Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act

Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act below.
Solutions of Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 1

What do formal admissions in legal proceedings carry according to the Indian Evidence Act?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 1
Formal admissions in legal proceedings, as outlined in the Indian Evidence Act, carry substantive weight and are admissible as evidence without further proof. This means that once a formal admission is made during legal proceedings, it can be accepted as evidence without the need for additional verification or proof, unless requested by the court. This provision is crucial in expediting legal processes and ensuring the efficient presentation of relevant facts in court.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 2

What type of statements can be considered as informal admissions under the Indian Evidence Act?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 2
Informal admissions under the Indian Evidence Act encompass any oral or written statements made by a party regarding the facts of the case. These statements are not made formally during legal proceedings but can still be significant in providing insights into the case. Additionally, a person's conduct can also be considered an informal admission. This broad category of informal admissions underscores the Act's inclusivity in considering various forms of statements and conduct as potential indicators of a party's position or understanding of the case.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 3

What type of statements made by parties in a lawsuit are considered significant under Section 18 of the Indian Evidence Act?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 3
In Section 18 of the Indian Evidence Act, statements made by parties in a lawsuit that suggest relevant facts are considered significant. This implies that statements which are pertinent to the case or issue at hand hold importance in legal proceedings, aiding in the determination of facts and outcomes. It is essential to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant statements to ensure fair and just adjudication.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 4
Under the Indian Evidence Act, which individuals are bound by statements made in a representative capacity according to the provisions discussed?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 4
As per the provisions outlined in the Indian Evidence Act, individuals like trustees, administrators, etc., are bound by statements made in a representative capacity. This means that when these individuals make statements on behalf of the parties they represent, these statements are considered binding and hold legal significance. Such statements are crucial in legal proceedings where representatives speak or act on behalf of others, impacting the course of the case.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 5
What type of statements are considered irrelevant in civil cases according to Section 23?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 5
In civil cases, statements made without prejudice are considered irrelevant. These statements are intended to facilitate compromise and are kept confidential. They cannot be disclosed without the consent of both parties involved.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 6
According to Section 21, which of the following is true regarding admissions against a party?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 6
Section 21 specifies that an admission against a party cannot be proved by that same party. This rule is designed to prevent self-incrimination or self-damaging statements from being used against the party making them.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 7
What is the key requirement for a confession to be considered valid under the Indian Evidence Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 7
According to the Indian Evidence Act, for a confession to be considered valid, it must explicitly admit guilt. This means that the individual confessing must acknowledge their involvement or guilt in the matter under consideration. Explicitly admitting guilt is crucial in distinguishing a valid confession from other types of statements.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 8
What does Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act primarily deem irrelevant regarding confessions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 8
Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act deems confessions obtained through inducement, threat, or promise as irrelevant. This provision highlights the importance of ensuring that confessions are made voluntarily and without any external influence to maintain their admissibility in legal proceedings.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 9
What exception in the Indian Evidence Act permits the admissibility of a statement obtained through coercion if it leads to discovering a crime-related fact?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 9
Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act provides an exception where a statement obtained through coercion becomes admissible if it leads to the discovery of a fact related to a crime. This exception underscores the significance of uncovering crucial crime-related information, even if the statement was obtained under coercive circumstances.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 10
According to the Indian Evidence Act, when does a subsequent confession become relevant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 10
According to the Indian Evidence Act, a subsequent confession becomes relevant when inducement, threat, or promise is removed, thus making the confession voluntary. This ensures that the confession is not influenced by external factors and is given willingly by the individual, strengthening its admissibility in legal proceedings.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 11
In the case of Kashmira Singh v State of MP, why was an accused acquitted despite a confession being made?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 11
In the case of Kashmira Singh v State of MP, the court acquitted an accused individual due to insufficient corroboration of the confession. This emphasizes the importance of corroborative evidence in legal proceedings, highlighting the significance of having additional supporting evidence to validate the claims made in a confession. Corroborative evidence helps in ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the statements provided, leading to fairer and more just outcomes in the legal system.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 12
What key characteristic distinguishes confessions from admissions in legal contexts, especially concerning their implications on the parties involved?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 12
Confessions carry binding implications for co-accused individuals, a characteristic not shared by admissions. This means that confessions made by one party can have legal consequences for others involved in the same crime. It is essential to understand this distinction to grasp the legal ramifications of confessions in criminal cases.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 13
In the context of legal statements, why are confessions considered to have more weight as evidence compared to admissions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 13
Confessions are viewed as more substantial evidence because they entail an explicit acknowledgment of guilt or a substantial admission of facts leading to guilt. In contrast, admissions may simply suggest a fact or inference without directly accepting guilt. This distinction underscores the significance of confessions in legal proceedings as they provide clearer and more decisive evidence regarding the involvement of the accused in a crime.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 14
What distinguishes admissions from confessions in the context of the Evidence Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 14
Admissions and confessions in the Evidence Act differ primarily based on the types of cases they are associated with. Admissions relate to civil cases, encompassing statements that can either support or oppose the interests of the party making them. On the other hand, confessions are specific to criminal cases, involving an acknowledgment of guilt or admission of guilt-related facts. This distinction is crucial in understanding their roles and implications within legal proceedings.
Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 15
What is a key characteristic of confessions as per the Evidence Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act - Question 15
A significant characteristic of confessions under the Evidence Act is that they involve an acknowledgment of guilt or a substantial admission of guilt-related facts. This admission of guilt is specific to criminal cases and holds significant weight as evidence, often considered as satisfactory proof of the accused's guilt. Confessions play a crucial role in establishing culpability in legal contexts.
279 docs|259 tests
Information about Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Admissions and Confessions in Evidence Act, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams