CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Tests  >  Legal Reasoning for CLAT  >  Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - CLAT MCQ

Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - CLAT MCQ


Test Description

10 Questions MCQ Test Legal Reasoning for CLAT - Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2

Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 for CLAT 2024 is part of Legal Reasoning for CLAT preparation. The Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 MCQs are made for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 below.
Solutions of Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 questions in English are available as part of our Legal Reasoning for CLAT for CLAT & Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 solutions in Hindi for Legal Reasoning for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 | 10 questions in 10 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Legal Reasoning for CLAT for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 1

Who is the senior counsel mentioned in the text who has been involved in significant telecom litigations?

Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 1
Abhishek Manu Singhvi is the senior counsel mentioned in the text who has been actively involved in significant telecom litigations over the past two decades.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 2

Which significant telecom issue led to the formation of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)?

Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 2
The formation of TRAI was prompted by CDMA and GSM technology-related arguments, where the need for a techno-economic regulator was emphasized by the court.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 3

In which year did Abhishek Manu Singhvi take on his first telecom case, becoming the youngest lawyer to be designated as a senior counsel?

Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 3
Abhishek Manu Singhvi took on his first telecom case in 1993-94, becoming the youngest lawyer to be designated as a senior counsel at that time.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 4
In the case of Shreya Singhal v Union of India (2015), what aspect of the Information Technology Act, 2000, did Justice Nariman's judgment address?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 4
Justice Nariman's judgment in Shreya Singhal v Union of India (2015) addressed the issue of freedom of speech on digital platforms and the problematic provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 5
In the case of Jarnail Singh v Lacchmi Narain Gupta (2018), what significant change did the judgment bring about in reservation criteria?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 5
The judgment in Jarnail Singh v Lacchmi Narain Gupta (2018) eliminated the requirement to prove backwardness for implementing reservation in promotions, making it easier to grant reservations in public employment.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 6
In which case did Justice Nariman locate the right to privacy as 'inherent' in every individual, irrespective of the Constitution?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 6
Justice Nariman located the right to privacy as 'inherent' in every individual in the case of Justice K. S. Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017).
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 7
What was the main issue addressed in the case of Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha v Union of India (2014)?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 7
The main issue addressed in the case of Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha v Union of India (2014) was the National Registry of Citizens in Assam.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 8
In the case of Siddaraju v State of Karnataka (2020), what clarification did Justice Nariman provide regarding reservations?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 8
In Siddaraju v State of Karnataka (2020), Justice Nariman clarified that reservations for persons with disabilities did not follow the same rules as backward classes, and they could be entitled to reservations in promotions.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 9
What significant change did the judgment in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India (2018) bring about?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 9
The judgment in Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India (2018) led to the decriminalization of homosexuality in India.
Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 10
In Amazon.com v Future Retail (2021), what aspect of arbitration did Justice Nariman's judgment address?
Detailed Solution for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 - Question 10
Justice Nariman's judgment in Amazon.com v Future Retail (2021) addressed the enforcement of Emergency Arbitration awards in India.
112 videos|161 docs|44 tests
Information about Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Famous Indian Cases and Lawyers - 2, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CLAT

112 videos|161 docs|44 tests
Download as PDF

Top Courses for CLAT