All questions of Parajumbles for SSC CGL Exam

Logical Order Explanation:

Context: The paragraph discusses how certain factors within organizations can hinder their ability to respond to changing conditions effectively.

1. Arrogant managers can overevaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. (Q)
- This sentence introduces the issue of arrogant managers who are resistant to change and new ideas.

2. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities. (S)
- This sentence highlights another factor that can impede organizational adaptability, which is employees who are not aware of external threats and opportunities due to their inward focus.

3. Bureaucratic cultures can smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. (P)
- This sentence points out how bureaucratic structures can stifle innovation and responsiveness to changing circumstances.

4. And the lack of leadership leaves no force inside these organizations to break out of the morass. (R)
- Finally, this sentence concludes by emphasizing the crucial role of leadership in driving organizational change and breaking free from stagnation.

Correct Order: QSPR (Option D)
- The most logical order of the sentences is to first introduce the issue of arrogant managers, followed by the challenge posed by inwardly focused employees, then discussing the impact of bureaucratic cultures, and concluding with the importance of leadership in overcoming these obstacles.

Understanding the Correct Order of Sentences
To form a coherent paragraph from the given sentences, we need to identify the logical flow of information. Here’s a breakdown of the chosen order:
1. Introduction of the Practice
- Sentence Q: "A common German practice in occupied Poland was to round up random civilians on the streets of Polish cities."
- This sentence sets the stage by introducing the practice of rounding up civilians, establishing the context for the following details.
2. Explanation of the Term
- Sentence P: "The term, 'lapanka' carried a sardonic connotation from the words earlier use for the childrens game known in English as 'tag'."
- Following the introduction, this sentence explains the term used for the practice, providing insight into its nature and the grim irony behind it.
3. Victims' Statistics
- Sentence R: "According to various estimates between 1942 and 1944 there were approximately 400 victims of this practice daily in Warsaw alone, with numbers on some days reaching several thousands."
- After explaining the term, this sentence presents statistical data that highlights the scale of the issue, emphasizing the severity of the situation.
4. Specific Case Example
- Sentence S: "For example, on 19th September 1942 close to 3000 men and women were transported by train to Germany - they had been caught in the massive round-ups all over Warsaw the previous two days."
- Concluding with a specific example, this sentence illustrates the previous statistics, providing a real-life instance of the consequences of the practice.
Conclusion
The logical sequence of Q, P, R, S effectively narrates the context, definition, magnitude, and specific instances of the rounding up of civilians during the German occupation of Poland. This order ensures clarity and coherence in conveying the gravity of the situation faced by the Polish population.

Understanding the Logical Order
To create a coherent paragraph from the given sentences, it's essential to analyze the meaning and flow of each sentence.
Sentence Breakdown
- P: It introduces the idea that discussing uniformities of nature is preferable.
- Q: It clarifies that laws of nature are statements of facts rather than commands.
- R: It mentions that recognizing laws as statements helps eliminate the misconception that laws are directives.
- S: It comments on the unfortunate use of the term "law" in this context.
Logical Flow of Ideas
1. Starting with Q: The discussion begins with Q, as it sets the foundation by defining laws of nature as factual statements. This is crucial for understanding the rest of the argument.
2. Transition to S: Next, S logically follows, as it critiques the terminology used, indicating why the term "law" might be misleading in this scientific context.
3. Continuing with R: After establishing the terminology issue, R effectively elaborates on the implications of understanding laws as statements rather than commands, addressing the fallacy associated with this interpretation.
4. Concluding with P: Finally, P wraps up the argument by suggesting that a focus on uniformities of nature is a more effective approach. This serves as a logical conclusion to the discussion initiated by Q.
Final Sequence
Thus, the most logical order of the sentences is QSPR, as it flows from the definition of laws, critiques the terminology, clarifies misconceptions, and concludes with a more effective perspective.
Hence, the correct answer is option C: QSPR.

Understanding the Passage Structure
To determine the correct order of the sentences, we need to analyze their content and logical connections.
Initial Statement
- The passage begins with the statement that students are the most vulnerable section of society.
Analyzing the Parts
- P: Revolutionary and new fledged ideas have a great appeal to them.
- Q: Agitations may be non-violent methods of protest.
- R: They cannot resist the charm of persuasion.
- S: They are to be taught that without discipline they cannot get proper education.
Logical Flow
1. Starting with Attraction:
- Sentence P introduces the idea that students are attracted to new ideas.
- This aligns well with the theme of vulnerability discussed in the opening sentence.
2. Persuasion's Role:
- Following P, sentence R elaborates that students cannot resist persuasion, reinforcing their vulnerability to these ideas.
3. Education and Discipline:
- Next, sentence S emphasizes the need for discipline in education, indicating that students must be educated about the consequences of their actions.
4. Protests and Consequences:
- Finally, sentence Q discusses non-violent protests, leading into the closing sentence (6), which warns that if protests become violent, it encourages anti-social behavior.
Correct Sequence: PRSQ
Combining these insights, the correct order of the sentences is P, R, S, Q:
- P (Appeal to ideas)
- R (Charm of persuasion)
- S (Need for discipline)
- Q (Consequences of agitations)
Thus, the correct answer is option 'A' (PRSQ). This sequence maintains a coherent flow of thoughts regarding the vulnerability of students, their attraction to ideas, the necessity of discipline, and the implications of protests.