All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts

Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts below.
Solutions of Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 1
Save

What does legal liability under the Law of Torts entail?

Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 1
Legal liability under the Law of Torts involves the obligation that legally binds an individual to rectify a wrongful act they may have committed. This liability can arise from explicit or implicit contracts or as a consequence of torts committed. It is crucial in holding individuals accountable for their actions and ensuring justice in civil wrongs.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 2
Save

What is the concept of no-fault liability in legal terms?

Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 2
No-fault liability refers to legal responsibility for an injury that can be imposed on the wrongdoer without the need to prove carelessness or fault. This concept is significant in cases where proving fault may be difficult or unnecessary for providing compensation to the injured party.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 3
Save

In what scenario can a master be held accountable for the actions of their servant?

Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 3
A master can be accountable for the actions of their servant when those actions are performed within the usual scope of business, presumed to be authorized by the master. This principle is essential for ensuring that employers take responsibility for the actions of their employees during work-related tasks.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 4
Save
How are the liabilities of an individual typically handled beyond their estate?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 4
The liabilities of an individual do not typically transfer to their representatives beyond their estate. This means that the legal obligations and responsibilities of an individual generally do not extend to their heirs or other representatives after their death. It ensures that individuals are accountable only within their lifetime and estate.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 5
Save
What is the legal concept known as when someone is held responsible for the actions of another individual under the Law of Torts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 5
Vicarious liability, in legal terms, refers to a situation where one person is held responsible for the actions of another individual. This concept is particularly significant in cases involving principals and their agents, where the principal can be held accountable for the actions of the agent. It's a fundamental principle in tort law that helps determine liability in scenarios where an individual is acting on behalf of another party.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 6
Save
According to the principle of 'Respondent Superior,' under what circumstances can a master be held liable for the actions of their servant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 6
The principle of 'Respondent Superior' holds that a master can be held liable for the actions of their servant if the servant commits a tort within the scope of their employment. This legal doctrine establishes that the master is responsible for the actions of the servant while they are carrying out tasks on behalf of the master within the scope of their job responsibilities.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 7
Save
When can a master be held responsible for the mistake or fraud committed by their servant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 7
A master can be held responsible for the mistake or fraud of their servant if the act causes harm and falls within the scope of the servant's employment. In such cases, the master may be deemed accountable for the wrongful actions of the servant if they directly relate to the tasks assigned to the servant within the scope of their job duties.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 8
Save
What legal concept was illustrated in the case of Lloyd versus Grace Smith and Company?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 8
The case of Lloyd versus Grace Smith and Company exemplifies vicarious liability, where an entity or employer is held responsible for the wrongful actions of its agents or employees committed within the scope of their employment. This legal principle holds the company accountable for the deceitful actions of its agent, even if the company itself did not directly participate in the misconduct. Vicarious liability aims to ensure that companies are responsible for the acts of individuals acting on their behalf.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 9
Save
What legal principle dictates that partners in a partnership firm are equally liable for the actions of one partner in the ordinary course of business?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 9
The doctrine of collective responsibility governs partnerships, stating that partners are jointly and severally liable for the actions of any partner undertaken in the normal course of business. This legal principle ensures that all partners bear responsibility for the consequences of each other's actions, emphasizing the shared liability and accountability within a partnership structure.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 10
Save
What does the legal concept of "Act of God" typically refer to in tort law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 10
The term "Act of God" in tort law pertains to damages caused by natural occurrences or events that are beyond human control, such as heavy rainfall, storms, or earthquakes. These events are considered unforeseeable and absolve individuals from liability for resulting damages.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 11
Save
Which type of damage is considered to occur due to natural events beyond human control?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 11
Damage caused by natural events beyond human control, such as heavy rainfall, tides, or storms, is categorized as an Act of God. In legal terms, an Act of God refers to events that are caused by natural forces and are unforeseeable and uncontrollable.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 12
Save
Why was the U.S. firm held absolutely liable in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 12
The U.S. firm was held absolutely liable in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) to ensure compensation for the victims affected by the leakage of oleum gas. Absolute Liability was enforced to guarantee that those harmed by the incident would receive the necessary financial support and remedies, emphasizing the importance of accountability and justice in such situations.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 13
Save
What precedent did M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) set regarding liability in tort cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 13
The case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) set a significant precedent by introducing the concept of Absolute Liability in tort cases. This legal doctrine ensured that in situations where strict liability might not adequately address the harm caused, absolute liability could be imposed to hold parties entirely accountable for compensating the victims, without exceptions.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 14
Save
Why did the court introduce the concept of Absolute Liability in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 14
The court introduced the concept of Absolute Liability in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) to ensure that the U.S. firm was held absolutely liable to compensate the victims, bypassing the usual exceptions of strict liability. This step was taken to guarantee that victims are not left without remedies in situations where fault may be attributed to third parties.
Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 15
Save
What does the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) exemplify regarding Absolute Liability?
Detailed Solution for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts - Question 15
The case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) exemplifies the significance of accountability and the need to prioritize compensation for those affected by harmful activities, irrespective of fault attribution. By introducing the concept of Absolute Liability, the court ensured that victims were not deprived of remedies, emphasizing the importance of holding parties responsible for their actions in hazardous situations.
253 docs|259 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Concept of Liability under Law of Torts, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Concept of Liability under Law of Torts

Find all the important questions for Concept of Liability under Law of Torts at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Concept of Liability under Law of Torts with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Concept of Liability under Law of Torts syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Concept of Liability under Law of Torts resources.

Concept of Liability under Law of Torts MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Concept of Liability under Law of Torts within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Concept of Liability under Law of Torts Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Concept of Liability under Law of Torts with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup