MCQ: Seating Arrangements- 2 - SSC CGL MCQ

From the common explanation, we get O sits exactly opposite to Q.

Hence, Option B is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

References:

M is sitting fourth to the right of N.

P is sitting second to the left of N.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get the following arrangements:

References:

Q is sitting third to the right of S.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get two different cases:

Case 1:

Case 2:

References:

S is not sitting beside P.

T is sitting second to the left of O.

O is not sitting beside M.

Inferences:

So, from this case 1 will be eliminated as S is not sitting beside P.

Thus, the final arrangement,

From the common explanation, we get the immediate neighbour of P and M is Q.

Hence, Option C is correct.

Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:

References:

M is sitting fourth to the right of N.

P is sitting second to the left of N.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get the following arrangements:

References:

Q is sitting third to the right of S.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get two different cases:

Case 1:

Case 2:

References:

S is not sitting beside P.

T is sitting second to the left of O.

O is not sitting beside M.

Inferences:

So, from this case 1 will be eliminated as S is not sitting beside P.

Thus, the final arrangement,

From the common explanation, we get Sagar scored 2nd lowest marks.

Hence, Option D is correct.

References:

Tarun scored more marks than Priyam but less than Rahul.

Sagar neither scored 3rd highest nor scored lowest marks.

Priyam scored more marks than Anurag.

Sagar scored less than Tarun, who scored 87 marks.

Inferences:

From the above references, we get the following arrangements

Rahul > Tarun (87) > Priyam > Sagar > Anurag

From the common explanation, we get Rahul > 87, so only 90 is greater than 87.

Hence, Option C is correct.

References:

Tarun scored more marks than Priyam but less than Rahul.

Sagar neither scored 3rd highest nor scored lowest marks.

Priyam scored more marks than Anurag.

Sagar scored less than Tarun, who scored 87 marks.

Inferences:

From the above references, we get the following arrangements

Rahul > Tarun (87) > Priyam > Sagar > Anurag

P sits to the immediate left of S.

Hence, option A is correct.

From the common explanation, we can say that there are at least 16 boys sitting in the row.
Hence, Option B is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Only two boys sit to the left of J.
Eight boys sit between R and J.
Only three boys sit between R and M.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
P sits fourth to the right of R.
O sits third to the left of M.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as P sits fourth to the right of R.

References:
Only three boys sit between O and H.
T sits third to the right of M.
V sits fourth to the right of O.
More than 12 boys sit between P and H.
More than seven boys sit between P and J.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we can say that there are at least 16 boys sitting in the row.
Hence, Option B is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Only two boys sit to the left of J.
Eight boys sit between R and J.
Only three boys sit between R and M.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
P sits fourth to the right of R.
O sits third to the left of M.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as P sits fourth to the right of R.

References:
Only three boys sit between O and H.
T sits third to the right of M.
V sits fourth to the right of O.
More than 12 boys sit between P and H.
More than seven boys sit between P and J.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we can say that R sits 3rd to the right of the one who sits immediate right of M. 
Hence, Option D is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Only two boys sit to the left of J.
Eight boys sit between R and J.
Only three boys sit between R and M.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
P sits fourth to the right of R.
O sits third to the left of M.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as P sits fourth to the right of R.

References:
Only three boys sit between O and H.
T sits third to the right of M.
V sits fourth to the right of O.
More than 12 boys sit between P and H.
More than seven boys sit between P and J.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get (P, H) sits at the extreme end of the row.
Hence, Option D is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Only two boys sit to the left of J.
Eight boys sit between R and J.
Only three boys sit between R and M.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
P sits fourth to the right of R.
O sits third to the left of M.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as P sits fourth to the right of R.

References:
Only three boys sit between O and H.
T sits third to the right of M.
V sits fourth to the right of O.
More than 12 boys sit between P and H.
More than seven boys sit between P and J.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get T sits immediate right of Q.
Hence, Option B is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Exactly two persons are sitting between P and Q.
Only one person is sitting between P and U.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
S is sitting second to the right of R.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the following arrangements:

References:
T is not sitting beside S.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as T is not sitting beside S.
Hence, we get our final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get R sits exactly opposite to U.
Hence, Option C is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Exactly two persons are sitting between P and Q.
Only one person is sitting between P and U.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
S is sitting second to the right of R.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the following arrangements:

References:
T is not sitting beside S.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as T is not sitting beside S.
Hence, we get our final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get the immediate neighbour of P and U is S.
Hence, Option D is correct.
Final Arrangement:

Common Explanation:
References:
Exactly two persons are sitting between P and Q.
Only one person is sitting between P and U.
Inferences:
From the above references, we get two different cases:

References:
S is sitting second to the right of R.
Inferences:
From the above reference, we get the following arrangements:

References:
T is not sitting beside S.
Inferences:
So, from this case 2 will be eliminated as T is not sitting beside S.
Hence, we get our final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get the position of G is 3rd to the right of C.

Hence, Option B is correct.

Common Explanation:

References:

One person sits between A and C, who sits second to the right of H.

G sits opposite to B.

Both G and B do not sit immediate left of H.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get two different cases:

References:

D sits second to the left of B.

A doesn’t sit beside D.

E doesn’t face C.

Inferences:

From the above reference, case 1 will be eliminated because A doesn’t sit beside of D.

So, the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we get C sits opposite to F.

Hence, Option C is correct.

Common Explanation:

References:

One person sits between A and C, who sits second to the right of H.

G sits opposite to B.

Both G and B do not sit immediate left of H.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get two different cases:

References:

D sits second to the left of B.

A doesn’t sit beside D.

E doesn’t face C.

Inferences:

From the above reference, case 1 will be eliminated because A doesn’t sit beside of D.

So, the final arrangement:

From the common explanation, we can say that H sits 3rd to the left of the one who sits opposite to D.

Hence, Option B is correct.

Common Explanation:

References:

One person sits between A and C, who sits second to the right of H.

G sits opposite to B.

Both G and B do not sit immediate left of H.

Inferences:

From the above reference, we get two different cases:

References:

D sits second to the left of B.

A doesn’t sit beside D.

E doesn’t face C.

Inferences:

From the above reference, case 1 will be eliminated because A doesn’t sit beside of D.

So, the final arrangement: