What legal maxim is associated with vicarious liability and translates to 'Let the master answer'?

'Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se'

'Actio Personalis Moritur Cum Persona'

What is the primary purpose of the Respondeat Superior doctrine?

To absolve employers of any responsibility for their employees' actions

To allocate personal liabilities of employees to the company

To hold employers accountable for the actions of their employees within their job scope

To limit the legal rights of employees in case of negligence

When can liability extend to actions by agents with the employer's implied or express authorization?

When employees act outside the scope of their job responsibilities

When agents act independently without any authorization

When employees act within their job responsibilities

When agents act against the employer's explicit instructions

What is a key requirement for the principle of 'respondeat superior' to apply?

The employee must have explicit authorization from the employer for their actions.

The wrongful act must occur outside the scope of employment.

A genuine relationship between the employer and the employee must be established.

The employee must be acting independently without any supervision.

What must occur for a wrongful act to fall within the scope of employment under the principle of 'respondeat superior'?

The act must be specifically instructed by the employer.

The act must be committed during working hours.

The act must be beneficial to the employer.

The act must be in line with the employee's job responsibilities.

In a case where a court dismissed a defense based on a 'Contract of Service,' what was the ruling regarding the liability of the overseeing entity?

The overseeing entity was found not liable due to the temporary service agreement.

The overseeing entity was held responsible for negligence regardless of the service agreement.

The overseeing entity was exempt from any liability under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

The overseeing entity was not involved in the case proceedings.

Why is establishing a clear employee-employer relationship essential for the application of respondeat superior?

To hold employers accountable for employee actions

To streamline company operations

What is the significance of the 'hire and fire' test in evaluating the relationship between an employer and an employee?

It assesses employee performance

It determines employee benefits eligibility

It helps identify the nature of the employee-employer relationship

It establishes employee training requirements

In the mentioned court case Cassidy v. Ministry of Health, what aspect did the court specifically examine?

Control over employee actions and methods

Employee performance evaluations

In cases of negligence, what is the presumption regarding employers and their employees' autonomy?

Employers are presumed to have no control over employees' actions.

Employers are presumed to have granted autonomy to employees.

Employers are presumed to micro-manage every employee decision.

Employers are presumed to be unaware of employee actions.

When it comes to intentional torts, what is the general stance of courts regarding employer liability?

Employers are always held liable for intentional torts committed by employees.

Courts rarely attribute liability to employers in cases of intentional torts.

Employers are never held accountable for intentional torts.

Courts always side with employers in intentional tort cases.

Why can employers still be held accountable if they hire employees with prior offenses who then act negligently?

Employers are unaware of their employees' past actions.

It is illegal to hold employers accountable in such cases.

Employers have a duty to ensure responsible hiring practices.

Employees with prior offenses cannot be held liable for their actions.

In cases of negligence, what is the presumption regarding employers and their direction or granting of autonomy to employees?

Employers are always presumed to have directed all employee actions.

Employers are presumed to have granted autonomy to employees.

Employers are absolved of any responsibility in cases of negligence.

Employers are presumed to be unaware of employee actions.

Under what circumstances can employers be held liable for intentional torts committed by their employees?

Employers are never held liable for intentional torts committed by employees.

Employers are always held liable for any harm caused by their employees.

Employers are only held liable if they specifically authorized or encouraged the harmful acts.

Employers are held liable if employees act intentionally without authorization.

What is the potential consequence for employers who hire individuals with prior offenses that later result in negligent actions?

Employers are never held accountable for the actions of employees with prior offenses.

Employers can be held accountable if the hired individual acts negligently.

Employers are immune to legal action if a hired individual has a prior offense.

Employers are only accountable if the prior offense directly relates to the negligent actions.

In the case of Lloyd v. Grace Smith & Co., why was the firm held liable for the deceitful actions of its agent?

The agent was acting within their personal interests.

The agent was granted explicit authority by the firm.

The agent was operating within the apparent authority granted by the firm.

The firm was unaware of the agent's actions.

What did the case Poland v. Parr & Sons establish concerning employer accountability for employee conduct?

Employers are never responsible for the actions of their employees.

Employers can only be held liable for actions explicitly authorized by them.

Employers are accountable for their employees' conduct during employment, regardless of excessiveness.

Employers are only responsible if employees act with reasonable force.

What was the key decision made in Morris v. C.W. Martin & Sons regarding employer liability?

Employers are never responsible for their employees' actions.

Employers are liable only for intentional employee misconduct.

Employers can be held responsible for employees' dishonest actions within the scope of employment.

Employers are only liable for actions performed during official working hours.

What legal principle holds employers accountable for the actions of their employees or servants during the course of employment?

Doctrine of Respondeat Superior

Law of Diminished Responsibility

What are the two essential conditions that must be demonstrated to establish liability under respondeat superior?

A genuine employer-employee or master-servant relationship, and the intentional act of the employee

A contractual agreement between employer and employee, and the location where the act occurred

A genuine employer-employee or master-servant relationship, and the tortious act falling within the scope of employment

A formal grievance procedure, and the involvement of a union representative

Respondeat Superior Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

EduRev

All Courses

Open App

	Civil Law for Judiciary Exams 253 docs\|259 tests

	Civil Law for Judiciary Exams 253 docs\|259 tests

Important Questions for Respondeat Superior

Find all the important questions for Respondeat Superior at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Respondeat Superior with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Respondeat Superior syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Respondeat Superior resources.

Respondeat Superior MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Respondeat Superior within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Respondeat Superior Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Respondeat Superior with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution