Bank Exams Exam  >  Bank Exams Notes  >  Reasoning Aptitude for Competitive Examinations  >  PPT: Structure of Arguments

PPT: Structure of Arguments

Download, print and study this document offline
Please wait while the PDF view is loading
 Page 1


Structure of 
Arguments
Page 2


Structure of 
Arguments
Introduction
1
Knowledge Made 
Explicit
Newton's apple 
story shows how 
implicit knowledge 
becomes explicit 
through reasoning.
2
Justification 
Required
Arguments need 
objective 
justification that all 
rational individuals 
can agree upon.
3
Structure of Arguments
An argument is a connected series of 
statements with premises leading to a 
conclusion.
Page 3


Structure of 
Arguments
Introduction
1
Knowledge Made 
Explicit
Newton's apple 
story shows how 
implicit knowledge 
becomes explicit 
through reasoning.
2
Justification 
Required
Arguments need 
objective 
justification that all 
rational individuals 
can agree upon.
3
Structure of Arguments
An argument is a connected series of 
statements with premises leading to a 
conclusion.
Identifying Arguments
Premise Signals
"Because," "due to," "as 
indicated by," and 
"owing to" signal that a 
premise is being 
provided.
Conclusion Signals
"Therefore," 
"consequently," "infer 
that," and "hence" 
indicate a conclusion 
is being made.
Example
Argument: "The internet is a good invention." 
Premises: "Source of endless information" and "hub 
of entertainment."
Page 4


Structure of 
Arguments
Introduction
1
Knowledge Made 
Explicit
Newton's apple 
story shows how 
implicit knowledge 
becomes explicit 
through reasoning.
2
Justification 
Required
Arguments need 
objective 
justification that all 
rational individuals 
can agree upon.
3
Structure of Arguments
An argument is a connected series of 
statements with premises leading to a 
conclusion.
Identifying Arguments
Premise Signals
"Because," "due to," "as 
indicated by," and 
"owing to" signal that a 
premise is being 
provided.
Conclusion Signals
"Therefore," 
"consequently," "infer 
that," and "hence" 
indicate a conclusion 
is being made.
Example
Argument: "The internet is a good invention." 
Premises: "Source of endless information" and "hub 
of entertainment."
Arguments 3 Types of Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Supports a conclusion with certainty. Moves 
from general principles to specific instances.
Inductive Reasoning
Supports a conclusion with probability. Moves 
from specific observations to general 
principles.
Page 5


Structure of 
Arguments
Introduction
1
Knowledge Made 
Explicit
Newton's apple 
story shows how 
implicit knowledge 
becomes explicit 
through reasoning.
2
Justification 
Required
Arguments need 
objective 
justification that all 
rational individuals 
can agree upon.
3
Structure of Arguments
An argument is a connected series of 
statements with premises leading to a 
conclusion.
Identifying Arguments
Premise Signals
"Because," "due to," "as 
indicated by," and 
"owing to" signal that a 
premise is being 
provided.
Conclusion Signals
"Therefore," 
"consequently," "infer 
that," and "hence" 
indicate a conclusion 
is being made.
Example
Argument: "The internet is a good invention." 
Premises: "Source of endless information" and "hub 
of entertainment."
Arguments 3 Types of Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning
Supports a conclusion with certainty. Moves 
from general principles to specific instances.
Inductive Reasoning
Supports a conclusion with probability. Moves 
from specific observations to general 
principles.
Deductive Reasoning
1
Definition
An inferential process that supports a conclusion with certainty.
2
Example
Premise 1: All men are mortal. Premise 2: I am a man. Conclusion: So I am mortal.
3
Characteristics
Deterministic, scientific, and deals with whole classes. Nothing is excluded.
Read More

FAQs on PPT: Structure of Arguments

1. What is the basic structure of an argument in reasoning aptitude?
Ans. An argument comprises three essential components: a premise (what you claim to be true), a conclusion (what you're trying to prove), and the logical connection between them. The premise provides evidence or reasons, while the conclusion is the final claim derived from those reasons. Understanding this framework helps you identify arguments in competitive exams and evaluate their validity effectively.
2. How do I identify the premise and conclusion in a complex argument?
Ans. The conclusion typically appears first or last in a passage and answers "what is being claimed?" The premise supports it by answering "why is this true?" Look for indicator words like "therefore," "thus," "hence" (conclusion signals) or "because," "since," "given that" (premise signals). Practice with reasoning aptitude worksheets to strengthen recognition of these structural patterns.
3. What's the difference between a deductive and inductive argument structure?
Ans. Deductive arguments move from general premises to a specific conclusion, guaranteeing truth if premises are valid. Inductive arguments move from specific observations to a general conclusion, offering probability rather than certainty. Bank exams test both types, so understanding their distinct logical pathways helps you evaluate argument strength and identify logical fallacies correctly.
4. Why do some arguments in bank exams feel hard to break down?
Ans. Arguments become complex when they contain multiple premises, hidden assumptions, or implicit conclusions buried within narrative text. Students miss these because they scan for obvious signals rather than mapping the entire logical chain. Creating mind maps of argument structure-showing how each premise connects to the final claim-clarifies these relationships and prevents mistakes during timed exams.
5. How can I spot weak reasoning in an argument structure before the exam asks me about it?
Ans. Weak arguments often contain unsupported jumps between premises and conclusions, overlooked assumptions, or irrelevant premises that don't strengthen the claim. Ask yourself: "Does every premise directly support the conclusion? Are there missing logical steps?" Practising argument analysis through flashcards and PPTs on argument evaluation techniques builds this critical eye for identifying logical flaws quickly.
Explore Courses for Bank Exams exam
Related Searches
past year papers, Objective type Questions, PPT: Structure of Arguments, Semester Notes, ppt, PPT: Structure of Arguments, PPT: Structure of Arguments, Free, Sample Paper, Important questions, mock tests for examination, pdf , Viva Questions, practice quizzes, video lectures, MCQs, Exam, study material, shortcuts and tricks, Extra Questions, Summary, Previous Year Questions with Solutions;