Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice

Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice below.
Solutions of Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 1

What is the primary purpose of the legal concept of Res Sub judice?

Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 1
The primary purpose of the legal concept of Res Sub judice is to prevent conflicting judgments from different courts. This principle aims to ensure consistency in legal decisions by prohibiting parties from litigating the same matter in different courts simultaneously. By avoiding contradictory outcomes, Res Sub judice helps maintain coherence in legal rulings and streamlines the judicial system.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 2

Why is Res Sub judice considered important in the legal system?

Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 2
Res Sub judice is considered important in the legal system because it promotes judicial efficiency and helps prevent the waste of resources that would result from redundant legal proceedings. By restricting parties from litigating the same matter in different courts at the same time, this principle plays a crucial role in streamlining legal processes and ensuring that only one court addresses a particular issue, thus avoiding unnecessary duplication and confusion.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 3

What is the primary purpose of Res Judicata according to the Civil Procedure Code, 1882?

Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 3
Res Judicata, as discussed in Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1882, serves the purpose of preventing the re-trial of a suit or issue that has already been conclusively decided. This legal doctrine aims to promote finality in legal proceedings and avoid prolonged litigation on matters that have been settled in prior cases.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 4
What action does Res Sub Judice require during court consideration or adjudication?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 4
Res Sub Judice, explained in Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1882, mandates that cases are to be stayed or suspended during court consideration or adjudication. This provision aims to avoid conflicting judgments and ensure a fair legal process by preventing parallel proceedings on the same subject matter simultaneously in different courts.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 5
What is the primary purpose of Res Judicata as outlined in the provided material?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 5
Res Judicata serves to prevent repetitive trials on the same subject matter by prohibiting the re-opening of cases that have already been conclusively settled. This legal doctrine ensures judicial efficiency and the finality of judgments by safeguarding against multiple litigations on identical issues.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 6
What is the primary purpose of the doctrine of res judicata in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 6
The doctrine of res judicata serves to prevent parties from initiating new legal actions against the same parties over the same facts and grounds that have already been adjudicated. This principle ensures the finality of legal disputes and emphasizes the importance of not re-litigating cases that have already been settled.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 7
What is the main purpose of the doctrine of res sub judice in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 7
The doctrine of res sub judice aims to prevent contradictory decisions and unnecessary court proceedings by ensuring that matters under consideration by the court are not subjected to parallel proceedings on the same subject matter. This principle helps maintain judicial efficiency, consistency, and avoids conflicting judgments in legal cases.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 8
In which legal case did the Delhi High Court outline the conditions necessary to invoke Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 8
The case of Escorts Const. Equipment Ltd v. Action Const. Equipments Ltd (1998) is significant as it provided clarity on the conditions required to invoke Section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). This ruling emphasized the importance of avoiding parallel proceedings and reiterated the need for judicial efficiency and consistency in legal matters.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 9
How does res judicata contribute to maintaining legal coherence and order?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 9
Res judicata maintains legal coherence and order by restricting courts from addressing similar issues in multiple lawsuits. This restriction prevents conflicting judgments on the same matter and ensures that legal decisions are consistent and aligned. This aspect of res judicata helps in upholding the integrity and clarity of the legal system.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 10

What is the primary purpose of joinder of claims in a lawsuit?

Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 10

Joinder of claims in a lawsuit allows a plaintiff to address all relevant issues and facts against the same defendant in a single lawsuit. This process enhances clarity and focus by consolidating related legal matters into one case, streamlining the legal process for all parties involved. It prevents the need for multiple separate lawsuits on the same subject matter, ultimately saving judicial time and resources.

Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 11
How does joinder of claims protect defendants in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 11
Joinder of claims in legal proceedings protects defendants from facing multiple claims on the same subject matter. This legal principle helps reduce the burden and confusion for defendants by ensuring that related claims are consolidated into a single lawsuit, preventing the need to defend against multiple separate actions. By avoiding the complexities of multiple lawsuits on the same issue, defendants can focus their resources and defense strategies effectively.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 12
What is the primary aim of Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 12
Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure primarily aims to prevent multiple courts from simultaneously handling two parallel lawsuits concerning the same claim, issue, and relief. This section plays a crucial role in streamlining legal procedures, avoiding conflicting judgments, and ensuring a fair and efficient legal process.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 13
What is the significance of Res Sub Judice in legal cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 13
Res Sub Judice comes into play to prevent the initiation of a subsequent suit when a similar suit involving the same parties is already pending before the court. This legal principle aims to avoid duplicative litigation, promote judicial efficiency, and maintain the integrity of the legal process.
Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 14

In which situation can Res Judicata not be applied?

Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 14

Res Judicata cannot be applied when the judgment is based on the merits of the case. This principle implies that the judgment was made after considering all the essential aspects of the case and reaching a decision based on the substantive issues at hand. It's a fundamental legal concept that prevents the same matter from being litigated again once a judgment has been reached on its merits.

Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 15
What condition must be satisfied for Res Judicata to apply in a legal scenario?
Detailed Solution for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice - Question 15
For Res Judicata to be applicable in a legal context, there must be a final decision on one former and one subsequent suit with similar parties and titles. This condition signifies that the same parties are involved in both cases, ensuring that the matter has been conclusively adjudicated upon in a prior legal proceeding. Understanding this requirement is essential for recognizing when the principle of Res Judicata comes into effect and its implications on subsequent legal actions.
253 docs|259 tests
Information about Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Difference Between Res Judicata and Res Sub Judice, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams