What is a cross-offer in contract law?

When one party makes an offer, and the other party accepts it.

When both parties make offers to each other, but neither offer is accepted.

When a contract is formed without clear acceptance from both parties.

When two parties negotiate the terms of a contract extensively before forming it.

According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, how is an offer defined?

A proposal made by one party to another with the intention of obtaining the other party's assent.

An invitation to treat exchanged between potential contract parties.

A formal agreement signed by both parties involved.

A unilateral promise made by one party without expecting anything in return.

In a cross-offer scenario, why is it crucial for both parties to accept each other's offers for a contract to be formed?

To ensure equal benefits for both parties involved.

To prevent any misunderstandings during contract negotiations.

Because acceptance is a necessary element in contract formation.

To establish a legally binding agreement instantly.

What happens in a cross-offer situation where two companies simultaneously send offers to sell goods to each other at different prices?

A contract is automatically formed based on the offers exchanged.

Both companies are legally obligated to accept each other's offers.

A cross-offer situation arises, and no contract is established.

The companies must seek legal intervention to resolve the offer discrepancies.

What was the outcome of the negotiation between Tinn and Hoffman in the case Tinn v Hoffman (1873) LR 29 Ch D 271?

Tinn accepted Hoffman's counteroffer.

Hoffman accepted Tinn's initial offer.

Both parties accepted each other's offers.

A contract did not exist due to lack of mutual acceptance.

What action did Tinn take in the negotiation with Hoffman regarding the sale of iron goods?

Tinn accepted Hoffman's counteroffer.

Tinn proposed a lower price to Hoffman.

Tinn made an offer to sell the goods at a specific price.

Tinn rejected Hoffman's initial offer.

How did Hoffman respond to Tinn's offer in the negotiation?

Hoffman rejected Tinn's offer outright.

Hoffman accepted Tinn's offer without changes.

Hoffman proposed a lower price in a counteroffer.

Hoffman requested additional goods in the offer.

Why did the court determine that a contract did not exist in the case of Tinn v Hoffman?

Due to lack of interest from both parties in finalizing the deal.

Because Tinn withdrew the offer before acceptance.

Because there was no mutual acceptance of the offers.

Because Hoffman failed to respond to Tinn's offer in time.

In the case of Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co., why did the court determine that no contract existed between the parties?

Failure to negotiate in good faith

What was the key reason cited by the court for the absence of a contract in the case of Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co.?

Lack of intention to create legal relations

What legal concept was central to the court's ruling in the case of Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co.?

Principle of promissory estoppel

Doctrine of privity of contract

What does a counteroffer represent in a negotiation process?

Acceptance of the original offer

Rejection of the original offer and introduction of new terms

Immediate agreement to the original offer

Request for further clarification on the original offer

When Party B responds to Party A's offer with different terms, what type of action is being taken?

Confirmation of the original offer

Acceptance of the terms as they are

How does a counteroffer impact the original offer in a negotiation?

Simplifies the negotiation process

Which legal concept is illustrated by the cases of Hyde v. Wrench (1840) and Stevenson, Jaques & Co. v. McLean (1880)?

Precedence of verbal agreements over written contracts

Validity of offers made in haste

Definition of counter offers within contract law

Establishment of fixed pricing structures in negotiations

In the case of Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334, what was the consequence of Hyde proposing to buy the farm for £950 after Wrench offered it for £1,000?

Hyde's proposal was accepted by Wrench.

Wrench immediately agreed to lower the price to £950.

Hyde's counteroffer of £950 effectively terminated Wrench's original offer of £1,000.

Wrench decided to sell the farm to Hyde for £900.

What was the legal consequence of Hyde's counteroffer of £950 in the case of Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334?

It led to the formation of a binding contract between Hyde and Wrench.

It resulted in Wrench lowering the price to £900.

It rendered Wrench's original offer of £1,000 void.

It prompted Wrench to reconsider selling the farm to Hyde.

What was the outcome when Hyde attempted to accept the initial offer of £1,000 after Wrench rejected Hyde's counteroffer of £950?

Wrench accepted Hyde's attempt to accept the initial offer.

Hyde successfully purchased the farm for £1,000.

The court deemed Hyde's attempted acceptance of £1,000 as valid.

The court deemed Hyde's attempted acceptance of £1,000 as invalid.

When Hyde tried to accept the initial offer of £1,000 after Wrench rejected Hyde's counteroffer of £950, what was Wrench's response?

Wrench accepted Hyde's attempt to accept the initial offer.

Wrench lowered the price to £900 for Hyde.

Wrench declined to sell the farm to Hyde.

Wrench proposed a new counteroffer to Hyde.

What distinguishes a cross-offer from a counter-offer in contract law?

In a cross-offer, parties knowingly make identical offers, while in a counter-offer, parties make different offers.

A cross-offer occurs when parties make offers successively, whereas a counter-offer involves simultaneous offers.

In a cross-offer, acceptance is required for a valid contract, but in a counter-offer, acceptance is not necessary.

A cross-offer leads to a valid contract, but a counter-offer terminates the original offer.

What is the outcome of a cross-offer situation in terms of forming a contract?

A cross-offer leads to a valid contract.

A cross-offer results in automatic acceptance.

A cross-offer does not lead to a valid contract.

A cross-offer creates a binding agreement regardless of acceptance.

How does a counter-offer differ from a cross-offer in terms of offer modification?

A counter-offer maintains the terms of the original offer, while a cross-offer introduces entirely new terms.

A counter-offer alters the terms of the original offer, while a cross-offer keeps the terms unchanged.

Both a counter-offer and a cross-offer maintain the original terms of the offer.

A counter-offer and a cross-offer involve the complete revocation of the original offer.

What is the key distinction between a cross-offer and a counter-offer in contract law?

In a cross-offer, the original offer is terminated, while in a counter-offer, both offers can coexist.

A counter-offer leads to the termination of the original offer, whereas a cross-offer allows parties to accept or reject both offers.

In a cross-offer, there is immediate acceptance, while in a counter-offer, there is a delay before acceptance.

A cross-offer cannot be revoked, while a counter-offer can be revoked at any time.

What action terminates the original offer in a counter-offer situation?

Acceptance of the counter-offer by the offeree

Presentation of a new offer by the offeror

Rejection of the initial offer by the offeree

Modification of the original offer by the offeror

Cross Offer and Counter Offer Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

	Civil Law for Judiciary Exams 253 docs\|259 tests

	Civil Law for Judiciary Exams 253 docs\|259 tests

Important Questions for Cross Offer and Counter Offer

Find all the important questions for Cross Offer and Counter Offer at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Cross Offer and Counter Offer with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Cross Offer and Counter Offer syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Cross Offer and Counter Offer resources.

Cross Offer and Counter Offer MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Cross Offer and Counter Offer within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Cross Offer and Counter Offer Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Cross Offer and Counter Offer with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution