GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Tests  >  Practice Questions for GMAT  >  Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - GMAT MCQ

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - GMAT MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test Practice Questions for GMAT - Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors for GMAT 2024 is part of Practice Questions for GMAT preparation. The Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors questions and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus.The Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors MCQs are made for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors below.
Solutions of Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors questions in English are available as part of our Practice Questions for GMAT for GMAT & Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors solutions in Hindi for Practice Questions for GMAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors | 10 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for GMAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Practice Questions for GMAT for GMAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 1

Is the number of distinct prime factors of the positive integer X more than 4?
(1) X is a multiple of 42.
(2) X is a multiple of 98.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 1

(1) X is a multiple of 42.

Prime factors of 42 are 2, 3 and 7. If x is 42, unique prime factors are less than 4, if x is 462, unique prime factors are 2,3,5,7 and 11 i.e. greater than 4. Therefore, not sufficient.

(2) X is a multiple of 98.

Prime factors of 98 are 2 and 7. A multiple of 98 can have more than or less than 4 unique prime factors. Not sufficient.

Merging them, we get that x is a multiple of both, 98 and 42. The prime factors of LCM are 2, 3 and 7 i.e. less than 4 but if we multiple the LCM itself by 55, then we would have more than 4 unique prime factors. Therefore, not sufficient.

E is the correct answer.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 2

Is a positive integer n a multiple of 12

(1) n is a multiple of 6
(2) n is a multiple of 24

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 2

Statement 1

(1) n is a multiple of 6

We cannot conclude whether x is a multiple of 12.

Ex. x = 6; Is 6 a multiple of 12 -- No
x = 12; Is 12 a multiple of 12 -- Yes

The statement is not sufficient and we can eliminate A and D.

Statement 2

(2) n is a multiple of 24

If n is a multiple of 24, the number is also a multiple of 12.

The statement is sufficient.

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 3

If a and b are positive integers, what is the remainder when 74a + b is divided by 4?

1) a = 2
2) b = 3

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 3

(1) a = 2

If we substitute a = 2 into the expression 74a + b, we have 74(2) + b = 148 + b. Without knowing the value of b, we cannot determine the remainder when dividing by 4. Therefore, statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

(2) b = 3

If we substitute b = 3 into the expression 74a + b, we have 74a + 3. However, we don't have any information about the value of a, and without knowing the value of a, we cannot determine the remainder when dividing by 4. Therefore, statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

When considering each statement individually, neither statement alone is sufficient to determine the remainder when 74a + b is divided by 4.

Let's consider both statements together:

From statement (1), we know that a = 2. From statement (2), we know that b = 3.

Substituting these values into the expression 74a + b, we have 74(2) + 3 = 148 + 3 = 151.

To find the remainder when 151 is divided by 4, we divide 151 by 4:

151 ÷ 4 = 37 remainder 3.

Therefore, both statements together are sufficient to determine the remainder when 74a + b is divided by 4.

The answer is (B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 4

If x, y, and z are positive integers, is x+y divisible by 5?

1) x+z is divisible by 5
2) y+z is divisible by 5

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 4

Statement (1): x+z is divisible by 5.
This statement alone does not provide any information about whether x+y is divisible by 5. We don't have any direct relationship between x+z and x+y.

Statement (2): y+z is divisible by 5.
Similarly, this statement alone does not give us any information about the divisibility of x+y by 5. There is no direct relationship between y+z and x+y.

Since neither statement alone is sufficient to answer the question, and the statements do not provide enough information when considered together, the answer is (E): Statements (1) and (2) together are not sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data are needed.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 5

What is the remainder when the positive three-digit number xyz is divided by 9?

(1) The three-digit number whose hundreds digit is (x+2), tens digit is (y+1) and units digit is z, is divisible by 9

(2) xyz is divisible by 7

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 5

(1) The three-digit number whose hundreds digit is (x+2), tens digit is (y+1), and units digit is z is divisible by 9.

If this three-digit number is divisible by 9, it means that the sum of its digits is divisible by 9. From the given information, we have (x+2) + (y+1) + z. However, we don't have any specific information about the values of x, y, and z, so we cannot determine if their sum is divisible by 9. Therefore, statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

(2) xyz is divisible by 7.

This statement tells us that the three-digit number xyz is divisible by 7. However, divisibility by 7 does not provide any information about divisibility by 9. Therefore, statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

When considering each statement individually, neither statement alone is sufficient to determine the remainder when xyz is divided by 9.

Therefore, the answer is (A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 6

Is the tens digit of two-digit positive integer p divisible by 3?

(1) p – 5 is a multiple of 3.
(2) p – 11 is a multiple of 3.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 6

(1) p - 5 is a multiple of 3.

From this statement, we can deduce that p is 5 more than a multiple of 3. However, this information alone does not give us any specific information about the tens digit of p or its divisibility by 3.

(2) p - 11 is a multiple of 3.

From this statement, we can deduce that p is 11 more than a multiple of 3. Again, this information alone does not provide us with any specific information about the tens digit of p or its divisibility by 3.

When considering both statements together, we still don't have enough information to determine the divisibility of the tens digit of p by 3. The statements only provide information about the difference between p and a multiple of 3, but not about the specific value or range of p.

Therefore, the answer is (E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question asked, and additional data are needed.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 7

If x, y, z are positive integers, is xyz divisible by 6?

(1) x, y, z are consecutive.
(2) x + y + z is a multiple of 3.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 7

(1) x, y, z are consecutive.

If x, y, and z are consecutive, it means they are consecutive positive integers. In this case, we have two possible scenarios:

  • If one of x, y, or z is divisible by 2 and another one is divisible by 3, then xyz will be divisible by 6 because it will have both prime factors 2 and 3.
  • If none of x, y, or z is divisible by 2 or 3, then xyz will not be divisible by 6.

Therefore, statement (1) alone is sufficient to determine if xyz is divisible by 6.

(2) x + y + z is a multiple of 3.

If the sum of x, y, and z is a multiple of 3, it implies that at least one of x, y, or z is divisible by 3. However, this information alone does not tell us anything about whether xyz is divisible by 2. There could be cases where x, y, and z are not consecutive but still result in xyz being divisible by 6.

When considering each statement individually, we find that statement (1) alone is sufficient to determine if xyz is divisible by 6, while statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is (A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 8

If 4 is a factor of positive integer x and 9 is a factor of positive integer y, is 42 a factor of xy?

(1) 14 is a factor of x.
(2) 25 is a factor of y.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 8

(1) 14 is a factor of x.

If 14 is a factor of x, it means that x is divisible by 14. Since 14 is a factor of x, and 4 is a factor of x, we can conclude that x must be a multiple of 4 and 14. Since 42 is a multiple of both 4 and 14, if x is divisible by both 4 and 14, then xy will be divisible by 42. Therefore, statement (1) alone is sufficient to answer the question.

(2) 25 is a factor of y.

If 25 is a factor of y, it means that y is divisible by 25. However, this information alone does not tell us anything about x or whether xy is divisible by 42. Therefore, statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

When considering each statement individually, we find that statement (1) alone is sufficient to determine if 42 is a factor of xy, while statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is (A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 9

If positive integer x is a multiple of 6 and positive integer y is a multiple of 14, is xy a multiple of 105?

(1) x is a multiple of 9.
(2) y is a multiple of 25.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 9

Let's analyze the given statements:

Statement (1): x is a multiple of 9. This statement tells us that x is a multiple of 3, which is one of the prime factors of 105. Therefore, if statement (1) is true, xy will be a multiple of 105 regardless of the value of y.

Statement (2): y is a multiple of 25. This statement tells us that y is a multiple of 5, another prime factor of 105. However, it does not provide any information about whether x is a multiple of 3 or 7, so we cannot determine if xy is a multiple of 105 based on statement (2) alone.

Combining both statements, we know that x is a multiple of 3 and y is a multiple of 5. However, we still don't know if x is a multiple of 7. Without knowing if x is divisible by 7, we cannot conclusively determine if xy is a multiple of 105.

Therefore, the answer is (B): Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 10

If s is an integer, is 24 a divisor of s ?

(1) Each of the numbers 3 and 8 is a divisor of s.
(2) Each of the numbers 4 and 6 is a divisor of s.

Detailed Solution for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors - Question 10

(1) Each of the numbers 3 and 8 is a divisor of s.

If both 3 and 8 are divisors of s, it means that s is divisible by both 3 and 8. Since 24 is a multiple of both 3 and 8, if s is divisible by both 3 and 8, then it is also divisible by 24. Therefore, statement (1) alone is sufficient to answer the question.

(2) Each of the numbers 4 and 6 is a divisor of s.

If both 4 and 6 are divisors of s, it means that s is divisible by both 4 and 6. However, this information alone does not tell us if s is divisible by 24. For example, s could be 12, which is divisible by 4 and 6 but not by 24. Therefore, statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

When considering each statement individually, we find that statement (1) alone is sufficient to determine if 24 is a divisor of s, while statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

Therefore, the answer is (A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.

18 docs|139 tests
Information about Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Divisibility/Multiples/Factors, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for GMAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for GMAT