Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31)

Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) below.
Solutions of Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 1

In what circumstances can statements made by a deceased person be considered as admissions in favor of that person?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 1
Statements made by a deceased person can be considered as admissions in favor of that person when they are in dispute with another individual. This legal principle allows for certain statements to be used as evidence in situations where there is a disagreement or controversy, aiding in the resolution of disputes even after the person has passed away.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 2

Which type of statements can also be considered as admissions in favor of the individual making them?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 2
Statements regarding bodily feelings or state of mind can also be considered as admissions in favor of the individual making them. This legal concept acknowledges that statements reflecting one's bodily sensations or mental states can be valuable evidence in certain situations, shedding light on the individual's perspective or intentions.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 3

When can a statement be proven as a relevant fact and not necessarily as admissions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 3
A statement can be proven as a relevant fact and not necessarily as admissions when it is otherwise relevant to the case at hand. This distinction is crucial in legal proceedings, where different types of statements serve varying purposes in establishing facts and supporting arguments. Relevant statements contribute directly to understanding the issues at stake without necessarily implying admission of guilt or liability.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 4
In the provided illustration, what scenario showcases the limitations faced by individuals A and B regarding the authenticity of a deed?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 4
The scenario in the illustration highlights the limitations faced by individuals A and B regarding the authenticity of a deed when they try to prove their own statements about the deed. This situation underscores the legal complexities surrounding self-incriminating statements and the challenges individuals may encounter in substantiating their own claims without additional evidence or corroboration.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 5
What does Section 22 primarily address in terms of the admissibility of oral evidence?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 5
Section 22 specifically deals with the admissibility of oral evidence, emphasizing that oral admissions concerning the contents of a document are not considered relevant unless the party presenting them demonstrates their entitlement to provide secondary evidence of the document's contents under subsequent rules or if the authenticity of a produced document is under scrutiny. This rule aims to maintain the integrity and reliability of documentary evidence in legal proceedings.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 6
Under what circumstance are oral admissions concerning the content of an electronic recording considered relevant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 6
Oral admissions regarding the content of an electronic recording are deemed relevant, except when the authenticity of the recording is not in question. This provision ensures that oral evidence related to electronic recordings can be considered valid and admissible when the recording's authenticity is established. It underscores the importance of verifying the integrity of electronic evidence in legal proceedings.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 7
What is the key consideration for determining the relevance of oral admissions regarding the contents of a document?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 7
The primary consideration for establishing the relevance of oral admissions concerning document contents is the demonstrating party's entitlement to provide secondary evidence of the document's contents under subsequent rules or when the authenticity of a produced document is under scrutiny. This requirement ensures that oral evidence is presented responsibly and with appropriate verification, maintaining the credibility and reliability of information shared during legal proceedings.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 8
In legal contexts, why is it crucial to establish the relevance of oral admissions related to document contents?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 8
It is essential to determine the relevance of oral admissions concerning document contents to guarantee the accuracy of evidence presented in legal settings. By requiring parties to demonstrate the validity of such admissions through secondary evidence or authenticity verification, the legal system upholds the integrity of information provided orally, ensuring that it aligns with the facts and truth of the matter at hand.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 9
What type of admission in civil cases is considered irrelevant if made with an express condition that evidence of it will not be presented?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 9
In civil cases, an admission is deemed irrelevant if it is made with the express condition that evidence of it will not be presented. This condition renders the admission unusable in court proceedings, ensuring that parties cannot selectively admit facts and then prevent their use as evidence, thereby maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 10
What inference can the Court draw regarding an admission in civil cases if the parties mutually agree that evidence of it should not be given?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 10
When both parties agree that a particular admission should not be used as evidence, the Court deems it irrelevant in civil cases. This mutual agreement between parties indicates a conscious decision to exclude specific admissions from the legal proceedings, ensuring that only relevant and agreed-upon facts are considered during the case.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 11
In civil cases, what happens if an admission is made under circumstances where the Court can infer that the parties agreed together that evidence of it should not be given?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 11
When the Court can infer that both parties agreed that evidence of a particular admission should not be given, the admission is considered inadmissible in civil cases. This inference of mutual agreement to exclude certain admissions from evidence ensures that legal proceedings are based on admissible and relevant facts.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 12
What is the significance of ensuring the relevance of admissions in civil cases?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 12
Ensuring the relevance of admissions in civil cases is crucial to maintaining the integrity of evidence presented during legal proceedings. By only considering admissible and relevant admissions, the Court upholds the standards of evidence and ensures that only pertinent facts are used to make informed legal decisions.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 13
What does Section 31 of The Indian Evidence Act primarily assign to admissions made under Sections 17-30?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 13
Section 31 of The Indian Evidence Act assigns estoppel value to admissions made under Sections 17-30. This means that such admissions can operate as an estoppel, preventing a party from asserting something contrary to what was admitted. This legal principle aims to promote honesty and fairness in legal proceedings by holding parties accountable for their admissions.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 14
How are admissions viewed if they do not operate as an estoppel?
Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 14
Admissions that do not operate as an estoppel are not considered conclusive but can be challenged. This means that parties have the opportunity to contest or refute admissions that do not have the binding effect of an estoppel. It highlights the importance of examining admissions critically within the context of legal proceedings.
Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 15

What role do admissions play in legal cases?

Detailed Solution for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) - Question 15

Admissions play a significant role in legal cases as they can be used as evidence. When parties make admissions relevant to a case, these statements can be presented as evidence to support or prove certain aspects of the case. Admissions can carry weight in legal proceedings and influence the outcomes of cases based on their content and relevance.

253 docs|259 tests
Information about Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Admission Under Indian Evidence Act ( SEC 17-23, 31), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams