Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 below.
Solutions of Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 1

Why is it important to corroborate confessions with additional evidence in legal proceedings?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 1
It is essential to corroborate confessions with additional evidence in legal proceedings to validate the confession and strengthen the case. By corroborating confessions with other evidence, the legal system can ensure that the confession is reliable and that the case against the accused is robust. This practice helps uphold the principles of fairness and justice in legal proceedings.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 2

What is a confession, as per legal terms?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 2
In legal terms, a confession refers to an admission made by a person accused of a crime, suggesting their guilt. This admission plays a crucial role in legal proceedings and is significant in determining the guilt or innocence of the accused individual.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 3

According to Mr. Justice Stephen, what does a confession involve?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 3
As per Mr. Justice Stephen, a confession involves admitting to the crime or suggesting facts that indicate the commission of the offense. This admission is considered a crucial element in legal proceedings as it directly relates to the acknowledgment of guilt by the accused individual.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 4
In what scenario are admissions considered the best form of proof according to the Supreme Court of India?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 4
The Supreme Court of India has emphasized that admissions are most compelling when they are clear, unambiguous, and directly establish facts or relevant issues in question. Such admissions serve as potent evidence due to their unequivocal nature, providing strong support for the establishment of truths in legal proceedings and beyond.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 5
In the case of Sahoo v. State of U.P., what specific statement was considered a confession by the court?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 5
The statement "I have finished her and with her the daily quarrels" was considered a confession by the court in the case of Sahoo v. State of U.P. This statement, uttered by the accused who was witnessed leaving the house on the day of the murder, was deemed relevant evidence in the case. Confessions play a critical role in legal proceedings as they can provide direct insight into the mindset and actions of the accused, influencing the outcome of the trial.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 6
What is the primary purpose of a judicial confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 6
A judicial confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 serves the purpose of establishing guilt voluntarily before a court. It is a statement made by an individual before a magistrate or in court, admitting to the charges against them. This confession is crucial as it can significantly impact the outcome of a case by providing valuable evidence. It must be made freely and voluntarily without any coercion, showcasing the individual's plea of guilt in a sound mental state.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 7
What are the essential conditions for a valid judicial confession?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 7
For a valid judicial confession, it must be made freely without any coercion. The individual confessing should be in a fit mental state and the confession should be given during the course of legal proceedings. These conditions ensure that the confession is genuine, voluntary, and legally admissible as evidence in court.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 8
What are the conditions necessary for a valid judicial confession to be considered admissible in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 8
For a judicial confession to be considered valid and admissible in legal proceedings, it must be made freely without any coercion. This ensures that the confession is voluntary and not a result of external pressures or influences. A confession made under duress or through coercion would not hold the same weight in court. It is crucial for the person confessing to be in a fit mental state and for the confession to be given during the course of legal proceedings to be considered valid.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 9
What is the key characteristic of extra-judicial confessions as defined in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 9
Extra-judicial confessions, as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, can take various forms such as a prayer or a private conversation. These confessions do not necessarily need to be directed towards a specific individual but involve a voluntary admission of guilt by the accused in a conversation with individuals other than a judge or magistrate handling the case.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 10
What is emphasized by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab v. Bhagwan Singh regarding the value of an extra-judicial confession?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 10
In the case of State of Punjab v. Bhagwan Singh, the Supreme Court stressed the significance of the consistency and persuasiveness of an extra-judicial confession. This means that for such a confession to hold weight in court, it must be coherent and convincing, highlighting the importance of the quality of the confession in legal proceedings.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 11
According to the guidelines outlined by the Supreme Court in Balwinder Singh v. State, what must the court do when assessing the credibility of a person making an extra-judicial confession?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 11
In Balwinder Singh v. State, the Supreme Court directed that the court should meticulously scrutinize all statements made by the person giving an extra-judicial confession to ascertain the trustworthiness of the confessor. This underscores the critical role of the court in evaluating the credibility of such confessions by carefully examining all related statements for reliability and accuracy.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 12
What type of confession is considered inadmissible if it appears to be influenced by inducement, threat, or promise from a person in authority?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 12
A voluntary confession is one that is made without any external influence such as inducement, threat, or promise from a person in authority. When a confession seems to be influenced by such factors, it is considered irrelevant and inadmissible in legal proceedings. It is crucial that confessions are given freely and without coercion to ensure the integrity of the legal process.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 13
According to Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act, what kind of confessions are deemed irrelevant in criminal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 13
Confessions caused by inducement, threat, or promise are considered irrelevant in criminal proceedings as per Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act. This provision aims to safeguard the rights of the accused and ensure that confessions are not obtained through improper means. It highlights the importance of upholding ethical standards in the legal system to maintain fairness and justice.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 14
According to the Supreme Court ruling in the Pancho v. State of Haryana case, what is the evidentiary value of confessions made by co-accused individuals?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 14
The Supreme Court ruling in the Pancho v. State of Haryana case highlighted that confessions made by co-accused individuals are not deemed as primary evidence. Instead, they hold value in supporting or corroborating conclusions drawn from other substantial evidence. It is crucial to rely on concrete and reliable evidence beyond co-accused confessions to ensure justice and truth in legal proceedings.
Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 15
Why is it important to consider concrete and reliable evidence beyond co-accused confessions in legal cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Question 15
It is crucial to look beyond co-accused confessions and rely on concrete and reliable evidence in legal cases to reach just conclusions and ascertain the truth. While co-accused confessions can provide valuable supplementary information, a comprehensive body of evidence is necessary to ensure a fair and accurate legal process.
253 docs|259 tests
Information about Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Confessions under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams