All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Civil Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts

Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Civil Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts below.
Solutions of Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts questions in English are available as part of our Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts solutions in Hindi for Civil Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Civil Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 1
Save

According to Prof. Winfield, what is the basis for tortious liability, and what remedies are typically available to the injured party?

Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 1
Prof. Winfield explains that tortious liability stems from breaching a duty fixed by law, resulting in the violation of another's legal rights. In such cases, the injured party can seek various remedies, including damages (monetary compensation), injunctions, property restitution, or self-help. These remedies aim to address the harm caused by the wrongful act and restore the injured party as much as possible.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 2
Save

What legal concept is central to the case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966?

Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 2
The case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966 revolves around the legal concept of the standard of care. In tort law, the standard of care refers to the level of caution that a reasonable person would exercise in a similar situation to prevent foreseeable harm to others. In this case, the municipal corporation of Delhi was found liable for negligence as it failed to meet the expected standard of care in maintaining the clock tower, leading to its collapse and resulting in fatalities.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 3
Save

What legal principle was invoked in the case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966?

Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 3
The legal principle invoked in the case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966 was "res ipsa loquitur," which translates to "the thing speaks for itself." This principle is applied when the circumstances surrounding an incident clearly indicate negligence, shifting the burden of proof to the defendant. In this case, the collapse of the clock tower in Chandni Chowk, Delhi, and the resulting fatalities pointed directly to the negligence of the municipal corporation, invoking the principle of res ipsa loquitur.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 4
Save
What was the key reason for finding the municipal corporation of Delhi liable in the case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 4
The key reason for finding the municipal corporation of Delhi liable in the case of Municipal Corporation Delhi vs. Subhagwanti, 1966 was negligence. Negligence in tort law refers to the failure to exercise the standard of care expected in a given situation, leading to harm or injury to others. In this instance, the corporation's failure to maintain the clock tower adequately, despite its deteriorating condition, resulted in its collapse and the subsequent loss of lives, making the corporation liable for negligence.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 5
Save
What legal concept does the case of Ashby vs. White, 1703 primarily illustrate?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 5
The case of Ashby vs. White, 1703, primarily illustrates the legal concept of "injuria sine damno," which refers to a wrongful act occurring without resulting in actual damage. This principle emphasizes that even if no tangible harm is caused, the infringement of a legal right warrants a remedy. This is a fundamental aspect of certain legal actions, highlighting the significance of protecting rights even in the absence of financial loss.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 6
Save
How does the legal principle of injuria sine damno apply in cases of trespass?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 6
In cases of trespass, the legal principle of injuria sine damno applies by addressing the wrongful act itself, irrespective of whether actual harm or damage to the property occurred. This principle underscores the significance of respecting property rights and holding individuals accountable for their unauthorized entry onto another person's land. It highlights that trespass can be legally actionable based on the violation of property rights, even in the absence of physical harm to the property.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 7
Save
What legal concept is highlighted in the case of Bhim Singh vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir, 1985?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 7
The case of Bhim Singh vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir, 1985 emphasizes the legal concept of false imprisonment. False imprisonment involves intentionally confining another individual within fixed boundaries without lawful justification. In this case, Mr. Bhim Singh was unlawfully detained by the police to prevent him from attending legislative assembly sessions. The court ruled that this act constituted false imprisonment, leading to a violation of Mr. Bhim Singh's constitutional rights.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 8
Save
What legal action did Mr. Bhim Singh's wife take in response to his detention?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 8
In response to Mr. Bhim Singh's detention, his wife filed a petition in the Supreme Court under Habeas Corpus. Habeas Corpus is a legal action that safeguards individuals against unlawful detention by requiring the detaining authority to justify the cause and legality of the detention. By filing this petition, Mr. Bhim Singh's wife sought to challenge the legality of his arrest and secure his release from unlawful confinement.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 9
Save
What was the court's ruling regarding Mr. Bhim Singh's arrest in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 9
The court determined that Mr. Bhim Singh's arrest was illegal and motivated by malicious intent. This ruling signifies that the arrest was not conducted within the bounds of the law and was driven by wrongful motives. As a result, the court concluded that Mr. Bhim Singh's constitutional rights were violated due to the unlawful nature of his arrest, leading to the decision to provide him with adequate compensation for the infringement of his legal rights.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 10
Save
What legal concept is exemplified in the Gloucester Grammar School Case where the plaintiff's financial loss was deemed non-compensable?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 10
The legal concept exemplified in the Gloucester Grammar School Case, where the plaintiff's financial loss was deemed non-compensable, is known as "damnum sine injuria," which translates to "injury caused without any actual loss." This principle signifies that when harm is inflicted without a violation of a legal right, no compensation is warranted.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 11
Save
Why did the court rule that the plaintiff in the Gloucester Grammar School Case had no legal grounds for action against the defendant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 11
The court ruled that the plaintiff in the Gloucester Grammar School Case had no legal grounds for action against the defendant because of the presence of bona fide competition. Despite the financial loss suffered by the plaintiff due to the defendant's actions, the court held that competition, even if resulting in damage, does not constitute legal wrongdoing and therefore does not justify legal action.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 12
Save
In the case of Mayor of Bradford vs. Pickles, 1985, what was the central legal question raised by the petitioner against the defendant's actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 12
The central legal question raised in the case of Mayor of Bradford vs. Pickles, 1985, revolved around whether a lawful use of property could be considered unlawful solely based on the malicious intent behind it. The court's ruling emphasized that the legality of an action is determined by whether it falls within the bounds of the law, regardless of the intentions behind it. This principle highlights the significance of distinguishing between lawful and unlawful actions based on legal considerations rather than motives.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 13
Save
What was the primary reason behind the petitioner seeking injunctions against the defendant in the case of Mayor of Bradford vs. Pickles, 1985?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 13
The petitioner sought injunctions against the defendant primarily due to the diminishment of water flow to the petitioner's springs caused by the defendant's actions. This interference with the water supply had significant implications for the petitioner, as their springs supplied water to the entire city. By seeking injunctions, the petitioner aimed to address the adverse effects of the defendant's activities on the water flow and protect their interests in maintaining a stable water supply for the city.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 14
Save
Which principle in Tort law refers to a legal injury without actual damage, highlighting situations where a legal right has been violated without resulting in any physical harm?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 14
Injuria sine damno is a principle in Tort law that refers to a legal injury without actual damage. This principle recognizes that certain legal rights are so important that their violation, even without resulting in physical harm, can still give rise to a valid claim in tort. It emphasizes the protection of legal rights and ensures that individuals can seek redress for infringements even if no tangible harm is suffered.
Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 15
Save
What is a fundamental concept within Tort law that addresses violations of basic legal rights and serves as the foundation of the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts - Question 15
Negligence is a fundamental concept within Tort law that involves the failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in similar circumstances. It forms the basis of many tort cases where individuals seek compensation for harm caused by the negligent actions of others. Negligence requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused harm as a result.
253 docs|259 tests
Join Course
Information about Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts

Find all the important questions for Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts resources.

Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Top 5 Important Cases to Understand the Basics of Torts with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup