Page 1
The Deccani Schools of Painting
4
T
he history of Deccani Painting can largely be constructed
from the late sixteenth century until the 1680s — the time
when the Mughals conquered the Deccan. It is continued
to be seen in the art of the nineteenth century, as well as,
under the Asafiya dynasty, and finally, in paintings in the
provincial courts of Rajas and Nawabs, ruling various lands
in the State of Hyderabad under the Nizam.
The Deccani style of Painting was placed under
the Indo-Persian art for long. It was considered to be
Middle Eastern, Safavid, Persian, Turkish and even Mughal
in origin. Art historians acknowledged its
uniqueness but failed to recognise it as a
full-fledged school, which was sustained
by a class of rulers, who had their peculiar
political and cultural vision. They hired and
nurtured artists and commissioned works
that enhanced their artistic sensibilities
and specific requirements of governance in
their kingdoms.
The art of portraiture and representation
of historical and religious figures are seen
elsewhere in other contemporary schools of
painting. Mughal portraiture, in this sense,
was not wholly unique. We see such artistic
inclinations in the Safavid and Ottoman
Schools of Painting. The highly documentary
nature of portraits is a singularly unique
development seen extensively in the Asian
Islamic art as also in the Mughal art in India.
In the plateau region of southern India,
beyond the Vindhya mountain range, an
endearing school of painting, which was
distinct and strong, was nurtured and
expanded under various Sultans of the Deccan
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Sultan Adil Shah II
playing Tambura, Farrukh
Beg, Bijapur, 1595–1600,
National Museum,
Prague, Czech Republic
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 55 01 Sep 2020 02:21:44 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
Page 2
The Deccani Schools of Painting
4
T
he history of Deccani Painting can largely be constructed
from the late sixteenth century until the 1680s — the time
when the Mughals conquered the Deccan. It is continued
to be seen in the art of the nineteenth century, as well as,
under the Asafiya dynasty, and finally, in paintings in the
provincial courts of Rajas and Nawabs, ruling various lands
in the State of Hyderabad under the Nizam.
The Deccani style of Painting was placed under
the Indo-Persian art for long. It was considered to be
Middle Eastern, Safavid, Persian, Turkish and even Mughal
in origin. Art historians acknowledged its
uniqueness but failed to recognise it as a
full-fledged school, which was sustained
by a class of rulers, who had their peculiar
political and cultural vision. They hired and
nurtured artists and commissioned works
that enhanced their artistic sensibilities
and specific requirements of governance in
their kingdoms.
The art of portraiture and representation
of historical and religious figures are seen
elsewhere in other contemporary schools of
painting. Mughal portraiture, in this sense,
was not wholly unique. We see such artistic
inclinations in the Safavid and Ottoman
Schools of Painting. The highly documentary
nature of portraits is a singularly unique
development seen extensively in the Asian
Islamic art as also in the Mughal art in India.
In the plateau region of southern India,
beyond the Vindhya mountain range, an
endearing school of painting, which was
distinct and strong, was nurtured and
expanded under various Sultans of the Deccan
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Sultan Adil Shah II
playing Tambura, Farrukh
Beg, Bijapur, 1595–1600,
National Museum,
Prague, Czech Republic
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 55 01 Sep 2020 02:21:44 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
56 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
The kingdoms of Bijapur, Golconda and Ahmadnagar
developed highly sophisticated and distinct school of court
painting. Its unique sensuality and intense colours have
strong affinity to regional aesthetics. The school preferred
dense composition and attempted to create an aura of
romance, which invariably expressed itself in an idiom that
was eloquently natural and vivid.
Ahmadnagar School of Painting
The earliest examples of Deccani painting are in a volume
of poems, celebrating the reign of Hussain Nizam Shah I
of Ahmadnagar (1553–1565). Most of the 12 miniatures
that illustrate battle scenes are of no artistic interest, but
interestingly, those depicting the queen and her marriage
delight us with gorgeous colours and sensuous lines. The
woman represented in it belongs to the northern tradition
of pre-Mughal painting, which was flourishing especially
in Malwa and Ahmedabad during this period. The women
in the paintings of Ahmadnagar wear a modified northern
costume with choli (bodice) and long braided pigtails, ending
in a tassel. Only a long scarf, passing round the body below
the hips, is a southern fashion, which is seen in the Lepakshi
frescoes. The palette is different from paintings
of northern manuscripts, coming largely from
the Mughal atelier, as they are more rich and
brilliant. Paintings of the Deccan have similar
characteristics. The high circular horizon and
gold sky have Persian influence. We may see
the debt of all Deccani kingdoms, which they
owe to Persia for their landscape idiom.
These feminine dress, present in a series
of Ragamala paintings, are the most striking
and moving examples of the sixteenth century
Deccan Schools of Painting. The women’s hair
is rolled up in a bun on the nape of the neck,
similar to the Lepakshi murals. The horizon,
in the painting, disappears and is replaced
by a neutral coloured ground patterned all
over with small stylised plants, or occupied
by symmetrical architectural domes over
the archades. All these features, except the
hairstyle, have traces of north India or Persia.
Tarif–i–Hussain Shahi:
King sitting on the Throne,
Ahmadnagar, 1565–1569,
Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka
Mandala, Poona
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 56 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
Page 3
The Deccani Schools of Painting
4
T
he history of Deccani Painting can largely be constructed
from the late sixteenth century until the 1680s — the time
when the Mughals conquered the Deccan. It is continued
to be seen in the art of the nineteenth century, as well as,
under the Asafiya dynasty, and finally, in paintings in the
provincial courts of Rajas and Nawabs, ruling various lands
in the State of Hyderabad under the Nizam.
The Deccani style of Painting was placed under
the Indo-Persian art for long. It was considered to be
Middle Eastern, Safavid, Persian, Turkish and even Mughal
in origin. Art historians acknowledged its
uniqueness but failed to recognise it as a
full-fledged school, which was sustained
by a class of rulers, who had their peculiar
political and cultural vision. They hired and
nurtured artists and commissioned works
that enhanced their artistic sensibilities
and specific requirements of governance in
their kingdoms.
The art of portraiture and representation
of historical and religious figures are seen
elsewhere in other contemporary schools of
painting. Mughal portraiture, in this sense,
was not wholly unique. We see such artistic
inclinations in the Safavid and Ottoman
Schools of Painting. The highly documentary
nature of portraits is a singularly unique
development seen extensively in the Asian
Islamic art as also in the Mughal art in India.
In the plateau region of southern India,
beyond the Vindhya mountain range, an
endearing school of painting, which was
distinct and strong, was nurtured and
expanded under various Sultans of the Deccan
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Sultan Adil Shah II
playing Tambura, Farrukh
Beg, Bijapur, 1595–1600,
National Museum,
Prague, Czech Republic
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 55 01 Sep 2020 02:21:44 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
56 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
The kingdoms of Bijapur, Golconda and Ahmadnagar
developed highly sophisticated and distinct school of court
painting. Its unique sensuality and intense colours have
strong affinity to regional aesthetics. The school preferred
dense composition and attempted to create an aura of
romance, which invariably expressed itself in an idiom that
was eloquently natural and vivid.
Ahmadnagar School of Painting
The earliest examples of Deccani painting are in a volume
of poems, celebrating the reign of Hussain Nizam Shah I
of Ahmadnagar (1553–1565). Most of the 12 miniatures
that illustrate battle scenes are of no artistic interest, but
interestingly, those depicting the queen and her marriage
delight us with gorgeous colours and sensuous lines. The
woman represented in it belongs to the northern tradition
of pre-Mughal painting, which was flourishing especially
in Malwa and Ahmedabad during this period. The women
in the paintings of Ahmadnagar wear a modified northern
costume with choli (bodice) and long braided pigtails, ending
in a tassel. Only a long scarf, passing round the body below
the hips, is a southern fashion, which is seen in the Lepakshi
frescoes. The palette is different from paintings
of northern manuscripts, coming largely from
the Mughal atelier, as they are more rich and
brilliant. Paintings of the Deccan have similar
characteristics. The high circular horizon and
gold sky have Persian influence. We may see
the debt of all Deccani kingdoms, which they
owe to Persia for their landscape idiom.
These feminine dress, present in a series
of Ragamala paintings, are the most striking
and moving examples of the sixteenth century
Deccan Schools of Painting. The women’s hair
is rolled up in a bun on the nape of the neck,
similar to the Lepakshi murals. The horizon,
in the painting, disappears and is replaced
by a neutral coloured ground patterned all
over with small stylised plants, or occupied
by symmetrical architectural domes over
the archades. All these features, except the
hairstyle, have traces of north India or Persia.
Tarif–i–Hussain Shahi:
King sitting on the Throne,
Ahmadnagar, 1565–1569,
Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka
Mandala, Poona
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 56 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
t he d eccAnI SchoolS of PAIntIng 57
Male costume is also decisively northern. The jama with
pointed tails is frequently seen in early Akbari miniatures
and probably originated in the area somewhere between
Delhi and Ahmedabad. The small pagri is close to the
form found in the earliest Akbari miniatures. The original
paintings in the Gulistan of 1567 have been attributed by art
historians to the Bukhara artists. Another interesting fact
is that such painters may also have worked in the Deccan.
This supported by a manuscript is now in the collection of
Bankipore Library, Patna. It is signed by a scribe, Yusuf,
and is dedicated to Ibrahim Adil (1569), presumably Ibrahim
Qutb Shah of Golconda, who ruled from 1550–1580. This
manuscript contains seven miniatures that are completely
in the Bukhara idiom of that date.
Bijapur School of Painting
Paintings from Bijapur in the sixteenth century have a
richly illustrated encyclopaedia known as the Nujum al-Ulum
dated 1570. Among the 876 miniatures, which adorn this
remarkable little volume, many illustrate weapons and
utensils, while others the constellations. The
women are shown in south Indian dress, tall
and slender as those in the Ragamala paintings.
The school of Bijapur was patronised by Ali
Adil Shah I (1558–1580) and his successor
Ibrahim II (1580–1627), both patrons of art
and literature. The latter was also an expert
in Indian music and author of a book on this
subject, Nauras-nama. He was the owner of
Nujum al-Ulum manuscript and might have
commissioned the Ragamala series in the
1590s. Bijapur had a close connection with
Turkey and astronomical illustrations in Nujum
al-Ulum may have been derived from Ottoman
Turkish manuscripts. The Ragamala are, as
we have seen, Indian in their connections,
with definite echoes of the Lepakshi style. They
exemplify the luxuriant aestheticism of the
Adil Shah court in their daring and brilliantly
successful colouring and vigour of simplified
compositions. The Throne of Prosperity is a
symbolic diagram of an auspicious throne of
Nujum al-Ulum: The Throne
of Prosperity, Bijapur, 1570,
The Chester Beatty Library,
Dublin, Ireland
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 57 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
Page 4
The Deccani Schools of Painting
4
T
he history of Deccani Painting can largely be constructed
from the late sixteenth century until the 1680s — the time
when the Mughals conquered the Deccan. It is continued
to be seen in the art of the nineteenth century, as well as,
under the Asafiya dynasty, and finally, in paintings in the
provincial courts of Rajas and Nawabs, ruling various lands
in the State of Hyderabad under the Nizam.
The Deccani style of Painting was placed under
the Indo-Persian art for long. It was considered to be
Middle Eastern, Safavid, Persian, Turkish and even Mughal
in origin. Art historians acknowledged its
uniqueness but failed to recognise it as a
full-fledged school, which was sustained
by a class of rulers, who had their peculiar
political and cultural vision. They hired and
nurtured artists and commissioned works
that enhanced their artistic sensibilities
and specific requirements of governance in
their kingdoms.
The art of portraiture and representation
of historical and religious figures are seen
elsewhere in other contemporary schools of
painting. Mughal portraiture, in this sense,
was not wholly unique. We see such artistic
inclinations in the Safavid and Ottoman
Schools of Painting. The highly documentary
nature of portraits is a singularly unique
development seen extensively in the Asian
Islamic art as also in the Mughal art in India.
In the plateau region of southern India,
beyond the Vindhya mountain range, an
endearing school of painting, which was
distinct and strong, was nurtured and
expanded under various Sultans of the Deccan
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Sultan Adil Shah II
playing Tambura, Farrukh
Beg, Bijapur, 1595–1600,
National Museum,
Prague, Czech Republic
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 55 01 Sep 2020 02:21:44 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
56 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
The kingdoms of Bijapur, Golconda and Ahmadnagar
developed highly sophisticated and distinct school of court
painting. Its unique sensuality and intense colours have
strong affinity to regional aesthetics. The school preferred
dense composition and attempted to create an aura of
romance, which invariably expressed itself in an idiom that
was eloquently natural and vivid.
Ahmadnagar School of Painting
The earliest examples of Deccani painting are in a volume
of poems, celebrating the reign of Hussain Nizam Shah I
of Ahmadnagar (1553–1565). Most of the 12 miniatures
that illustrate battle scenes are of no artistic interest, but
interestingly, those depicting the queen and her marriage
delight us with gorgeous colours and sensuous lines. The
woman represented in it belongs to the northern tradition
of pre-Mughal painting, which was flourishing especially
in Malwa and Ahmedabad during this period. The women
in the paintings of Ahmadnagar wear a modified northern
costume with choli (bodice) and long braided pigtails, ending
in a tassel. Only a long scarf, passing round the body below
the hips, is a southern fashion, which is seen in the Lepakshi
frescoes. The palette is different from paintings
of northern manuscripts, coming largely from
the Mughal atelier, as they are more rich and
brilliant. Paintings of the Deccan have similar
characteristics. The high circular horizon and
gold sky have Persian influence. We may see
the debt of all Deccani kingdoms, which they
owe to Persia for their landscape idiom.
These feminine dress, present in a series
of Ragamala paintings, are the most striking
and moving examples of the sixteenth century
Deccan Schools of Painting. The women’s hair
is rolled up in a bun on the nape of the neck,
similar to the Lepakshi murals. The horizon,
in the painting, disappears and is replaced
by a neutral coloured ground patterned all
over with small stylised plants, or occupied
by symmetrical architectural domes over
the archades. All these features, except the
hairstyle, have traces of north India or Persia.
Tarif–i–Hussain Shahi:
King sitting on the Throne,
Ahmadnagar, 1565–1569,
Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka
Mandala, Poona
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 56 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
t he d eccAnI SchoolS of PAIntIng 57
Male costume is also decisively northern. The jama with
pointed tails is frequently seen in early Akbari miniatures
and probably originated in the area somewhere between
Delhi and Ahmedabad. The small pagri is close to the
form found in the earliest Akbari miniatures. The original
paintings in the Gulistan of 1567 have been attributed by art
historians to the Bukhara artists. Another interesting fact
is that such painters may also have worked in the Deccan.
This supported by a manuscript is now in the collection of
Bankipore Library, Patna. It is signed by a scribe, Yusuf,
and is dedicated to Ibrahim Adil (1569), presumably Ibrahim
Qutb Shah of Golconda, who ruled from 1550–1580. This
manuscript contains seven miniatures that are completely
in the Bukhara idiom of that date.
Bijapur School of Painting
Paintings from Bijapur in the sixteenth century have a
richly illustrated encyclopaedia known as the Nujum al-Ulum
dated 1570. Among the 876 miniatures, which adorn this
remarkable little volume, many illustrate weapons and
utensils, while others the constellations. The
women are shown in south Indian dress, tall
and slender as those in the Ragamala paintings.
The school of Bijapur was patronised by Ali
Adil Shah I (1558–1580) and his successor
Ibrahim II (1580–1627), both patrons of art
and literature. The latter was also an expert
in Indian music and author of a book on this
subject, Nauras-nama. He was the owner of
Nujum al-Ulum manuscript and might have
commissioned the Ragamala series in the
1590s. Bijapur had a close connection with
Turkey and astronomical illustrations in Nujum
al-Ulum may have been derived from Ottoman
Turkish manuscripts. The Ragamala are, as
we have seen, Indian in their connections,
with definite echoes of the Lepakshi style. They
exemplify the luxuriant aestheticism of the
Adil Shah court in their daring and brilliantly
successful colouring and vigour of simplified
compositions. The Throne of Prosperity is a
symbolic diagram of an auspicious throne of
Nujum al-Ulum: The Throne
of Prosperity, Bijapur, 1570,
The Chester Beatty Library,
Dublin, Ireland
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 57 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
58 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
seven stages, each supported by different inhabitants — from
elephants and tigers to palm trees, through storeys of
peacocks and primitive tribes. The basic structures recall
the wood carved doorways and facades of Gujarati homes
or perhaps remind us of the temples of the Deccan. The
colouring of this page is in Islamic Persian tradition,
especially, the arabesques on the top of the throne. We see it
is surmounted by a Deccani foliage against amazingly deep
blue sky. The stylised plants on either side of the throne have
visual reference to margin decoration in Gujarati manuscript
of say early sixteenth century. There is, thus, a strong Indian
visual tradition that structure this miniature.
The theme of another Deccani painting is Yogini — one
who believes in yoga, leads a disciplined life of physical
and emotional training, pursues spiritual and intellectual
explorations, and is famous for renunciation of worldly
attachments. But such an attitude was
not usual, and therefore, extraordinary
in practice.
This work is attributed to an artist, about
whom we do not have any record. It is to
be noted that the artist prefers a vertical
composition, where the long standing figure
of the Yogini is complimented by a group of
white structures right at the top, as a tapering,
visual note. The Yogini is preoccupied with a
myna bird as if in conversation. The Yogini
is adorned with jewellery and her hair bun
elongates her visual presence. The long
scarves swirl in rhythmic circle around her
body, which has exquisite flora surrounding
it in exquisite landscape.
Golconda School of Painting
Golconda became an independent state in
1512. By the end of the sixteenth century, it
was the wealthiest of the Deccan kingdoms.
This was largely due to brisk trade from the
ports along the east coast, from where iron
and cotton goods were shipped to South East
Asia. Meanwhile expansive trade continued
with Persia, which became a rage in Europe
Yogini, Bijapur, seventeenth
century, The Chester Beatty
Library, Dublin, Ireland
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 58 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
Page 5
The Deccani Schools of Painting
4
T
he history of Deccani Painting can largely be constructed
from the late sixteenth century until the 1680s — the time
when the Mughals conquered the Deccan. It is continued
to be seen in the art of the nineteenth century, as well as,
under the Asafiya dynasty, and finally, in paintings in the
provincial courts of Rajas and Nawabs, ruling various lands
in the State of Hyderabad under the Nizam.
The Deccani style of Painting was placed under
the Indo-Persian art for long. It was considered to be
Middle Eastern, Safavid, Persian, Turkish and even Mughal
in origin. Art historians acknowledged its
uniqueness but failed to recognise it as a
full-fledged school, which was sustained
by a class of rulers, who had their peculiar
political and cultural vision. They hired and
nurtured artists and commissioned works
that enhanced their artistic sensibilities
and specific requirements of governance in
their kingdoms.
The art of portraiture and representation
of historical and religious figures are seen
elsewhere in other contemporary schools of
painting. Mughal portraiture, in this sense,
was not wholly unique. We see such artistic
inclinations in the Safavid and Ottoman
Schools of Painting. The highly documentary
nature of portraits is a singularly unique
development seen extensively in the Asian
Islamic art as also in the Mughal art in India.
In the plateau region of southern India,
beyond the Vindhya mountain range, an
endearing school of painting, which was
distinct and strong, was nurtured and
expanded under various Sultans of the Deccan
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
Sultan Adil Shah II
playing Tambura, Farrukh
Beg, Bijapur, 1595–1600,
National Museum,
Prague, Czech Republic
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 55 01 Sep 2020 02:21:44 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
56 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
The kingdoms of Bijapur, Golconda and Ahmadnagar
developed highly sophisticated and distinct school of court
painting. Its unique sensuality and intense colours have
strong affinity to regional aesthetics. The school preferred
dense composition and attempted to create an aura of
romance, which invariably expressed itself in an idiom that
was eloquently natural and vivid.
Ahmadnagar School of Painting
The earliest examples of Deccani painting are in a volume
of poems, celebrating the reign of Hussain Nizam Shah I
of Ahmadnagar (1553–1565). Most of the 12 miniatures
that illustrate battle scenes are of no artistic interest, but
interestingly, those depicting the queen and her marriage
delight us with gorgeous colours and sensuous lines. The
woman represented in it belongs to the northern tradition
of pre-Mughal painting, which was flourishing especially
in Malwa and Ahmedabad during this period. The women
in the paintings of Ahmadnagar wear a modified northern
costume with choli (bodice) and long braided pigtails, ending
in a tassel. Only a long scarf, passing round the body below
the hips, is a southern fashion, which is seen in the Lepakshi
frescoes. The palette is different from paintings
of northern manuscripts, coming largely from
the Mughal atelier, as they are more rich and
brilliant. Paintings of the Deccan have similar
characteristics. The high circular horizon and
gold sky have Persian influence. We may see
the debt of all Deccani kingdoms, which they
owe to Persia for their landscape idiom.
These feminine dress, present in a series
of Ragamala paintings, are the most striking
and moving examples of the sixteenth century
Deccan Schools of Painting. The women’s hair
is rolled up in a bun on the nape of the neck,
similar to the Lepakshi murals. The horizon,
in the painting, disappears and is replaced
by a neutral coloured ground patterned all
over with small stylised plants, or occupied
by symmetrical architectural domes over
the archades. All these features, except the
hairstyle, have traces of north India or Persia.
Tarif–i–Hussain Shahi:
King sitting on the Throne,
Ahmadnagar, 1565–1569,
Bharata Itihasa Samshodaka
Mandala, Poona
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 56 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
t he d eccAnI SchoolS of PAIntIng 57
Male costume is also decisively northern. The jama with
pointed tails is frequently seen in early Akbari miniatures
and probably originated in the area somewhere between
Delhi and Ahmedabad. The small pagri is close to the
form found in the earliest Akbari miniatures. The original
paintings in the Gulistan of 1567 have been attributed by art
historians to the Bukhara artists. Another interesting fact
is that such painters may also have worked in the Deccan.
This supported by a manuscript is now in the collection of
Bankipore Library, Patna. It is signed by a scribe, Yusuf,
and is dedicated to Ibrahim Adil (1569), presumably Ibrahim
Qutb Shah of Golconda, who ruled from 1550–1580. This
manuscript contains seven miniatures that are completely
in the Bukhara idiom of that date.
Bijapur School of Painting
Paintings from Bijapur in the sixteenth century have a
richly illustrated encyclopaedia known as the Nujum al-Ulum
dated 1570. Among the 876 miniatures, which adorn this
remarkable little volume, many illustrate weapons and
utensils, while others the constellations. The
women are shown in south Indian dress, tall
and slender as those in the Ragamala paintings.
The school of Bijapur was patronised by Ali
Adil Shah I (1558–1580) and his successor
Ibrahim II (1580–1627), both patrons of art
and literature. The latter was also an expert
in Indian music and author of a book on this
subject, Nauras-nama. He was the owner of
Nujum al-Ulum manuscript and might have
commissioned the Ragamala series in the
1590s. Bijapur had a close connection with
Turkey and astronomical illustrations in Nujum
al-Ulum may have been derived from Ottoman
Turkish manuscripts. The Ragamala are, as
we have seen, Indian in their connections,
with definite echoes of the Lepakshi style. They
exemplify the luxuriant aestheticism of the
Adil Shah court in their daring and brilliantly
successful colouring and vigour of simplified
compositions. The Throne of Prosperity is a
symbolic diagram of an auspicious throne of
Nujum al-Ulum: The Throne
of Prosperity, Bijapur, 1570,
The Chester Beatty Library,
Dublin, Ireland
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 57 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
58 An IntroductIon to IndIAn Art —PArt II
seven stages, each supported by different inhabitants — from
elephants and tigers to palm trees, through storeys of
peacocks and primitive tribes. The basic structures recall
the wood carved doorways and facades of Gujarati homes
or perhaps remind us of the temples of the Deccan. The
colouring of this page is in Islamic Persian tradition,
especially, the arabesques on the top of the throne. We see it
is surmounted by a Deccani foliage against amazingly deep
blue sky. The stylised plants on either side of the throne have
visual reference to margin decoration in Gujarati manuscript
of say early sixteenth century. There is, thus, a strong Indian
visual tradition that structure this miniature.
The theme of another Deccani painting is Yogini — one
who believes in yoga, leads a disciplined life of physical
and emotional training, pursues spiritual and intellectual
explorations, and is famous for renunciation of worldly
attachments. But such an attitude was
not usual, and therefore, extraordinary
in practice.
This work is attributed to an artist, about
whom we do not have any record. It is to
be noted that the artist prefers a vertical
composition, where the long standing figure
of the Yogini is complimented by a group of
white structures right at the top, as a tapering,
visual note. The Yogini is preoccupied with a
myna bird as if in conversation. The Yogini
is adorned with jewellery and her hair bun
elongates her visual presence. The long
scarves swirl in rhythmic circle around her
body, which has exquisite flora surrounding
it in exquisite landscape.
Golconda School of Painting
Golconda became an independent state in
1512. By the end of the sixteenth century, it
was the wealthiest of the Deccan kingdoms.
This was largely due to brisk trade from the
ports along the east coast, from where iron
and cotton goods were shipped to South East
Asia. Meanwhile expansive trade continued
with Persia, which became a rage in Europe
Yogini, Bijapur, seventeenth
century, The Chester Beatty
Library, Dublin, Ireland
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 58 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
t he d eccAnI SchoolS of PAIntIng 59
and was greatly valued among painted cottons. Early in the
seventeenth century, diamonds were discovered, expanding
the source of revenue. The visuals from Golconda draw
one’s attention to the gold jewellery worn by both women
and men. Besides, the themes of Golconda paintings gained
exceptional fame.
Golconda’s art became popular as Dutch merchants
carried the portraits of sultans in the late seventeenth
century to Europe. These were probably done for the bazaar
and had references to royal paintings. The earlier Golconda
paintings, dated 1635–1650, at times as large as eight
feet high, were made to be used as wall hangings. These
paintings are covered with pictorial designs,
generally, figures in architectural settings of
varied origin.
The earliest five miniatures, identified as
Golconda work, were bound up in Diwan of
Hafiz, dated 1463. These paintings represent
court scenes of a young ruler, who is depicted
seated enthroned, holding a typically long and
straight Deccani sword, in the centre of one of
the painting folios. The Prince is seen wearing
a white coat with embroidered vertical bands.
All five painted pages are lavishly enriched
with gold, touching deep azure sky. Dancing
girls are seen entertaining the royal gathering.
The symmetrical and apparently unfunctional
architecture has several registers of flat
screens one above the other. The ground
appears covered with elaborately patterned
carpets. It is important to note here that the
painting suggests no Mughal influence. Purple
hue is amply applied, and at times, animals
become blue, so you see blue foxes.
There is a portrait of Muhammad Qutb
Shah (1611–1626) as he sits on a diwan
early in his reign. He wears this typical
Golconda dress and an elegant tight-fitting
cap. The composition has gained increased
sophistication and skill, while the strict
symmetry of the 1590 pages is retained.
One may say there is adequate reference to
Dancing before Muhammad
Quli Qutb Shah, Golconda,
1590. British Museum,
London, UK
1_4.The Deccani School of Painting.indd 59 01 Sep 2020 02:21:45 PM
Rationalised 2023-24
Read More