NCERT Textbook - Kings And Chronicles | NCERT Textbooks (Class 6 to Class 12) - CTET & State TET PDF Download

 Page 1


? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ???? ?
?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????
?????
????
The rulers of the Mughal Empire saw themselves
as appointed by Divine Will to rule over a large
and heterogeneous populace. Although this
grand vision was often circumscribed by actual
political circumstances, it remained
important. One way of transmitting
this vision was through the
writing of dynastic histories. The
Mughal kings commissioned court
historians to write accounts. These
accounts recorded the events of the
emperor’s time. In addition, their
writers collected vast amounts of
information from the regions of the
subcontinent to help the rulers
govern their domain.
Modern historians writing in
English have termed this genre
of texts chronicles, as they
present a continuous chronological
record  of events. Chronicles are
an indispensable source for any
scholar wishing to write a history
of the Mughals. At one level
they were a repository of factual
information about the institutions
of the Mughal state, painstakingly
collected and classified by
individuals closely connected with the court. At
the same time these texts were intended as
conveyors of meanings that the Mughal rulers
sought to impose on their domain. They therefore
give us a glimpse into how imperial ideologies
were created and disseminated. This chapter will
look at the workings of this rich and fascinating
dimension of the Mughal Empire.
Fig. 9.1
The mausoleum of Timur at
Samarqand, 1404
2022-23
Page 2


? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ???? ?
?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????
?????
????
The rulers of the Mughal Empire saw themselves
as appointed by Divine Will to rule over a large
and heterogeneous populace. Although this
grand vision was often circumscribed by actual
political circumstances, it remained
important. One way of transmitting
this vision was through the
writing of dynastic histories. The
Mughal kings commissioned court
historians to write accounts. These
accounts recorded the events of the
emperor’s time. In addition, their
writers collected vast amounts of
information from the regions of the
subcontinent to help the rulers
govern their domain.
Modern historians writing in
English have termed this genre
of texts chronicles, as they
present a continuous chronological
record  of events. Chronicles are
an indispensable source for any
scholar wishing to write a history
of the Mughals. At one level
they were a repository of factual
information about the institutions
of the Mughal state, painstakingly
collected and classified by
individuals closely connected with the court. At
the same time these texts were intended as
conveyors of meanings that the Mughal rulers
sought to impose on their domain. They therefore
give us a glimpse into how imperial ideologies
were created and disseminated. This chapter will
look at the workings of this rich and fascinating
dimension of the Mughal Empire.
Fig. 9.1
The mausoleum of Timur at
Samarqand, 1404
2022-23
???
? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?
The name Mughal derives from Mongol. Though today
the term evokes the grandeur of an empire, it was
not the name the rulers of the dynasty chose for
themselves. They referred to themselves as Timurids,
as descendants of the Turkish ruler Timur on the
paternal side. Babur, the first Mughal ruler, was
related to Ghenghiz Khan from his mother’s side.
He spoke Turkish and referred derisively to the
Mongols as barbaric hordes.
During the sixteenth century, Europeans used the
term Mughal to describe the Indian rulers of this
branch of the family. Over the past centuries the
word has been frequently used – even the name
Mowgli, the young hero of Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle
Book, is derived from it.
The empire was carved out of a number of regional
states of India through conquests and political
alliances between the Mughals and local chieftains.
The founder of the empire, Zahiruddin Babur, was
driven from his Central Asian homeland, Farghana,
by the warring Uzbeks. He first established himself
at Kabul and then in 1526 pushed further into
the Indian subcontinent in search of territories and
resources to satisfy the needs of the members of
his clan.
His successor, Nasiruddin Humayun (1530-40,
1555-56) expanded the frontiers of the empire, but
lost it to the Afghan leader Sher Shah Sur, who drove
him into exile. Humayun took refuge in the court of
the Safavid ruler of Iran. In 1555 Humayun defeated
the Surs, but died a year later.
Many consider Jalaluddin Akbar (1556-1605) the
greatest of all the Mughal emperors, for he not only
expanded but also consolidated his empire, making
it the largest, strongest and richest kingdom of
his time. Akbar succeeded in extending the frontiers
of the empire to the Hindukush mountains, and
checked the expansionist designs of the Uzbeks of
Turan (Central Asia) and the Safavids of Iran.
Akbar had three fairly able successors in Jahangir
(1605-27), Shah Jahan (1628-58) and Aurangzeb
(1658-1707), much as their characters varied. Under
them the territorial expansion continued, though at
a much reduced pace. The three rulers maintained and
consolidated the various instruments of governance.
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
Fig. 9.2
An eighteenth-century depiction of
Humayun’s wife Nadira crossing
the desert of Rajasthan
2022-23
Page 3


? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ???? ?
?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????
?????
????
The rulers of the Mughal Empire saw themselves
as appointed by Divine Will to rule over a large
and heterogeneous populace. Although this
grand vision was often circumscribed by actual
political circumstances, it remained
important. One way of transmitting
this vision was through the
writing of dynastic histories. The
Mughal kings commissioned court
historians to write accounts. These
accounts recorded the events of the
emperor’s time. In addition, their
writers collected vast amounts of
information from the regions of the
subcontinent to help the rulers
govern their domain.
Modern historians writing in
English have termed this genre
of texts chronicles, as they
present a continuous chronological
record  of events. Chronicles are
an indispensable source for any
scholar wishing to write a history
of the Mughals. At one level
they were a repository of factual
information about the institutions
of the Mughal state, painstakingly
collected and classified by
individuals closely connected with the court. At
the same time these texts were intended as
conveyors of meanings that the Mughal rulers
sought to impose on their domain. They therefore
give us a glimpse into how imperial ideologies
were created and disseminated. This chapter will
look at the workings of this rich and fascinating
dimension of the Mughal Empire.
Fig. 9.1
The mausoleum of Timur at
Samarqand, 1404
2022-23
???
? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?
The name Mughal derives from Mongol. Though today
the term evokes the grandeur of an empire, it was
not the name the rulers of the dynasty chose for
themselves. They referred to themselves as Timurids,
as descendants of the Turkish ruler Timur on the
paternal side. Babur, the first Mughal ruler, was
related to Ghenghiz Khan from his mother’s side.
He spoke Turkish and referred derisively to the
Mongols as barbaric hordes.
During the sixteenth century, Europeans used the
term Mughal to describe the Indian rulers of this
branch of the family. Over the past centuries the
word has been frequently used – even the name
Mowgli, the young hero of Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle
Book, is derived from it.
The empire was carved out of a number of regional
states of India through conquests and political
alliances between the Mughals and local chieftains.
The founder of the empire, Zahiruddin Babur, was
driven from his Central Asian homeland, Farghana,
by the warring Uzbeks. He first established himself
at Kabul and then in 1526 pushed further into
the Indian subcontinent in search of territories and
resources to satisfy the needs of the members of
his clan.
His successor, Nasiruddin Humayun (1530-40,
1555-56) expanded the frontiers of the empire, but
lost it to the Afghan leader Sher Shah Sur, who drove
him into exile. Humayun took refuge in the court of
the Safavid ruler of Iran. In 1555 Humayun defeated
the Surs, but died a year later.
Many consider Jalaluddin Akbar (1556-1605) the
greatest of all the Mughal emperors, for he not only
expanded but also consolidated his empire, making
it the largest, strongest and richest kingdom of
his time. Akbar succeeded in extending the frontiers
of the empire to the Hindukush mountains, and
checked the expansionist designs of the Uzbeks of
Turan (Central Asia) and the Safavids of Iran.
Akbar had three fairly able successors in Jahangir
(1605-27), Shah Jahan (1628-58) and Aurangzeb
(1658-1707), much as their characters varied. Under
them the territorial expansion continued, though at
a much reduced pace. The three rulers maintained and
consolidated the various instruments of governance.
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
Fig. 9.2
An eighteenth-century depiction of
Humayun’s wife Nadira crossing
the desert of Rajasthan
2022-23
? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ???
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
the institutions of an imperial structure were created.
These included effective methods of administration
and taxation. The visible centre of Mughal power was
the court. Here political alliances and relationships
were forged, status and hierarchies defined. The
political system devised by the Mughals was based
on a combination of military power and conscious
policy to accommodate the different traditions they
encountered in the subcontinent.
After 1707, following the death of Aurangzeb, the
power of the dynasty diminished. In place of the vast
apparatus of empire controlled from Delhi, Agra or
Lahore – the different capital cities – regional powers
acquired greater autonomy. Yet symbolically the
prestige of the Mughal ruler did not lose its aura. In
1857 the last scion of this dynasty, Bahadur Shah
Zafar II, was overthrown by the British.
???????????????????????????????
Chronicles commissioned by the Mughal emperors
are an important source for studying the empire and
its court. They were written in order to project a
vision of an enlightened kingdom to all those who
came under its umbrella. At the same time they were
meant to convey to those who resisted the rule of
the Mughals that all resistance was destined to fail.
Also, the rulers wanted to ensure that there was an
account of their rule for posterity.
The authors of Mughal chronicles were invariably
courtiers. The histories they wrote focused on events
centred on the ruler, his family, the court and nobles,
wars and administrative arrangements. Their titles,
such as the Akbar Nama, Shahjahan Nama, Alamgir
Nama, that is, the story of Akbar, Shah Jahan and
Alamgir (a title of the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb),
suggest that in the eyes of their authors the history
of the empire and the court was  synonymous with
that of the emperor.
2.1 From Turkish to Persian
Mughal court chronicles were written in Persian.
Under the Sultans of Delhi it flourished as a
language of the court and of literary writings,
alongside north Indian languages, especially Hindavi
and its regional variants. As the Mughals were
Chaghtai Turks by origin, Turkish was their mother
? Discuss...
Find out whether the state in
which you live formed part
of the Mughal Empire.
Were there any changes in
the area as a result of the
establishment of the empire?
If your state was not part of
the empire, find out more
about contemporary regional
rulers – their origins and
policies. What kind of records
did they maintain?
Chaghtai Turks traced descent
from the eldest son of Ghengiz
Khan.
2022-23
Page 4


? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ???? ?
?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????
?????
????
The rulers of the Mughal Empire saw themselves
as appointed by Divine Will to rule over a large
and heterogeneous populace. Although this
grand vision was often circumscribed by actual
political circumstances, it remained
important. One way of transmitting
this vision was through the
writing of dynastic histories. The
Mughal kings commissioned court
historians to write accounts. These
accounts recorded the events of the
emperor’s time. In addition, their
writers collected vast amounts of
information from the regions of the
subcontinent to help the rulers
govern their domain.
Modern historians writing in
English have termed this genre
of texts chronicles, as they
present a continuous chronological
record  of events. Chronicles are
an indispensable source for any
scholar wishing to write a history
of the Mughals. At one level
they were a repository of factual
information about the institutions
of the Mughal state, painstakingly
collected and classified by
individuals closely connected with the court. At
the same time these texts were intended as
conveyors of meanings that the Mughal rulers
sought to impose on their domain. They therefore
give us a glimpse into how imperial ideologies
were created and disseminated. This chapter will
look at the workings of this rich and fascinating
dimension of the Mughal Empire.
Fig. 9.1
The mausoleum of Timur at
Samarqand, 1404
2022-23
???
? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?
The name Mughal derives from Mongol. Though today
the term evokes the grandeur of an empire, it was
not the name the rulers of the dynasty chose for
themselves. They referred to themselves as Timurids,
as descendants of the Turkish ruler Timur on the
paternal side. Babur, the first Mughal ruler, was
related to Ghenghiz Khan from his mother’s side.
He spoke Turkish and referred derisively to the
Mongols as barbaric hordes.
During the sixteenth century, Europeans used the
term Mughal to describe the Indian rulers of this
branch of the family. Over the past centuries the
word has been frequently used – even the name
Mowgli, the young hero of Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle
Book, is derived from it.
The empire was carved out of a number of regional
states of India through conquests and political
alliances between the Mughals and local chieftains.
The founder of the empire, Zahiruddin Babur, was
driven from his Central Asian homeland, Farghana,
by the warring Uzbeks. He first established himself
at Kabul and then in 1526 pushed further into
the Indian subcontinent in search of territories and
resources to satisfy the needs of the members of
his clan.
His successor, Nasiruddin Humayun (1530-40,
1555-56) expanded the frontiers of the empire, but
lost it to the Afghan leader Sher Shah Sur, who drove
him into exile. Humayun took refuge in the court of
the Safavid ruler of Iran. In 1555 Humayun defeated
the Surs, but died a year later.
Many consider Jalaluddin Akbar (1556-1605) the
greatest of all the Mughal emperors, for he not only
expanded but also consolidated his empire, making
it the largest, strongest and richest kingdom of
his time. Akbar succeeded in extending the frontiers
of the empire to the Hindukush mountains, and
checked the expansionist designs of the Uzbeks of
Turan (Central Asia) and the Safavids of Iran.
Akbar had three fairly able successors in Jahangir
(1605-27), Shah Jahan (1628-58) and Aurangzeb
(1658-1707), much as their characters varied. Under
them the territorial expansion continued, though at
a much reduced pace. The three rulers maintained and
consolidated the various instruments of governance.
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
Fig. 9.2
An eighteenth-century depiction of
Humayun’s wife Nadira crossing
the desert of Rajasthan
2022-23
? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ???
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
the institutions of an imperial structure were created.
These included effective methods of administration
and taxation. The visible centre of Mughal power was
the court. Here political alliances and relationships
were forged, status and hierarchies defined. The
political system devised by the Mughals was based
on a combination of military power and conscious
policy to accommodate the different traditions they
encountered in the subcontinent.
After 1707, following the death of Aurangzeb, the
power of the dynasty diminished. In place of the vast
apparatus of empire controlled from Delhi, Agra or
Lahore – the different capital cities – regional powers
acquired greater autonomy. Yet symbolically the
prestige of the Mughal ruler did not lose its aura. In
1857 the last scion of this dynasty, Bahadur Shah
Zafar II, was overthrown by the British.
???????????????????????????????
Chronicles commissioned by the Mughal emperors
are an important source for studying the empire and
its court. They were written in order to project a
vision of an enlightened kingdom to all those who
came under its umbrella. At the same time they were
meant to convey to those who resisted the rule of
the Mughals that all resistance was destined to fail.
Also, the rulers wanted to ensure that there was an
account of their rule for posterity.
The authors of Mughal chronicles were invariably
courtiers. The histories they wrote focused on events
centred on the ruler, his family, the court and nobles,
wars and administrative arrangements. Their titles,
such as the Akbar Nama, Shahjahan Nama, Alamgir
Nama, that is, the story of Akbar, Shah Jahan and
Alamgir (a title of the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb),
suggest that in the eyes of their authors the history
of the empire and the court was  synonymous with
that of the emperor.
2.1 From Turkish to Persian
Mughal court chronicles were written in Persian.
Under the Sultans of Delhi it flourished as a
language of the court and of literary writings,
alongside north Indian languages, especially Hindavi
and its regional variants. As the Mughals were
Chaghtai Turks by origin, Turkish was their mother
? Discuss...
Find out whether the state in
which you live formed part
of the Mughal Empire.
Were there any changes in
the area as a result of the
establishment of the empire?
If your state was not part of
the empire, find out more
about contemporary regional
rulers – their origins and
policies. What kind of records
did they maintain?
Chaghtai Turks traced descent
from the eldest son of Ghengiz
Khan.
2022-23
???
tongue. Their first ruler Babur wrote poetry and his
memoirs in this language.
It was Akbar who consciously set out to make
Persian the leading language of the Mughal court.
Cultural and intellectual contacts with Iran, as well
as a regular stream of Iranian and Central Asian
migrants seeking positions at the Mughal court,
might have motivated the emperor to adopt the
language. Persian was elevated to a language of
empire, conferring power and prestige on those who
had a command of it. It was spoken by the king, the
royal household and the elite at court. Further, it
became the language of administration at all levels
so that accountants, clerks and other functionaries
also learnt it.
Even when Persian was not directly used, its
vocabulary and idiom heavily influenced the language
of official records in Rajasthani and Marathi and
even Tamil. Since the people using Persian in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries came from
many different regions of the subcontinent and
spoke other Indian languages, Persian too became
Indianised by absorbing local idioms. A new
language, Urdu, sprang from the interaction of
Persian with Hindavi.
Mughal chronicles such as the Akbar Nama were
written in Persian, others, like Babur’s memoirs,
were translated from the Turkish into the Persian
Babur Nama. Translations of Sanskrit texts such as
the Mahabharata and the Ramayana into Persian
were commissioned by the Mughal emperors. The
Mahabharata was translated as the Razmnama
(Book of Wars).
2.2 The making of manuscripts
All books in Mughal India were manuscripts, that
is, they were handwritten. The centre of manuscript
production was the imperial kitabkhana. Although
kitabkhana can be translated as library, it was a
scriptorium, that is, a place where the emperor’s
collection of manuscripts was kept and new
manuscripts were produced.
 The creation of a manuscript involved a number
of people performing a variety of tasks. Paper makers
were needed to prepare the folios of the manuscript,
scribes or calligraphers to copy the text, gilders to
illuminate the pages, painters to illustrate scenes
???? ??????? ??? ???
???????? ????
? ???? ?? ? ?? ????????????
???? ???????? ????? ???
??????? ???? ??????? ??
??????? ????? ???? ???
??????? ?? ?????? ??
?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???
??????? ????? ????? ??? ???
?????? ??? ?????? ???? ???
???????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ???????
????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????
?? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???
???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ???
??????? ????? ?????? ????
??????????????????????????
??? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???
??????? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ??
?????????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ?
????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????
???????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??
??????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??
???? ???????? ????? ?????? ??????
???????????????? ???? ????????
????? ??????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?????
????? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?????
???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??????
? ??? ? ?? ??? ???? ????????? ??
?? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?
???? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ????
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?????? ?????? ????????? ????
? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ?? ??
?????? ??????????? ???
? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ??
??????? ???? ???? ???????
? ? ? ?? ? ? ?
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
2022-23
Page 5


? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?? ???? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ??? ?? ??? ? ??? ???? ? ???? ?
?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ??????????
?????
????
The rulers of the Mughal Empire saw themselves
as appointed by Divine Will to rule over a large
and heterogeneous populace. Although this
grand vision was often circumscribed by actual
political circumstances, it remained
important. One way of transmitting
this vision was through the
writing of dynastic histories. The
Mughal kings commissioned court
historians to write accounts. These
accounts recorded the events of the
emperor’s time. In addition, their
writers collected vast amounts of
information from the regions of the
subcontinent to help the rulers
govern their domain.
Modern historians writing in
English have termed this genre
of texts chronicles, as they
present a continuous chronological
record  of events. Chronicles are
an indispensable source for any
scholar wishing to write a history
of the Mughals. At one level
they were a repository of factual
information about the institutions
of the Mughal state, painstakingly
collected and classified by
individuals closely connected with the court. At
the same time these texts were intended as
conveyors of meanings that the Mughal rulers
sought to impose on their domain. They therefore
give us a glimpse into how imperial ideologies
were created and disseminated. This chapter will
look at the workings of this rich and fascinating
dimension of the Mughal Empire.
Fig. 9.1
The mausoleum of Timur at
Samarqand, 1404
2022-23
???
? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?
The name Mughal derives from Mongol. Though today
the term evokes the grandeur of an empire, it was
not the name the rulers of the dynasty chose for
themselves. They referred to themselves as Timurids,
as descendants of the Turkish ruler Timur on the
paternal side. Babur, the first Mughal ruler, was
related to Ghenghiz Khan from his mother’s side.
He spoke Turkish and referred derisively to the
Mongols as barbaric hordes.
During the sixteenth century, Europeans used the
term Mughal to describe the Indian rulers of this
branch of the family. Over the past centuries the
word has been frequently used – even the name
Mowgli, the young hero of Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle
Book, is derived from it.
The empire was carved out of a number of regional
states of India through conquests and political
alliances between the Mughals and local chieftains.
The founder of the empire, Zahiruddin Babur, was
driven from his Central Asian homeland, Farghana,
by the warring Uzbeks. He first established himself
at Kabul and then in 1526 pushed further into
the Indian subcontinent in search of territories and
resources to satisfy the needs of the members of
his clan.
His successor, Nasiruddin Humayun (1530-40,
1555-56) expanded the frontiers of the empire, but
lost it to the Afghan leader Sher Shah Sur, who drove
him into exile. Humayun took refuge in the court of
the Safavid ruler of Iran. In 1555 Humayun defeated
the Surs, but died a year later.
Many consider Jalaluddin Akbar (1556-1605) the
greatest of all the Mughal emperors, for he not only
expanded but also consolidated his empire, making
it the largest, strongest and richest kingdom of
his time. Akbar succeeded in extending the frontiers
of the empire to the Hindukush mountains, and
checked the expansionist designs of the Uzbeks of
Turan (Central Asia) and the Safavids of Iran.
Akbar had three fairly able successors in Jahangir
(1605-27), Shah Jahan (1628-58) and Aurangzeb
(1658-1707), much as their characters varied. Under
them the territorial expansion continued, though at
a much reduced pace. The three rulers maintained and
consolidated the various instruments of governance.
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
Fig. 9.2
An eighteenth-century depiction of
Humayun’s wife Nadira crossing
the desert of Rajasthan
2022-23
? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ???
During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
the institutions of an imperial structure were created.
These included effective methods of administration
and taxation. The visible centre of Mughal power was
the court. Here political alliances and relationships
were forged, status and hierarchies defined. The
political system devised by the Mughals was based
on a combination of military power and conscious
policy to accommodate the different traditions they
encountered in the subcontinent.
After 1707, following the death of Aurangzeb, the
power of the dynasty diminished. In place of the vast
apparatus of empire controlled from Delhi, Agra or
Lahore – the different capital cities – regional powers
acquired greater autonomy. Yet symbolically the
prestige of the Mughal ruler did not lose its aura. In
1857 the last scion of this dynasty, Bahadur Shah
Zafar II, was overthrown by the British.
???????????????????????????????
Chronicles commissioned by the Mughal emperors
are an important source for studying the empire and
its court. They were written in order to project a
vision of an enlightened kingdom to all those who
came under its umbrella. At the same time they were
meant to convey to those who resisted the rule of
the Mughals that all resistance was destined to fail.
Also, the rulers wanted to ensure that there was an
account of their rule for posterity.
The authors of Mughal chronicles were invariably
courtiers. The histories they wrote focused on events
centred on the ruler, his family, the court and nobles,
wars and administrative arrangements. Their titles,
such as the Akbar Nama, Shahjahan Nama, Alamgir
Nama, that is, the story of Akbar, Shah Jahan and
Alamgir (a title of the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb),
suggest that in the eyes of their authors the history
of the empire and the court was  synonymous with
that of the emperor.
2.1 From Turkish to Persian
Mughal court chronicles were written in Persian.
Under the Sultans of Delhi it flourished as a
language of the court and of literary writings,
alongside north Indian languages, especially Hindavi
and its regional variants. As the Mughals were
Chaghtai Turks by origin, Turkish was their mother
? Discuss...
Find out whether the state in
which you live formed part
of the Mughal Empire.
Were there any changes in
the area as a result of the
establishment of the empire?
If your state was not part of
the empire, find out more
about contemporary regional
rulers – their origins and
policies. What kind of records
did they maintain?
Chaghtai Turks traced descent
from the eldest son of Ghengiz
Khan.
2022-23
???
tongue. Their first ruler Babur wrote poetry and his
memoirs in this language.
It was Akbar who consciously set out to make
Persian the leading language of the Mughal court.
Cultural and intellectual contacts with Iran, as well
as a regular stream of Iranian and Central Asian
migrants seeking positions at the Mughal court,
might have motivated the emperor to adopt the
language. Persian was elevated to a language of
empire, conferring power and prestige on those who
had a command of it. It was spoken by the king, the
royal household and the elite at court. Further, it
became the language of administration at all levels
so that accountants, clerks and other functionaries
also learnt it.
Even when Persian was not directly used, its
vocabulary and idiom heavily influenced the language
of official records in Rajasthani and Marathi and
even Tamil. Since the people using Persian in the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries came from
many different regions of the subcontinent and
spoke other Indian languages, Persian too became
Indianised by absorbing local idioms. A new
language, Urdu, sprang from the interaction of
Persian with Hindavi.
Mughal chronicles such as the Akbar Nama were
written in Persian, others, like Babur’s memoirs,
were translated from the Turkish into the Persian
Babur Nama. Translations of Sanskrit texts such as
the Mahabharata and the Ramayana into Persian
were commissioned by the Mughal emperors. The
Mahabharata was translated as the Razmnama
(Book of Wars).
2.2 The making of manuscripts
All books in Mughal India were manuscripts, that
is, they were handwritten. The centre of manuscript
production was the imperial kitabkhana. Although
kitabkhana can be translated as library, it was a
scriptorium, that is, a place where the emperor’s
collection of manuscripts was kept and new
manuscripts were produced.
 The creation of a manuscript involved a number
of people performing a variety of tasks. Paper makers
were needed to prepare the folios of the manuscript,
scribes or calligraphers to copy the text, gilders to
illuminate the pages, painters to illustrate scenes
???? ??????? ??? ???
???????? ????
? ???? ?? ? ?? ????????????
???? ???????? ????? ???
??????? ???? ??????? ??
??????? ????? ???? ???
??????? ?? ?????? ??
?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???
??????? ????? ????? ??? ???
?????? ??? ?????? ???? ???
???????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ???????
????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????
?? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ???
???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ???
??????? ????? ?????? ????
??????????????????????????
??? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???
??????? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ??
?????????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ?
????? ???????? ???? ???? ?????
???????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??
??????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??
???? ???????? ????? ?????? ??????
???????????????? ???? ????????
????? ??????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?????
????? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?????
???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??????
? ??? ? ?? ??? ???? ????????? ??
?? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ?
???? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ????
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?????? ?????? ????????? ????
? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ?? ??
?????? ??????????? ???
? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ??
??????? ???? ???? ???????
? ? ? ?? ? ? ?
? ???? ? ??? ? ??????????
2022-23
? ? ????? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ?????? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ???
from the text, bookbinders to gather the individual
folios and set them within ornamental covers. The
finished manuscript was seen as a precious object,
a work of intellectual wealth and beauty. It
exemplified the power of its patron, the Mughal
emperor, to bring such beauty into being.
At the same time some of the people involved in
the actual production of the manuscript also got
recognition in the form of titles and awards. Of these,
calligraphers and painters held a high social
standing while others, such as paper makers or
bookbinders, have remained anonymous artisans.
Calligraphy, the art of handwriting, was considered
a skill of great importance. It was practised using
different styles. Akbar’s favourite was the nastaliq, a
fluid style with long horizontal strokes. It is written
using a piece of trimmed reed with a tip of five to 10
mm called qalam, dipped in carbon ink (siyahi). The
nib of the qalam is usually split in the middle to
facilitate the absorption of ink.
? Discuss...
In what ways do you think the production of books
today is similar to or different from the ways in
which Mughal chronicles were produced?
??? ???? ? ??????????? ?
As we read in the previous section, painters too were
involved in the production of Mughal manuscripts.
Chronicles narrating the events of a Mughal emperor’s
reign contained, alongside the written text, images
that described an event in visual form. When scenes
or themes in a book were to be given visual expression,
the scribe left blank spaces on nearby pages;
paintings, executed separately by artists, were
inserted to accompany what was described in words.
These paintings were miniatures, and could therefore
be passed around for viewing and mounting on the
pages of manuscripts.
Paintings served not only to enhance the beauty of
a book, but were believed to possess special powers
of communicating ideas about the kingdom and the
power of kings in ways that the written medium could
not. The historian Abu’l Fazl described painting as
a “magical art”: in his view it had the power to make
inanimate objects look as if they possessed life.
Fig. 9.3
A folio in nastaliq, the work of
Muhammad Husayn of Kashmir
(c.1575-1605), one of the finest
calligraphers at Akbar’s court, who
was honoured with the title “zarrin
qalam” (golden pen) in recognition
of the perfectly proportioned
curvature of his letters
The calligrapher has signed his
name on the lower section of
the page, taking up almost
one-fourth of its space.
2022-23