Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Tests  >  Political Science Class 12  >  Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Humanities/Arts MCQ

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Humanities/Arts MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Political Science Class 12 - Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Political Science Class 12 preparation. The Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions questions and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus.The Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions MCQs are made for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions below.
Solutions of Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions questions in English are available as part of our Political Science Class 12 for Humanities/Arts & Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions solutions in Hindi for Political Science Class 12 course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions | 15 questions in 32 minutes | Mock test for Humanities/Arts preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Political Science Class 12 for Humanities/Arts Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 1

Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the following questions:

Q. What does tiger in the cartoon represent?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 1

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam was a Tamil militant organization that was based in north-eastern Sri Lanka.

 

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 2

Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the following questions:

Q. What does the lion in the cartoon represent?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 2

The lion represents the Sinhala community of Srilanka, it believes that Srilanka belongs to Sinhalas and no concessions to the Tamils should be given.

 

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 3

Study the cartoon given below carefully and answer the following questions:

Q. Which country ’s problem is depicted here?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 3

The cartoon depicts the dilemma of the Sri Lankan leadership who are trying to balance the Sinhala hardliners lion or the Tamil militant tiger while negotiating peace. The government thinks if it goes according to the Sinhala community, actions would be taken by LTTE in Sri Lanka and if LTTE is given preference, the Sinhala community would become upset and the country would be divided.

 

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 4

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

After Pakistan framed its first constitution, General Ayub Khan took over the administration of the country and soon got himself elected. He had to give up office when there was popular dissatisfaction against his rule. This gave way to a military takeover once again under General Yahya Khan. During Yahya’s military rule, Pakistan faced the Bangladesh crisis, and after a war with India in 1971, East Pakistan broke away to emerge as an independent country called Bangladesh. After this, an elected government under the leadership of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto came to power in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977. The Bhutto government was removed by General Zia-ul-Haq in 1977. General Zia faced a pro-democracy movement from 1982 onwards and an elected democratic government was established once again in 1988 under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto. In the period that followed, Pakistani politics centred around the competition between her party, the Pakistan People’s Party, and the Muslim League. This phase of elective democracy lasted till 1999 when the army stepped in again and General Pervez Musharraf removed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. In 2001, General Musharraf got himself elected as the President. Pakistan continued to be ruled by the army, though the army rulers have held some elections to give their rule a democratic image. Since 2008, democratically elected leaders have been ruling Pakistan.

Q. How long did Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s Government lasted?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 4

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's government lasted from 1971 to 1977.

  • The government was established after the Bangladesh crisis.
  • It was in power for a total of six years.
  • General Zia-ul-Haq removed Bhutto from office in 1977.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 5

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

After Pakistan framed its first constitution, General Ayub Khan took over the administration of the country and soon got himself elected. He had to give up office when there was popular dissatisfaction against his rule. This gave way to a military takeover once again under General Yahya Khan. During Yahya’s military rule, Pakistan faced the Bangladesh crisis, and after a war with India in 1971, East Pakistan broke away to emerge as an independent country called Bangladesh. After this, an elected government under the leadership of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto came to power in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977. The Bhutto government was removed by General Zia-ul-Haq in 1977. General Zia faced a pro-democracy movement from 1982 onwards and an elected democratic government was established once again in 1988 under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto. In the period that followed, Pakistani politics centred around the competition between her party, the Pakistan People’s Party, and the Muslim League. This phase of elective democracy lasted till 1999 when the army stepped in again and General Pervez Musharraf removed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. In 2001, General Musharraf got himself elected as the President. Pakistan continued to be ruled by the army, though the army rulers have held some elections to give their rule a democratic image. Since 2008, democratically elected leaders have been ruling Pakistan.

Q. Why democracy isn’t stable in Pakistan?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 5

The instability of democracy in Pakistan can be attributed to the following factors:

  • The military holds significant power, often overshadowing civilian governance.
  • Frequent military interventions disrupt democratic processes.
  • Political parties often engage in conflict rather than collaboration.
  • There is a history of political instability and lack of continuity in governance.

These factors contribute to a challenging environment for democracy to thrive in Pakistan.

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 6

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

After Pakistan framed its first constitution, General Ayub Khan took over the administration of the country and soon got himself elected. He had to give up office when there was popular dissatisfaction against his rule. This gave way to a military takeover once again under General Yahya Khan. During Yahya’s military rule, Pakistan faced the Bangladesh crisis, and after a war with India in 1971, East Pakistan broke away to emerge as an independent country called Bangladesh. After this, an elected government under the leadership of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto came to power in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977. The Bhutto government was removed by General Zia-ul-Haq in 1977. General Zia faced a pro-democracy movement from 1982 onwards and an elected democratic government was established once again in 1988 under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto. In the period that followed, Pakistani politics centred around the competition between her party, the Pakistan People’s Party, and the Muslim League. This phase of elective democracy lasted till 1999 when the army stepped in again and General Pervez Musharraf removed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. In 2001, General Musharraf got himself elected as the President. Pakistan continued to be ruled by the army, though the army rulers have held some elections to give their rule a democratic image. Since 2008, democratically elected leaders have been ruling Pakistan.

Q. Pakistan’s first constitution was enacted by the Constituent Assembly in

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 6

The first constitution of Pakistan was established in 1956. This marked a significant moment in the country's history as it laid the foundation for governance and legal structure.

  • The constitution aimed to define the rights and responsibilities of citizens.
  • It established Pakistan as an Islamic republic.
  • The document was a response to the need for a formal legal framework following independence.

This constitution was eventually replaced, but it remains a crucial part of Pakistan's political evolution.

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 7

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

After Pakistan framed its first constitution, General Ayub Khan took over the administration of the country and soon got himself elected. He had to give up office when there was popular dissatisfaction against his rule. This gave way to a military takeover once again under General Yahya Khan. During Yahya’s military rule, Pakistan faced the Bangladesh crisis, and after a war with India in 1971, East Pakistan broke away to emerge as an independent country called Bangladesh. After this, an elected government under the leadership of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto came to power in Pakistan from 1971 to 1977. The Bhutto government was removed by General Zia-ul-Haq in 1977. General Zia faced a pro-democracy movement from 1982 onwards and an elected democratic government was established once again in 1988 under the leadership of Benazir Bhutto. In the period that followed, Pakistani politics centred around the competition between her party, the Pakistan People’s Party, and the Muslim League. This phase of elective democracy lasted till 1999 when the army stepped in again and General Pervez Musharraf removed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. In 2001, General Musharraf got himself elected as the President. Pakistan continued to be ruled by the army, though the army rulers have held some elections to give their rule a democratic image. Since 2008, democratically elected leaders have been ruling Pakistan.

Q. Who removed Bhutto’s govt.? When?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 7

General Zia-ul-Haq removed Bhutto's government in 1977.

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 8

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

The Sri Lankan problem involves people of Indian origin, and there is considerable pressure from the Tamil people in India to the effect that the Indian government should protect the interests of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. The government of India has from time to time tried to negotiate with the Sri Lankan government on the Tamil question. But in 1987, the government of India for the first time got directly involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question. India signed an accord with Sri Lanka and sent troops to stabilise relations between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamils. Eventually, the Indian Army got into a fight with the LTTE. The presence of Indian troops was also not liked much by the Sri Lankans. They saw this as an attempt by India to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. In 1989, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) pulled out of Sri Lanka without attaining its objective. The Sri Lankan crisis continued to be violent. However, international actors, particularly the Scandinavian countries such as Norway and Iceland tried to bring the warring groups back to negotiations. Finally, the armed conflict came to an end, as the LTTE was vanquished in 2009.

Q. When did government of India directly got involve in the conflict of Sri Lanka?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 8

The Sri Lankan conflict involved people of Indian origin. There was pressure from the Tamil people in India for the Indian government to protect the Tamils' interests in Sri Lanka.

  • The Indian government tried negotiating with Sri Lanka on the Tamil issue.
  • In 1987, India became directly involved by signing an accord with Sri Lanka and sending troops.
  • The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) was involved, but withdrew in 1989 without achieving its goals.
  • International players, like Norway, attempted to mediate.
  • The armed conflict ended in 2009 with the defeat of the LTTE.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 9

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

The Sri Lankan problem involves people of Indian origin, and there is considerable pressure from the Tamil people in India to the effect that the Indian government should protect the interests of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. The government of India has from time to time tried to negotiate with the Sri Lankan government on the Tamil question. But in 1987, the government of India for the first time got directly involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question. India signed an accord with Sri Lanka and sent troops to stabilise relations between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamils. Eventually, the Indian Army got into a fight with the LTTE. The presence of Indian troops was also not liked much by the Sri Lankans. They saw this as an attempt by India to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. In 1989, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) pulled out of Sri Lanka without attaining its objective. The Sri Lankan crisis continued to be violent. However, international actors, particularly the Scandinavian countries such as Norway and Iceland tried to bring the warring groups back to negotiations. Finally, the armed conflict came to an end, as the LTTE was vanquished in 2009.

Q. When did IPKF have to abort the objective in Sri Lanka?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 9

The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) had to abort its mission in Sri Lanka in 1989. Here are the key points regarding this situation:

  • The IPKF was deployed to stabilise relations between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamils.
  • Despite initial intentions, the mission faced significant challenges, including conflict with the LTTE.
  • Local sentiment in Sri Lanka was largely against the presence of Indian troops, viewing it as interference.
  • Ultimately, the IPKF withdrew without achieving its objectives, leaving the conflict unresolved.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 10

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

The Sri Lankan problem involves people of Indian origin, and there is considerable pressure from the Tamil people in India to the effect that the Indian government should protect the interests of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. The government of India has from time to time tried to negotiate with the Sri Lankan government on the Tamil question. But in 1987, the government of India for the first time got directly involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question. India signed an accord with Sri Lanka and sent troops to stabilise relations between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamils. Eventually, the Indian Army got into a fight with the LTTE. The presence of Indian troops was also not liked much by the Sri Lankans. They saw this as an attempt by India to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. In 1989, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) pulled out of Sri Lanka without attaining its objective. The Sri Lankan crisis continued to be violent. However, international actors, particularly the Scandinavian countries such as Norway and Iceland tried to bring the warring groups back to negotiations. Finally, the armed conflict came to an end, as the LTTE was vanquished in 2009.

Q. Why was there pressure from Indian Tamils to protect and safeguard the interests of Tamil living in Sri Lanka?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 10

There was pressure because the conflict in Sri Lanka involved people of Indian origin.

  • Indian Tamils are ethnically related to the Tamils in Sri Lanka, creating a sense of solidarity.
  • The Indian government was urged to intervene to protect these shared ethnic interests.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 11

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

The Sri Lankan problem involves people of Indian origin, and there is considerable pressure from the Tamil people in India to the effect that the Indian government should protect the interests of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. The government of India has from time to time tried to negotiate with the Sri Lankan government on the Tamil question. But in 1987, the government of India for the first time got directly involved in the Sri Lankan Tamil question. India signed an accord with Sri Lanka and sent troops to stabilise relations between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamils. Eventually, the Indian Army got into a fight with the LTTE. The presence of Indian troops was also not liked much by the Sri Lankans. They saw this as an attempt by India to interfere in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka. In 1989, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) pulled out of Sri Lanka without attaining its objective. The Sri Lankan crisis continued to be violent. However, international actors, particularly the Scandinavian countries such as Norway and Iceland tried to bring the warring groups back to negotiations. Finally, the armed conflict came to an end, as the LTTE was vanquished in 2009.

Q. Who posed challenge to Indian Army in Sri Lanka?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 11

The Indian Army encountered significant challenges during its mission in Sri Lanka, mainly from the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam). Key points regarding this conflict include:

  • The LTTE was a militant group advocating for an independent Tamil state in Sri Lanka.
  • They opposed the presence of Indian troops, perceiving it as foreign interference.
  • Direct confrontations occurred between the Indian Army and the LTTE.
  • Despite attempts to stabilise the situation, the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) withdrew in 1989 without achieving its goals.

Therefore, the primary challenge to the Indian Army in Sri Lanka was from the LTTE.

Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 12

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo- Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control. Both sides accuse the other of violating the cease-fire and claim to be shooting in response to attacks. An up-tick in border skirmishes that began in late 2016 and continued into 2018 killed dozens and displaced thousands of civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.

In 2014, after India’s then newly elected Prime Minister Modi invited then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to attend his inauguration, there were hopes that Modi’s government would pursue meaningful peace negotiations with Pakistan. However, after a brief period of optimism, relations turned sour once more when India cancelled talks with Pakistan’s foreign minister in August 2014 after the Pakistani high commissioner in India met with Kashmiri separatist leaders. A series of openings continued throughout 2015, including an unscheduled December meeting on the side-lines of the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris. This led to a meeting between national security advisors in Bangkok a few days later, where the Kashmir dispute was discussed. Later in December, Prime Minister Modi made a surprise visit to Lahore to meet with Prime Minister Sharif, the first visit of an Indian leader to Pakistan in more than a decade.

Q. Till which year both the countries have maintained “fragile cease fire”?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 12
Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo-Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control. Both sides accuse the other of violating the cease-fire and claim to be shooting in response to attacks. An uptick in border skirmishes that began in late 2016 and continued into 2018 killed dozens and displaced thousands of civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 13

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo- Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control. Both sides accuse the other of violating the cease-fire and claim to be shooting in response to attacks. An up-tick in border skirmishes that began in late 2016 and continued into 2018 killed dozens and displaced thousands of civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.

In 2014, after India’s then newly elected Prime Minister Modi invited then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to attend his inauguration, there were hopes that Modi’s government would pursue meaningful peace negotiations with Pakistan. However, after a brief period of optimism, relations turned sour once more when India cancelled talks with Pakistan’s foreign minister in August 2014 after the Pakistani high commissioner in India met with Kashmiri separatist leaders. A series of openings continued throughout 2015, including an unscheduled December meeting on the side-lines of the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris. This led to a meeting between national security advisors in Bangkok a few days later, where the Kashmir dispute was discussed. Later in December, Prime Minister Modi made a surprise visit to Lahore to meet with Prime Minister Sharif, the first visit of an Indian leader to Pakistan in more than a decade.

Q. When did PM Narendra Modi make a surprise visit to Pakistan?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 13

Prime Minister Modi made a surprise visit to Lahore in December 2015. This visit was significant as it marked the first time in over a decade that an Indian leader had visited Pakistan.

  • The visit occurred shortly after a series of diplomatic engagements between India and Pakistan.
  • It was aimed at improving relations and fostering dialogue on various issues, including the Kashmir dispute.
  • Despite initial optimism, relations between the two countries have remained tense.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 14

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo- Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control. Both sides accuse the other of violating the cease-fire and claim to be shooting in response to attacks. An up-tick in border skirmishes that began in late 2016 and continued into 2018 killed dozens and displaced thousands of civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.

In 2014, after India’s then newly elected Prime Minister Modi invited then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to attend his inauguration, there were hopes that Modi’s government would pursue meaningful peace negotiations with Pakistan. However, after a brief period of optimism, relations turned sour once more when India cancelled talks with Pakistan’s foreign minister in August 2014 after the Pakistani high commissioner in India met with Kashmiri separatist leaders. A series of openings continued throughout 2015, including an unscheduled December meeting on the side-lines of the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris. This led to a meeting between national security advisors in Bangkok a few days later, where the Kashmir dispute was discussed. Later in December, Prime Minister Modi made a surprise visit to Lahore to meet with Prime Minister Sharif, the first visit of an Indian leader to Pakistan in more than a decade.

Q. In which years, according to this paragraph, India and Pakistan were involved in face to face conflicts?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 14
Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo-Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control.
Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 15

Read the following paragraph and answer the questions that follow:

Territorial disputes over the Kashmir region sparked two of the three major Indo- Pakistani wars in 1947 and 1965, and a limited war in 1999. Although both countries have maintained a fragile cease-fire since 2003, they regularly exchange fire across the contested border, known as the Line of Control. Both sides accuse the other of violating the cease-fire and claim to be shooting in response to attacks. An up-tick in border skirmishes that began in late 2016 and continued into 2018 killed dozens and displaced thousands of civilians on both sides of the Line of Control.

In 2014, after India’s then newly elected Prime Minister Modi invited then Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to attend his inauguration, there were hopes that Modi’s government would pursue meaningful peace negotiations with Pakistan. However, after a brief period of optimism, relations turned sour once more when India cancelled talks with Pakistan’s foreign minister in August 2014 after the Pakistani high commissioner in India met with Kashmiri separatist leaders. A series of openings continued throughout 2015, including an unscheduled December meeting on the side-lines of the UN Climate Change Conference in Paris. This led to a meeting between national security advisors in Bangkok a few days later, where the Kashmir dispute was discussed. Later in December, Prime Minister Modi made a surprise visit to Lahore to meet with Prime Minister Sharif, the first visit of an Indian leader to Pakistan in more than a decade.

Q. Under whose leadership in India, there was a hope of peace on LOC?

Detailed Solution for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions - Question 15

Narendra Modi was the Indian leader under whose leadership there was hope for peace along the Line of Control (LOC).

Key points regarding this period include:

  • In 2014, Prime Minister Modi invited Nawaz Sharif, then Prime Minister of Pakistan, to his inauguration.
  • This gesture raised hopes for meaningful peace negotiations.
  • However, relations soured when India cancelled talks in August 2014 after a meeting between the Pakistani high commissioner and Kashmiri separatist leaders.
  • Despite setbacks, there were further attempts at dialogue in 2015, including a meeting on the sidelines of the UN Climate Change Conference.
  • Modi's surprise visit to Lahore in December 2015 marked the first visit of an Indian leader to Pakistan in over a decade.

These events highlight the fluctuating dynamics of Indo-Pakistani relations during Modi's tenure.

34 videos|276 docs|51 tests
Information about Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Security in the Contemporary World- Case Based Type Questions, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
34 videos|276 docs|51 tests
Download as PDF