Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

20 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal

Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal below.
Solutions of Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal | 20 questions in 20 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 1

What historical event prompted the replacement of the Arbitration Act of 1899 with the more comprehensive Arbitration Act of 1940?

Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 1
The replacement of the Arbitration Act of 1899 with the Arbitration Act of 1940 was primarily driven by the realization of the limitations of the former Act. The 1940 Act aimed to address these shortcomings and provide a more comprehensive legal framework for arbitration in India.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 2

Which international standards influenced the drafting of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 2
The drafting of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in India was influenced by the United Nations Model Law on Arbitration. This international standard helped shape the Act to align with modern practices in international arbitration, ensuring that India's legislation was in line with global norms and best practices in the field.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 3

According to Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, what is the authority granted to the arbitral tribunal regarding its jurisdiction?

Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 3
Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act empowers the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, which includes the authority to address any objections related to its jurisdiction. This provision ensures that the tribunal can determine its competence to arbitrate a dispute effectively. It is crucial for maintaining the autonomy of the arbitration process and streamlining the resolution of disputes without unnecessary delays or complications.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 4
When can challenges to the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction be raised according to Section 16 of the Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 4
As per Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, challenges to the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction must be raised promptly before addressing the substantive issues of the dispute. This requirement ensures that any objections or challenges related to jurisdiction are addressed early in the arbitration process, allowing for a clear determination of the tribunal's authority to arbitrate the specific dispute at hand.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 5
What does Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act empower the arbitral tribunal to do regarding its jurisdiction?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 5
Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act grants the arbitral tribunal the authority to manage its own jurisdiction, which includes resolving matters related to the validity or existence of the arbitration agreement. This provision ensures that the tribunal can address challenges specifically concerning the arbitration agreement, highlighting the autonomy and significance of arbitration clauses within contracts.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 6
When can a party raise an objection about the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction during arbitration proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 6
It is essential for a party to raise objections regarding the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction before submitting the defense statement during arbitration proceedings. This rule ensures timely addressing of jurisdictional concerns and maintains the integrity of the arbitration process. By adhering to this requirement, parties can effectively navigate the arbitration proceedings and address any jurisdictional issues promptly.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 7
What principle allows the Arbitral Tribunal to autonomously decide on its jurisdiction without immediate court intervention?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 7
The Competence-Competence Principle grants the Arbitral Tribunal the authority to independently decide on its jurisdiction without immediate court intervention. This principle is incorporated in Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing the tribunal to rule on its jurisdiction, including challenges to the validity or existence of the arbitration agreement.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 8
What type of decisions made by an arbitral tribunal are subject to appeal and review under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 8
Decisions by the arbitral tribunal related to jurisdictional matters are subject to appeal and review under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. This includes decisions on whether the tribunal has the authority to hear and decide a particular case. Jurisdictional issues are crucial as they determine the tribunal's scope of power and its ability to handle the dispute effectively.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 9
What is the implication when an arbitral tribunal dismisses a jurisdiction plea under Section 16(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 9
When an arbitral tribunal dismisses a jurisdiction plea under Section 16(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, it implies that the tribunal will continue with the arbitration process and proceed to finalize the award. This decision underscores the principle of minimal court interference in arbitration proceedings, promoting a swift and uninterrupted resolution of disputes through arbitration.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 10
In arbitration cases, which decisions made by the Arbitral Tribunal are subject to appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 10
In arbitration cases, decisions made by the Arbitral Tribunal concerning its jurisdiction are subject to appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. If the Arbitral Tribunal rejects a jurisdiction-related plea, it can continue with the arbitral proceedings and issue an arbitral award. However, if the tribunal determines that it lacks jurisdiction, this decision can be appealed under the relevant sections of the Act.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 11
What happens to an arbitration clause if it is part of a main contract that is declared void or illegal?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 11
When an arbitration clause is part of a main contract that is declared void or illegal, questions arise regarding the status of the arbitration clause itself. In such cases, the arbitration clause may be deemed void along with the main contract. This means that the enforceability and validity of the arbitration clause are tied to the legality and validity of the overarching contract within which it is embedded.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 12
In the legal realm, what scenario is possible regarding the termination of a primary contract and the enforceability of the arbitration agreement within it?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 12
In the legal realm, it is conceivable for a primary contract to be terminated while the arbitration agreement within it remains enforceable. This situation highlights the distinctiveness and independence of an arbitration agreement from the primary contract. Even if the main contract is terminated, the arbitration clause can still hold weight, enabling parties to resolve disputes through arbitration.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 13
According to the Supreme Court's clarification in the case of Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Raymon and Co. (India) Ltd., what is necessary for arbitration agreements to be valid when disputes arise from a contract's legality?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 13
As per the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Waverly Jute Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Raymon and Co. (India) Ltd., for arbitration agreements to be valid when disputes stem from a contract's legality, they must be distinct from and not reliant on the disputed contract's validity. This requirement ensures that arbitration can proceed independently, even if there are challenges to the legality of the underlying contract.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 14
What does Section 16 (1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 primarily emphasize regarding arbitration clauses in contracts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 14
Section 16 (1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 underscores that the arbitration clause is treated independently of the contract's validity. This means that even if the contract itself is invalidated, the arbitration clause remains enforceable and can still be utilized to resolve disputes between the parties involved.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 15
What does Section 16(1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 establish regarding arbitration clauses within a contract?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 15
Section 16(1) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 establishes the autonomy of an arbitration clause within a contract, stating that the arbitration clause is to be treated independently, irrespective of the validity of the main contract. This means that determinations made by an Arbitral Tribunal regarding the invalidity of the contract do not automatically invalidate the arbitration clause itself. This provision ensures that the arbitration process can proceed independently of challenges to the main contract's validity.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 16
Under what circumstances can a party appeal to the designate of the Chief Justice or the Chief Justice directly according to Section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 16
Section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act allows a party to appeal to the designate of the Chief Justice or the Chief Justice directly in specific situations, such as when a party fails to act as required under an appointment procedure. This provision ensures that parties involved in arbitration adhere to the agreed-upon procedures, promoting fairness and efficiency in the arbitration process.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 17
In which case was it determined that the Arbitral Tribunal would not be constituted properly if the arbitrator was nominated by the Chief Justice or a designated person before the thirty-day period had expired?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 17
In the case of Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. vs. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd., it was established that the Arbitral Tribunal would not be properly constituted if the arbitrator was nominated by the Chief Justice or a designated person before the thirty-day period had expired. This ruling underscores the importance of following the prescribed timeline for arbitrator nominations to ensure the proper constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 18
What is the key aspect highlighted in the Supreme Court's clarification regarding the enforcement of arbitral awards in the case of Sundaram Finance vs. Abdul Samad & Anr?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 18
The Supreme Court's clarification in the case of Sundaram Finance vs. Abdul Samad & Anr significantly expanded the authority and reach of arbitral tribunals in the country. This ruling emphasized that arbitral awards can be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction without the need for a transfer order from another court. This decision marked a pivotal moment in empowering arbitral tribunals and streamlining the enforcement process across various judicial forums.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 19
According to Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, what limitation does the act impose on the Arbitral tribunal concerning decisions made by judicial authorities or the Chief Justice prior to the initiation of the reference to the tribunal?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 19
Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, mandates that the Arbitral tribunal is not authorized to disregard decisions made by judicial authorities or the Chief Justice before the reference to it was initiated. This provision restricts the tribunal from reassessing its jurisdiction if the validity of the arbitration provision and its jurisdiction has already been examined by the Chief Justice or their designate. It underscores the significance of respecting prior decisions made by judicial entities in arbitration proceedings.
Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 20
What is the primary purpose of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 in relation to legal remedies in arbitration proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal - Question 20
The primary purpose of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, concerning legal remedies in arbitration proceedings, was to enhance and redefine the available legal remedies compared to the earlier legislation. This amendment divided the remedies into two categories, shifting the responsibility of rectifying errors to the tribunal and the involved parties. The Act also clarified grounds for setting aside an arbitral award, such as invalid agreements, incapacity, and contravention of public policy, among others, emphasizing the importance of proper conduct in arbitration proceedings.
253 docs|259 tests
Information about Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams