MCQ: Sentence Completion - 2 - SSC CGL MCQ

I. Critical thinking is essential in problem-solving because it helps in evaluating different options and choosing the best one.
The above sentence is logically coherent and contextually correct because critical thinking is the process of evaluating and analyzing different options to find the most effective solution to a problem. Hence, fragment I is correct.

II. Critical thinking is essential in problem-solving because it ensures that the problem is solved quickly and professionally.
The above sentence is not logically coherent and contextually incorrect because critical thinking involves a deliberate and systematic process of evaluating information, considering multiple perspectives, and making informed decisions. Hence, fragment II is incorrect.

III. Critical thinking is essential in problem-solving because it reduces the likelihood of making incorrect decisions.
The above sentence is logically coherent and contextually correct because critical thinking helps to identify and avoid common mistakes, biases, and assumptions that can lead to incorrect decisions. Hence, fragment III is correct. 
Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

I. Effective communication is important in the workplace because it helps to build trust and strengthen relationships between colleagues.
The above sentence is logically coherent and contextually correct because effective communication is essential for building trust and rapport between colleagues. It fosters a positive work environment, encourages teamwork and collaboration, and enhances employee morale. Hence, fragment I is correct.

II. Effective communication is important in the workplace because it enables employees to work independently without supervision.
The above sentence is not logically coherent and contextually incorrect because effective communication involves exchanging information, ideas, and feedback between employees and their supervisors. While employees may be able to work independently, communication with their supervisors is necessary to ensure that they are on track and that their work meets the organization's goals. Hence, fragment II is incorrect.

III. Effective communication is important in the workplace because it reduces the need for face-to-face interactions.
The above sentence is not logically coherent and contextually incorrect because effective communication involves exchanging information, ideas, and feedback between employees, and this can be done through various channels, including face-to-face interactions, emails, and video conferencing. Effective communication does not necessarily reduce the need for face-to-face interactions. Hence, fragment III is incorrect.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.

The sentence suggests that the CEO's lack of experience in the industry may make his plans appear uncertain or risky. Therefore, the correct option would be related to a risky or uncertain situation.

Option A, "shot in the dark," correctly fits the context and meaning of the sentence, as it refers to a situation where you try something without being certain it will work. Option B, "stroke of genius," is incorrect, as it implies that the CEO's plans are brilliant, which is contradictory to the rest of the sentence. Option C, "calculated risk," and D, "sound investment," are incorrect as they imply that the CEO's plans are well thought out and likely to succeed, which is also contradictory to the rest of the sentence.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

The sentence suggests that the artist's latest exhibit was successful, and the critics admired the uniqueness and thought-provoking nature of the pieces on display. Therefore, the correct option would be related to a successful and well-received event.

Option A, “massive knockout” does not make meaningful context for the given sentence as it renders the sentence with ambiguity. Option C, "thought-provoking showcase," is incorrect, as it only describes the nature of the exhibit, but not whether it was successful or not. Option D, "controversial failure," is also incorrect, as it implies that the exhibit was not successful, which is contradictory to the rest of the sentence.

Option B, "stunning success," correctly fits the context and meaning of the sentence, as it refers to a highly successful event.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

The sentence suggests that the team scored a goal at the last minute, which was well-received by the fans who celebrated it. Therefore, the correct option would be related to a positive or successful event.

Option A, "heartbreaking defeat," C, "forgettable performance," and D, "lackluster effort," are all incorrect, as they refer to negative events that are contradictory to the rest of the sentence.

Option B, "game-changing moment," correctly fits the context and meaning of the sentence, as it refers to a crucial or decisive moment that significantly impacted the game's outcome.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

All three fragments provide valid reasons for the increasing popularity of social media platforms. Fragment I highlights the easy communication and connection with others, fragment II mentions the limitation of exposure to diverse perspectives and opinions, and fragment III emphasizes the provision of a safe and controlled online environment. Therefore, all three fragments contribute to the coherence and logical explanation of the given statement.

Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

Fragments I and II offer valid justifications for the importance of preserving natural resources. Fragment I explains that natural resources provide essential ecosystem services that support life on Earth, while fragment II highlights the consequences of their depletion, such as environmental degradation and loss of biodiversity. Fragment III, on the other hand, presents an incorrect and illogical statement by suggesting that human activities have no impact on the natural environment.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

Option A is correct. It fits grammatically and contextually with the sentence. Option B is incorrect because it uses "that progresses" instead of "toward improving." Option C is grammatically incorrect. Option D is grammatically incorrect as it uses "progressed step" instead of "progressive step."
Hence, option A is correct.

Option C is correct as it suggests that the annual festival has an effect on the local economy. Option B is incorrect as it uses plural noun ‘impacts’ but the sentence talks about ‘a significant impact’ which is singular. Options A and D use the word ‘impact’ as verb which is not correct grammatically.
Hence, option C is correct.

Option A does not fit as ‘racism’ is totally out of context.
Option B is incorrect grammatically as ‘rattle on’ is totally inappropriate.
Option C is also incorrect as adjective ‘sufficient’ is irrelevant to modify ‘strong’. We need adverb ‘sufficiently’ to modify adjective ‘strong’.
Option D is the right answer as it is correct both meaningfully and grammatically.
Hence, Option D is the correct answer.

Fragments I and II provide coherent and logical reasons for the importance of education. Fragment I explains that education equips individuals with knowledge and skills for personal and professional development, while fragment II states that it leads to higher employment opportunities and economic growth. Fragment III, however, presents an opposing viewpoint by suggesting that education restricts creativity and hinders critical thinking, which is not in line with the coherence of the statement.
Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

Only fragment I provides a logical reason for how technological advancements have revolutionized communication. It states that advancements have made information sharing faster and more convenient. Fragment II incorrectly suggests that technological advancements have led to increased isolation and lack of face-to-face interactions, which is not in line with the coherence of the statement. Fragment III is also incorrect as it states that all forms of traditional communication methods have been eliminated, which is an extreme and unrealistic claim.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

Option B is the correct answer. It grammatically fits in the sentence. It conveys the intended meaning that the companies have implemented multiple actions or measures to reduce carbon emissions. Other options are grammatically incorrect.
Hence, option B is correct.

Option A is the correct choice as it correctly conveys the idea that the company's decision is a significant and difficult challenge for its competitors. Options B and D do not make grammatical sense in the context of the sentence. Option C changes the meaning of the sentence by suggesting that the company's decision is a challenge for its competitors, which is not the intended meaning.
Hence, option A is correct.

Option A does not fit as 'panic of getting healed’ doesn’t make sense.
Option C is incorrect grammatically due to the presence of preposition ‘by’; it should be replaced with ‘from’.
Option D does not make the sentence coherent as ‘avoid panic’ does not sound appropriate.
Option B is the right answer as it is correct both meaningfully and grammatically.
Hence, Option B is the correct answer.