Commerce Exam  >  Commerce Tests  >  Economics Class 11  >  Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Commerce MCQ

Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Commerce MCQ


Test Description

8 Questions MCQ Test Economics Class 11 - Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions

Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions for Commerce 2024 is part of Economics Class 11 preparation. The Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions questions and answers have been prepared according to the Commerce exam syllabus.The Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions MCQs are made for Commerce 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions below.
Solutions of Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions questions in English are available as part of our Economics Class 11 for Commerce & Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions solutions in Hindi for Economics Class 11 course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Commerce Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions | 8 questions in 16 minutes | Mock test for Commerce preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Economics Class 11 for Commerce Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 1

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.

The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.

Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations” (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.

Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.

From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principles

of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.

Q. ______ is a curve showing a different combination of two goods, each combination offering the same level of satisfaction to the consumer.

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 1
An indifference curve shows a combination of two goods that give a consumer equal satisfaction and utility thereby making the consumer indifferent. Along the curve, the consumer has an equal preference for the combinations of goods shown—i.e. is indifferent about any combination of goods on the curve.
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 2

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.

The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.

Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations” (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.

Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.

From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principles

of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.

Q. Which of the following is not the way of studying Utility?

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 3

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.

The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.

Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations' ' (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.

Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.

From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principles

of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.

Q. Under Cardinal Utility approach, utility is measured in utils.

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 3
A qualitative idea such as utility can be difficult to measure, but economists try to quantify the concept in two different ways: cardinal utility and ordinal utility. Both are imperfect, but each can provide an important foundation for studying consumer choice.
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 4

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The ordinalist revolution originates in the criticism of the psychological foundations of the theory of demand, namely, the principle of decreasing marginal utility as Alfred Marshall ([1890] 1898) used it. The rejection of hedonist hypotheses led Irving Fisher (1892) and Pareto (1896–97, 1900, 1909) to favour an objective or “positive” approach to economic concepts.

The “ordinalist revolution” (Ormazabal 1995, 116) is grounded in a methodological transformation of economics that put the facts of objective experience as a foundation of economics and provided a research program for the ensuing years (Green and Moss 1993; Lewin 1996). Mathematically, ordinalism is entirely based upon the idea that one can dispense with the use of a specific utility function and that no meaning shall be attached to utility measurement, except as an ordinal principle.

Clearly, the development of ordinalist must be separated from the introduction of the concept of the indifference curve. Ordinalism was first advocated in Fisher’s “Mathematical Investigations' ' (1892) and Pareto’s Suunto (1900) and Manual ([1909] 1971), while the indifference curve had appeared in F. Y. Edge worth’s Mathematical Psychics (1881). It was thus only through Fisher’s and Pareto’s recasting that the concept of the indifference curve became irreversibly associated with the promotion of ordinalism.

Along the way, the recasting of the theory of choice along ordinalist lines raised a number of issues (about integrability, measurability, and complementarity) that would be progressively settled. A reasonable closing date for the ordinalist revolution is 1950, after Houthakker (1950) and Samuelson’s (1950) contributions.

From the late 1920s, the Paretian school was progressively gaining a larger audience while the use of the concept of marginal utility and other derivative concepts was challenged. Consequently, demand theory was recast along the principles

of individual preferences and ordinal utility functions. Nevertheless, English authors proved very silent about the meaning of indifference curves. Most if not all of the reflections after 1920 about the nature of indifference curves took place in America, mainly under the impulse of Henry Schultz at Chicago. This is an American story.

Q. How is utility measured in Ordinal utility theory?

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 4
In Ordinal utility theory, the utility is measured through indifference curves.
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 5

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:

In economics, rationing is an artificial restriction of demand and is done to keep price below the equilibrium (market-clearing) price determined by the process of supply and demand in an unfettered market. Thus, rationing can be complementary to price controls which can be explained through indifference curve approach.

There are two kinds of rationing done by the government to reduce consumption—price rationing and non-price rationing. By rationing, we mean exercise tax and by non-price rationing, we mean all types of control on the quantity consumed. Non-price rationing could be done by giving away coupons that would enable low income families to obtain some goods at affordable prices, which could not be possible if the prices were to increase alone. With coupon schemes, it would develop a black market for coupons, which would paradoxically increase the utility for those who are in need of that commodity by collection of more of these coupons from those who are not in need. This ensures greater marginal utility for those people who are in need of the commodity and will provide exchange of money to those who sell these coupons. For this, it is necessary for the government to encourage trading of the coupons.

The major importance of introducing rationing is to keep the price of important commodities under control, as for a necessary commodity, there will be an excessive demand in the market which will drive their price up in the market and high prices leads to reduction of consumption and utility for those who could not afford it. This ensures that the resources are planned in favour of the poor people of the country and restricts the rich people to ensure excessive purchase of limited resources of the country. This ensures development and equality of welfare and utility

between the rich and the poor people. Rationing of the good is done by the government and not the private sector. There is the same limit put on every person on the budget spending to which people could buy the commodities and within the limit, one could buy any amount of the commodity.

Q. Rationing of goods by the government ......................

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 5
Rationing is the limiting of goods or services that are in high demand and short supply. It is often undertaken by governments as a way of mitigating the impact of scarcity and dealing with economic challenges.
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 6

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:

In economics, rationing is an artificial restriction of demand and is done to keep price below the equilibrium (market-clearing) price determined by the process of supply and demand in an unfettered market. Thus, rationing can be complementary to price controls which can be explained through indifference curve approach.

There are two kinds of rationing done by the government to reduce consumption—price rationing and non-price rationing. By rationing, we mean exercise tax and by non-price rationing, we mean all types of control on the quantity consumed. Non-price rationing could be done by giving away coupons that would enable low income families to obtain some goods at affordable prices, which could not be possible if the prices were to increase alone. With coupon schemes, it would develop a black market for coupons, which would paradoxically increase the utility for those who are in need of that commodity by collection of more of these coupons from those who are not in need. This ensures greater marginal utility for those people who are in need of the commodity and will provide exchange of money to those who sell these coupons. For this, it is necessary for the government to encourage trading of the coupons.

The major importance of introducing rationing is to keep the price of important commodities under control, as for a necessary commodity, there will be an excessive demand in the market which will drive their price up in the market and high prices leads to reduction of consumption and utility for those who could not afford it. This ensures that the resources are planned in favour of the poor people of the country and restricts the rich people to ensure excessive purchase of limited resources of the country. This ensures development and equality of welfare and utility

between the rich and the poor people. Rationing of the good is done by the government and not the private sector. There is the same limit put on every person on the budget spending to which people could buy the commodities and within the limit, one could buy any amount of the commodity.

Q. The marginal utility of a person diminishes.

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 6

The law of diminishing marginal utility explains that as a person consumes an item or a product, the satisfaction or utility that they derive from the product wanes as they consume more and more of that product. Economic actors receive less and less satisfaction from consuming incremental amounts of a good.

Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 7

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:

In economics, rationing is an artificial restriction of demand and is done to keep price below the equilibrium (market-clearing) price determined by the process of supply and demand in an unfettered market. Thus, rationing can be complementary to price controls which can be explained through indifference curve approach.

There are two kinds of rationing done by the government to reduce consumption—price rationing and non-price rationing. By rationing, we mean exercise tax and by non-price rationing, we mean all types of control on the quantity consumed. Non-price rationing could be done by giving away coupons that would enable low income families to obtain some goods at affordable prices, which could not be possible if the prices were to increase alone. With coupon schemes, it would develop a black market for coupons, which would paradoxically increase the utility for those who are in need of that commodity by collection of more of these coupons from those who are not in need. This ensures greater marginal utility for those people who are in need of the commodity and will provide exchange of money to those who sell these coupons. For this, it is necessary for the government to encourage trading of the coupons.

The major importance of introducing rationing is to keep the price of important commodities under control, as for a necessary commodity, there will be an excessive demand in the market which will drive their price up in the market and high prices leads to reduction of consumption and utility for those who could not afford it. This ensures that the resources are planned in favour of the poor people of the country and restricts the rich people to ensure excessive purchase of limited resources of the country. This ensures development and equality of welfare and utility

between the rich and the poor people. Rationing of the good is done by the government and not the private sector. There is the same limit put on every person on the budget spending to which people could buy the commodities and within the limit, one could buy any amount of the commodity.

Q. The marginal utility derived from a commodity keeps on ..................... .

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 7
The marginal utility derived from a commodity keeps on decreasing.
Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 8

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follows:

In economics, rationing is an artificial restriction of demand and is done to keep price below the equilibrium (market-clearing) price determined by the process of supply and demand in an unfettered market. Thus, rationing can be complementary to price controls which can be explained through indifference curve approach.

There are two kinds of rationing done by the government to reduce consumption—price rationing and non-price rationing. By rationing, we mean exercise tax and by non-price rationing, we mean all types of control on the quantity consumed. Non-price rationing could be done by giving away coupons that would enable low income families to obtain some goods at affordable prices, which could not be possible if the prices were to increase alone. With coupon schemes, it would develop a black market for coupons, which would paradoxically increase the utility for those who are in need of that commodity by collection of more of these coupons from those who are not in need. This ensures greater marginal utility for those people who are in need of the commodity and will provide exchange of money to those who sell these coupons. For this, it is necessary for the government to encourage trading of the coupons.

The major importance of introducing rationing is to keep the price of important commodities under control, as for a necessary commodity, there will be an excessive demand in the market which will drive their price up in the market and high prices leads to reduction of consumption and utility for those who could not afford it. This ensures that the resources are planned in favour of the poor people of the country and restricts the rich people to ensure excessive purchase of limited resources of the country. This ensures development and equality of welfare and utility

between the rich and the poor people. Rationing of the good is done by the government and not the private sector. There is the same limit put on every person on the budget spending to which people could buy the commodities and within the limit, one could buy any amount of the commodity.

Q. ______ means the utility derived from the total number of products consumed (choose the correct alternative).

Detailed Solution for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions - Question 8
Total utility is the aggregate amount of satisfaction or fulfillment that a consumer receives through the consumption of a specific good or service. Total utility is often compared to marginal utility, which is the satisfaction a consumer receives from consuming one additional unit of a good or service.
75 videos|274 docs|46 tests
Information about Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Consumer's Equilibrium and Demand- Case Based Type Questions, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Commerce

75 videos|274 docs|46 tests
Download as PDF

Top Courses for Commerce