What was the majority decision of the Allahabad High Court regarding the disputed land in Ayodhya?

It ruled in favor of giving the entire land to the Hindu Maha Sabha.

It ordered the land to be divided equally among the Hindu deity Ram Lalla, Nirmohi Akhara, and the Sunni Waqf Board.

It favored the complete restoration of the Babri Masjid to the Muslim party.

It declared the land to be a government-controlled heritage site.

What was the significance of the central dome of the Babri Masjid according to the Allahabad High Court's judgment?

It was declared as the place of birth of Lord Ram and allotted to the Hindus.

It was designated as a historical monument and opened to the public.

It was converted into a museum showcasing the history of Ayodhya.

It was given to the Nirmohi Akhara for religious purposes.

According to the Supreme Court, why did it invoke Article 142 in the Ayodhya case?

To establish the supremacy of the judiciary over religious institutions.

To ensure a fair and impartial resolution of the dispute.

To grant complete control of the disputed land to the Nirmohi Akhara.

To remedy the wrong committed during the demolition of the Babri Masjid.

How did the Supreme Court view the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992?

It deemed it as a legitimate act of protest.

It considered it an unfortunate incident but not a violation of law.

It classified it as an egregious violation of the rule of law.

It ignored the issue and did not comment on it.

What was the primary reason for granting the entire 2.77 acres of disputed land to deity Ram Lalla?

Because the Hindus had established adverse possession over the land.

To compensate for the destruction of the Babri Masjid in 1992.

To promote religious harmony in Ayodhya.

To satisfy the demands of the Nirmohi Akhara.

What did the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act of 1991 prohibit?

It prohibited the construction of new places of worship.

It prohibited the conversion of the status of any place of worship.

It prohibited any worship or religious activities at historical sites.

It prohibited religious organizations from owning property.

According to the Supreme Court, why did the Muslim side's claim of adverse possession over the disputed land get rejected?

Because they failed to prove the historical presence of a mosque on the land.

Because the Babri Masjid was an open place visited by all communities.

Because the Supreme Court favored the Hindu side's faith-based argument.

Because the court believed that adverse possession could not apply to religious sites.

What did the Supreme Court direct the Central and Uttar Pradesh governments to do regarding the disputed land in Ayodhya?

To sell the land to the highest bidder in a public auction.

To maintain the status quo and not make any changes to the land.

To allot an alternative 5-acre land to the Muslims for a mosque.

To construct a joint Hindu-Muslim worship complex on the land.

Why was the Places of Worship Act considered significant in the Ayodhya case?

It mandated the demolition of all disputed religious structures.

It reaffirmed the equal treatment of all religions in matters of worship.

It granted exclusive rights to the Hindu community over the disputed land.

It allowed for the conversion of religious sites based on majority faith.

What potential positive outcome for Ayodhya's future?

The construction of a museum showcasing the history of the Ayodhya dispute.

The development of Ayodhya as a prominent religious and tourist destination.

The establishment of Ayodhya as the political center of India.

The exclusion of Ayodhya from future political discussions.

Ayodhya Verdict Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

	Post Independence History for UPSC Mains 24 videos\|44 docs\|21 tests

	Post Independence History for UPSC Mains 24 videos\|44 docs\|21 tests

Important Questions for Ayodhya Verdict

Find all the important questions for Ayodhya Verdict at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Ayodhya Verdict with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Ayodhya Verdict syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Ayodhya Verdict resources.

Ayodhya Verdict MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Ayodhya Verdict within the UPSC exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Ayodhya Verdict Post Independence History for UPSC Mains

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Ayodhya Verdict with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution