Page 1
1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
POLITY FOR PRE-PLUS-MAINS
HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION
(Part 1)
• The English East lndia Company was essentially a commercial body.
• Following the principles of mercantilism and to ensure monopolistic profit the company
needed political power hence political activities which resulted in acquiring revenue-
yielding territories.
• After 1757 it was in a privileged position of yielding political power over a large section
of the population of India.
• The Company had become a great empire combining the role of trader and an overlord.
The British Government decided that it could no longer be allowed to remain outside the
ambit of the state.
• A select committee of Parliament was appointed in April, 1772 to enquire into the state
of affairs in India.
Regulating Act of 1773
• In these circumstances. the Parliament passed its first important Act in 1773 called the
Regulating Act to control the Company's Administration.
• Changes were made in the Constitution of the Court of Directors of the Company. It was
required that it should submit to the Government all communications about civil and
military affairs received from Bengal and revenues of India.
• In the field of executive government. the status of Governor of Bengal was raised to
Governor General. His Council would consist of four members.
• The Governor General in Council was given the power to superintend and control the
presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and peace and was vested the
civil and military administration of the presidency, and government of all the territorial
acquisitions and revenues in the kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to send regularly to the Governor
General, information connected with government, revenues. or interests of the
Company.
• The Governor General in turn was under the direct control of Court of Directors and kept
it fully informed of the affairs concerning the interests of the Company.
Page 2
1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
POLITY FOR PRE-PLUS-MAINS
HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION
(Part 1)
• The English East lndia Company was essentially a commercial body.
• Following the principles of mercantilism and to ensure monopolistic profit the company
needed political power hence political activities which resulted in acquiring revenue-
yielding territories.
• After 1757 it was in a privileged position of yielding political power over a large section
of the population of India.
• The Company had become a great empire combining the role of trader and an overlord.
The British Government decided that it could no longer be allowed to remain outside the
ambit of the state.
• A select committee of Parliament was appointed in April, 1772 to enquire into the state
of affairs in India.
Regulating Act of 1773
• In these circumstances. the Parliament passed its first important Act in 1773 called the
Regulating Act to control the Company's Administration.
• Changes were made in the Constitution of the Court of Directors of the Company. It was
required that it should submit to the Government all communications about civil and
military affairs received from Bengal and revenues of India.
• In the field of executive government. the status of Governor of Bengal was raised to
Governor General. His Council would consist of four members.
• The Governor General in Council was given the power to superintend and control the
presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and peace and was vested the
civil and military administration of the presidency, and government of all the territorial
acquisitions and revenues in the kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to send regularly to the Governor
General, information connected with government, revenues. or interests of the
Company.
• The Governor General in turn was under the direct control of Court of Directors and kept
it fully informed of the affairs concerning the interests of the Company.
2
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• The Act also provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta to
give justice to Europeans, their employees and citizens of Calcutta.
• Legislative powers were granted to the Governor General and Council to make rules,
ordinances and regulations for the civil government of Fort William and subordinate
factories.
Issues and the Amending Act of 1781
• In the Regulating Act of 1773, the constitution of the Supreme Court was defective in
many ways. Its jurisdiction was vague.
• They said nothing about to jurisdiction of the Court, the law it had to a administer and its
relation to the Governor - General – in-Council.
• The fundamental questions lacked clarity and precision. For instance, the Act did not
clearly say as to who were to be the British subject within the meaning of the Charter of
the Supreme court.
• The court did not know whether it was to administer native law or English law. Similarly,
relations between the court and the Council were not clearly defined. It was not clear
how far the Supreme Court could question the legality of the orders issued by the
governor-General-in-Council.
• The Amending Act provided that the public servants of the Company, revenue collectors
and judicial officers were not to be subject the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for
things done by them in their official capacity.
• Governor –General and the member of the council were also exempted from the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court both individually and collectively ?for anything
counselled, ordered or done by them in their public capacity?.
• Formerly, the rules and regulations made by the Governor –General were required to
be registered with the Supreme Court. This led to a lot of inconvenience. Consequently,
the Act of 1781 provided that no such registration was required.
• The Act provided that appeals were to be taken from the provincial courts to the
Governor –General in Council. The latter was to be the final Court of Appeal except in
those civil cases which involved Pounds 5,000 or more. In case the amount involved
was more than Pounds 5,000, an appeal was to be taken to the King-in-Council.
Pitts India Act 1784
• The purpose of the Act was to remove defects in the Regulating Act. Its essential plan
was the same. Company's public affairs and its administration in lndia were to come
Page 3
1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
POLITY FOR PRE-PLUS-MAINS
HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION
(Part 1)
• The English East lndia Company was essentially a commercial body.
• Following the principles of mercantilism and to ensure monopolistic profit the company
needed political power hence political activities which resulted in acquiring revenue-
yielding territories.
• After 1757 it was in a privileged position of yielding political power over a large section
of the population of India.
• The Company had become a great empire combining the role of trader and an overlord.
The British Government decided that it could no longer be allowed to remain outside the
ambit of the state.
• A select committee of Parliament was appointed in April, 1772 to enquire into the state
of affairs in India.
Regulating Act of 1773
• In these circumstances. the Parliament passed its first important Act in 1773 called the
Regulating Act to control the Company's Administration.
• Changes were made in the Constitution of the Court of Directors of the Company. It was
required that it should submit to the Government all communications about civil and
military affairs received from Bengal and revenues of India.
• In the field of executive government. the status of Governor of Bengal was raised to
Governor General. His Council would consist of four members.
• The Governor General in Council was given the power to superintend and control the
presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and peace and was vested the
civil and military administration of the presidency, and government of all the territorial
acquisitions and revenues in the kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to send regularly to the Governor
General, information connected with government, revenues. or interests of the
Company.
• The Governor General in turn was under the direct control of Court of Directors and kept
it fully informed of the affairs concerning the interests of the Company.
2
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• The Act also provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta to
give justice to Europeans, their employees and citizens of Calcutta.
• Legislative powers were granted to the Governor General and Council to make rules,
ordinances and regulations for the civil government of Fort William and subordinate
factories.
Issues and the Amending Act of 1781
• In the Regulating Act of 1773, the constitution of the Supreme Court was defective in
many ways. Its jurisdiction was vague.
• They said nothing about to jurisdiction of the Court, the law it had to a administer and its
relation to the Governor - General – in-Council.
• The fundamental questions lacked clarity and precision. For instance, the Act did not
clearly say as to who were to be the British subject within the meaning of the Charter of
the Supreme court.
• The court did not know whether it was to administer native law or English law. Similarly,
relations between the court and the Council were not clearly defined. It was not clear
how far the Supreme Court could question the legality of the orders issued by the
governor-General-in-Council.
• The Amending Act provided that the public servants of the Company, revenue collectors
and judicial officers were not to be subject the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for
things done by them in their official capacity.
• Governor –General and the member of the council were also exempted from the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court both individually and collectively ?for anything
counselled, ordered or done by them in their public capacity?.
• Formerly, the rules and regulations made by the Governor –General were required to
be registered with the Supreme Court. This led to a lot of inconvenience. Consequently,
the Act of 1781 provided that no such registration was required.
• The Act provided that appeals were to be taken from the provincial courts to the
Governor –General in Council. The latter was to be the final Court of Appeal except in
those civil cases which involved Pounds 5,000 or more. In case the amount involved
was more than Pounds 5,000, an appeal was to be taken to the King-in-Council.
Pitts India Act 1784
• The purpose of the Act was to remove defects in the Regulating Act. Its essential plan
was the same. Company's public affairs and its administration in lndia were to come
3
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
directly under supreme control of the British Government. The right of the Company to
territorial possessions was however not touched.
• The Act established a Board of Control consisting of six commissioners, including, two
Cabinet ministers. The Board of Control was to guide and control the work of the Court
of Directors and the Government of India. They were to control all matters of civil and
military Government of the British territories in India.
• The Act established the principle that the government of lndia be placed under the
Governor General and a Council of three, so that if only one member of the Council
supported him, he could have his way.
• The Governor General was given a casting vote. The Act clearly stated that the
Presidencies of Madras and Bombay were to be subordinate to the Presidency of
Bengal in all matters of war, diplomatic relations and revenue.
• The Governor General and council were made subordinate to British Government. They
were forbidden to declare war and enter into any treaty without the sanction of the
directors or the secret committee.
• The Act laid the foundation of a centralised administration-a process which reached its
climax towards the close of the nineteenth century. Parliament's control over East lndia
Company was tightened, a trend which remained conspicuous till the Crown directly
took over the Government of lndia in 1858.
• The Act established a system of double government which also led to problems. The
Governor General had two masters, the Court of Directors and the Board of Control.
Out of this conflict of authority emerged the view of the primacy of the man on the spot.
• The Act termed Company‘s territories in India as the =British possessions in India‘; and
second, the British Government was given the supreme control over Company‘s affairs
and its administration in India through the establishment of Board of Control.
• Declaratory Act of 1788 gave full powers and supremacy to the Board of control. This
was a step towards transfer of powers of the Company to the Crown.
Charter Act of 1793
• The Charter of the Company was renewed for 20 years and it was declared that it
would be allowed to continue with the possession of all territories for the next 20 years.
• The Governor General's and Governors' powers to overrule their council were
emphasised and explained. Governor General's control over the Presidencies was
strengthened.
• He was allowed /to issue orders and directions to any Government and Presidency of
lndia during his absence from Bengal without previous consultation with his council. He
could exercise all executive power vested in the Central Government.
Page 4
1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
POLITY FOR PRE-PLUS-MAINS
HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION
(Part 1)
• The English East lndia Company was essentially a commercial body.
• Following the principles of mercantilism and to ensure monopolistic profit the company
needed political power hence political activities which resulted in acquiring revenue-
yielding territories.
• After 1757 it was in a privileged position of yielding political power over a large section
of the population of India.
• The Company had become a great empire combining the role of trader and an overlord.
The British Government decided that it could no longer be allowed to remain outside the
ambit of the state.
• A select committee of Parliament was appointed in April, 1772 to enquire into the state
of affairs in India.
Regulating Act of 1773
• In these circumstances. the Parliament passed its first important Act in 1773 called the
Regulating Act to control the Company's Administration.
• Changes were made in the Constitution of the Court of Directors of the Company. It was
required that it should submit to the Government all communications about civil and
military affairs received from Bengal and revenues of India.
• In the field of executive government. the status of Governor of Bengal was raised to
Governor General. His Council would consist of four members.
• The Governor General in Council was given the power to superintend and control the
presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and peace and was vested the
civil and military administration of the presidency, and government of all the territorial
acquisitions and revenues in the kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to send regularly to the Governor
General, information connected with government, revenues. or interests of the
Company.
• The Governor General in turn was under the direct control of Court of Directors and kept
it fully informed of the affairs concerning the interests of the Company.
2
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• The Act also provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta to
give justice to Europeans, their employees and citizens of Calcutta.
• Legislative powers were granted to the Governor General and Council to make rules,
ordinances and regulations for the civil government of Fort William and subordinate
factories.
Issues and the Amending Act of 1781
• In the Regulating Act of 1773, the constitution of the Supreme Court was defective in
many ways. Its jurisdiction was vague.
• They said nothing about to jurisdiction of the Court, the law it had to a administer and its
relation to the Governor - General – in-Council.
• The fundamental questions lacked clarity and precision. For instance, the Act did not
clearly say as to who were to be the British subject within the meaning of the Charter of
the Supreme court.
• The court did not know whether it was to administer native law or English law. Similarly,
relations between the court and the Council were not clearly defined. It was not clear
how far the Supreme Court could question the legality of the orders issued by the
governor-General-in-Council.
• The Amending Act provided that the public servants of the Company, revenue collectors
and judicial officers were not to be subject the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for
things done by them in their official capacity.
• Governor –General and the member of the council were also exempted from the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court both individually and collectively ?for anything
counselled, ordered or done by them in their public capacity?.
• Formerly, the rules and regulations made by the Governor –General were required to
be registered with the Supreme Court. This led to a lot of inconvenience. Consequently,
the Act of 1781 provided that no such registration was required.
• The Act provided that appeals were to be taken from the provincial courts to the
Governor –General in Council. The latter was to be the final Court of Appeal except in
those civil cases which involved Pounds 5,000 or more. In case the amount involved
was more than Pounds 5,000, an appeal was to be taken to the King-in-Council.
Pitts India Act 1784
• The purpose of the Act was to remove defects in the Regulating Act. Its essential plan
was the same. Company's public affairs and its administration in lndia were to come
3
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
directly under supreme control of the British Government. The right of the Company to
territorial possessions was however not touched.
• The Act established a Board of Control consisting of six commissioners, including, two
Cabinet ministers. The Board of Control was to guide and control the work of the Court
of Directors and the Government of India. They were to control all matters of civil and
military Government of the British territories in India.
• The Act established the principle that the government of lndia be placed under the
Governor General and a Council of three, so that if only one member of the Council
supported him, he could have his way.
• The Governor General was given a casting vote. The Act clearly stated that the
Presidencies of Madras and Bombay were to be subordinate to the Presidency of
Bengal in all matters of war, diplomatic relations and revenue.
• The Governor General and council were made subordinate to British Government. They
were forbidden to declare war and enter into any treaty without the sanction of the
directors or the secret committee.
• The Act laid the foundation of a centralised administration-a process which reached its
climax towards the close of the nineteenth century. Parliament's control over East lndia
Company was tightened, a trend which remained conspicuous till the Crown directly
took over the Government of lndia in 1858.
• The Act established a system of double government which also led to problems. The
Governor General had two masters, the Court of Directors and the Board of Control.
Out of this conflict of authority emerged the view of the primacy of the man on the spot.
• The Act termed Company‘s territories in India as the =British possessions in India‘; and
second, the British Government was given the supreme control over Company‘s affairs
and its administration in India through the establishment of Board of Control.
• Declaratory Act of 1788 gave full powers and supremacy to the Board of control. This
was a step towards transfer of powers of the Company to the Crown.
Charter Act of 1793
• The Charter of the Company was renewed for 20 years and it was declared that it
would be allowed to continue with the possession of all territories for the next 20 years.
• The Governor General's and Governors' powers to overrule their council were
emphasised and explained. Governor General's control over the Presidencies was
strengthened.
• He was allowed /to issue orders and directions to any Government and Presidency of
lndia during his absence from Bengal without previous consultation with his council. He
could exercise all executive power vested in the Central Government.
4
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• A regular code of all regulations that could be enacted for the internal Government of
the British territory in Bengal was framed applying to the rights persons and property of
the Indian people. This was to be translated in local languages for people to know their
rights.
• The Act of 1793 thus laid the foundation of government by written laws and regulations
in British lndia in place of the personal rule of the past rulers. The interpretation of
regulations and written laws was to be done by the Courts.
Charter Act of 1813
• In 1808, the House of Commons appointed a Committee of investigations. Its report
on judicial and police arrangements was submitted in 1812.
• The government decided to allow British subjects access to lndia with their ships. The
Act of 1813 renewed the Company's Charter for 20 years, but it asserted the
sovereignty of the British Crown over the lndian territories held by the Company.
• The Company was allowed to have territorial possessions for another 20 years. The
Company was deprived of its monopoly of trade with India. It was allowed to continue
with its monopoly of trade with China for 20 years. The lndian trade was thrown open to
all British merchants.
• The power of the provincial governments and courts in India over European British
subjects was also strengthened by the Act.
• It allotted Rs 100,000 to promote education in Indian masses and allowed them to open
anywhere anytime. This act permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English
and preach their religion at the expense of the Company in India. Financial provision
was also made to encourage a revival in Indian literature and for the promotion of
science.
Charter Act of 1833
• Laissez Faire had become the basic philosophy of the new industrial policy in
Britain. There was a popular desire to free trade from restrictions and monopolies.
• When it was time for the renewal of the Charter in 1833 there was widespread agitation
for abolition of the Company and take over of administration by the Crown.
• A Parliamentary enquiry was held. The monopoly of tea trade with China was abolished.
The Company was to have only political functions. lndia was to pay the Company's
debts. Its shareholders were guaranteed a dividend of 10.5 per cent per annum. lndian
possessions of the Company were to be held in trust for the British Crown.
Page 5
1
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
POLITY FOR PRE-PLUS-MAINS
HISTORICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION
(Part 1)
• The English East lndia Company was essentially a commercial body.
• Following the principles of mercantilism and to ensure monopolistic profit the company
needed political power hence political activities which resulted in acquiring revenue-
yielding territories.
• After 1757 it was in a privileged position of yielding political power over a large section
of the population of India.
• The Company had become a great empire combining the role of trader and an overlord.
The British Government decided that it could no longer be allowed to remain outside the
ambit of the state.
• A select committee of Parliament was appointed in April, 1772 to enquire into the state
of affairs in India.
Regulating Act of 1773
• In these circumstances. the Parliament passed its first important Act in 1773 called the
Regulating Act to control the Company's Administration.
• Changes were made in the Constitution of the Court of Directors of the Company. It was
required that it should submit to the Government all communications about civil and
military affairs received from Bengal and revenues of India.
• In the field of executive government. the status of Governor of Bengal was raised to
Governor General. His Council would consist of four members.
• The Governor General in Council was given the power to superintend and control the
presidencies of Madras and Bombay in matters of war and peace and was vested the
civil and military administration of the presidency, and government of all the territorial
acquisitions and revenues in the kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• The Governors of Madras and Bombay were required to send regularly to the Governor
General, information connected with government, revenues. or interests of the
Company.
• The Governor General in turn was under the direct control of Court of Directors and kept
it fully informed of the affairs concerning the interests of the Company.
2
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• The Act also provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court of Justice at Calcutta to
give justice to Europeans, their employees and citizens of Calcutta.
• Legislative powers were granted to the Governor General and Council to make rules,
ordinances and regulations for the civil government of Fort William and subordinate
factories.
Issues and the Amending Act of 1781
• In the Regulating Act of 1773, the constitution of the Supreme Court was defective in
many ways. Its jurisdiction was vague.
• They said nothing about to jurisdiction of the Court, the law it had to a administer and its
relation to the Governor - General – in-Council.
• The fundamental questions lacked clarity and precision. For instance, the Act did not
clearly say as to who were to be the British subject within the meaning of the Charter of
the Supreme court.
• The court did not know whether it was to administer native law or English law. Similarly,
relations between the court and the Council were not clearly defined. It was not clear
how far the Supreme Court could question the legality of the orders issued by the
governor-General-in-Council.
• The Amending Act provided that the public servants of the Company, revenue collectors
and judicial officers were not to be subject the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court for
things done by them in their official capacity.
• Governor –General and the member of the council were also exempted from the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court both individually and collectively ?for anything
counselled, ordered or done by them in their public capacity?.
• Formerly, the rules and regulations made by the Governor –General were required to
be registered with the Supreme Court. This led to a lot of inconvenience. Consequently,
the Act of 1781 provided that no such registration was required.
• The Act provided that appeals were to be taken from the provincial courts to the
Governor –General in Council. The latter was to be the final Court of Appeal except in
those civil cases which involved Pounds 5,000 or more. In case the amount involved
was more than Pounds 5,000, an appeal was to be taken to the King-in-Council.
Pitts India Act 1784
• The purpose of the Act was to remove defects in the Regulating Act. Its essential plan
was the same. Company's public affairs and its administration in lndia were to come
3
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
directly under supreme control of the British Government. The right of the Company to
territorial possessions was however not touched.
• The Act established a Board of Control consisting of six commissioners, including, two
Cabinet ministers. The Board of Control was to guide and control the work of the Court
of Directors and the Government of India. They were to control all matters of civil and
military Government of the British territories in India.
• The Act established the principle that the government of lndia be placed under the
Governor General and a Council of three, so that if only one member of the Council
supported him, he could have his way.
• The Governor General was given a casting vote. The Act clearly stated that the
Presidencies of Madras and Bombay were to be subordinate to the Presidency of
Bengal in all matters of war, diplomatic relations and revenue.
• The Governor General and council were made subordinate to British Government. They
were forbidden to declare war and enter into any treaty without the sanction of the
directors or the secret committee.
• The Act laid the foundation of a centralised administration-a process which reached its
climax towards the close of the nineteenth century. Parliament's control over East lndia
Company was tightened, a trend which remained conspicuous till the Crown directly
took over the Government of lndia in 1858.
• The Act established a system of double government which also led to problems. The
Governor General had two masters, the Court of Directors and the Board of Control.
Out of this conflict of authority emerged the view of the primacy of the man on the spot.
• The Act termed Company‘s territories in India as the =British possessions in India‘; and
second, the British Government was given the supreme control over Company‘s affairs
and its administration in India through the establishment of Board of Control.
• Declaratory Act of 1788 gave full powers and supremacy to the Board of control. This
was a step towards transfer of powers of the Company to the Crown.
Charter Act of 1793
• The Charter of the Company was renewed for 20 years and it was declared that it
would be allowed to continue with the possession of all territories for the next 20 years.
• The Governor General's and Governors' powers to overrule their council were
emphasised and explained. Governor General's control over the Presidencies was
strengthened.
• He was allowed /to issue orders and directions to any Government and Presidency of
lndia during his absence from Bengal without previous consultation with his council. He
could exercise all executive power vested in the Central Government.
4
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• A regular code of all regulations that could be enacted for the internal Government of
the British territory in Bengal was framed applying to the rights persons and property of
the Indian people. This was to be translated in local languages for people to know their
rights.
• The Act of 1793 thus laid the foundation of government by written laws and regulations
in British lndia in place of the personal rule of the past rulers. The interpretation of
regulations and written laws was to be done by the Courts.
Charter Act of 1813
• In 1808, the House of Commons appointed a Committee of investigations. Its report
on judicial and police arrangements was submitted in 1812.
• The government decided to allow British subjects access to lndia with their ships. The
Act of 1813 renewed the Company's Charter for 20 years, but it asserted the
sovereignty of the British Crown over the lndian territories held by the Company.
• The Company was allowed to have territorial possessions for another 20 years. The
Company was deprived of its monopoly of trade with India. It was allowed to continue
with its monopoly of trade with China for 20 years. The lndian trade was thrown open to
all British merchants.
• The power of the provincial governments and courts in India over European British
subjects was also strengthened by the Act.
• It allotted Rs 100,000 to promote education in Indian masses and allowed them to open
anywhere anytime. This act permitted Christian missionaries to propagate English
and preach their religion at the expense of the Company in India. Financial provision
was also made to encourage a revival in Indian literature and for the promotion of
science.
Charter Act of 1833
• Laissez Faire had become the basic philosophy of the new industrial policy in
Britain. There was a popular desire to free trade from restrictions and monopolies.
• When it was time for the renewal of the Charter in 1833 there was widespread agitation
for abolition of the Company and take over of administration by the Crown.
• A Parliamentary enquiry was held. The monopoly of tea trade with China was abolished.
The Company was to have only political functions. lndia was to pay the Company's
debts. Its shareholders were guaranteed a dividend of 10.5 per cent per annum. lndian
possessions of the Company were to be held in trust for the British Crown.
5
www.YouTube.com/SleepyClases
www.SleepyClasses.com
• The President of the Board of-Control became the minister for lndian affairs. The
Directors were to act as expert advisors of the President of the Board of Control. It
provided that the company‘s territories in India were held by it in trust for the Crown.
• Governor General of Bengal became the Governor General of India. The Governor
General in Council was to control, superintend and direct the civil and military affairs of
the Company. Bombay, Bengal, Madras and other regions were subjected to
complete control of the Governor General in Council.
• By the Act of 1833, the Governor General in Council were given the power to legislate
for the whole of the British territories in India. These laws were applicable to all
persons, British or lndian foreigners or others and to the servants of the Company.
• They were enforceable by all courts in India. The Act added one more member to the
Executive council of the Governor General, the Law Member, whose work was fully
legislative. He had no vote in the Council and he was to attend meetings, on invitation.
But he practically became a regular member of the council. Lord Macaulay, the Law
member, influenced the educational policy of the government for a number of years.
• The Act provided for the codification of laws in India. There were several type of laws
before 1833. There were the English Acts, Presidency Regulations, Hindu Law, Muslim
Law, Customary Law etc. Laws were now called Acts
• By this Act the Governor General was empower to appoint the Law Commission to
study, collect and codify various rules and regulations prevalent in India. The lndian
Penal Code and Codes of Civil and Criminal Law were enacted by the efforts of
lndian Law Commission.
• Section 87 of the Act declared, "that no native or natural born subject of the crown
resident in lndia should be by reason only of his religion, place of birth, descent, colour
or any of them be disqualified for any place in the company's service.?
• The Charter Act of 1833 made no provision to secure the nomination of Indians to the
covenanted services of the company. Yet the clause proclaiming on discrimination was
of great importance for it became the sheet-anchor of political agitation in lndia towards
the end of the century.
Charter Act of 1853
• By the Act of 1853, separation of the executive and the legislative functions was carried
a step further by the provision of additional members of council for the purpose of
legislation.
• It provided for addition of six new members called legislative councillors to the council.
The Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Calcutta was to be the ex-officio member of the
Council.
Read More