CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Tests  >  Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - CLAT MCQ

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - CLAT MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test - Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper MCQs are made for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper below.
Solutions of Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper questions in English are available as part of our course for CLAT & Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper solutions in Hindi for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper | 200 questions in 120 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 1

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. Choose the word, which is most opposite in meaning of the word, printed in bold as used in the passage Deleterious.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 2

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. The author’s most important objective of writing the above passage seems to — —-

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 3

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. The scientists engaged in manufacturing destructive weapons are ———-.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 4

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. According [o the passage, the argument on use and manufacture of nuclear weapons

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 4

The correct answer is A as legally According [o the passage, the argument on use and manufacture of nuclear weapon Does not stand the test of legality.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 5

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. The author of the passage seems to be of the view that

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 5

The correct option is D as How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience. so spending money on manufacture of weapons is not justifiable. so, option c incorrect

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 6

Instruction: Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. Which of the following is one of the consequences of nuclear war?

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 6

The correct option is A.
From the following lines from the passage it is clear ‘Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more’.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 7

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. Which of the following best explains the word devoted, as used in the passage?

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 8

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. The biological consequences of nuclear war as given in the passage include all the following, except

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 8

The correct answer is D as the the author has talked about all the consequences given in options except Abundant food for smaller population.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 9

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. It appears from the passage that the use of nuclear weapons is considered against morality by

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 9

The correct answer is B as according to the passage as anyone who indulge in nuclear war is against morality

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 10

Instruction:  Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.

There is a fairly universal sentiment that the use of nuclear weapons is clearly contrary to morality and that its production probably so, does not go far enough. These activities are not only opposed to morality but also to law if the legal objection can be added to the moral, the argument against the use and the manufacture of these weapons will considerably be reinforced. Now the time is ripe to evaluate the responsibility of scientists who knowingly use their expertise for the construction of such weapons, which has deleterious effect on mankind.

To this must be added the fact that more than 50 percent of the skilled scientific manpower in the world is now engaged in the armaments industry. How appropriate it is that all this valuable skill should be devoted to the manufacture of weapons of death in a world of poverty is a question that must touch the scientific conscience.

A meeting of biologists on the Long-Term Worldwide Biological consequences of nuclear war added frightening dimension to those forecasts. Its report suggested that the long biological effects resulting from climatic changes may at least be as serious as the immediate ones. Sub-freezing temperatures, low light levels, and high doses of ionizing and ultraviolet radiation extending for many months after a large-scale nuclear war could destroy the biological support system of civilization, at least in the Northern Hemisphere. Productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems could be severely restricted for a year or more. Post war survivors would face starvation as well as freezing conditions in the dark and be exposed to near lethal doses of radiation. If, as now seems possible, the, Southern Hemisphere were affected also, global disruption of the biosphere could ensue. In any event, there would be severe consequences, even in the areas not affected directly, because of the inter-dependence of the world economy. In either case the extinction of a large fraction of the earth’s animals, plants and microorganism seems possible. The population size of Homo sapiens conceivably could be reduced to prehistoric levels or below, and extinction of the human species itself cannot be excluded.

Q. Which of the following statements I, II, III and IV is definitely true in the context of the passage?

(I) There is every likelihood of survival of the human species as a consequence of nuclear war.

(II) Nuclear war risks and harmful effects are highly exaggerated.

(III) The post war survivors would be exposed to the benefits of non-lethal radiation.

(IV) Living organisms in the areas which we not directly affected by nuclear was would also suffer.

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 10

The correct answer is  D as with context to the passage in the second para it is mentioned that  Living organisms in the areas which we not directly affected by nuclear was would also suffer.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 11

Three of the four words given in these questions are spelt wrong. 

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 11

The correct option is A.
Renaissance is a French word meaning “rebirth.” It refers to a period in European civilization that was marked by a revival of Classical learning and wisdom.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 12

Three of the four words given in these questions are spelt wrong. 

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 12

The correct option is D.
Malaise refers to an overall feeling of discomfort and lack of well-being. Fatigue is extreme tiredness and lack of energy or motivation for everyday activities.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 13

Three of the four words given in these questions are spelt wrong. 

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 13

The correct option is C.
 regardless, which means “without concern as to advice, warning, or hardship,” or “heedless.”

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 14

Three of the four words given in these questions are spelt wrong. 

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 15

Three of the four words given in these questions are spelt wrong. 

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 15

The correct option is A.
 gaiety definition:
1. happiness and excitement: 2. happiness and excitement: 3. happiness and excitement

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 16

Instructions:  Given below are a few foreign language phrases that are commonly used.

Q. Mala fide

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 16

The correct option is B.
Mala fide means in bad faith; with intent to deceive.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 17

Instructions: Given below are a few foreign language phrases that are commonly used.

Q. Pro rata

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 17

The correct answer is D as Pro rata is the latin for 'proportionally' or a 'proportion of' . therefore option D is correct.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 18

Instructions: Given below are a few foreign language phrases that are commonly used.

Q. Vice versa

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 19

Instructions: Given below are a few foreign language phrases that are commonly used.

Q. Ab initio    

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 19

The correct answer is A as Ab initio   means from the very beginning.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 20

Instructions: Given below are a few foreign language phrases that are commonly used.

Q. Alibi

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 20

The correct answer is B as word alibi means else where .

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 21

Instructions: Some idioms given below are commonly used. 

Q. To give the game away

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 21

The correct answer is C as the phrase means to reveal something which someone had been trying to keep secret.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 22

Instructions: Some idioms given below are commonly used. 

Q. To cool one’s heels

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 22

The correct answer is D as To cool one’s heels
Means to wait and keep waiting and take rest for time.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 23

Instructions: Some idioms given below are commonly used. 

Q. To bury the hatchet

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 23

The correct option is B.
bury the hatchet
Meaning: make peace; end a quarrel, settle one's differences to become friends again. 

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 24

Instructions: Some idioms given below are commonly used. 

Q. Gift of the gab

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 24
Becoming a good conversationalist requires having a certain set of skills in your communication toolbox. Some people have the gift of gab, and can talk to anyone about anything. And some people struggle to make small talk.  That gives the other person something to work with, creating a more stimulating conversation.”
Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 25

Instructions: Some idioms given below are commonly used. 

Q. To smell a rat

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 25

The correct answer is A as to smell a rat means to become suspicious that something in a given situation is not quite right or to suspect a trick being applied.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 26

Instructions: Given below are sentences with a blank in each sentence. Choose the right answer.

Q. Some people believe that in emotional maturity men are inferior ………women.

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 26

The correct answer is B as The adjective ending with -ior (ex - prior , junior , senior , inferior , superior) take "to" after them.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 27

Instructions: Given below are sentences with a blank in each sentence. Choose the right answer.

Q. My father was annoyed …………… me.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 28

Instructions: Given below are sentences with a blank in each sentence. Choose the right answer.

Q. Some orthodox persons are averse ………….. drinking liquor.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 29

Instructions: Given below are sentences with a blank in each sentence. Choose the right answer.

Q. The Cinema Hall was on fire and the Cinema owner had to send ………………….. the Fire Brigade.

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 29

The correct option is A.
In English language, certain words are followed by certain specific prepositions. Such prepositions are known as appropriate prepositions.
For the word "send", the appropriate preposition is "for".
The phrasal verb send for in option (a) is correct as it means, to ask or tell somebody to come to you, especially in order to help you.
Thus, the correct complete sentence is:
The Cinema Hall was on fire and the Cinema owner had to send  FOR  the Fire Brigade.

Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 30

Instructions: Given below are sentences with a blank in each sentence. Choose the right answer.

Q. He was not listening ……………. I was saying.

Detailed Solution for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper - Question 30

The correct answer is C as it is grammatically correct .

View more questions
Information about Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: CLAT 2009 Past Year Paper, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CLAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for CLAT