English Language Mock Test - 5 - CUET MCQ

The correct answer is Option (4) "was allowed to".

Key Points

• The structure "was allowed to" is appropriate in this sentence because it indicates that the speaker was permitted to do something—in this case, give their side of the story.
• The phrase correctly employs the passive voice, which fits the context of receiving permission from someone else.
• It maintains the grammatical consistency required by the context, using the past tense to indicate an action that took place after the meeting concluded.

Therefore, the correct answer is- 'After the meeting concluded, I was allowed to give my side of the story.’

Additional Information

• Option 1, "left to," suggests departure or moving away to perform a task but does not imply permission, which is the focus here.
• Option 2, "allowed to," could potentially fit in a different grammatical structure but is incorrect in this passive construction because it lacks the necessary "was" to indicate that the speaker was the recipient of permission.
• Option 3, "was allowed for," is grammatically incorrect in this context. The preposition "for" does not correctly follow "allowed" when discussing permission to perform an action.

The correct answer is Option (1) "a skillful performance or achievement.".

Key Points

• "Tour de force" is a French term that is used in English to describe an impressive performance or achievement that showcases great skill.
• This expression is often used in the context of artistic or creative endeavors but can be applied to any area in which notable skill is demonstrated.
• It implies not just proficiency but an extraordinary level of craftsmanship or mastery in a given field.

Therefore, the correct answer is- "a skillful performance or achievement.".

The correct answer is Option 1) "a person who is blindly devoted to an idea".

Key Points

• Chauvinist (अंधराष्ट्रवादी) - A person who shows excessive or prejudiced loyalty or support for their own cause, group, or sex.
  • Example: His speeches often revealed him to be a chauvinist, disregarding any achievements made by rival teams.
• a person who is blindly devoted to an idea (एक व्यक्ति जो किसी विचार के प्रति अंधभक्त है)
• Chauvinist accurately describes "a person who is blindly devoted to an idea"

Therefore, the correct answer is- "a person who is blindly devoted to an idea".

The correct answer is 'Option 2'. i.e. "Sender's Address".

Key Points

• In formal letter writing, the sender's address is typically placed at the top of the document before the date, making it the first piece of information to be written.
• The sender's address is crucial for providing the recipient with the address to which they can send a reply.
• Positioning the sender's address at the beginning of the letter establishes the sender's identity and location, which is important for official correspondence.

Therefore, the correct answer is- "Sender's Address".

Additional Information

• Option 1 (Date): The date usually follows the sender's address in a formal letter layout. It's important but not the first thing.
• Option 3 (Salutation): The salutation comes after the sender's address and the date, and it is used to greet the recipient.
• Option 4 (Subject): The subject line, which succinctly states the purpose of the letter, usually comes after the salutation in a formal letter setup.

The correct answer is 'Option 2'.

Key Points

• "The meal is very delicious" directly states the quality of the meal without the emotional exuberance of the exclamatory sentence but retains the original meaning and context.
• Assertive sentences are declarative and provide a straightforward fact or opinion; "The meal is very delicious" aligns with the sentiment expressed in "What a delicious meal!" without the exclamatory format.

Therefore, the correct answer is- "The meal is very delicious".

Additional Information

• Option 1 ("It was what a delicious meal.") is grammatically incorrect and does not convert the exclamatory sentiment into a proper assertive format.
• Option 3 ("It is a meal very delicious.") has awkward phrasing and is not the standard way of conveying the sentiment in English.
• Option 4 ("This were a delicious meal.") is grammatically incorrect due to the incorrect verb form "were" with the singular subject "This".

The correct answer is 'A - 2, B - 1, C - 4, D - 3'.

Key Points

• Let's look at the meaning of different phrasal verbs given in the question:
  • Look after: take care of someone or something
    • Example: Meg is expected to come straight home from school and look after her younger sister
  • Put on: place a garment, piece of jewelry, etc. on part of one's body
    • Example: Julie had put on a cotton dress.
  • Keep on: continue to do something
    • Example: He kept on moving.
  • Called off: cancel an event or agreement
    • Example: They held a ballot on whether to call off industrial action.
• Therefore, as per the points mentioned above, we find that the correct answer is Option 1.

Correct Answer: A - 2, B - 1, C - 4, D - 3

The correct answer is "reluctant"

Key Points

• The given word "eager" means (of a person) wanting to do or have something very much.
• The antonym of "eager" is "reluctant" which means unwilling or hesitant to do something.
• • Eg. He was eager to complete his homework.
  • He was reluctant to go on a trip with him.
• Option 1 "repulsive" means disgusting or unpleasant
  • Eg. She was repulsed by his inappropriate behaviour.
• Option 2 "nervous" means anxious or uneasy
  • Eg. They were nervous about their supposed perception from the world.
• Option 4 "passive" means inactive or not taking action
  • Eg. Passive income is a great way to increase your wealth.

Thus, option 3 is the correct answer.

Correct sentence: The kids are feeling bored, but they are reluctant to participate in the activities.

The correct answer is 'The offer was so good that it could not be refused. '

Key Points

• The given sentence implies that the subject (offer) was so good that it could not be refused.
• This same meaning is echoed by option 1 making it the correct answer.
• Option 2 is incorrect as it is incomplete. It does not state why the offer cannot be refused.
• Option 3 is incorrect as it introduces 'you' as the subject.
• Option 4 is grammatically incorrect.
• Hence, option 1 is the correct answer as it means the same as the given sentence.
  

Correct sentence - The offer is so good that it could not be refused.

The correct answer is Crazy.

Key Points

• The word 'sane' means sound mind; not mad or mentally ill.
• Let's consider each option-
  • End- A final part of something, especially a period of time, an activity, or a story.
  • Beautiful- Pleasing the senses or mind aesthetically.
  • Delicious- Highly pleasant to the taste.
  • Crazy- Mad, especially as manifested in wild or aggressive behaviour.
• Hence, the most appropriate antonym of the word 'Sane' is 'Crazy'.
• Thus, option 4 is the correct answer.

Here the correct answer is 'To openly display one's emotions'.

Key Points

• The most appropriate meaning of the idiom "Wear your heart on your sleeve" is: To openly display one's emotions.
• The idiom "Wear your heart on your sleeve" means to openly or transparently display one's emotions or feelings, without trying to hide or conceal them. It suggests being emotionally vulnerable and not being afraid to show one's true emotions to others.
• For example:
  • Sarah wears her heart on her sleeve and is not afraid to express her love and affection for others.
  • John is known for wearing his heart on his sleeve, always displaying his excitement, disappointment, or sadness openly.
• This meaning is correct because the idiom derives from the literal act of wearing a heart-shaped badge or symbol on one's sleeve, which historically symbolized openly expressing one's emotions. It has come to represent a person's tendency to openly and honestly display their emotions without reservation.
• Therefore, the correct answer is Option 1.

The very first paragraph and the last line of the passage talk about the theme of the passage. Refer to the first sentence. The same thing is spoken about in option (d).

Refer to the sentence, "the Amazons…...the equivalents of giants and centaurs" of the third paragraph. Hence (c).

Refer to the first paragraph, "In large part as a consequence of the feminist movement, historians have focused a great deal of attention in recent years on determining more accurately the status of women in various periods….. An example is Johann Bachofen's 1861 treatise on Amazons, women-ruled societies of questionable existence contemporary with ancient Greece." Hence (c).

Statement I is can be inferred from the second paragraph.
II is not mentioned at all in the passage.
III contradicts the third paragraph.
Hence (a).

Refer to the concluding paragraph. It talks about the Greek male-dominated society that viewed all female groups as destructive and dangerous.
So it can be inferred from the last paragraph that many males' probable reactions to the idea of a society ruled by women in ancient Greece could best be characterized as adverse and hostile. Hence (b).

The author argues Bachofen’s reliance on myths was flawed because Greek accounts of Amazons were didactic—intended to teach moral lessons about women’s rule—rather than factual, portraying them as dangerous opposites to Greek norms. The author suggests social documents like gravestones, wills, and marriage contracts as better sources, offering concrete insights into women’s status. Option A correctly captures this critique and recommendation, unlike the other options which misrepresent the passage’s points.

Option (c) is the correct answer as IMF does not find mention in the list of organizations which have hailed the 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a failure. All the other options are incorrect as they are mentioned in the passage as organizations which have termed the convention as a failure.

Option (a) is the correct answer as 'signatory' does not refer to an individual but a nation which has signed and promised to follow the provisions of the convention.

Option (b) is the correct answer as by referring the coverage of Indian media as 'uncritical' the author opines that the Indian media lacked opinion on the issue. Options (a) and (c) are incorrect as they are vague and do not elaborate as to how the author has criticized or distinguished the Indian media respectively. Option (d) is incorrect as it is contrary to the information provided in the passage.

Option (a) is the correct answer as it has been stated in the passage that all countries are responsible for the failure of COP25 as they have showed lack of ambitious outcomes adequate to dealing with the climate emergency.

Option (d) is the correct answer as it has been mentioned in the passage that developed countries are seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.

Option (c) is the correct answer as the term innuendo refers to a hint, insinuation or intimation about a person or thing, especially of a denigrating or a derogatory nature.

Refer to the first sentence of the third paragraph where the answer is given. The other options are out of scope.

Refer to the sixth paragraph for the answer.

Infringe means to actively break the terms of something.

Refer to the last sentence of the third paragraph for the answer.

Refer to the seventh paragraph for the answer.

The passage identifies rising jet fuel prices as the primary reason for increased domestic airfares, noting an 8% on-month rise in November and further increases in January and February, driving airlines to pass costs to consumers. Jet Airways has responded by reviving the fuel surcharge, now charging up to Rs 700 compared to Rs 100-300 previously, as confirmed by a senior executive. Option A correctly reflects this cause and response, while other options misalign with the passage’s focus and details.

Option (c) is correct as the passage offers multiple comparisons between the rich and poor to reflect the growing gap between them.
All other options are incorrect as they are the points used to make the wider point about inequality.

Option (a) is correct as the author mentions that regulations are the only way to alter corporate behavior towards public good. Thus, a controlled capitalist model is the closest to his ideology.