Statement I :Carbon can reduce Fe2O3 to Fe at a temperature below 983 ...
Below 983 K iron having higher affinity towards oxygen than carbon, carbon cannot reduce Fe2O3 to Fe.
View all questions of this test
Statement I :Carbon can reduce Fe2O3 to Fe at a temperature below 983 ...
Statement I: Carbon can reduce Fe2O3 to Fe at a temperature below 983 K.
Statement II: Iron has higher affinity toward oxygen than carbon.
Explanation:
To understand whether both statements are correct and if Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I, let's analyze each statement individually.
Statement I: Carbon can reduce Fe2O3 to Fe at a temperature below 983 K.
This statement is correct. Reduction is a chemical reaction that involves the gain of electrons. In this case, Fe2O3 (iron(III) oxide) is being reduced to Fe (iron) by carbon (C). The reaction can be represented as follows:
Fe2O3 + 3C → 2Fe + 3CO
This reaction is commonly known as the reduction of iron(III) oxide with carbon. It occurs at temperatures below 983 K (710 °C) and is commonly used in the production of iron and steel.
Statement II: Iron has higher affinity toward oxygen than carbon.
This statement is also correct. Affinity refers to the strength of attraction or the tendency of an element to combine with another element. Iron has a higher affinity for oxygen than carbon. This can be observed in various chemical reactions, such as the reduction of Fe2O3 mentioned in Statement I. Iron readily reacts with oxygen to form iron oxide, while carbon does not have a strong affinity for oxygen.
Explanation of the relationship between Statement I and Statement II:
Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. While it is true that iron has a higher affinity for oxygen than carbon, this fact alone does not explain why carbon can reduce Fe2O3 to Fe at a temperature below 983 K. The reduction reaction is influenced by a combination of factors, including temperature, the reactivity of the elements involved, and the thermodynamics of the reaction.
In conclusion, both Statement I and Statement II are correct, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.