CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rear... Start Learning for Free
Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.
1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.
2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.
3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.
4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.
5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.
Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a ...
The issue - “Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes” is introduced in statement 4. Although statements 1 and 2 make for tempting starters, only statement 4 provides the necessary context that validates them. Hence, statement 4 must precede statements 1 and 2. “Income inequality” is further explained in statement 2. This is done in "... two other ways...” - first of which if is in statement 2. Therefore, statement 2 follows statement 4.
This is followed by statement 5 which states the second way in which “income inequality” has increased.
Statement 1 reiterates what statements 2 and 5 mention. It also introduces the issue of “displacement of workers” which places the workers at risk.
Statement 3 concludes the paragraph by expressing concern about workers who are at risk..
The correct sequence is 42513.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a ...
Explanation:

Context:
The jumbled sentences discuss the impact of smart machines and global connections on income inequality and labour market trends.

Logical Sequence:

1. Skill-biased Technological Change:
- Sentence 4 discusses how skill-biased technological change has contributed to growing inequality within and across occupations, leading to overall income inequality.

2. Boosting Income Inequality:
- Sentence 2 explains how smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality by expanding global markets for top talent and generating excess returns from intellectual property.

3. Concern over Technological Advances:
- Sentence 3 expresses concern over the potential risk to workers due to rapid technological advances, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the extent of this risk.

4. Aggravation of Labour Market Trends:
- Sentence 1 concludes the sequence by stating that ever-smarter machines and global connections are likely to worsen adverse labour-market trends and income inequality as technology displaces more workers.
Therefore, the correct sequence is '42513', as it follows a logical flow from discussing technological change and income inequality to expressing concern over the impact on workers and concluding with the aggravation of labour market trends.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. According to the passage, which of the following is a key benefit of adopting technology?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the given question. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering the question.Technological change is recognised as one of the main drivers of long-term growth. In the coming decades, radical innovations such as mobile internet and cloud computing are likely to revolutionise production processes, particularly in developing countries.It is undebatable that technology makes production processes more efficient, thereby increasing the competitiveness of countries and reducing their vulnerability to market fluctuations. Structural change, i.e. the transition from a labour-intensive to a technology-intensive economy, drives economic upgrading. Low income countries thus acquire the necessary capabilities to catch up and reduce the gap with per capita incomes in high income countries.Catching up, unfortunately, does not occur frequently. In the last 50 years, only a few countries were successful in rapidly industrialising and achieving sustained economic growth. Technology was always a key driver in these cases and they successfully developed an advanced technology-intensive industry.Though technology is linked to sustainable growth, it is uncertain whether it can simultaneously create social inclusiveness and environmental sustainability. Technological change also requires the labour force to be prepared to use increasingly complex machinery and equipment, which widens the inequality between highly skilled and unskilled workers in terms of wage distribution. Industrialisation has historically been accompanied by increasing pollution and the depletion of natural resources. Economic growth also entails a rise in the use of inputs, materials and fossil fuels, which generate environmental pollution and degradation, especially in low income countries.From an economic point of view, globalisation and the fragmentation of production at international level have facilitated the diffusion of new technologies through the intensification of trade in sophisticated manufacturing goods. However, this diffusion of technology has in many cases not translated into concrete growth opportunities due to the lack of technological capabilities and the capacity of countries to promote innovation systems. Innovation needs to be supported by appropriate interventions that strengthen the process from technology invention to adoption by firms as was the case in benchmark countries such as China and the Republic of Korea.Even though technology and automation generally improve people's working conditions, the number of jobs may decrease as a result, with workers being replaced by machines. But, the technological change itself can mitigate this effect. New technologies also generate new markets, for example the waste and recycling industry, reduce the prices of consumer goods and provide opportunities for new investments with higher levels of profitability. Most importantly, the expansion of new technologically-intensive industries absorbs those workers who have lost their jobs to machines.Despite these positive dynamics, the current trend of technological change does not guarantee that we will follow a sustainable path in the future.Q. In many countries, the desired results of technology could not be achieved due to

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:Iceland, Norway, Finland and Sweden are, according to the World Economic Forum, the most gender-equal countries in the world, while Denmark is in 14th place. Iceland has been named the most gender-equal in the world for 11 years running. Strong economic and work participation, together with political empowerment, has led many to see the Nordic countries as a “gender equality utopia”. However, behind women participation statistics and progressive policies, gender stereotypes prevail, particularly in the workplace, and women in the region say that there is still a lot of work to be done.A recent report by intergovernmental forum the Nordic Council of Ministers found that, whereas Nordic governments’ policies have contributed to reducing the income disparities between men and women, financial gender equality is far from a reality yet. Occupational segregation still exists across the region’s industries and sectors and “social norms continue to restrict occupational choices”, the study points out. This gender segregation is more pronounced in Stem industries, which in turn is linked to a segregation in education on these subjectsGabriele Griffin, professor of gender research at the University of Uppsala, says that closer examination of the statistics about gender equality in Nordic countries shows that most of the people who believe it has already been achieved are men, whereas women are more sceptical. Griffin says that there is still a rooted stereotype of technology being a male field and humanities and medicine being female. Progressive legislation and policy have not prevented the continuation of gender stereotypes.The modern concept of gender equality has its foundations in the postwar welfare state. In Sweden, it was motivated by the need for more women in the workforce after the Second World War, explains Jenny Björklund, associate professor of gender studies at the University of Uppsala. During the 1960s and 1970s, the feminist movement demanded that the social democratic government introduce childcare to allow women to have full-time jobs. Men were also encouraged to take care of the family. “There’s this dual-earner/dual-carer ideal that Swedish gender equality is based on,” says Björklund.Policies in Sweden have since then focused on facilitating that work-family balance. However, the expectations on women to be full-time workers, self-sacrificing mothers and still have leisure time have put unrealistic pressure on this ideal. Expectations on men are not as high, and Björklund says that fathers can get away with being less caring than mothers - an idea underpinned by traditional stereotypes and middle-class values.Furthermore, the ideal of gender equality has been made a key element of a white and middle-class “Swedishness” - a national trait hijacked by far-right political parties promoting anti-immigration policies, says Björklund. These parties stereotype the immigrant woman as “less gender-equal” and repressed, and present immigrant men as patriarchal and aggressive, diverting attention away from the issues still at stake. Professor Griffin adds that this rising conservatism in Sweden has led to a liberalisation of discourses that are in many ways discriminatory, where it becomes acceptable to say that gender equality has gone too far.Q.Which of the following statements CANNOT be inferred from the passage concerning the Nordic regions?I. Progressive policies have not addressed the presence of gender stereotypes in the workplace.II. Competition among women has exacerbated the income gap between men and women.III. Occupational gender segregation has led to segregation in education on major subjects.IV. Social norms discourage women from taking up certain occupations.

Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions:Iceland, Norway, Finland and Sweden are, according to the World Economic Forum, the most gender-equal countries in the world, while Denmark is in 14th place. Iceland has been named the most gender-equal in the world for 11 years running. Strong economic and work participation, together with political empowerment, has led many to see the Nordic countries as a “gender equality utopia”. However, behind women participation statistics and progressive policies, gender stereotypes prevail, particularly in the workplace, and women in the region say that there is still a lot of work to be done.A recent report by intergovernmental forum the Nordic Council of Ministers found that, whereas Nordic governments’ policies have contributed to reducing the income disparities between men and women, financial gender equality is far from a reality yet. Occupational segregation still exists across the region’s industries and sectors and “social norms continue to restrict occupational choices”, the study points out. This gender segregation is more pronounced in Stem industries, which in turn is linked to a segregation in education on these subjectsGabriele Griffin, professor of gender research at the University of Uppsala, says that closer examination of the statistics about gender equality in Nordic countries shows that most of the people who believe it has already been achieved are men, whereas women are more sceptical. Griffin says that there is still a rooted stereotype of technology being a male field and humanities and medicine being female. Progressive legislation and policy have not prevented the continuation of gender stereotypes.The modern concept of gender equality has its foundations in the postwar welfare state. In Sweden, it was motivated by the need for more women in the workforce after the Second World War, explains Jenny Björklund, associate professor of gender studies at the University of Uppsala. During the 1960s and 1970s, the feminist movement demanded that the social democratic government introduce childcare to allow women to have full-time jobs. Men were also encouraged to take care of the family. “There’s this dual-earner/dual-carer ideal that Swedish gender equality is based on,” says Björklund.Policies in Sweden have since then focused on facilitating that work-family balance. However, the expectations on women to be full-time workers, self-sacrificing mothers and still have leisure time have put unrealistic pressure on this ideal. Expectations on men are not as high, and Björklund says that fathers can get away with being less caring than mothers - an idea underpinned by traditional stereotypes and middle-class values.Furthermore, the ideal of gender equality has been made a key element of a white and middle-class “Swedishness” - a national trait hijacked by far-right political parties promoting anti-immigration policies, says Björklund. These parties stereotype the immigrant woman as “less gender-equal” and repressed, and present immigrant men as patriarchal and aggressive, diverting attention away from the issues still at stake. Professor Griffin adds that this rising conservatism in Sweden has led to a liberalisation of discourses that are in many ways discriminatory, where it becomes acceptable to say that gender equality has gone too far.Q.Which of the following is likely to be the next course of discussion?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow it: Does having a mood disorder make you more creative? That’s the most frequent question I hear about the relationship. But because we cannot control the instance of a mood disorder (that is, we can’t turn it on and off, and measure that person’s creativity under both conditions), the question should really be: Do individuals with a mood disorder exhibit greater creativity than those without? Studies that attempt to answer this question by comparing the creativity of individuals with a mood disorder against those without, have been well, mixed.Studies that ask participants to complete surveys of creative personality, behavior or accomplishment, or to complete divergent thinking measures (where they are asked to generate lots of ideas) often find that individuals with mood disorders do not differ from those without. However, studies using “creative occupation” as an indicator of creativity (based on the assumption that those employed in these occupations are relatively more creative than others) have found that people with bipolar disorders are overrepresented in these occupations. These studies do not measure the creativity of participants directly, rather they use external records (such as censuses and medical registries) to tally the number of people with a history of mood disorders (compared with those without) who report being employed in a creative occupation at some time. These studies incorporate an enormous number of people and provide solid evidence that people who have sought treatment for mood disorders are engaged in creative occupations to a greater extent than those who have not. But can creative occupations serve as a proxy for creative ability?The creative occupations considered in these studies are overwhelmingly in the arts, which frequently provide greater autonomy and less rigid structure than the average nine-to-five job. This makes these jobs more conducive to the success of individuals who struggle with performance consistency as the result of a mood disorder. The American psychiatrist Arnold Ludwig has suggested that the level of emotional expressiveness required to be successful in various occupations creates an occupational drift and demonstrated that the pattern of expressive occupations being associated with a greater incidence of psychopathology is a self-repeating pattern. For example, professions in the creative arts are associated with greater psychopathology than professions in the sciences whereas, within creative arts professions, architects exhibit a lower lifetime prevalence rate of psychopathology than visual artists and, within the visual arts, abstract artists exhibit lower rates of psychopathology than expressive artists. Therefore, it is possible that many people who suffer from mood disorders gravitate towards these types of professions, regardless of creative ability or inclination.Q. Go through the following: 1. Mood disorders do not lead to creativity 2. The flexibility of creative occupations makes them more appealing to people with mood disorder 3. Mood swings in creative professions is less prevalent than in non-creative professions Which of the following would undermine the passage’s main argument?

Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Given below are a few jumbled sentences. Rearrange the sentences in a proper and logical sequence.1. Ever-smarter machines and ever-tighter global connections are likely to aggravate adverse labour-market trends and growing income inequality, as technology displaces more and more workers.2. Smart machines and global connections have boosted income inequality in two other ways: by increasing the size and scope of global markets for top-rated talent in a variety of fields.3. No one is certain about how many workers are at risk; but, based on the pace of recent technological advances, there is reason for concern.4. Skill-biased technological change has propelled growing inequality in labour incomes both within and across occupations, in turn fueling the marked increase in overall income inequality.5. Also by generating huge excess returns or monopoly rents from the creation and ownership of intellectual property and intangible capital.Correct answer is '42513'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev