Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

25 Questions MCQ Test Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams - Test: General Exceptions in IPC

Test: General Exceptions in IPC for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: General Exceptions in IPC questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: General Exceptions in IPC MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: General Exceptions in IPC below.
Solutions of Test: General Exceptions in IPC questions in English are available as part of our Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams & Test: General Exceptions in IPC solutions in Hindi for Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: General Exceptions in IPC | 25 questions in 25 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Criminal Law for Judiciary Exams for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 1

What do Sections 87-91 of the Indian Penal Code primarily deal with?

Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 1
Sections 87-91 of the Indian Penal Code primarily deal with acts done with the consent of the affected party. This means that these sections cover situations where an action is carried out with the explicit agreement of the person impacted by the act. Consent plays a crucial role in determining the legality and permissibility of certain actions within the legal framework.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 2

What is the main focus of the exceptions outlined in Sections 76 to 106 of the Indian Penal Code?

Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 2
The exceptions detailed in Sections 76 to 106 of the Indian Penal Code primarily delineate circumstances where certain acts are not considered offenses. These exceptions provide a framework within which individuals can defend themselves against criminal liability by demonstrating that their actions fall within specific criteria as outlined in the mentioned sections.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 3

What legal defense can be used when an individual commits an offense without understanding the nature of their actions due to mental incapacity?

Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 3
The legal defense that can be utilized when an individual commits an offense without comprehending the nature of their actions due to mental incapacity is known as mental incapacity. This defense is invoked when an individual lacks the mental capacity to understand the consequences of their actions at the time the offense was committed. It is important in such cases to establish that the individual was not aware of the nature of their actions due to a mental condition.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 4
Under what circumstance are individuals under a specified age not held criminally responsible for their actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 4
Individuals under a specified age are not held criminally responsible for their actions under the legal defense of infancy. This defense recognizes that young individuals may not have the maturity or understanding to fully comprehend the consequences of their actions, and therefore, they are exempt from criminal liability based on their age. The law considers them incapable of forming criminal intent due to their young age, emphasizing the need for protective measures rather than punitive actions.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 5
In legal terms, what is not considered a valid defense under the principle of respondeat superior?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 5
The principle of respondeat superior, which translates to "let the master answer," does not apply to illegal orders from superiors as a valid defense in criminal law. Even if an individual receives instructions from a superior to commit an offense, especially if the order itself is illegal, this does not absolve the individual from legal responsibility. It is essential to understand that individuals are accountable for their actions, particularly when they knowingly engage in unlawful activities, irrespective of the source of the directive.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 6
What is the key distinction between Section 76 and Section 79 in terms of belief?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 6
The key difference between Section 76 and Section 79 lies in the nature of the belief they entail. Section 76 pertains to actions driven by legal obligation, while Section 79 deals with actions believed to be justified by law. This distinction is crucial in understanding the legal framework surrounding good faith beliefs and their implications.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 7
What is the key distinction between Section 77 and Section 78 regarding protection under the law?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 7
Section 77 offers protection to judges for acts carried out within their lawful jurisdiction, emphasizing that judges are shielded from liability if they sincerely believe, in good faith, that their actions are authorized by law. This specific provision ensures that judges acting within the boundaries of their jurisdiction are not held accountable for their decisions, even if they make mistakes.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 8
In what scenario does Section 78 provide protection to individuals under the law?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 8
Section 78 safeguards individuals who act in accordance with a court's judgment or order as long as they genuinely believe, in good faith, that the court has jurisdiction. This provision ensures protection for individuals who, based on their sincere belief in the legitimacy of the court's directive, carry out actions as per the court's orders, even if the court's jurisdiction might be debated or uncertain.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 9
What is the key difference between Section 77 and Section 78 as outlined in the provided content?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 9
The key difference between Section 77 and Section 78 lies in the protection offered to individuals following a court order. Under Section 77, judges are shielded if they act within their lawful jurisdiction and sincerely believe their actions are authorized by law. On the other hand, Section 78 safeguards individuals who act in accordance with a court's judgment, even if the court's jurisdiction is questionable. This distinction highlights the varying circumstances under which individuals are protected under these legal provisions.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 10
What does Section 78 of the law protect individuals from, even if the court's jurisdiction is questionable?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 10
Section 78 of the law protects individuals from legal consequences when they are obeying a court order, even if the court's jurisdiction is questionable. This provision ensures that individuals following court orders are shielded from liability, emphasizing the importance of compliance with court directives.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 11
According to Section 80 of the law, under what circumstances is no offense considered to have been committed?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 11
As per Section 80 of the law, no offense is considered to have been committed when an act is performed without criminal intent or knowledge, in the course of executing a lawful act using lawful means and in a lawful manner, and with the exercise of proper care and caution. This provision highlights the legal protection provided in cases of accidental acts carried out within the specified conditions.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 12
What distinguishes accidental acts as outlined in Section 80 from intentional wrongdoing and negligence?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 12
Accidental acts, as defined in Section 80, are characterized by events that occur without criminal intent or negligence. These acts are unforeseen occurrences that happen without the presence of deliberate wrongdoing or carelessness. It is essential to differentiate between intentional actions and those that happen unexpectedly, emphasizing the importance of proper care and caution in determining the accidental nature of an act.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 13
What does Section 81 of the given legal framework primarily address?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 13
Section 81 deals with acts done to avoid harm in good faith without criminal intent. It focuses on situations where actions are taken to prevent or mitigate harm to individuals or property. This provision emphasizes that in certain extreme circumstances where harm is inevitable, it may be lawful to choose the lesser evil. For example, pulling down houses during a fire to prevent its spread is considered an act done to avoid harm and is not an offense under Section 81.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 14
In the case of Dudley v. Stephens (1884) 14 Q. B. D. 173, what ruling was made regarding killing for survival?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 14
In the case of Dudley v. Stephens, it was ruled that killing for survival, such as consuming flesh for survival purposes, constitutes murder. This ruling indicates that self-preservation does not justify committing intentional crimes, even in extreme circumstances. This case is often cited in legal discussions regarding the limits of justifying criminal acts based on the need for self-preservation.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 15
According to Sections 82-83 of the Indian Penal Code, which category of individuals is considered "doli incapax" and immune from criminal liability due to an inability to understand right and wrong?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 15
Children under seven years old are considered "doli incapax" under Sections 82-83 of the Indian Penal Code. This designation implies that they are incapable of understanding right and wrong, leading to immunity from criminal liability for their actions.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 16
What is the primary purpose of Section 84 in criminal law regarding individuals deemed insane?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 16
Section 84 in criminal law serves to excuse the actions of individuals who are unable to comprehend the nature or wrongfulness of their acts due to unsoundness of mind. This provision recognizes various categories of unsoundness of mind such as idiocy, lunacy, unconsciousness, and intoxication. It aims to protect individuals who, due to their mental condition, are unable to understand the consequences of their actions, thereby providing a legal framework for dealing with such cases.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 17
What does Section 85 aim to protect in criminal law concerning intoxicated individuals?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 17
Section 85 in criminal law is designed to protect individuals who are incapable of knowing the nature or wrongfulness of their actions due to intoxication. This section recognizes that drunkenness can lead to a state where individuals are unable to comprehend the consequences of their actions, and thus, it provides a legal safeguard for such individuals in cases where their intoxication impairs their mental faculties.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 18
In which scenario does Section 94 of the legal framework provide an excuse for committing an offense?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 18
Section 94 of the legal framework allows for excuses if an individual commits an offense under the threat of immediate death. This provision recognizes the extreme circumstances where an individual may feel compelled to act unlawfully to safeguard their own life. It sets specific limitations on the type of threat that can be considered a valid defense under this section.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 19
In which situation would an act likely fall under the provisions of Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 19
Acts covered by Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are those that cause harm so minimal that an ordinary person wouldn't find it worth complaining about. This provision deals with trivial or minor matters that are not considered offenses, such as taking a wafer from someone's plate without permission. It recognizes that certain actions, although falling under criminal law, are inconsequential and do not warrant legal repercussions.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 20
What is the core purpose of Section 95 in the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 20
The primary function of Section 95 in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is to prevent the law from being overly burdensome by exempting trivial matters from criminal liability. This section ensures that minor actions causing trifling harm, which an ordinary person would not consider significant, are not prosecuted. By focusing on significant offenses that merit legal action, Section 95 helps maintain the effectiveness and relevance of criminal law.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 21
Which kinds of actions are typically covered by Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 21
Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) typically covers actions that result in negligible or trifling harm. These actions include both accidental and deliberate deeds that cause minimal harm, such as taking a wafer from someone's plate without permission or lightly striking someone with an umbrella. Despite technically qualifying as offenses, these actions are considered insignificant and not deserving of legal repercussions under Section 95.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 22
What is the primary purpose of the right of private defence as outlined in the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 22
The primary purpose of the right of private defence as outlined in the Indian Penal Code is to empower individuals to protect themselves and their property from unlawful aggression. It serves as a preventive measure, allowing individuals to respond to imminent danger when immediate aid is unavailable.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 23
According to the principles of private defence, when is it legitimate to exercise the right of private defence?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 23
According to the principles of private defence, it is legitimate to exercise the right of private defence when there is a genuine and immediate threat. This means that individuals can act in self-defence when there is a reasonable apprehension of danger, even if an offense has not yet been committed. It is crucial that the force used in self-defence is proportional to the threat faced and does not exceed necessary limits.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 24
What purpose do the general exceptions within the Indian Penal Code serve?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 24
The general exceptions within the Indian Penal Code serve the purpose of mitigating or negating criminal liability under specific circumstances. These exceptions are crucial as they take into account various situations where individuals may have acted under conditions that warrant consideration and understanding, ensuring a fair application of criminal law.
Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 25
Which of the following is NOT considered a general exception within the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: General Exceptions in IPC - Question 25
Strict liability offenses are not considered general exceptions within the Indian Penal Code. Unlike general exceptions that provide for specific circumstances where criminal liability may be mitigated or negated, strict liability offenses do not require proof of criminal intent for conviction. This distinction is essential in understanding the nuances of criminal law and how different legal concepts operate within the legal framework.
99 docs|98 tests
Information about Test: General Exceptions in IPC Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: General Exceptions in IPC solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: General Exceptions in IPC, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams