through legal and legitimate methods like lobbying, correspondence, publicity, propagandising, petitioning, public debating, maintaining contacts with their legislators and so forth.
Which of the following are the principles of the Panchsheel? - Peaceful co-existence
- Mutual protection of the environment
- Mutual protection of indigenous population
- Mutual non-aggression
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:- a)2 and 3
- b)1 and 2
- c)1, 2 and 4
- d)1 and 4
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following are the principles of the Panchsheel?
- Peaceful co-existence
- Mutual protection of the environment
- Mutual protection of indigenous population
- Mutual non-aggression
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
a)
2 and 3
b)
1 and 2
c)
1, 2 and 4
d)
1 and 4
 | Kavita Mehta answered |
The five principles were:
(i) mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty;
(ii) non-aggression;
(iii) non-interference in each other’s internal affairs;
(iv) equality and mutual benefit; and
(v) peaceful co-existence
(i) mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty;
(ii) non-aggression;
(iii) non-interference in each other’s internal affairs;
(iv) equality and mutual benefit; and
(v) peaceful co-existence
About the registration of political parties in India, consider the following statements:1. All political parties must register themselves with the Election Commission.
2. Not all parties that are registered with the Election Commission are recognized by it.
3. The registered parties will get unique symbols.
4. The registered parties are entitled to free broadcasting or telecasting facilities.Select the correct answers using the codes below- a)2 and 4
- b)1 and 3
- c)1, 3 and 4
- d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
About the registration of political parties in India, consider the following statements:
1. All political parties must register themselves with the Election Commission.
2. Not all parties that are registered with the Election Commission are recognized by it.
3. The registered parties will get unique symbols.
4. The registered parties are entitled to free broadcasting or telecasting facilities.
2. Not all parties that are registered with the Election Commission are recognized by it.
3. The registered parties will get unique symbols.
4. The registered parties are entitled to free broadcasting or telecasting facilities.
Select the correct answers using the codes below
a)
2 and 4
b)
1 and 3
c)
1, 3 and 4
d)
1, 2, 3 and 4
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- Every party in the country has to register with the Election Commission. While the Commission treats all parties equally, it offers some special facilities to large and established parties.
- These parties are given a unique symbol - only the official candidates of that party can use that election symbol. Parties that get this privilege and some other special facilities are ‘recognised’ by the Election Commission for this purpose. That is why these parties are called, ‘recognised political parties.
- The Election Commission has laid down detailed criteria of the proportion of votes and seats that a party must get to be a recognised party. ‘Recognised parties’ get preference in the matter of allotment of free symbols.
- Further, registered political parties, in course of time, can get recognition as ‘State Party’ or National Party’ subject to the fulfilment of the conditions prescribed by the Commission in the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, as amended from time to time.
- Recognised ‘State’ and ‘National’ parties need only one proposer for filing the nomination and are also entitled to two sets of electoral rolls free of cost and broadcast/telecast facilities over Akashvani (AIR)/Doordarshan during general elections.
Consider the following statements:1. The state legislatures can also enact laws relating to the elections to the state legislatures so far that they are consistent with the provisions enacted by the Parliament.
2. The election petitions concerning the Parliament can only be entertained by the Supreme Court.Which of these is/are correct?- a)Only 1
- b)Only 2
- c)Both
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The state legislatures can also enact laws relating to the elections to the state legislatures so far that they are consistent with the provisions enacted by the Parliament.
2. The election petitions concerning the Parliament can only be entertained by the Supreme Court.
2. The election petitions concerning the Parliament can only be entertained by the Supreme Court.
Which of these is/are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both
d)
None of the above
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
The high courts and other authorities as provided by the Parliament can also entertain election petitions.
The ‘Left’, ‘Right’ and ‘Centre’ classification of political parties in India is done largely based on- a)Strength of political party cadres
- b)The conventional sitting position in the legislature
- c)The ideology of the political parties
- d)Past electoral performance
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The ‘Left’, ‘Right’ and ‘Centre’ classification of political parties in India is done largely based on
a)
Strength of political party cadres
b)
The conventional sitting position in the legislature
c)
The ideology of the political parties
d)
Past electoral performance
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- Based on ideologies, the political scientists have placed the radical parties on the left and the liberal parties in the centre and reactionary and conservative parties on the right.
- In India, the CPI and CPIM are examples of leftist parties, the Congress of centrist parties and the BJP is an example of a rightist.
- The ideology of the party affects their manifesto and working style when they come to power. For example, TMC is farmer oriented and not so business-friendly supporting the socialist ideology. On the other hand, the Indian National Congress takes more nuanced pro-capitalist positions.
Statement I: The states were reorganized on a large-scale in 1956 on the basis of the recommendations made by the States Reorganisation Commission.
Statement II: The creation of the first linguistic state of Andhra in 1953 led to the country-wide demand for the reorganization of states on the basis of language.
Codes: - a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.
- b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.
- c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
- d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statement I: The states were reorganized on a large-scale in 1956 on the basis of the recommendations made by the States Reorganisation Commission.
Statement II: The creation of the first linguistic state of Andhra in 1953 led to the country-wide demand for the reorganization of states on the basis of language.
Codes:
Statement II: The creation of the first linguistic state of Andhra in 1953 led to the country-wide demand for the reorganization of states on the basis of language.
Codes:
a)
Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.
b)
Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.
c)
Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
d)
Statement I is false but Statement II is true.
| | Utkarsh Joshi answered |
The creation of the first linguistic state of Andhra out of the then Madras state in 1953 led to the countrywide demand for the reorganisation of states on the basis of language. Consequently, the states were reorganised on a large-scale in 1956 on the basis of the recommendations made by the States Reorganisation Commission6 (1953–1955).
Assertion (A): Regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country.
Reason (R): Political leaders whip up the ethnic identities.
Codes:- a)Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- b)Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- c)A is true but R is false.
- d)A is false but R is true.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): Regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country.
Reason (R): Political leaders whip up the ethnic identities.
Codes:
Reason (R): Political leaders whip up the ethnic identities.
Codes:
a)
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.
b)
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
c)
A is true but R is false.
d)
A is false but R is true.
| | Aditi Iyer answered |
Explanation:
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are individually true, but R is not the correct explanation of A. Let's break down the statement and analyze each part:
Assertion (A): Regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country.
This statement is true. India is a culturally diverse country with a rich heritage and a diverse population comprising various ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups. This diversity is reflected in the regional politics of India, where political parties and leaders often align themselves with specific regional identities and issues. Regionalism in Indian politics is a manifestation of the cultural diversity and distinct identities present within the country.
Reason (R): Political leaders whip up ethnic identities.
This statement is also true. In Indian politics, political leaders often try to mobilize support by appealing to ethnic identities and regional aspirations. They may use language, symbols, and cultural references associated with specific regions or communities to establish a connection with the electorate. By emphasizing regional identities, political leaders can gain support and consolidate their vote bank within a particular region. However, this reason alone does not fully explain why regionalism exists in Indian politics.
Analysis:
While it is true that political leaders whip up ethnic identities to gain support, it is not the only reason for the existence of regionalism in Indian politics. Regionalism is deeply rooted in the diverse cultural, linguistic, and historical backgrounds of different regions in India. It is a reflection of the aspirations, grievances, and demands of the people belonging to specific regions. Factors such as economic disparities, historical grievances, linguistic differences, and cultural distinctiveness also contribute to the rise of regionalism in Indian politics.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Assertion (A) is true as regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country. Reason (R) is also true as political leaders do whip up ethnic identities to gain support. However, Reason (R) alone does not provide a comprehensive explanation for the existence of regionalism in Indian politics. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are individually true, but R is not the correct explanation of A. Let's break down the statement and analyze each part:
Assertion (A): Regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country.
This statement is true. India is a culturally diverse country with a rich heritage and a diverse population comprising various ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups. This diversity is reflected in the regional politics of India, where political parties and leaders often align themselves with specific regional identities and issues. Regionalism in Indian politics is a manifestation of the cultural diversity and distinct identities present within the country.
Reason (R): Political leaders whip up ethnic identities.
This statement is also true. In Indian politics, political leaders often try to mobilize support by appealing to ethnic identities and regional aspirations. They may use language, symbols, and cultural references associated with specific regions or communities to establish a connection with the electorate. By emphasizing regional identities, political leaders can gain support and consolidate their vote bank within a particular region. However, this reason alone does not fully explain why regionalism exists in Indian politics.
Analysis:
While it is true that political leaders whip up ethnic identities to gain support, it is not the only reason for the existence of regionalism in Indian politics. Regionalism is deeply rooted in the diverse cultural, linguistic, and historical backgrounds of different regions in India. It is a reflection of the aspirations, grievances, and demands of the people belonging to specific regions. Factors such as economic disparities, historical grievances, linguistic differences, and cultural distinctiveness also contribute to the rise of regionalism in Indian politics.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Assertion (A) is true as regionalism in Indian politics reflects the cultural diversity of the country. Reason (R) is also true as political leaders do whip up ethnic identities to gain support. However, Reason (R) alone does not provide a comprehensive explanation for the existence of regionalism in Indian politics. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
Consider the following statements: - The anti-defection law is intended to strengthen the fabric of Indian Parliamentary democracy.
- The anti-defection law was enacted during the Prime Ministership of P.V. Narasimha Rao.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)Only 1 (
- b)Only 2 (
- c)Both 1 and 2 (
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- The anti-defection law is intended to strengthen the fabric of Indian Parliamentary democracy.
- The anti-defection law was enacted during the Prime Ministership of P.V. Narasimha Rao.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
Only 1 (
b)
Only 2 (
c)
Both 1 and 2 (
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
 | Vijay Kumar answered |
It is intended to strengthen the fabric of Indian parliamentary democracy by curbing unprincipled and unethical political defections. Rajiv Gandhi, the then Prime Minister, described it as the ‘first step towards cleaning-up public life’.
The ex-officio members of the National Human Rights Commission are: - Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities
- Chairman of the National Commission for SCs
- Chairman of the National Commission for STs
- Chairman of the National Commission for Women
Select the correct answer from the codes given below:- a)1, 2 and 3
- b)2, 3 and 4
- c)1, 2, 3 and 4
- d)1, 2 and 4
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
The ex-officio members of the National Human Rights Commission are:
- Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities
- Chairman of the National Commission for SCs
- Chairman of the National Commission for STs
- Chairman of the National Commission for Women
Select the correct answer from the codes given below:
a)
1, 2 and 3
b)
2, 3 and 4
c)
1, 2, 3 and 4
d)
1, 2 and 4
 | Pranab Patel answered |
The ex-officio members of the National Human Rights Commission are:
- Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities
- Chairman of the National Commission for SCs
- Chairman of the National Commission for STs
- Chairman of the National Commission for Women
Explanation:
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is a statutory body in India that is responsible for the protection and promotion of human rights. It was established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and four members. The Chairperson must be a retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, while the members must be serving or retired judges of the Supreme Court, High Courts, or experts in the field of human rights. In addition to these members, there are also ex-officio members who are part of the NHRC.
The ex-officio members of the NHRC are individuals who hold positions in other commissions or bodies that are related to the protection of human rights. These members are included in the NHRC to ensure the representation of various sections of society and to bring their expertise and experience to the commission.
The ex-officio members of the NHRC include:
1. Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities: The National Commission for Minorities is a body that safeguards and protects the rights of religious and linguistic minorities in India. The Chairman of this commission is an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
2. Chairman of the National Commission for SCs: The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (SCs) is responsible for monitoring and safeguarding the rights of Scheduled Castes, who are historically disadvantaged and oppressed communities in India. The Chairman of this commission is also an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
3. Chairman of the National Commission for STs: The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (STs) is tasked with protecting and promoting the rights of Scheduled Tribes, who are indigenous communities in India. The Chairman of this commission is an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
4. Chairman of the National Commission for Women: The National Commission for Women (NCW) is a body that works towards the protection and promotion of women's rights in India. The Chairman of this commission is also an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - 1, 2, 3, and 4.
- Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities
- Chairman of the National Commission for SCs
- Chairman of the National Commission for STs
- Chairman of the National Commission for Women
Explanation:
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is a statutory body in India that is responsible for the protection and promotion of human rights. It was established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and four members. The Chairperson must be a retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, while the members must be serving or retired judges of the Supreme Court, High Courts, or experts in the field of human rights. In addition to these members, there are also ex-officio members who are part of the NHRC.
The ex-officio members of the NHRC are individuals who hold positions in other commissions or bodies that are related to the protection of human rights. These members are included in the NHRC to ensure the representation of various sections of society and to bring their expertise and experience to the commission.
The ex-officio members of the NHRC include:
1. Chairman of the National Commission for Minorities: The National Commission for Minorities is a body that safeguards and protects the rights of religious and linguistic minorities in India. The Chairman of this commission is an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
2. Chairman of the National Commission for SCs: The National Commission for Scheduled Castes (SCs) is responsible for monitoring and safeguarding the rights of Scheduled Castes, who are historically disadvantaged and oppressed communities in India. The Chairman of this commission is also an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
3. Chairman of the National Commission for STs: The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (STs) is tasked with protecting and promoting the rights of Scheduled Tribes, who are indigenous communities in India. The Chairman of this commission is an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
4. Chairman of the National Commission for Women: The National Commission for Women (NCW) is a body that works towards the protection and promotion of women's rights in India. The Chairman of this commission is also an ex-officio member of the NHRC.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Consider the following statements and choose the correct one from belowStatement- I: The anti-defection law gives for the first time a clear cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties
Statement- II: The total number of ministers including the Prime Minister in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok sabha.- a)Both i and ii
- b)ii only
- c)i only
- d)Neither i nor ii
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements and choose the correct one from below
Statement- I: The anti-defection law gives for the first time a clear cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties
Statement- II: The total number of ministers including the Prime Minister in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok sabha.
Statement- II: The total number of ministers including the Prime Minister in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok sabha.
a)
Both i and ii
b)
ii only
c)
i only
d)
Neither i nor ii
| | Maitri Patel answered |
The correct answer is option 'A' - Both I and II.
Explanation:
Statement I: The anti-defection law gives for the first time a clear cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties.
- This statement is correct. The anti-defection law was passed in 1985 as the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution. It was introduced to address the issue of defections by Members of Parliament and State Legislatures. This law recognizes the existence of political parties and provides provisions to curb defections.
Statement II: The total number of ministers including the Prime Minister in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha.
- This statement is also correct. According to Article 75(1) of the Indian Constitution, the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha. This provision ensures that the size of the council of ministers does not become too large and helps in maintaining efficiency and accountability.
Therefore, both statements I and II are correct, and the correct answer is option 'A' - Both I and II.
Explanation:
Statement I: The anti-defection law gives for the first time a clear cut constitutional recognition to the existence of political parties.
- This statement is correct. The anti-defection law was passed in 1985 as the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution. It was introduced to address the issue of defections by Members of Parliament and State Legislatures. This law recognizes the existence of political parties and provides provisions to curb defections.
Statement II: The total number of ministers including the Prime Minister in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha.
- This statement is also correct. According to Article 75(1) of the Indian Constitution, the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, in the central council of ministers shall not exceed 15% of the total strength of the Lok Sabha. This provision ensures that the size of the council of ministers does not become too large and helps in maintaining efficiency and accountability.
Therefore, both statements I and II are correct, and the correct answer is option 'A' - Both I and II.
Consider the following statements: - The National Integration Council is a recommendation body.
- The National Integration Council is a constitutional body.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct?- a)Only 1
- b)Only 2
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- The National Integration Council is a recommendation body.
- The National Integration Council is a constitutional body.
Which of the statements given above is / are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
| | Suyash Kulkarni answered |
Explanation:
b) Only 2
- The National Integration Council is not a constitutional body.
- It was set up as a recommendation body to address issues of national integration and communal harmony in India.
- The NIC was established in 1961 and has the Prime Minister as its chairperson.
- It includes members from various political parties, states, and union territories, as well as eminent personalities from different fields.
a) Only 1
- Therefore, the correct statement is that the National Integration Council is a recommendation body.
b) Only 2
- The National Integration Council is not a constitutional body.
- It was set up as a recommendation body to address issues of national integration and communal harmony in India.
- The NIC was established in 1961 and has the Prime Minister as its chairperson.
- It includes members from various political parties, states, and union territories, as well as eminent personalities from different fields.
a) Only 1
- Therefore, the correct statement is that the National Integration Council is a recommendation body.
Consider the following statements about the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation:- It is an intergovernmental organization to promote cooperation in trade, politics, and culture.
- The Anti-Terrorist structure of SCO is located in Beijing.
Which of the above statement is/are correct?- a)1 only
- b)2 only
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements about the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation:
- It is an intergovernmental organization to promote cooperation in trade, politics, and culture.
- The Anti-Terrorist structure of SCO is located in Beijing.
Which of the above statement is/are correct?
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
| | Ashish Kumar answered |
Explanation:
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is an intergovernmental organization founded in Shanghai, China, on 15 June 2001. It is a Eurasian political, economic, and security alliance comprising eight countries: China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
Statement 1: It is an intergovernmental organization to promote cooperation in trade, politics, and culture.
This statement is correct. The SCO was formed to promote cooperation among member countries in various fields such as trade, politics, and culture. The SCO has been working towards promoting regional security, stability, and economic development through cooperation among member nations.
Statement 2: The Anti-Terrorist structure of SCO is located in Beijing.
This statement is incorrect. The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) of the SCO is located in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, not in Beijing, China. RATS is responsible for coordinating and implementing the SCO's counter-terrorism policies and strategies.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A, i.e., statement 1 only.
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is an intergovernmental organization founded in Shanghai, China, on 15 June 2001. It is a Eurasian political, economic, and security alliance comprising eight countries: China, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.
Statement 1: It is an intergovernmental organization to promote cooperation in trade, politics, and culture.
This statement is correct. The SCO was formed to promote cooperation among member countries in various fields such as trade, politics, and culture. The SCO has been working towards promoting regional security, stability, and economic development through cooperation among member nations.
Statement 2: The Anti-Terrorist structure of SCO is located in Beijing.
This statement is incorrect. The Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS) of the SCO is located in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, not in Beijing, China. RATS is responsible for coordinating and implementing the SCO's counter-terrorism policies and strategies.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A, i.e., statement 1 only.
Given below are some of the offices in the Indian polity. For which of the following offices, provisions regarding the appointment/elections is/are not mentioned in the constitution of India?1. Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha.
2. Solicitor general of India.
3. Lok Sabha Secretary
4. Advocate GeneralChoose the correct answer using the codes below:- a)1 and 4 only
- b)2 and 3 only
- c)1 and 3 only
- d)2, 3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Given below are some of the offices in the Indian polity. For which of the following offices, provisions regarding the appointment/elections is/are not mentioned in the constitution of India?
1. Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha.
2. Solicitor general of India.
3. Lok Sabha Secretary
4. Advocate General
2. Solicitor general of India.
3. Lok Sabha Secretary
4. Advocate General
Choose the correct answer using the codes below:
a)
1 and 4 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
2, 3 and 4
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- There is no provision for the Lok Sabha secretary specifically in the constitution. It only talks about the secretarial staff via Article 98.
- Article 98 (1) depicts that ‘Each House of Parliament shall have a separate secretarial staff: Provided that nothing in this clause shall be construed as preventing the creation of posts common to both Houses of Parliament.
- The Constitution has no provision for the solicitor general of India.
The area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general election is determined by the: - a)Delimitation Commission
- b)Election Commission of India
- c)Census Commission
- d)President
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general election is determined by the:
a)
Delimitation Commission
b)
Election Commission of India
c)
Census Commission
d)
President
| | Dishani Das answered |
The correct answer is option 'A', the Delimitation Commission.
The Delimitation Commission is responsible for determining the area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general elections in India. Let's understand this in detail:
1. What is the Delimitation Commission?
The Delimitation Commission is a constitutional body established under Article 82 of the Constitution of India. It is responsible for the delimitation or division of constituencies for the purpose of elections to the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) and the State Legislative Assemblies.
2. Purpose of Delimitation:
The primary objective of delimitation is to ensure the equitable distribution of seats and to provide adequate representation to all sections of society. It aims to ensure that every constituency has a similar number of voters, thereby ensuring fairness and avoiding malapportionment.
3. Composition of the Delimitation Commission:
The Delimitation Commission is usually constituted by the President of India. It consists of a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India or the Chief Justice of a High Court as the Chairperson, and two other members who are either judges of High Courts or individuals qualified to be appointed as judges. The Election Commission of India provides necessary assistance to the Delimitation Commission.
4. Process of Delimitation:
The Delimitation Commission carries out the process of delimitation in a systematic manner. It takes into account various factors such as population density, geographical features, and administrative convenience while determining the boundaries of the constituencies. The process involves the identification of existing constituencies, the determination of the number of seats allocated to each state or union territory, and the demarcation of boundaries accordingly.
5. Role of the Election Commission of India:
While the Delimitation Commission is responsible for determining the area of a Lok Sabha constituency, the Election Commission of India is responsible for the conduct of elections and the implementation of the delimitation exercise. The Election Commission ensures that the delimitation process is carried out effectively and that the elections are conducted smoothly.
In conclusion, the area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general elections is determined by the Delimitation Commission. This constitutional body plays a crucial role in ensuring fair representation and equitable distribution of seats in the Lok Sabha.
The Delimitation Commission is responsible for determining the area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general elections in India. Let's understand this in detail:
1. What is the Delimitation Commission?
The Delimitation Commission is a constitutional body established under Article 82 of the Constitution of India. It is responsible for the delimitation or division of constituencies for the purpose of elections to the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament) and the State Legislative Assemblies.
2. Purpose of Delimitation:
The primary objective of delimitation is to ensure the equitable distribution of seats and to provide adequate representation to all sections of society. It aims to ensure that every constituency has a similar number of voters, thereby ensuring fairness and avoiding malapportionment.
3. Composition of the Delimitation Commission:
The Delimitation Commission is usually constituted by the President of India. It consists of a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India or the Chief Justice of a High Court as the Chairperson, and two other members who are either judges of High Courts or individuals qualified to be appointed as judges. The Election Commission of India provides necessary assistance to the Delimitation Commission.
4. Process of Delimitation:
The Delimitation Commission carries out the process of delimitation in a systematic manner. It takes into account various factors such as population density, geographical features, and administrative convenience while determining the boundaries of the constituencies. The process involves the identification of existing constituencies, the determination of the number of seats allocated to each state or union territory, and the demarcation of boundaries accordingly.
5. Role of the Election Commission of India:
While the Delimitation Commission is responsible for determining the area of a Lok Sabha constituency, the Election Commission of India is responsible for the conduct of elections and the implementation of the delimitation exercise. The Election Commission ensures that the delimitation process is carried out effectively and that the elections are conducted smoothly.
In conclusion, the area of a Lok Sabha constituency for the purpose of general elections is determined by the Delimitation Commission. This constitutional body plays a crucial role in ensuring fair representation and equitable distribution of seats in the Lok Sabha.
Who among the following can be the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission? - a)Only a retired Chief Justice of a High Court
- b)Only a retired Chief Justice of India
- c)Any serving judge of the High Court
- d)Any serving judge of the Supreme Court
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who among the following can be the Chairperson of the National Human Rights Commission?
a)
Only a retired Chief Justice of a High Court
b)
Only a retired Chief Justice of India
c)
Any serving judge of the High Court
d)
Any serving judge of the Supreme Court
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India is a Statutory public body constituted on 12 October 1993. The chairman of NHRC can be a retired Chief Justice of India.
he salaries, allowances and other service conditions of the members of the National Human Rights Commission are determined by the: - a)President of India
- b)Parliament of India
- c)Chairman, NHRC
- d)Central Government
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
he salaries, allowances and other service conditions of the members of the National Human Rights Commission are determined by the:
a)
President of India
b)
Parliament of India
c)
Chairman, NHRC
d)
Central Government
 | Mihir Mukherjee answered |
The correct answer is option 'D' - Central Government.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is an autonomous body established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. It is responsible for the promotion and protection of human rights in India. The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and other members, whose salaries, allowances, and other service conditions are determined by the Central Government.
Here is a detailed explanation of why the correct answer is option 'D':
1. The NHRC is an autonomous body: The NHRC is an independent institution that operates separately from the government. It is not directly controlled by the President of India, Parliament of India, or the Chairman of NHRC. This independence ensures that the NHRC can function impartially and effectively in its mandate to protect human rights.
2. Determination of salaries and allowances: The salaries, allowances, and other service conditions of the members of the NHRC are determined by the Central Government. This means that the Ministry of Home Affairs, which is responsible for the administration of the NHRC, has the authority to decide the remuneration and perks for the members.
3. Reasons for Central Government's role: The involvement of the Central Government in determining the salaries and allowances of NHRC members is essential for several reasons:
a) Budgetary control: The Central Government is responsible for allocating funds to various autonomous bodies, including the NHRC. By determining the salaries and allowances, the government can ensure that the financial resources are allocated efficiently and in accordance with the overall budgetary framework.
b) Accountability and oversight: The Central Government plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability and oversight of the NHRC. By having the authority to determine the service conditions, the government can exercise control over the functioning of the NHRC and ensure that it operates within the legal and constitutional framework.
c) Uniformity and consistency: The involvement of the Central Government in determining the salaries and allowances of NHRC members ensures uniformity and consistency across different autonomous bodies. This helps in avoiding disparities and maintaining a standardized approach in terms of remuneration and perks.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'D' - Central Government. The salaries, allowances, and other service conditions of the members of the National Human Rights Commission are determined by the Central Government to ensure accountability, budgetary control, and uniformity.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is an autonomous body established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. It is responsible for the promotion and protection of human rights in India. The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and other members, whose salaries, allowances, and other service conditions are determined by the Central Government.
Here is a detailed explanation of why the correct answer is option 'D':
1. The NHRC is an autonomous body: The NHRC is an independent institution that operates separately from the government. It is not directly controlled by the President of India, Parliament of India, or the Chairman of NHRC. This independence ensures that the NHRC can function impartially and effectively in its mandate to protect human rights.
2. Determination of salaries and allowances: The salaries, allowances, and other service conditions of the members of the NHRC are determined by the Central Government. This means that the Ministry of Home Affairs, which is responsible for the administration of the NHRC, has the authority to decide the remuneration and perks for the members.
3. Reasons for Central Government's role: The involvement of the Central Government in determining the salaries and allowances of NHRC members is essential for several reasons:
a) Budgetary control: The Central Government is responsible for allocating funds to various autonomous bodies, including the NHRC. By determining the salaries and allowances, the government can ensure that the financial resources are allocated efficiently and in accordance with the overall budgetary framework.
b) Accountability and oversight: The Central Government plays a crucial role in ensuring accountability and oversight of the NHRC. By having the authority to determine the service conditions, the government can exercise control over the functioning of the NHRC and ensure that it operates within the legal and constitutional framework.
c) Uniformity and consistency: The involvement of the Central Government in determining the salaries and allowances of NHRC members ensures uniformity and consistency across different autonomous bodies. This helps in avoiding disparities and maintaining a standardized approach in terms of remuneration and perks.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'D' - Central Government. The salaries, allowances, and other service conditions of the members of the National Human Rights Commission are determined by the Central Government to ensure accountability, budgetary control, and uniformity.
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Codes: - a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.
- b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.
- c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
- d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Codes:
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Codes:
a)
Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.
b)
Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.
c)
Statement I is true but Statement II is false.
d)
Statement I is false but Statement II is true.
| | Devansh Yadav answered |
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Explanation:
The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, was inserted by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985. It was introduced to curb the evil of political defections, which were seen as a threat to the political stability and integrity of the country.
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
This statement is true. The 91st Amendment Act, 2003 amended the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution and removed the provision that allowed exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party. The amendment made it clear that a member of a House belonging to any political party would be disqualified if he voluntarily gives up his membership of that party.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
This statement is also true. The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission all recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits. These recommendations were made to strengthen the Anti-Defection Law and prevent political defections for personal gains.
Conclusion:
Both statements I and II are individually true. Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I. The 91st Amendment Act deleted the provision of exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party, and this deletion was recommended by the Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Explanation:
The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, was inserted by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985. It was introduced to curb the evil of political defections, which were seen as a threat to the political stability and integrity of the country.
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
This statement is true. The 91st Amendment Act, 2003 amended the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution and removed the provision that allowed exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party. The amendment made it clear that a member of a House belonging to any political party would be disqualified if he voluntarily gives up his membership of that party.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
This statement is also true. The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission all recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits. These recommendations were made to strengthen the Anti-Defection Law and prevent political defections for personal gains.
Conclusion:
Both statements I and II are individually true. Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I. The 91st Amendment Act deleted the provision of exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party, and this deletion was recommended by the Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission.
Which of the following Commonwealth Summit was hosted by India? - a)15th Summit
- b)18th Summit
- c)24th Summit
- d)27th Summit
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of the following Commonwealth Summit was hosted by India?
a)
15th Summit
b)
18th Summit
c)
24th Summit
d)
27th Summit
| | Simran Mehta answered |
India's Hosting of Commonwealth Summit
In 2018, India hosted the 24th Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in New Delhi. The theme of the summit was "Towards a Common Future".
About Commonwealth Summits
The Commonwealth Summit is a biennial meeting of the heads of government from all Commonwealth nations. The summit provides an opportunity for leaders to discuss issues of mutual concern and to make decisions on common goals and initiatives. The first Commonwealth Summit was held in 1971 in Singapore.
Previous Commonwealth Summits
Since the first summit in 1971, there have been a total of 25 Commonwealth Summits. The most recent summit, the 26th, was held in Kigali, Rwanda in 2021. The previous summits were:
- 1971: Singapore
- 1973: Ottawa, Canada
- 1975: Kingston, Jamaica
- 1977: London, UK
- 1979: Lusaka, Zambia
- 1981: Melbourne, Australia
- 1983: New Delhi, India
- 1985: Nassau, Bahamas
- 1987: Vancouver, Canada
- 1989: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 1991: Harare, Zimbabwe
- 1993: Limassol, Cyprus
- 1995: Auckland, New Zealand
- 1997: Edinburgh, UK
- 1999: Durban, South Africa
- 2002: Coolum, Australia
- 2003: Abuja, Nigeria
- 2005: Valletta, Malta
- 2007: Kampala, Uganda
- 2009: Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
- 2011: Perth, Australia
- 2013: Colombo, Sri Lanka
- 2015: Malta
- 2018: New Delhi, India
- 2021: Kigali, Rwanda
Conclusion
India has hosted the Commonwealth Summit once, in 2018. The summit provides an opportunity for leaders from Commonwealth nations to meet and discuss issues of mutual concern.
In 2018, India hosted the 24th Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in New Delhi. The theme of the summit was "Towards a Common Future".
About Commonwealth Summits
The Commonwealth Summit is a biennial meeting of the heads of government from all Commonwealth nations. The summit provides an opportunity for leaders to discuss issues of mutual concern and to make decisions on common goals and initiatives. The first Commonwealth Summit was held in 1971 in Singapore.
Previous Commonwealth Summits
Since the first summit in 1971, there have been a total of 25 Commonwealth Summits. The most recent summit, the 26th, was held in Kigali, Rwanda in 2021. The previous summits were:
- 1971: Singapore
- 1973: Ottawa, Canada
- 1975: Kingston, Jamaica
- 1977: London, UK
- 1979: Lusaka, Zambia
- 1981: Melbourne, Australia
- 1983: New Delhi, India
- 1985: Nassau, Bahamas
- 1987: Vancouver, Canada
- 1989: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- 1991: Harare, Zimbabwe
- 1993: Limassol, Cyprus
- 1995: Auckland, New Zealand
- 1997: Edinburgh, UK
- 1999: Durban, South Africa
- 2002: Coolum, Australia
- 2003: Abuja, Nigeria
- 2005: Valletta, Malta
- 2007: Kampala, Uganda
- 2009: Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
- 2011: Perth, Australia
- 2013: Colombo, Sri Lanka
- 2015: Malta
- 2018: New Delhi, India
- 2021: Kigali, Rwanda
Conclusion
India has hosted the Commonwealth Summit once, in 2018. The summit provides an opportunity for leaders from Commonwealth nations to meet and discuss issues of mutual concern.
Based on landmark judgments passed by the Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India came up with the following mandates:1. Every candidate has to make a legal declaration, giving full details of serious criminal cases pending against the candidate.
2. Details of the assets and liabilities of the candidate and his/her family.
3. Education qualifications were not mandatory.
4. The information furnished by the candidates has to be confidential. 5. The above mandates are in the spirit of Article 19.Which of the statements is/are correct?- a)1, 2 and 5
- b)1, 2 and 3
- c)1, 2, 3 and 4
- d)1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Based on landmark judgments passed by the Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India came up with the following mandates:
1. Every candidate has to make a legal declaration, giving full details of serious criminal cases pending against the candidate.
2. Details of the assets and liabilities of the candidate and his/her family.
3. Education qualifications were not mandatory.
4. The information furnished by the candidates has to be confidential. 5. The above mandates are in the spirit of Article 19.
2. Details of the assets and liabilities of the candidate and his/her family.
3. Education qualifications were not mandatory.
4. The information furnished by the candidates has to be confidential. 5. The above mandates are in the spirit of Article 19.
Which of the statements is/are correct?
a)
1, 2 and 5
b)
1, 2 and 3
c)
1, 2, 3 and 4
d)
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- Every person who wishes to contest an election has to fill out a ‘nomination form’ and give some money as a ‘security deposit’. Recently, a new system of declaration has been introduced in the direction of the Supreme Court. Every candidate has to make a legal declaration, giving full details of:
- Serious criminal cases pending against the candidate; assets and liabilities of the candidate and his or her family;
- Education qualifications of the candidate.
- This information has to be made public. This provides an opportunity for the voters to make their decision based on the information provided by the candidates.
- Right to Information is a part of fundamental rights under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. Article 19(1) says that every citizen has freedom of speech and expression. In 1976, the Supreme Court said in the case of Raj Narain v. State of UP, 1975 AIR 865, that people cannot speak or express themselves unless they know. Therefore, the right to information is embedded in article 19.
Consider the following about Elections in India.1. The recommendation for elections is made by the Government of India.
2. The announcement of elections is done by the Election Commission of India.
3. The model code of conduct is enforced by the Government of India.
4. The election conducting machinery is not controlled by the government.Choose the correct answer using the codes below.- a)1 and 2 only
- b)1, 3, and 4 only
- c)2 only
- d)1, 2, and 4 only
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following about Elections in India.
1. The recommendation for elections is made by the Government of India.
2. The announcement of elections is done by the Election Commission of India.
3. The model code of conduct is enforced by the Government of India.
4. The election conducting machinery is not controlled by the government.
2. The announcement of elections is done by the Election Commission of India.
3. The model code of conduct is enforced by the Government of India.
4. The election conducting machinery is not controlled by the government.
Choose the correct answer using the codes below.
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
1, 3, and 4 only
c)
2 only
d)
1, 2, and 4 only
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- The recommendation for election is made by the government and the notification for election is issued by the Election Commission.
- After the notification, the Election Commission of India announces the schedule and starts accepting nomination papers of candidates.
- After announcing the schedule, the model code of conduct comes automatically in force that prohibits certain kinds of political activities to ensure a level playing field.
A state political party can be derecognized by the Election Commission of India when1. It fails to submit its poll expenses
2. It does not reveal information under the RTI Act
3. It fails to win any seat in state elections.Choose the correct answer using the codes below.- a)1 and 2 only
- b)2 and 3 only
- c)1 only
- d)1 and 3 only
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
A state political party can be derecognized by the Election Commission of India when
1. It fails to submit its poll expenses
2. It does not reveal information under the RTI Act
3. It fails to win any seat in state elections.
2. It does not reveal information under the RTI Act
3. It fails to win any seat in state elections.
Choose the correct answer using the codes below.
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 and 3 only
c)
1 only
d)
1 and 3 only
 | Innovative Classes answered |
- The Election Commission of India (ECI) has suspended recognition of the P. A. Sangma-led National People’s Party (NPP) which was a recognized state party in Meghalaya.
- ECI decision in this regard comes in line with the Supreme Court’s judgement in the case of Common Cause vs Union of India and others. In this judgement, SC had made it compulsory for all political parties to file their election expenditure statement within 75 days of assembly elections and 90 days of Lok Sabha elections. The de-recognition of a party does not mean it's banned.
A ‘by-election’ is held when- a)A party candidate during elections withdraws or dies
- b)A vacancy caused by the death or resignation of a legislator is to be filled between general elections
- c)The Election Commission of India thinks it to be in the best interest of the nation
- d)There is no decisive winner in a general election
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
A ‘by-election’ is held when
a)
A party candidate during elections withdraws or dies
b)
A vacancy caused by the death or resignation of a legislator is to be filled between general elections
c)
The Election Commission of India thinks it to be in the best interest of the nation
d)
There is no decisive winner in a general election
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
In most cases, these elections occur when the incumbent died or resigned, but they also occur when the incumbent becomes ineligible to continue in office (because of a recall, ennoblement, criminal conviction or failure to maintain a minimum attendance). Less commonly, these elections have been called when a constituency election is invalidated by voting irregularities.
Which of these is NOT a good reason to say that Indian elections are democratic?- a)India has the largest number of voters in the world.
- b)India’s Election Commission is very powerful.
- c)In India, everyone above the age of 18 has the right to vote.
- d)In India, the losing parties accept the electoral verdict.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Which of these is NOT a good reason to say that Indian elections are democratic?
a)
India has the largest number of voters in the world.
b)
India’s Election Commission is very powerful.
c)
In India, everyone above the age of 18 has the right to vote.
d)
In India, the losing parties accept the electoral verdict.
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- Even China has a very large number of voters in its elections. But that does not make China a democracy.
- The existence of a democracy is not decided solely by the number of voters or the existence of voters. There are several other criteria such as free and fair elections; decision-making power with the people; freedom of speech and expression; open political competition, etc.
Arrange these election-related activities in the correct order from earlier to later.1. Announcing election schedule
2. Election Campaign
3. Filing nominations for electionsChoose the correct answer from the codes below:- a)1:2:3
- b)1:3:2
- c)3:1:2
- d)3:2:1
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Arrange these election-related activities in the correct order from earlier to later.
1. Announcing election schedule
2. Election Campaign
3. Filing nominations for elections
2. Election Campaign
3. Filing nominations for elections
Choose the correct answer from the codes below:
a)
1:2:3
b)
1:3:2
c)
3:1:2
d)
3:2:1
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
- The Commission normally announces the schedule of elections in a major Press Conference a few weeks before the formal process is set in motion. The Model Code of Conduct for the guidance of candidates and Political Parties immediately comes into effect after such an announcement.
- The formal process for the elections starts with the Notification or Notifications. As soon as Notifications are issued, Candidates can start filing their nominations in the constituencies from where they wish to contest. These are scrutinized by the Returning Officer of the constituency concerned after the last date for the same is over after about a week.
- The validly nominated candidates can withdraw from the contest within 2 days from the date of scrutiny.
- Contesting candidates get at least 2 weeks for a political campaign before the actual date of the poll.
- On account of the vast magnitude of operations and the massive size of the electorate, polling is held at least 3 days for the national elections.
- A separate date for counting is fixed and the results are declared for each constituency by the concerned Returning Officer.
- The Commission compiles the complete list of Members elected and issues an appropriate Notification for the due Constitution of the House. With this, the process of elections is complete and the President, in the case of the Lok Sabha, and the Governors of the concerned States, in the case of Vidhan Sabhas, can then convene their respective Houses to hold their sessions.
- The entire process takes between 5 to 8 weeks for the national elections, 4 to 5 weeks for separate elections only for Legislative Assemblies.
Who/Which of the following decides the question of disqualification of a member of the Parliament, arising on the ground of defection? - a)President of India
- b)Supreme Court
- c)Presiding Officer of the House
- d)Election Commission
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Who/Which of the following decides the question of disqualification of a member of the Parliament, arising on the ground of defection?
a)
President of India
b)
Supreme Court
c)
Presiding Officer of the House
d)
Election Commission
| | Rahul Mehta answered |
Any question regarding disqualification arising out of defection is to be decided by the presiding officer of the House. Originally, the act provided that the decision of the presiding officer is final and cannot be questioned in any court.
The Returning Officer of a parliamentary or assembly constituency is responsible for the conduct of elections in the Parliamentary or assembly constituency concerned. How is she appointed?- a)The Election Commission of India (ECI) nominates or designates an officer of the Government in consultation with the State government
- b)The District Magistrate nominates from among the officers of the Constituency in consultation with the ECI
- c)The Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) appoints her based on the recommendation of the District Magistrate
- d)The State Government appoints her from among the polling officers within the constituency in consultation with the ECI
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
The Returning Officer of a parliamentary or assembly constituency is responsible for the conduct of elections in the Parliamentary or assembly constituency concerned. How is she appointed?
a)
The Election Commission of India (ECI) nominates or designates an officer of the Government in consultation with the State government
b)
The District Magistrate nominates from among the officers of the Constituency in consultation with the ECI
c)
The Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) appoints her based on the recommendation of the District Magistrate
d)
The State Government appoints her from among the polling officers within the constituency in consultation with the ECI
| | Ravi Sharma answered |
This is the hierarchy of the election machinery.
Consider the following concerning election outcomes in India.1. Majority of votes by a political party necessarily means a majority of seats.
2. Majority of seats garnered by a political party necessarily means a majority of votes.Which of the above is/are correct?- a)1 only
- b)2 only
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following concerning election outcomes in India.
1. Majority of votes by a political party necessarily means a majority of seats.
2. Majority of seats garnered by a political party necessarily means a majority of votes.
2. Majority of seats garnered by a political party necessarily means a majority of votes.
Which of the above is/are correct?
a)
1 only
b)
2 only
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
None
| | Dishani Choudhary answered |
Explanation:
1. Majority of votes by a political party necessarily means a majority of seats:
- In India, elections are conducted using a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes wins the seat.
- While a political party may receive the majority of votes overall, it does not guarantee a majority of seats in the legislature.
- The distribution of votes across different constituencies can vary, leading to a situation where a party may have a significant vote share but not enough seats to form a majority.
2. Majority of seats garnered by a political party necessarily means a majority of votes:
- Similarly, winning a majority of seats in an election does not always mean that a party has received a majority of votes.
- In a multi-party system like India, a party can win seats with a relatively small percentage of the total votes cast.
- This can happen if the votes are divided among multiple parties, allowing a party to win seats with a plurality rather than a majority of the votes.
Therefore, both statements are not always correct as the relationship between votes and seats in an election is complex and can be influenced by various factors such as the electoral system, voting patterns, and the number of competing parties. It is essential to consider these nuances when analyzing election outcomes in India.
The registration of political parties is done as per the provisions/decision of: - a)Article 324 of the Constitution
- b)The Representation of the People Act, 1951
- c)The Election Commission by itself
- d)The Election Commission in consultation with cabinet committee on political affairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The registration of political parties is done as per the provisions/decision of:
a)
Article 324 of the Constitution
b)
The Representation of the People Act, 1951
c)
The Election Commission by itself
d)
The Election Commission in consultation with cabinet committee on political affairs
| | Uday Roy answered |
Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B' - The Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The registration of political parties in India is governed by the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This act provides the legal framework for elections in India and sets out the rules and regulations for the registration and functioning of political parties.
Registration Process:
The process of registration of political parties involves the following steps:
1. Eligibility Criteria: Political parties seeking registration must fulfill certain eligibility criteria as prescribed by the Election Commission of India (ECI). This includes having a minimum of 100 members who are registered voters, and these members should be from at least three different states.
2. Application: The political party must submit an application for registration to the Election Commission. The application should include the party's constitution, objectives, and rules governing its internal functioning.
3. Verification: The Election Commission verifies the application and checks if the party meets the eligibility criteria. It also examines the party's constitution and objectives to ensure they are not in violation of any laws.
4. Public Notice: Once the application is found to be in order, the Election Commission publishes a public notice inviting objections or suggestions from the public regarding the registration of the party. This is done to ensure transparency and give an opportunity for anyone who may have concerns about the party's registration.
5. Decision: After considering any objections or suggestions received, the Election Commission makes a decision on the registration of the political party. If the party meets all the requirements and there are no valid objections, it is registered as a political party.
Role of Election Commission:
The Election Commission plays a crucial role in the registration of political parties. It is responsible for examining the applications, verifying the eligibility criteria, and making the final decision on registration. The Election Commission ensures that the registration process is fair, transparent, and in accordance with the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the registration of political parties in India is done as per the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This act sets out the rules and regulations for the registration and functioning of political parties, and the Election Commission plays a key role in the registration process.
The correct answer is option 'B' - The Representation of the People Act, 1951.
The registration of political parties in India is governed by the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This act provides the legal framework for elections in India and sets out the rules and regulations for the registration and functioning of political parties.
Registration Process:
The process of registration of political parties involves the following steps:
1. Eligibility Criteria: Political parties seeking registration must fulfill certain eligibility criteria as prescribed by the Election Commission of India (ECI). This includes having a minimum of 100 members who are registered voters, and these members should be from at least three different states.
2. Application: The political party must submit an application for registration to the Election Commission. The application should include the party's constitution, objectives, and rules governing its internal functioning.
3. Verification: The Election Commission verifies the application and checks if the party meets the eligibility criteria. It also examines the party's constitution and objectives to ensure they are not in violation of any laws.
4. Public Notice: Once the application is found to be in order, the Election Commission publishes a public notice inviting objections or suggestions from the public regarding the registration of the party. This is done to ensure transparency and give an opportunity for anyone who may have concerns about the party's registration.
5. Decision: After considering any objections or suggestions received, the Election Commission makes a decision on the registration of the political party. If the party meets all the requirements and there are no valid objections, it is registered as a political party.
Role of Election Commission:
The Election Commission plays a crucial role in the registration of political parties. It is responsible for examining the applications, verifying the eligibility criteria, and making the final decision on registration. The Election Commission ensures that the registration process is fair, transparent, and in accordance with the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the registration of political parties in India is done as per the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This act sets out the rules and regulations for the registration and functioning of political parties, and the Election Commission plays a key role in the registration process.
In which year was the Human Rights Protection Law passed in India? - a)1986
- b)1987
- c)1993
- d)1995
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
In which year was the Human Rights Protection Law passed in India?
a)
1986
b)
1987
c)
1993
d)
1995
 | Moumita Sengupta answered |
Human Rights Protection Law in India was passed in the year 1993.
Explanation:
The Human Rights Protection Law in India, also known as the Protection of Human Rights Act, was enacted by the Parliament of India in 1993. This law was passed to establish the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) for the protection and promotion of human rights in the country.
1. Background:
- Prior to the enactment of this law, there was no dedicated institution to address human rights violations in India.
- The need for a comprehensive legislation to safeguard human rights was recognized both at the national and international levels.
2. Introduction of the Law:
- The Protection of Human Rights Bill was introduced in the Parliament in 1991.
- After detailed discussions and deliberations, the Bill was passed by both the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) in 1993.
- It received the assent of the President of India on 28th September 1993, thereby becoming an Act.
3. Key Provisions of the Law:
- The law provides for the establishment of the NHRC at the national level, and SHRCs at the state level.
- The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and members appointed by the President of India.
- The SHRCs consist of a Chairperson and members appointed by the respective State Governments.
- These commissions are empowered to inquire into complaints of human rights violations, initiate suo moto investigations, and take necessary actions for the protection of human rights.
4. Functions and Powers of the Commissions:
- The commissions have the power to visit prisons, detention centers, and other places of custody to ensure the protection of human rights.
- They can also recommend measures for the effective implementation of human rights safeguards.
- The commissions have the authority to intervene in legal proceedings involving human rights violations and provide relief to the victims.
5. Impact and Significance:
- The establishment of the NHRC and SHRCs has played a crucial role in addressing human rights violations in India.
- These institutions have brought transparency and accountability in the functioning of the government and its agencies.
- They have been instrumental in securing justice for victims of human rights abuses and ensuring the protection of human rights in the country.
In conclusion, the Human Rights Protection Law in India was passed in 1993, leading to the establishment of the NHRC and SHRCs. This law has been instrumental in safeguarding human rights and promoting justice in the country.
Explanation:
The Human Rights Protection Law in India, also known as the Protection of Human Rights Act, was enacted by the Parliament of India in 1993. This law was passed to establish the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) for the protection and promotion of human rights in the country.
1. Background:
- Prior to the enactment of this law, there was no dedicated institution to address human rights violations in India.
- The need for a comprehensive legislation to safeguard human rights was recognized both at the national and international levels.
2. Introduction of the Law:
- The Protection of Human Rights Bill was introduced in the Parliament in 1991.
- After detailed discussions and deliberations, the Bill was passed by both the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and the Rajya Sabha (Upper House) in 1993.
- It received the assent of the President of India on 28th September 1993, thereby becoming an Act.
3. Key Provisions of the Law:
- The law provides for the establishment of the NHRC at the national level, and SHRCs at the state level.
- The NHRC consists of a Chairperson and members appointed by the President of India.
- The SHRCs consist of a Chairperson and members appointed by the respective State Governments.
- These commissions are empowered to inquire into complaints of human rights violations, initiate suo moto investigations, and take necessary actions for the protection of human rights.
4. Functions and Powers of the Commissions:
- The commissions have the power to visit prisons, detention centers, and other places of custody to ensure the protection of human rights.
- They can also recommend measures for the effective implementation of human rights safeguards.
- The commissions have the authority to intervene in legal proceedings involving human rights violations and provide relief to the victims.
5. Impact and Significance:
- The establishment of the NHRC and SHRCs has played a crucial role in addressing human rights violations in India.
- These institutions have brought transparency and accountability in the functioning of the government and its agencies.
- They have been instrumental in securing justice for victims of human rights abuses and ensuring the protection of human rights in the country.
In conclusion, the Human Rights Protection Law in India was passed in 1993, leading to the establishment of the NHRC and SHRCs. This law has been instrumental in safeguarding human rights and promoting justice in the country.
What is the subject of the 91st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003? - a)Right to Information
- b)Limiting the size of Council of Ministers
- c)Right to Education
- d)Elimination of Corruption at all Levels
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the subject of the 91st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003?
a)
Right to Information
b)
Limiting the size of Council of Ministers
c)
Right to Education
d)
Elimination of Corruption at all Levels
| | Ritika Choudhury answered |
Later, the 91st Amendment Act of 2003 made one change in the provisions of the Tenth Schedule. It omitted an exception provision i.e., disqualification on ground of defection not to apply in case of split.
Which one of the following Amendments to the Constitution of India sought to curb the political defection? - a)42nd Amendment
- b)52nd Amendment
- c)62nd Amendment
- d)70th Amendment
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following Amendments to the Constitution of India sought to curb the political defection?
a)
42nd Amendment
b)
52nd Amendment
c)
62nd Amendment
d)
70th Amendment
 | Suyash Unni answered |
Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B', which is the 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India. This amendment sought to curb political defection in India.
Background:
Political defection refers to the act of elected representatives changing their political party affiliation or leaving their party to join another party. It often leads to instability in the government and undermines the democratic process. In India, political defection has been a significant issue since the early years of independence.
Key Points:
1. 52nd Amendment:
- The 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India was enacted in 1985.
- It introduced the Tenth Schedule, popularly known as the Anti-Defection Law, in the Indian Constitution.
- The amendment sought to address the problem of political defection by disqualifying elected representatives who defected from their party.
- It aimed to provide stability to the government and promote party discipline.
2. The Anti-Defection Law:
- The Tenth Schedule, introduced by the 52nd Amendment, contains provisions regarding the disqualification of elected members on the grounds of defection.
- According to the law, if an elected member voluntarily gives up the membership of their party or votes against the party's directions, they can be disqualified from holding their office.
- The law applies to both Parliament and state legislatures.
- It prohibits defection by elected members and imposes penalties for defection, including the loss of membership and disqualification from holding any office.
- However, there are certain exceptions to the law, such as when a party merges with another party.
3. Importance and Impact:
- The 52nd Amendment and the Anti-Defection Law have played a crucial role in curbing political defection in India.
- They have helped in maintaining stability in the government and ensuring party discipline.
- By disqualifying defectors, the law acts as a deterrent and discourages elected representatives from switching parties for personal gain or political opportunism.
- The law has also led to legal battles and controversies, with various cases challenging its constitutional validity and interpretation.
In conclusion, the 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India introduced the Anti-Defection Law, which sought to curb political defection in the country. This amendment and the subsequent law have been instrumental in maintaining stability and promoting party discipline in the Indian political system.
The correct answer is option 'B', which is the 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India. This amendment sought to curb political defection in India.
Background:
Political defection refers to the act of elected representatives changing their political party affiliation or leaving their party to join another party. It often leads to instability in the government and undermines the democratic process. In India, political defection has been a significant issue since the early years of independence.
Key Points:
1. 52nd Amendment:
- The 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India was enacted in 1985.
- It introduced the Tenth Schedule, popularly known as the Anti-Defection Law, in the Indian Constitution.
- The amendment sought to address the problem of political defection by disqualifying elected representatives who defected from their party.
- It aimed to provide stability to the government and promote party discipline.
2. The Anti-Defection Law:
- The Tenth Schedule, introduced by the 52nd Amendment, contains provisions regarding the disqualification of elected members on the grounds of defection.
- According to the law, if an elected member voluntarily gives up the membership of their party or votes against the party's directions, they can be disqualified from holding their office.
- The law applies to both Parliament and state legislatures.
- It prohibits defection by elected members and imposes penalties for defection, including the loss of membership and disqualification from holding any office.
- However, there are certain exceptions to the law, such as when a party merges with another party.
3. Importance and Impact:
- The 52nd Amendment and the Anti-Defection Law have played a crucial role in curbing political defection in India.
- They have helped in maintaining stability in the government and ensuring party discipline.
- By disqualifying defectors, the law acts as a deterrent and discourages elected representatives from switching parties for personal gain or political opportunism.
- The law has also led to legal battles and controversies, with various cases challenging its constitutional validity and interpretation.
In conclusion, the 52nd Amendment to the Constitution of India introduced the Anti-Defection Law, which sought to curb political defection in the country. This amendment and the subsequent law have been instrumental in maintaining stability and promoting party discipline in the Indian political system.
A pressure group is distinct from a political party in as much as it does not directly: - a)Contest elections
- b)Finance a candidate
- c)Propagate a policy
- d)Resort to mobilisation of opinion
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
A pressure group is distinct from a political party in as much as it does not directly:
a)
Contest elections
b)
Finance a candidate
c)
Propagate a policy
d)
Resort to mobilisation of opinion
| | Nisha Desai answered |
Contest Elections:
Pressure groups are different from political parties in that they do not directly contest elections. While political parties aim to gain power through winning elections and forming governments, pressure groups focus on influencing government policy and decision-making from outside the political system.
Finance a Candidate:
Political parties often provide financial support to their candidates during election campaigns. In contrast, pressure groups do not typically provide financial backing to individual candidates. Instead, they focus on raising awareness, lobbying policymakers, and advocating for specific causes or interests.
Propagate a Policy:
Pressure groups work to promote specific policies or agendas that align with their goals and interests. They engage in activities such as research, advocacy, and public education to influence public opinion and government decision-making. While political parties also propagate policies, their primary focus is on winning elections and governing.
Resort to Mobilisation of Opinion:
Pressure groups rely on mobilizing public opinion to support their causes and put pressure on policymakers. They may organize protests, petitions, media campaigns, and other forms of advocacy to raise awareness and influence government action. Political parties, on the other hand, focus on mobilizing voters to support their candidates in elections.
In conclusion, pressure groups play a crucial role in shaping public policy and promoting specific interests, but they operate differently from political parties. While political parties prioritize electoral success and governance, pressure groups focus on advocacy, lobbying, and influencing government decisions without directly contesting elections.
Pressure groups are different from political parties in that they do not directly contest elections. While political parties aim to gain power through winning elections and forming governments, pressure groups focus on influencing government policy and decision-making from outside the political system.
Finance a Candidate:
Political parties often provide financial support to their candidates during election campaigns. In contrast, pressure groups do not typically provide financial backing to individual candidates. Instead, they focus on raising awareness, lobbying policymakers, and advocating for specific causes or interests.
Propagate a Policy:
Pressure groups work to promote specific policies or agendas that align with their goals and interests. They engage in activities such as research, advocacy, and public education to influence public opinion and government decision-making. While political parties also propagate policies, their primary focus is on winning elections and governing.
Resort to Mobilisation of Opinion:
Pressure groups rely on mobilizing public opinion to support their causes and put pressure on policymakers. They may organize protests, petitions, media campaigns, and other forms of advocacy to raise awareness and influence government action. Political parties, on the other hand, focus on mobilizing voters to support their candidates in elections.
In conclusion, pressure groups play a crucial role in shaping public policy and promoting specific interests, but they operate differently from political parties. While political parties prioritize electoral success and governance, pressure groups focus on advocacy, lobbying, and influencing government decisions without directly contesting elections.
Assertion (A): Pressure groups involve themselves in politics and policy-making process in India through direct and indirect means.
Reason (R): They aspire to come to power to achieve their goals.
Codes: - a)Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.
- b)Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
- c)A is true but R is false.
- d)A is false but R is true.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Assertion (A): Pressure groups involve themselves in politics and policy-making process in India through direct and indirect means.
Reason (R): They aspire to come to power to achieve their goals.
Codes:
Reason (R): They aspire to come to power to achieve their goals.
Codes:
a)
Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A.
b)
Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A.
c)
A is true but R is false.
d)
A is false but R is true.
| | Ojasvi Mehta answered |
The pressure groups influence the policymaking and policy implementation in the government through legal and legitimate methods like lobbying, correspondence, publicity, propagandising, petitioning, public debating, maintaining contacts with their legislators and so forth. However, some times they resort to illegitimate and illegal methods like strikes, violent activities and corruption which damages public interest and administrative integrity.
Consider the following statements: - India’s “Look East” policy lays emphasis on improving cooperation with India’s neighbouring south-east and east Asian countries.
- The “Look East” policy of India was initiated by the Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)Only 1
- b)Only 2
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- India’s “Look East” policy lays emphasis on improving cooperation with India’s neighbouring south-east and east Asian countries.
- The “Look East” policy of India was initiated by the Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
| | Prasenjit Mehra answered |
1. India is the seventh-largest country by land area in the world.
2. India is the second-most populous country in the world, with over 1.3 billion people.
3. India is a federal parliamentary democratic republic, with a President as the head of state and a Prime Minister as the head of government.
4. India gained independence from British colonial rule on August 15, 1947.
5. India is known for its diverse culture, languages, and religions, with Hinduism being the majority religion.
6. India is one of the world's fastest-growing major economies and is classified as a developing country.
7. India has a nuclear weapons program and is a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
8. India has a space program and has successfully launched missions to the Moon and Mars.
9. India has a history of conflicts and disputes with neighboring countries, including Pakistan and China.
10. India is a member of the United Nations and participates in various international organizations and forums.
2. India is the second-most populous country in the world, with over 1.3 billion people.
3. India is a federal parliamentary democratic republic, with a President as the head of state and a Prime Minister as the head of government.
4. India gained independence from British colonial rule on August 15, 1947.
5. India is known for its diverse culture, languages, and religions, with Hinduism being the majority religion.
6. India is one of the world's fastest-growing major economies and is classified as a developing country.
7. India has a nuclear weapons program and is a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
8. India has a space program and has successfully launched missions to the Moon and Mars.
9. India has a history of conflicts and disputes with neighboring countries, including Pakistan and China.
10. India is a member of the United Nations and participates in various international organizations and forums.
When was the National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH) set up?- a)1960
- b)1970
- c)1992
- d)2002
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
When was the National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH) set up?
a)
1960
b)
1970
c)
1992
d)
2002
| | Gauri Bajaj answered |
The correct answer is option 'C' - 1992.
The National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH) was established in 1992 by the Government of India as an autonomous organization under the Societies Registration Act. It was formed with the objective of promoting communal harmony, peace, and national integration in the country.
The establishment of NFCH was a response to the rising communal tensions and conflicts that plagued the nation during the late 1980s and early 1990s. The government recognized the need for a dedicated institution to address these issues and work towards fostering harmony among different religious and ethnic communities in India.
The key objective of NFCH is to provide assistance and support to the families affected by communal violence and to promote communal harmony through various programs and initiatives. The foundation aims to create an environment where people from diverse backgrounds can coexist peacefully and respect each other's beliefs and cultures.
Here are some key points about the National Foundation for Communal Harmony:
1. Establishment: NFCH was established in 1992 by the Government of India.
2. Legal Status: It is registered as an autonomous organization under the Societies Registration Act.
3. Objective: The primary objective of NFCH is to promote communal harmony, peace, and national integration in the country.
4. Assistance to Victims: NFCH provides financial assistance to the families affected by communal violence, including medical aid, educational support, and rehabilitation.
5. Rehabilitation Programs: The foundation organizes various rehabilitation programs for the victims of communal violence, including skill development training, vocational courses, and livelihood support.
6. Awareness Campaigns: NFCH conducts awareness campaigns and workshops to promote communal harmony and spread the message of peace and unity among different communities.
7. Financial Support: The foundation receives financial support from the government, public donations, and other sources to carry out its activities.
8. Partnerships: NFCH collaborates with various organizations, NGOs, and government agencies to implement its programs and initiatives effectively.
9. Awards and Recognition: NFCH has instituted various awards to recognize individuals and organizations working towards communal harmony and peace in the country.
By establishing NFCH, the government aimed to address the root causes of communal disharmony and create a society where people can live together in peace and harmony, irrespective of their religious or ethnic backgrounds. The foundation's efforts have played a significant role in promoting communal harmony and national integration in India.
The National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH) was established in 1992 by the Government of India as an autonomous organization under the Societies Registration Act. It was formed with the objective of promoting communal harmony, peace, and national integration in the country.
The establishment of NFCH was a response to the rising communal tensions and conflicts that plagued the nation during the late 1980s and early 1990s. The government recognized the need for a dedicated institution to address these issues and work towards fostering harmony among different religious and ethnic communities in India.
The key objective of NFCH is to provide assistance and support to the families affected by communal violence and to promote communal harmony through various programs and initiatives. The foundation aims to create an environment where people from diverse backgrounds can coexist peacefully and respect each other's beliefs and cultures.
Here are some key points about the National Foundation for Communal Harmony:
1. Establishment: NFCH was established in 1992 by the Government of India.
2. Legal Status: It is registered as an autonomous organization under the Societies Registration Act.
3. Objective: The primary objective of NFCH is to promote communal harmony, peace, and national integration in the country.
4. Assistance to Victims: NFCH provides financial assistance to the families affected by communal violence, including medical aid, educational support, and rehabilitation.
5. Rehabilitation Programs: The foundation organizes various rehabilitation programs for the victims of communal violence, including skill development training, vocational courses, and livelihood support.
6. Awareness Campaigns: NFCH conducts awareness campaigns and workshops to promote communal harmony and spread the message of peace and unity among different communities.
7. Financial Support: The foundation receives financial support from the government, public donations, and other sources to carry out its activities.
8. Partnerships: NFCH collaborates with various organizations, NGOs, and government agencies to implement its programs and initiatives effectively.
9. Awards and Recognition: NFCH has instituted various awards to recognize individuals and organizations working towards communal harmony and peace in the country.
By establishing NFCH, the government aimed to address the root causes of communal disharmony and create a society where people can live together in peace and harmony, irrespective of their religious or ethnic backgrounds. The foundation's efforts have played a significant role in promoting communal harmony and national integration in India.
Which committee was responsible for the exemption from disqualification in case of a split from Tenth Schedule (anti-defection)?- a)Kelkar committee
- b)Dinesh Goswami committee
- c)S.K. Majhi committee
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Which committee was responsible for the exemption from disqualification in case of a split from Tenth Schedule (anti-defection)?
a)
Kelkar committee
b)
Dinesh Goswami committee
c)
S.K. Majhi committee
d)
None of the above
| | Mira Sharma answered |
Following the Dinesh Goswami Committee's recommendations, there must be assent of at least 2-3rd members for any merger to be termed as valid.
Who was the Chairman of First Finance Commission of Rajasthan?- a)Krishna Kumar Goyal
- b)Jyoti Kiran
- c)Manik Chand Surana
- d)Heeralal Devpura
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Who was the Chairman of First Finance Commission of Rajasthan?
a)
Krishna Kumar Goyal
b)
Jyoti Kiran
c)
Manik Chand Surana
d)
Heeralal Devpura
| | Arun Khatri answered |
The correct answer is Krishna Kumar Goyal.
Key Points
- Krishna Kumar Goyal was the Chairman of the First Finance Commission of Rajasthan.
- Award period:1995-1996 to 1999-2000
- Devolution of State’s Own Net Tax Revenue recommended: 2.18
- Article 243-I of the Constitution of India
- It down that the Governor of state shall, as soon as may be within one year from the commencement of the Constitution (seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992, and thereafter at the expiration of every fifth year, constitute a Finance Commission to review the financial position of the Panchayats and make recommendations to the Governor.
- Similarly, Article 243-Y of the Constitution has a provision for municipalities.
- Articles 243-I and 243-Y have a provision that the State Finance Commission shall recommend the principles governing the distribution between the state and the panchayats and the municipalities of the net proceeds of the taxes, duties, tolls, and fees leviable by the State.
- The Commission is to recommend grants to the Panchayats and Municipalities from the Consolidated Fund of the State and measures to improve the financial position of these local bodies.
- The Governor shall cause every recommendation made by the Commission under Articles 243-I and 243-Y together with an explanatory memorandum as to the action taken thereon to be laid before the legislature of the State.
The ‘first-past-the-post’ electoral system, prevalent in India, refers to: - a)A system of proportional representation of weighted voting in a multi-member constituency
- b)Single ballot, plural member majority voting system
- c)An electoral system in which the person winning the most votes of the votes cast in a constituency (single ballot, single member) is declared elected
- d)A system in which the winning candidate has to secure a plurality as well as majority of the votes cast
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
The ‘first-past-the-post’ electoral system, prevalent in India, refers to:
a)
A system of proportional representation of weighted voting in a multi-member constituency
b)
Single ballot, plural member majority voting system
c)
An electoral system in which the person winning the most votes of the votes cast in a constituency (single ballot, single member) is declared elected
d)
A system in which the winning candidate has to secure a plurality as well as majority of the votes cast
| | Akshita Menon answered |
Understanding 'First-Past-The-Post' Electoral System
The 'first-past-the-post' (FPTP) system is a widely used electoral method, particularly in India, for electing representatives in single-member constituencies.
Key Features of FPTP:
- Single-Member Constituencies: Each electoral district elects one representative. Voters cast their vote for one candidate only.
- Winning by Plurality: The candidate who receives the most votes (not necessarily a majority) wins. This means that a candidate can win without securing over 50% of the total votes cast.
- Simplicity and Speed: The FPTP system is straightforward for voters to understand. Counting votes is also quick, leading to faster election results.
- Potential for Disproportionality: FPTP can lead to outcomes where the percentage of seats won by a party does not reflect the percentage of the overall vote they received. This can result in a significant number of 'wasted' votes, where votes for losing candidates do not contribute to the election outcome.
Misconception about Option 'B':
Option 'B' refers to a "single ballot, plural member majority voting system," which is incorrect in the context of FPTP. The correct interpretation of the FPTP system is that it is a single ballot and single-member voting system, where the candidate with the most votes wins, aligning with option 'C'.
Conclusion:
The 'first-past-the-post' electoral system is critical in shaping electoral outcomes in India and influences political party strategies and voter behavior. Understanding its mechanics helps in comprehending the dynamics of Indian democracy.
The 'first-past-the-post' (FPTP) system is a widely used electoral method, particularly in India, for electing representatives in single-member constituencies.
Key Features of FPTP:
- Single-Member Constituencies: Each electoral district elects one representative. Voters cast their vote for one candidate only.
- Winning by Plurality: The candidate who receives the most votes (not necessarily a majority) wins. This means that a candidate can win without securing over 50% of the total votes cast.
- Simplicity and Speed: The FPTP system is straightforward for voters to understand. Counting votes is also quick, leading to faster election results.
- Potential for Disproportionality: FPTP can lead to outcomes where the percentage of seats won by a party does not reflect the percentage of the overall vote they received. This can result in a significant number of 'wasted' votes, where votes for losing candidates do not contribute to the election outcome.
Misconception about Option 'B':
Option 'B' refers to a "single ballot, plural member majority voting system," which is incorrect in the context of FPTP. The correct interpretation of the FPTP system is that it is a single ballot and single-member voting system, where the candidate with the most votes wins, aligning with option 'C'.
Conclusion:
The 'first-past-the-post' electoral system is critical in shaping electoral outcomes in India and influences political party strategies and voter behavior. Understanding its mechanics helps in comprehending the dynamics of Indian democracy.
Who among the following is associated with the bachpan bachao andolan?- a)Medha Patkar
- b)Kailash Satyarthi
- c)Sidhu Kanswal
- d)Jabreen Shah
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Who among the following is associated with the bachpan bachao andolan?
a)
Medha Patkar
b)
Kailash Satyarthi
c)
Sidhu Kanswal
d)
Jabreen Shah
 | Nilesh Patel answered |
- Started in 1980, Bachpan Bachao Andolan is India's largest movement for the protection of children and works with government agencies and policy makers to strengthen the system.
- Kailash Satyarthl is the founder of the movement.
- He is a Nobel Peace Laureate, who envisions a world where all children are free, safe, healthy, receive quality education, and have the opportunity to realise their potential.
To which one of the following major political parties is the Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) attached? - a)Indian National Congress
- b)Communist Party of India (Marxist)
- c)Communist Party of India
- d)Bharatiya Janata Party
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
To which one of the following major political parties is the Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) attached?
a)
Indian National Congress
b)
Communist Party of India (Marxist)
c)
Communist Party of India
d)
Bharatiya Janata Party
| | Abhijeet Kumar answered |
Communist Party of India (Marxist)
The Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is attached to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)). The CPI(M) is one of the major political parties in India that follows a communist ideology. CITU is the trade union wing of the CPI(M) and plays a significant role in advocating for the rights and welfare of workers in the country.
Background of CITU
The Center of Indian Trade Unions was formed in 1970 and emerged as a powerful trade union organization in India. It was established to unite and mobilize the workers across various sectors to fight for their rights and better working conditions. CITU takes up issues related to wages, job security, social security, and other labor-related matters. It has a presence in both organized and unorganized sectors and has been actively involved in organizing workers and leading various struggles for their rights.
Alignment with CPI(M)
CITU is closely aligned with the Communist Party of India (Marxist), which is a major left-wing political party in India. The CPI(M) believes in socialist principles and advocates for worker's rights, social justice, and the welfare of the marginalized sections of society. The party has a strong presence in several states, especially in West Bengal, Kerala, and Tripura.
Collaborative Efforts
CITU and CPI(M) work in collaboration to champion the cause of workers' rights and welfare. CITU not only provides a platform for workers to voice their concerns but also actively participates in policy advocacy and collective bargaining on their behalf. As part of the broader left-wing movement, both CITU and CPI(M) aim to bring about social change and reduce the exploitation of workers in a capitalist society.
Conclusion
The Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is attached to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)). The close association between CITU and CPI(M) allows for a coordinated effort in addressing the issues faced by workers and advocating for their rights and welfare.
The Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is attached to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)). The CPI(M) is one of the major political parties in India that follows a communist ideology. CITU is the trade union wing of the CPI(M) and plays a significant role in advocating for the rights and welfare of workers in the country.
Background of CITU
The Center of Indian Trade Unions was formed in 1970 and emerged as a powerful trade union organization in India. It was established to unite and mobilize the workers across various sectors to fight for their rights and better working conditions. CITU takes up issues related to wages, job security, social security, and other labor-related matters. It has a presence in both organized and unorganized sectors and has been actively involved in organizing workers and leading various struggles for their rights.
Alignment with CPI(M)
CITU is closely aligned with the Communist Party of India (Marxist), which is a major left-wing political party in India. The CPI(M) believes in socialist principles and advocates for worker's rights, social justice, and the welfare of the marginalized sections of society. The party has a strong presence in several states, especially in West Bengal, Kerala, and Tripura.
Collaborative Efforts
CITU and CPI(M) work in collaboration to champion the cause of workers' rights and welfare. CITU not only provides a platform for workers to voice their concerns but also actively participates in policy advocacy and collective bargaining on their behalf. As part of the broader left-wing movement, both CITU and CPI(M) aim to bring about social change and reduce the exploitation of workers in a capitalist society.
Conclusion
The Center of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is attached to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)). The close association between CITU and CPI(M) allows for a coordinated effort in addressing the issues faced by workers and advocating for their rights and welfare.
Consider the following statements: - The Gujral Doctrine of India is formulated on India’s accommodating approach towards its smaller neighbours on the basis of the principle of non-reciprocity.
- The Gujral Doctrine of India was initiated in 1994.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)Only 1
- b)Only 2
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
- The Gujral Doctrine of India is formulated on India’s accommodating approach towards its smaller neighbours on the basis of the principle of non-reciprocity.
- The Gujral Doctrine of India was initiated in 1994.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both 1 and 2
d)
Neither 1 nor 2
| | Garima Datta answered |
's approach towards its neighboring countries, particularly smaller ones.
The doctrine emphasizes on non-reciprocity and goodwill gestures towards smaller countries.
It advocates for resolving bilateral issues through peaceful means and mutual understanding.
The doctrine also emphasizes on respecting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of neighboring countries.
Overall, the Gujral Doctrine aims to promote regional cooperation and mutual trust among neighboring countries, with India taking the lead in fostering positive relations. It is based on the principles of non-interference, non-reciprocity, and non-violence.
The doctrine emphasizes on non-reciprocity and goodwill gestures towards smaller countries.
It advocates for resolving bilateral issues through peaceful means and mutual understanding.
The doctrine also emphasizes on respecting the territorial integrity and sovereignty of neighboring countries.
Overall, the Gujral Doctrine aims to promote regional cooperation and mutual trust among neighboring countries, with India taking the lead in fostering positive relations. It is based on the principles of non-interference, non-reciprocity, and non-violence.
Despite being a Republican State, India is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations whose head is the British Monarch. This is because:- a)This membership does not affect the sovereign nature of the Indian Republic.
- b)This membership only shows that the British ruled over India.
- c)Members of the association are sovereign and independent.
- d)It is a symbol of the unity among the members of the association.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Despite being a Republican State, India is a member of the Commonwealth of Nations whose head is the British Monarch. This is because:
a)
This membership does not affect the sovereign nature of the Indian Republic.
b)
This membership only shows that the British ruled over India.
c)
Members of the association are sovereign and independent.
d)
It is a symbol of the unity among the members of the association.
| | Kavita Mehta answered |
This extra-constitutional declaration does not affect India’s sovereignty in any manner as the Commonwealth is a voluntary association of independent nations. It also does not affect India’s republican character as India neither pays final allegiance to the British Crown nor the latter has any functions to discharge in relation to India.
Which one of the following does not come under the concept of Non-alignment? - a)Foreign aid from all available sources
- b)Non-involvement in military alliances formulated in the context of Cold War
- c)Faith in isolationism
- d)A demand for a better deal from the North Countries or South Countries
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Which one of the following does not come under the concept of Non-alignment?
a)
Foreign aid from all available sources
b)
Non-involvement in military alliances formulated in the context of Cold War
c)
Faith in isolationism
d)
A demand for a better deal from the North Countries or South Countries
 | Anshu Khanna answered |
Non-alignment and its Concept
Non-alignment is a policy adopted by countries that choose not to align themselves with any of the major power blocs in the world. It involves the rejection of military alliances and the pursuit of an independent foreign policy. Non-alignment emerged as a concept during the Cold War when the world was divided into two major power blocs - the United States-led Western Bloc and the Soviet-led Eastern Bloc.
Non-Alignment and its Components
Foreign Aid from all available sources: Non-alignment involves seeking aid from all available sources, irrespective of their political alignment. Non-aligned countries do not limit themselves to seeking aid from any particular bloc or country. They seek aid from both the Western and Eastern Blocs, as well as from other countries.
Non-Involvement in Military Alliances: Non-alignment involves the rejection of military alliances and the pursuit of an independent foreign policy. Non-aligned countries do not participate in any military alliance that is formulated in the context of the Cold War. They pursue their own foreign policy, which is not influenced by any major power bloc.
Demand for a Better Deal from the North or South Countries: Non-alignment involves demanding a better deal from both the North and South countries. Non-aligned countries seek to promote their interests and ensure that they are not exploited by any major power bloc or country.
What Does Not Come Under Non-alignment?
Faith in Isolationism: Isolationism involves the policy of remaining separate from the affairs of other countries. It is not a part of non-alignment, which involves seeking aid from all available sources and promoting the interests of non-aligned countries. Non-alignment involves engaging with other countries, but not aligning oneself with any major power bloc or country.
Non-alignment is a policy adopted by countries that choose not to align themselves with any of the major power blocs in the world. It involves the rejection of military alliances and the pursuit of an independent foreign policy. Non-alignment emerged as a concept during the Cold War when the world was divided into two major power blocs - the United States-led Western Bloc and the Soviet-led Eastern Bloc.
Non-Alignment and its Components
Foreign Aid from all available sources: Non-alignment involves seeking aid from all available sources, irrespective of their political alignment. Non-aligned countries do not limit themselves to seeking aid from any particular bloc or country. They seek aid from both the Western and Eastern Blocs, as well as from other countries.
Non-Involvement in Military Alliances: Non-alignment involves the rejection of military alliances and the pursuit of an independent foreign policy. Non-aligned countries do not participate in any military alliance that is formulated in the context of the Cold War. They pursue their own foreign policy, which is not influenced by any major power bloc.
Demand for a Better Deal from the North or South Countries: Non-alignment involves demanding a better deal from both the North and South countries. Non-aligned countries seek to promote their interests and ensure that they are not exploited by any major power bloc or country.
What Does Not Come Under Non-alignment?
Faith in Isolationism: Isolationism involves the policy of remaining separate from the affairs of other countries. It is not a part of non-alignment, which involves seeking aid from all available sources and promoting the interests of non-aligned countries. Non-alignment involves engaging with other countries, but not aligning oneself with any major power bloc or country.
Chapter doubts & questions for Political Dynamics - Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos 2026 is part of UPSC CSE exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the UPSC CSE exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for UPSC CSE 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Political Dynamics - Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos in English & Hindi are available as part of UPSC CSE exam. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC CSE Exam by signing up for free.
Laxmikanth for Indian Polity: Summaries, MCQs & videos132 videos|126 docs|67 tests |
