Test: Legal Reasoning

Its supremacy in deciding matters internal as well as external interest of the country

It contains more than 300 articles

It has promises for justice

It has own supreme law and not a matter of any additional state or nation

Preamble will prevail

Other provisions of the constitution will prevail

Both will go side by side

Interpretation by the supreme court will have the last say

President, the head of the executive is answerable to parliament

Prime minister, the head of the cabinet is accountable to parliament

The council of ministers responsible to Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha

The council of ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok sabha

Is a fundamental duty

Is given in the preamble of the constitution

Is a directive principle

Is a duty under Art. 356 during emergency

First schedule

Second schedule

Third schedule

Fourth schedule

The chief justice may decide

The president may decide

The chief justice of India may with the approval of the president from time to time decide

The Prime Minister of India decides

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Can take the plea of volenti non fit injuria

Cannot take the plea of volenti non fit injuria

Can take the plea of ignorance

Cannot take any plea

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

The state of uttranchal cannot make a law taking away any fundamental right. Such law is null and void

The state can prohibit cow slaughter to organize animal husbandry on scientific lines

The right to carry on any occupation, trade or business is subject to reasonable restrictions. Banning cow slaughter is such a restriction to better animal husbandry production and it is within the power of state

None of them

B’s suit will fail because a supervening impossibility makes the contract void.

B’s suit will pass because A has to fulfill his part of contract

There is no impossibility in this situation. A can find out any other alternative mode

None of them

The advertisement is a promise to potential builders that the sale will actually be held but does not entitle the potential builders to reimbursement of travelling expenses if the sale is not held

The advertisement is a promise to potential bidders that the sale will actually be held but if the sale is not held the potential bidders are entitled to damages for the infructuous journey

The advertisement is a mere declaration of an interest and is not an offer

None of the above

A promise

Not a promise but is an invitation to offer

A proposal

None of these

Must agree upon the same thing in same sense

Must each stipulate his own offer and consideration

Must put the offer and cross offer

May make an offer or cross offer without the knowledge of the promise by the other party

Need not be communicated in writing

Must be communicated by registered acknowledgment due post

Must be communicated by telegram

May be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner

B is bound by the acceptance which is written and signed by him

The telegram delivered to A is not signed by. hence it has no validity

Since the acceptance and the revocation reached A simultaneously, no binding contract arises

None of them

A procured the weapon of offence voluntarily

The weapon of offence was taken away from A’s house without his knowledge

A was made to purchase the weapon of offence under the threat to his own wife

When the weapon was snatched away from A, he did not report the same to police

Grievous hurt

Simple hurt

Culpable homicide

Attempt to hurt

Affray

Assault

Rioting

Unlawful assembly

The offence of murder

The offence of abetment of suicide

The offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder

No offence

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Murder

House trespass

Attempt to murder

No effect

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

With the consent of the victim who has completed 12 yrs. of age

With the consent of the victim who has completed 18 yrs. of age

When the offender action is under the spell of madness

When the offender is acting in anger

No offence

Attempt to murder

Murder

Causing death by rash and negligent act

Do or cause to be done an illegal act

Do or cause to be done an illegal act or an act which is not illegal by illegal means

Do or cause to be done an act which is illegal by illegal means

Commit an offence

B commits theft and A abets theft

A commits no offence but B commits theft

Both A and B commits no offence

B does not commit any offence but A commit abetment of theft

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Can be revoked at any time

Cannot be revoked at all

Can be revoked before it comes to the knowledge of the offeree

Can be revoked only if it does not reach the offeror

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Actual damages

Liquidated damages

Exemplary damages

Nominal damages

Writing a letter accepting that after

Applying for a ticket

Driving in

Making enquiries about the facilities available

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

(A) is true (R) is wrong

(A) is wrong (R) is true

Fourth schedule

second schedule

eight schedule

sixth schedule

President

Vice President

Deputy Chairman

Speaker

Two months

Six months

Four months

One year

Elected members of Legislative council

Elected members of legislative assemblies

Elected members of Lok Sabha

Elected members of Rajya Sabha

Right to live

Right to freedom of religion

Right to contest an election

Right to equality

Fundamental right

Directive principle

Fundamental duty

Legal duty

Fundamental right

Fundamental duty

Directive principle

Constitutional duty

1 and 2

2 and 3

1 and 3

1, 2 and 3

Directive principle

Statutory provision in labour law

Fundamental right

Matter of state to pass bill

Calcutta High Court

Madras High Court

Port Blair High Court

Delhi High Court

zero hour  

debate hour  

question hour  

discussion hour

K.M. Munshi  

Frank anthony  

sarojini naidu  

G.V. Mavlankar