MCQ Test: Designation Puzzle - 2 - Bank Exams MCQ

Following the common explanation, we get "Ranjan-GM".
Hence, option B is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Rathish works in BHEL as MD and he gets Rs.12000.
Riyaz works in GIC.
Tarun is an AGM.
Bibin gets Rs.60000.
Jenish works in NACL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
All the above information is given directly, by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
The person who is working in ONGC gets Rs.14000.
The one who works in HPCL is DGM.
Ranjan neither works in IOC nor works in HPCL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Ranjan works in ONGC and he gets Rs.14000 (only possibility)
Bibin works in HPCL as DGM (only possibility)
By using above information, we get the table as follows

References:
The Supervisor gets Rs.25000 but he is not Jenish.
The Assistant gets Rs.10000.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Finally, Tarun works in IOC as AGM.
Riyaz is a Supervisor and he gets Rs.25000 (only possibility)
Jenish works in NACL as Assistant and he gets Rs.10000 (only possibility)
Finally, Ranjan works in ONGC as GM and Tarun has gets Rs.20000.
Thus we get the completed table as follows,

Following the common explanation, we get "Tarun-Rs.20000".
Hence, option D is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Rathish works in BHEL as MD and he gets Rs.12000.
Riyaz works in GIC.
Tarun is an AGM.
Bibin gets Rs.60000.
Jenish works in NACL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
All the above information is given directly, by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
The person who is working in ONGC gets Rs.14000.
The one who works in HPCL is DGM.
Ranjan neither works in IOC nor works in HPCL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Ranjan works in ONGC and he gets Rs.14000 (only possibility)
Bibin works in HPCL as DGM (only possibility)
By using above information, we get the table as follows

References:
The Supervisor gets Rs.25000 but he is not Jenish.
The Assistant gets Rs.10000.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Finally, Tarun works in IOC as AGM.
Riyaz is a Supervisor and he gets Rs.25000 (only possibility)
Jenish works in NACL as Assistant and he gets Rs.10000 (only possibility)
Finally, Ranjan works in ONGC as GM and Tarun has gets Rs.20000.
Thus we get the completed table as follows,

Following the common explanation, we get "Tarun-IOC-AGM".
Hence, option A is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Rathish works in BHEL as MD and he gets Rs.12000.
Riyaz works in GIC.
Tarun is an AGM.
Bibin gets Rs.60000.
Jenish works in NACL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
All the above information is given directly, by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
The person who is working in ONGC gets Rs.14000.
The one who works in HPCL is DGM.
Ranjan neither works in IOC nor works in HPCL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Ranjan works in ONGC and he gets Rs.14000 (only possibility)
Bibin works in HPCL as DGM (only possibility)
By using above information, we get the table as follows

References:
The Supervisor gets Rs.25000 but he is not Jenish.
The Assistant gets Rs.10000.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Finally, Tarun works in IOC as AGM.
Riyaz is a Supervisor and he gets Rs.25000 (only possibility)
Jenish works in NACL as Assistant and he gets Rs.10000 (only possibility)
Finally, Ranjan works in ONGC as GM and Tarun has gets Rs.20000.
Thus we get the completed table as follows,

Following the common explanation, we get "Riyaz GIC Supervisor ".
Hence, option D is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Rathish works in BHEL as MD and he gets Rs.12000.
Riyaz works in GIC.
Tarun is an AGM.
Bibin gets Rs.60000.
Jenish works in NACL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
All the above information is given directly, by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
The person who is working in ONGC gets Rs.14000.
The one who works in HPCL is DGM.
Ranjan neither works in IOC nor works in HPCL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Ranjan works in ONGC and he gets Rs.14000 (only possibility)
Bibin works in HPCL as DGM (only possibility)
By using above information, we get the table as follows

References:
The Supervisor gets Rs.25000 but he is not Jenish.
The Assistant gets Rs.10000.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Finally, Tarun works in IOC as AGM.
Riyaz is a Supervisor and he gets Rs.25000 (only possibility)
Jenish works in NACL as Assistant and he gets Rs.10000 (only possibility)
Finally, Ranjan works in ONGC as GM and Tarun has gets Rs.20000.
Thus we get the completed table as follows,

Following the common explanation, we get "Tarun is the person who gets Rs.20000 for special allowance". 
Hence, option B is correct.

Common Explanation
References:
Rathish works in BHEL as MD and he gets Rs.12000.
Riyaz works in GIC.
Tarun is an AGM.
Bibin gets Rs.60000.
Jenish works in NACL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
All the above information is given directly, by using we get the initial table as follows,

References:
The person who is working in ONGC gets Rs.14000.
The one who works in HPCL is DGM.
Ranjan neither works in IOC nor works in HPCL.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Ranjan works in ONGC and he gets Rs.14000 (only possibility)
Bibin works in HPCL as DGM (only possibility)
By using above information, we get the table as follows

References:
The Supervisor gets Rs.25000 but he is not Jenish.
The Assistant gets Rs.10000.
Inferences:
From above statements,
Finally, Tarun works in IOC as AGM.
Riyaz is a Supervisor and he gets Rs.25000 (only possibility)
Jenish works in NACL as Assistant and he gets Rs.10000 (only possibility)
Finally, Ranjan works in ONGC as GM and Tarun has gets Rs.20000.
Thus we get the completed table as follows,

We have,

• G works in Canara bank but not with J.
• J works with the one whose age is 69 years but not in Dena bank.
• F is 45 years old and works along with H but not in Vijaya bank.
• G is not working as a Clerk.
• J who is not a Probationary Officer and is the youngest person in the group whose age is not more than 27

Again we have,

• E doesn’t work in the Canara bank but works with the one whose age is 53 years.
• Age of E is 24 years more than the age of F.
• E’s age is 15 years more than the sum of the ages of L and J.

E=69, J=23 --> E = L + J + 15
69 = L + 23 + 15
Hence L = 31

Again we have,

• I and K Work in different banks but works at the same post.
• K is elder than I.
• The one who works with G is 16 years more than L.
• There are equal numbers of Probationary Officers and Clerks.

L=31, the one works with G has 16 years more than L so the person’s age is 47 years. Hence K(53) works at Vijaya Bank and is elder than I(47).

Again we have,

• The difference between the ages of K and I is twice the difference between the ages of G and E who is younger than G.
• The age of H is 7 years less than the age of E.

From the above condition,
K=53, I=47 and E=69
So K – I = 2 (G – E) -->53 – 47 = 2 (G - 69)
6 = 2(G - 69) --> G = 3 + 69 = 72.
H = 69 – 7 = 62.
Hence Case1a shows the final arrangement.

We have,

• G works in Canara bank but not with J.
• J works with the one whose age is 69 years but not in Dena bank.
• F is 45 years old and works along with H but not in Vijaya bank.
• G is not working as a Clerk.
• J who is not a Probationary Officer and is the youngest person in the group whose age is not more than 27

Again we have,

• E doesn’t work in the Canara bank but works with the one whose age is 53 years.
• Age of E is 24 years more than the age of F.
• E’s age is 15 years more than the sum of the ages of L and J.

E=69, J=23 --> E = L + J + 15
69 = L + 23 + 15
Hence L = 31

Again we have,

• I and K Work in different banks but works at the same post.
• K is elder than I.
• The one who works with G is 16 years more than L.
• There are equal numbers of Probationary Officers and Clerks.

L=31, the one works with G has 16 years more than L so the person’s age is 47 years. Hence K(53) works at Vijaya Bank and is elder than I(47).

Again we have,

• The difference between the ages of K and I is twice the difference between the ages of G and E who is younger than G.
• The age of H is 7 years less than the age of E.

From the above condition,
K=53, I=47 and E=69
So K – I = 2 (G – E) -->53 – 47 = 2 (G - 69)
6 = 2(G - 69) --> G = 3 + 69 = 72.
H = 69 – 7 = 62.
Hence Case1a shows the final arrangement.

We have,

• G works in Canara bank but not with J.
• J works with the one whose age is 69 years but not in Dena bank.
• F is 45 years old and works along with H but not in Vijaya bank.
• G is not working as a Clerk.
• J who is not a Probationary Officer and is the youngest person in the group whose age is not more than 27

Again we have,

• E doesn’t work in the Canara bank but works with the one whose age is 53 years.
• Age of E is 24 years more than the age of F.
• E’s age is 15 years more than the sum of the ages of L and J.

E=69, J=23 --> E = L + J + 15
69 = L + 23 + 15
Hence L = 31

Again we have,

• I and K Work in different banks but works at the same post.
• K is elder than I.
• The one who works with G is 16 years more than L.
• There are equal numbers of Probationary Officers and Clerks.

L=31, the one works with G has 16 years more than L so the person’s age is 47 years. Hence K(53) works at Vijaya Bank and is elder than I(47).

Again we have,

• The difference between the ages of K and I is twice the difference between the ages of G and E who is younger than G.
• The age of H is 7 years less than the age of E.

From the above condition,
K=53, I=47 and E=69
So K – I = 2 (G – E) -->53 – 47 = 2 (G - 69)
6 = 2(G - 69) --> G = 3 + 69 = 72.
H = 69 – 7 = 62.
Hence Case1a shows the final arrangement.

We have,

• G works in Canara bank but not with J.
• J works with the one whose age is 69 years but not in Dena bank.
• F is 45 years old and works along with H but not in Vijaya bank.
• G is not working as a Clerk.
• J who is not a Probationary Officer and is the youngest person in the group whose age is not more than 27

Again we have,

• E doesn’t work in the Canara bank but works with the one whose age is 53 years.
• Age of E is 24 years more than the age of F.
• E’s age is 15 years more than the sum of the ages of L and J.

E=69, J=23 --> E = L + J + 15
69 = L + 23 + 15
Hence L = 31

Again we have,

• I and K Work in different banks but works at the same post.
• K is elder than I.
• The one who works with G is 16 years more than L.
• There are equal numbers of Probationary Officers and Clerks.

L=31, the one works with G has 16 years more than L so the person’s age is 47 years. Hence K(53) works at Vijaya Bank and is elder than I(47).

Again we have,

• The difference between the ages of K and I is twice the difference between the ages of G and E who is younger than G.
• The age of H is 7 years less than the age of E.

From the above condition,
K=53, I=47 and E=69
So K – I = 2 (G – E) -->53 – 47 = 2 (G - 69)
6 = 2(G - 69) --> G = 3 + 69 = 72.
H = 69 – 7 = 62.
Hence Case1a shows the final arrangement.

We have,

• G works in Canara bank but not with J.
• J works with the one whose age is 69 years but not in Dena bank.
• F is 45 years old and works along with H but not in Vijaya bank.
• G is not working as a Clerk.
• J who is not a Probationary Officer and is the youngest person in the group whose age is not more than 27

Again we have,

• E doesn’t work in the Canara bank but works with the one whose age is 53 years.
• Age of E is 24 years more than the age of F.
• E’s age is 15 years more than the sum of the ages of L and J.

E=69, J=23 --> E = L + J + 15
69 = L + 23 + 15
Hence L = 31

Again we have,

• I and K Work in different banks but works at the same post.
• K is elder than I.
• The one who works with G is 16 years more than L.
• There are equal numbers of Probationary Officers and Clerks.

L=31, the one works with G has 16 years more than L so the person’s age is 47 years. Hence K(53) works at Vijaya Bank and is elder than I(47).

Again we have,

• The difference between the ages of K and I is twice the difference between the ages of G and E who is younger than G.
• The age of H is 7 years less than the age of E.

From the above condition,
K=53, I=47 and E=69
So K – I = 2 (G – E) -->53 – 47 = 2 (G - 69)
6 = 2(G - 69) --> G = 3 + 69 = 72.
H = 69 – 7 = 62.
Hence Case1a shows the final arrangement.

Final Arrangement:

We have,

• Q works three positions senior to the one who works immediately junior to R.
• More than four persons are senior to Q.

From the above condition, there are two possibilities.

Again we have,

• Only three persons are designated between Q and V.
• The number of persons senior to V is the same as the number of persons junior to X.
• P works immediately junior to the one who works four positions senior to U.
• P neither works as CHRO nor CIO.

From the above condition, there are four possibilities.

Again we have,

• The number of persons designated between P and Q is the same as the number of persons designated between R and Y.
• W is senior to T but not senior to S.
• T is designated as neither CMO nor CHRO.

From the above condition, case2, case-1a(1) and case1a get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.

Final Arrangement:

We have,

• Q works three positions senior to the one who works immediately junior to R.
• More than four persons are senior to Q.

From the above condition, there are two possibilities.

Again we have,

• Only three persons are designated between Q and V.
• The number of persons senior to V is the same as the number of persons junior to X.
• P works immediately junior to the one who works four positions senior to U.
• P neither works as CHRO nor CIO.

From the above condition, there are four possibilities.

Again we have,

• The number of persons designated between P and Q is the same as the number of persons designated between R and Y.
• W is senior to T but not senior to S.
• T is designated as neither CMO nor CHRO.

From the above condition, case2, case-1a(1) and case1a get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.

Final Arrangement:

We have,

• Q works three positions senior to the one who works immediately junior to R.
• More than four persons are senior to Q.

From the above condition, there are two possibilities.

Again we have,

• Only three persons are designated between Q and V.
• The number of persons senior to V is the same as the number of persons junior to X.
• P works immediately junior to the one who works four positions senior to U.
• P neither works as CHRO nor CIO.

From the above condition, there are four possibilities.

Again we have,

• The number of persons designated between P and Q is the same as the number of persons designated between R and Y.
• W is senior to T but not senior to S.
• T is designated as neither CMO nor CHRO.

From the above condition, case2, case-1a(1) and case1a get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.

Final Arrangement:

We have,

• Q works three positions senior to the one who works immediately junior to R.
• More than four persons are senior to Q.

From the above condition, there are two possibilities.

Again we have,

• Only three persons are designated between Q and V.
• The number of persons senior to V is the same as the number of persons junior to X.
• P works immediately junior to the one who works four positions senior to U.
• P neither works as CHRO nor CIO.

From the above condition, there are four possibilities.

Again we have,

• The number of persons designated between P and Q is the same as the number of persons designated between R and Y.
• W is senior to T but not senior to S.
• T is designated as neither CMO nor CHRO.

From the above condition, case2, case-1a(1) and case1a get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.

Final Arrangement:

We have,

• Q works three positions senior to the one who works immediately junior to R.
• More than four persons are senior to Q.

From the above condition, there are two possibilities.

Again we have,

• Only three persons are designated between Q and V.
• The number of persons senior to V is the same as the number of persons junior to X.
• P works immediately junior to the one who works four positions senior to U.
• P neither works as CHRO nor CIO.

From the above condition, there are four possibilities.

Again we have,

• The number of persons designated between P and Q is the same as the number of persons designated between R and Y.
• W is senior to T but not senior to S.
• T is designated as neither CMO nor CHRO.

From the above condition, case2, case-1a(1) and case1a get eliminated. Case1 shows the final arrangement.